{"id":261092,"date":"2022-02-03T17:00:49","date_gmt":"2022-02-03T11:30:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=261092"},"modified":"2025-10-16T16:40:23","modified_gmt":"2025-10-16T11:10:23","slug":"scc-online-weekly-rewind-episode-47-ft-devika-sharma","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/03\/scc-online-weekly-rewind-episode-47-ft-devika-sharma\/","title":{"rendered":"SCC Online Weekly Rewind Episode 47 ft. Devika Sharma"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"SCC Online Weekly Rewind Episode 47 ft. Devika Sharma\" width=\"1346\" height=\"757\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/nhYAkOWLiRs?start=5&#038;feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<blockquote>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Top Story<\/span><\/h2>\n<hr \/>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Inherited property of a female Hindu dying issueless and intestate to return to source <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In an important ruling on the property of female Hindu, the Supreme Court has held that the property of a female Hindu dying intestate would return to source I.e. if a female Hindu dies intestate without leaving any issue, then the property inherited by her from her father or mother would go to the heirs of her father whereas the property inherited from her husband or father-in-law would go to the heirs of the husband. However, if she dies leaving behind her husband or any issue, then Section 15(1)(a) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 comes into operation and the properties left behind including the properties which she inherited from her parents would devolve simultaneously upon her husband and her issues as provided in Section 15(1)(a) of the Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/24\/explained-who-can-claim-share-in-the-inherited-property-of-a-female-hindu-dying-issueless-and-intestate\/\">https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/24\/explained-who-can-claim-share-in-the-inherited-property-of-a-female-hindu-dying-issueless-and-intestate\/<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<blockquote>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>Supreme Court<\/strong>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\n<hr \/>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Suspension of 12 Maharashtra BJP MLAs for one year &#8220;grossly illegal&#8221;; worse than expulsion, disqualification or resignation<\/strong>\u00a0<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In a big relief to the 12 BJP MLAs who were suspended by the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly on 05.07.2021, for a period of 1 year due to \u201cindisciplined and unbecoming behavior resulting in maligning the dignity of the House\u201d, the Supreme Court has held that the\u00a0suspension beyond the remainder of the concerned (ongoing) Session\u00a0is unconstitutional, grossly illegal and irrational.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that suspension beyond the Session would be bordering on punishing not only the member concerned, but also inevitably impact the legitimate rights of the constituency from where the member had been elected.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The suspended MLAs belong to BJP, the principal Opposition Party in the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly. The Ruling Party is a coalition between the Shiv Sena, the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) and the Indian National Congress (INC) christened as \u201cMaha Vikas Aghadi\u201d.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On July 5, 2021, 12 BJP MLAs were suspended after the house witnessed heated exchanges between the members of the Opposition Party and the Ruling Party due to an impression formed by the former that the business of the House was being conducted\u00a0\u00a0 in unilateral manner, with conscious and engineered effort to suppress voice of the Opposition Party.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/29\/suspension-of-12-maharashtra-bjp-mlas-for-one-year-grossly-illegal-worse-than-expulsion-disqualification-or-resignation-sc\/\">https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/29\/suspension-of-12-maharashtra-bjp-mlas-for-one-year-grossly-illegal-worse-than-expulsion-disqualification-or-resignation-sc\/<\/a><\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Cheque gets deposited to the account of account holder with strikingly similar name. Bank blames customer. SC \u201csurprised\u201d at NCDRC\u2019s ruling <\/strong>\u00a0<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In an interesting case where one SBI account holder was left with a balance of Rs. 59\/- only in his account due to the existence of another bank account with strikingly similar name in the same branch, the Supreme Court has set aside the \u201chighly erroneous\u201d impugned order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission solely relying upon the suo-moto report called for from SBI during the pendency of the revision application.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Account Holder Sunil Kumar Maity was informed by the bank that his account number has changed. A sum of Rs. 3, 00, 000 was deposited in this new account number. However, a few days later, his passbook showed a balance of Rs. 59 only. Interestingly, this \u201cnew\u201d account number belonged one \u201cSunil Maity\u201d who had withdrawn a sum of Rs. 1 lakh and 2 lakhs on two occasions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The bank report submitted before the NCDRC indicated that the bank had every reason to believe that wrong account number was intentionally inserted by the appellant himself. Surprised that the NCDRC relied on this report to pass an order in favour of the bank, the Supreme Court observed that <em>\u201cThere was no way that the appellant would have known that the second respondent, namely Sunil Maity had an account in the same branch. No sane person would deposit cash or cheque meant to be deposited in his account in an account number belonging to another person with similar name.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/cheque-gets-deposited-to-the-account-of-account-holder-with-strikingly-similar-name-bank-blames-customer-read-why-sc-was-surprised-at-ncdrcs-ruling\/\"><em>https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/cheque-gets-deposited-to-the-account-of-account-holder-with-strikingly-similar-name-bank-blames-customer-read-why-sc-was-surprised-at-ncdrcs-ruling\/<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<blockquote>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">High Court Updates<\/span><\/h2>\n<hr \/>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00a0<span style=\"color: #993300;\"> <strong style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif; font-size: 16px;\">Madhya Pradesh High Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Can a Kazi adjudicate disputes like a Court and pass an order like a decree?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In a recent ruling, the Madhya Pradesh High Court while entertaining a Public Interest Litigation observed that if a Kazi entertains a dispute and acts as a mediator to settle the dispute between the members of the community that would be permissible, but he cannot adjudicate the dispute like a court and pass an order like a decree.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/27\/can-a-kazi-adjudicate-disputes-like-a-court-and-pass-an-order-like-a-decree\/\">https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/27\/can-a-kazi-adjudicate-disputes-like-a-court-and-pass-an-order-like-a-decree\/<\/a><\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong>Allahabad High Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u201c\u2026we boast ourselves as an educated society, but we live our lives with double standards\u201d: Allahabad HC condemns prevailing caste system even after 75 years of independence<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">While condemning the prevailing caste system even after 75 years of independence, Allahabad High Court made a very significant observation in a cold-blooded murder in an alleged honour killing case, that,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u00a0Caste system in our society is deep rooted, we boast ourselves as educated society, but we live our lives with double standards. Even after 75 years of Independence we are not able to get out with this social menace. This is pitiable and tragic. It is the moral duty of those sane person, who are well-off, to protect the under-privileged and downtrodden, so that they feel themselves safe, secure and comfortable. Simultaneously, the other group also feel that they are the integral and inseparable part of the society, and it is in the larger interest of the country and high time for the introspection for everyone to give serious thought over the matter.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/we-boast-ourselves-as-an-educated-society-but-we-live-our-lives-with-double-standards\/\">https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/we-boast-ourselves-as-an-educated-society-but-we-live-our-lives-with-double-standards\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Can wife claim maintenance under S. 125 CrPC where appeal is pending against divorce granted under S. 13 HMA?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong>A husband approached the Allahabad High Court claiming that the Family Court could not have granted maintenance to wife under Section 125 CrPC when divorce was already granted in his favour under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Allahabad High Court answered to this claim by stating that <em>When a divorce decree under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act is passed the wife of such annulled marriage can claim maintenance under Section 25 of Hindu Marriage Act.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/24\/can-wife-claim-maintenance-under-s-125-crpc-where-appeal-is-pending-against-divorce-granted-under-s-13-hma\/\">https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/24\/can-wife-claim-maintenance-under-s-125-crpc-where-appeal-is-pending-against-divorce-granted-under-s-13-hma\/<\/a><\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong>Bombay High Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Can a girl be treated as property and given in donation? Bom HC addresses in light of \u201cDaanpatra\u201d executed by father of a daughter<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bombay High Court while addressing a case wherein a father executed Daanpatra to give the minor daughter in donation to a baba observed that\u00a0 A girl is not property that can be donated and further directed the Child welfare committee to ascertain if the child could be declared as a child in need of protection.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court made a very pertinent observation in the case which was,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">When the girl as per her own statement is minor, then why the father who is in all respect guardian of the girl should give the girl as Daan? A girl is not a property which can be given in donation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/an-a-girl-be-treated-as-property-and-given-in-donation\/\">https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/an-a-girl-be-treated-as-property-and-given-in-donation\/<\/a><\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\">Calcutta High Court<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Daughter-in-law who obtains compassionate appointment by stating that she will take responsibility of her mother-in-law is bound by that undertaking<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Moving to another very interesting matter from Calcutta High Court, it was noted that a 80 year old widow had approached the Court to seek direction towards her daughter-in-law to provide for her maintenance as she had taken compassionate appointment on the death of her son.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court held that the daughter in law was bound by the undertaking by which she had obtained the compassionate appointment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/21\/daughter-in-law-who-obtains-compassionate-appointment-by-stating-that-she-will-take-responsibility-of-her-mother-in-law\/\">https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/21\/daughter-in-law-who-obtains-compassionate-appointment-by-stating-that-she-will-take-responsibility-of-her-mother-in-law\/<\/a><\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\">Delhi High Court<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>False invocation of Ss. 354A, 506 IPC merely trivalises offence of sexual harassment casting doubt on veracity of allegations by victim who has in reality faced sexual harassment<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Delhi High Court in a recent decision expressed its anguish at how provisions such as Sections 354A\/506 IPC are falsely invoked at the drop of a hat to register one\u2019s displeasure at the conduct of another individual.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In this false invocation of sections pertaining to sexual assault case, the Court stated that such instances merely trivalise the offence of sexual harassment and casts a doubt on the veracity of the allegations filed by every other victim who has in reality faced sexual harassment, thereby setting back the cause of women empowerment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/28\/false-invocation-of-ss-354a-506-ipc-merely-trivalises-offence-of-sexual-harassment-casting-doubt-on-veracity-of-allegations\/\">https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/28\/false-invocation-of-ss-354a-506-ipc-merely-trivalises-offence-of-sexual-harassment-casting-doubt-on-veracity-of-allegations\/<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<blockquote>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">District Court Updates<\/span><\/h2>\n<hr \/>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>53-year-old man molested a 9-year-old minor boy by pressing his private parts: Court sentences man under POCSO Act<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A Fast Track Court of Thiruvanathapuram addressed a case wherein a minor boy aged 9 years old was sexually assaulted by a 53-year-old man who had squeezed the boy\u2019s private part causing him pain.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In this case, Bench expressed that the <em>accused is a prudent man, well acquainted with the prose and cons of his misdeeds. His attitude shows his scant respect and honour for the legal system and morality. So he is not entitled to get the benevolent provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the said observation, the accused did not deserve any leniency for the sentence and was imprisoned for 5 years along with Rs 25000 fine.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/21\/53-year-old-man-molested-a-9-year-old-minor-boy-by-pressing-his-private-parts\/\">https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/21\/53-year-old-man-molested-a-9-year-old-minor-boy-by-pressing-his-private-parts\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Husband\u2019s company can have \u2018Virat Kohli\u2019 as a brand ambassador, but cannot provide maintenance to wife: Man tried appearing as a pauper? Saket Courts adjudicates<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A District Court while addressing a case of maintenance claimed by a wife wherein the husband stated that he was a businessman but had no monthly income and was sustaining himself on charity and borrowing from relatives and friends, found that the husband\u2019s company was one of the manufacturers of brand \u201ctoo yum\u201d and the brand ambassador of the said brand was \u2018Virat Kohli\u2019, hence it looked highly improbable that a company which is running into great losses was in a position to afford a celebrity of such stature for the advertisement of its product.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Court made an observation that \u201cIt cannot be believed that a person who was capable of supporting a family by getting married, would all of a sudden become devoid of all sources of income.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This is indeed is a very interesting case from Saket Court of Delhi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/20\/maintenance-to-wife\/\">https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/20\/maintenance-to-wife\/<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<blockquote>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<hr \/>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0Minor treated for \u201cMeasles\u201d instead of \u201cStevens-Johnson Syndrome\u201d due to wrong diagnosis and leading to medical negligence<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Due to doctor\u2019s lack of skill and reasonable standard of care a minor was wrongly treated due to wrong diagnosis.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In an unfortunate case of medical negligence, wherein an Ayurveda Doctor gave wrong treatment to a child i.e. gave the treatment of Measles instead of Steven Johnson Syndrome, Commission observed that,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u00a0The patient at her young age of 12 years suffered very serious and potentially fatal SJ syndrome. It was the patient\u2019s sheer good luck that she survived in spite of such grossly inappropriate\/inadequate treatment at every stage.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Therefore, the patient was awarded a lump sum amount of Rs 10 lakhs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/28\/medical-negligence-6\/\">https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/28\/medical-negligence-6\/<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<blockquote>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>Legislation Updates<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n<hr \/>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>CISF issues circular to implement \u201cOne Hand Bag Rule\u201d in airports more strictly\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A new circular has been issued by Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) which handles airport security on January 19, 2022. As per the circular, no passenger shall be permitted to carry more than one hand bag, other than the exceptions issued by the Bureau of Civil Aviation (BCAS). The circular noted that passengers are flouting the rule and on average carrying 2-3 bags to the screening point which causes congestion and inconvenience to other passengers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">CISF has instructed all airlines and airport operators to implement the \u2018One Hand Bag Rule\u2019 more meticulously to ease out congestion.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/cisf-issues-circular-to-implement-one-hand-bag-rule-in-airports-more-strictly\/\">https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/cisf-issues-circular-to-implement-one-hand-bag-rule-in-airports-more-strictly\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Gas Cylinders (Amendment) Rules, 2022\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Amendment requires all the high pressure cylinders and Cryogenic containers used for filling of Non-Toxic, Non-Flammable Gases and Liquids to have permanent and tamper proof marking in form of Bar Code or RFID or QR code or any means of electronic identification number at conspicuous place on cylinders and containers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/28\/high-pressure-cylinders-and-cryogenic-containers-used-for-filling-non-toxic-gases-and-liquids-to-have-tamper-proof-markings-vide-gas-cylinders-amendment-rules-2022\/\">https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/28\/high-pressure-cylinders-and-cryogenic-containers-used-for-filling-non-toxic-gases-and-liquids-to-have-tamper-proof-markings-vide-gas-cylinders-amendment-rules-2022\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Drugs (Amendment) Rules, 2022\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The amendment requires every active pharmaceutical ingredient (bulk drug) manufactured or imported in India to bear Quick Response code on its label at each level packaging that store data or information readable with software application to facilitate tracking and tracing.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Amendment Rules will come into force from January 01, 2023.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/22\/qr-codes-on-active-pharmaceutical-ingredients-mandatory-vide-drugs-amendment-rules-2022\/\">https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/22\/qr-codes-on-active-pharmaceutical-ingredients-mandatory-vide-drugs-amendment-rules-2022\/<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Top Story Inherited property of a female Hindu dying issueless and intestate to return to source In an important ruling on the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":261093,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[90924,90923],"tags":[7141,48518,29785,30687,19311,48519,42834,42768,45515,47320],"class_list":["post-261092","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-scc-times-newsflash","category-watch-now-2","tag-advocates","tag-episode-47","tag-law","tag-law-students","tag-lawyers","tag-legal-knowledge","tag-legal-news","tag-legal-updates","tag-scc-online-weekly-rewind","tag-weekly-updates"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SCC Online Weekly Rewind Episode 47 ft. Devika Sharma | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"SCC Online Weekly Rewind Episode 47 ft. Devika Sharma\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/03\/scc-online-weekly-rewind-episode-47-ft-devika-sharma\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SCC Online Weekly Rewind Episode 47 ft. Devika Sharma\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"SCC Online Weekly Rewind Episode 47 ft. Devika Sharma\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/03\/scc-online-weekly-rewind-episode-47-ft-devika-sharma\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-02-03T11:30:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-16T11:10:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/WR_47.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/03\/scc-online-weekly-rewind-episode-47-ft-devika-sharma\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/03\/scc-online-weekly-rewind-episode-47-ft-devika-sharma\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Online Weekly Rewind Episode 47 ft. Devika Sharma | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/03\/scc-online-weekly-rewind-episode-47-ft-devika-sharma\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/03\/scc-online-weekly-rewind-episode-47-ft-devika-sharma\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/WR_47.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-02-03T11:30:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-16T11:10:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"SCC Online Weekly Rewind Episode 47 ft. Devika Sharma\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/03\/scc-online-weekly-rewind-episode-47-ft-devika-sharma\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/03\/scc-online-weekly-rewind-episode-47-ft-devika-sharma\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/03\/scc-online-weekly-rewind-episode-47-ft-devika-sharma\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/WR_47.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/WR_47.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/03\/scc-online-weekly-rewind-episode-47-ft-devika-sharma\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SCC Online Weekly Rewind Episode 47 ft. Devika Sharma\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SCC Online Weekly Rewind Episode 47 ft. Devika Sharma | SCC Times","description":"SCC Online Weekly Rewind Episode 47 ft. Devika Sharma","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/03\/scc-online-weekly-rewind-episode-47-ft-devika-sharma\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SCC Online Weekly Rewind Episode 47 ft. Devika Sharma","og_description":"SCC Online Weekly Rewind Episode 47 ft. Devika Sharma","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/03\/scc-online-weekly-rewind-episode-47-ft-devika-sharma\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-02-03T11:30:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-16T11:10:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/WR_47.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/03\/scc-online-weekly-rewind-episode-47-ft-devika-sharma\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/03\/scc-online-weekly-rewind-episode-47-ft-devika-sharma\/","name":"SCC Online Weekly Rewind Episode 47 ft. Devika Sharma | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/03\/scc-online-weekly-rewind-episode-47-ft-devika-sharma\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/03\/scc-online-weekly-rewind-episode-47-ft-devika-sharma\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/WR_47.jpg","datePublished":"2022-02-03T11:30:49+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-16T11:10:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"SCC Online Weekly Rewind Episode 47 ft. Devika Sharma","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/03\/scc-online-weekly-rewind-episode-47-ft-devika-sharma\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/03\/scc-online-weekly-rewind-episode-47-ft-devika-sharma\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/03\/scc-online-weekly-rewind-episode-47-ft-devika-sharma\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/WR_47.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/WR_47.jpg","width":1331,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/03\/scc-online-weekly-rewind-episode-47-ft-devika-sharma\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SCC Online Weekly Rewind Episode 47 ft. Devika Sharma"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/WR_47.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":260506,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/24\/explained-who-can-claim-share-in-the-inherited-property-of-a-female-hindu-dying-issueless-and-intestate\/","url_meta":{"origin":261092,"position":0},"title":"Explained| Who can claim share in the inherited property of a female Hindu dying issueless and intestate?\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 24, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of SA Nazeer and Krishna Murari*, JJ has held that if a female Hindu dies intestate without leaving any issue, then the property inherited by her from her father or mother would go to the heirs of her father whereas the property inherited from her husband\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Who-can-claim-share-in-the-inherited-property-of-a-female-Hindu-dying-issueless-and-intestate.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Who-can-claim-share-in-the-inherited-property-of-a-female-Hindu-dying-issueless-and-intestate.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Who-can-claim-share-in-the-inherited-property-of-a-female-Hindu-dying-issueless-and-intestate.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Who-can-claim-share-in-the-inherited-property-of-a-female-Hindu-dying-issueless-and-intestate.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Who-can-claim-share-in-the-inherited-property-of-a-female-Hindu-dying-issueless-and-intestate.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":32881,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/01\/16\/succession-to-a-hindu-male-dying-intestate-will-vest-only-in-the-widow-excluding-the-daughters\/","url_meta":{"origin":261092,"position":1},"title":"Succession to a Hindu male dying intestate will vest only in the widow excluding the daughters","author":"Sucheta","date":"January 16, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: While construing the provisions of Hindu Law Women\u2019s Rights Act, 1933, the Court held that the succession to a Hindu male dying intestate will vest only in the widow under Section 4(1)(ii) to the exclusion of the daughters. \u00a0In the present case, two brother and the wife of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":356650,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/14\/criticism-of-female-intestate-succession-under-the-hindu-succession-act-1956\/","url_meta":{"origin":261092,"position":2},"title":"Criticism of Female Intestate Succession under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956","author":"Editor","date":"August 14, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Gunjan Jain*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Hindu Succession Act 1956","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Hindu-Succession-Act-1956.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Hindu-Succession-Act-1956.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Hindu-Succession-Act-1956.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Hindu-Succession-Act-1956.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":289721,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/15\/latest-supreme-court-judgment-on-ancestral-property\/","url_meta":{"origin":261092,"position":3},"title":"Ancestral Property: Latest Supreme Court Judgments","author":"Editor","date":"April 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"We often get to hear the term \u2018ancestral property\u2019, but the exact meaning of the term remains unknown to most of us. The term has not been defined expressly in any statute, but the Courts have time and again explained the term. In simple terms, an ancestral property is a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Law made Easy&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Law made Easy","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/law-made-easy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"latest supreme court judgment on ancestral propety","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/latest-supreme-court-judgment-on-ancestral-propety-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/latest-supreme-court-judgment-on-ancestral-propety-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/latest-supreme-court-judgment-on-ancestral-propety-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/latest-supreme-court-judgment-on-ancestral-propety-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":244293,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/23\/married-womans-heirs-on-paternal-side-are-not-strangers-she-can-enter-in-family-settlement-with-such-heirs-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":261092,"position":4},"title":"Married woman&#8217;s heirs on paternal side are not strangers; she can enter in family settlement with such heirs: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of Ashok Bhushan* and R. Subhash Reddy, JJ has held that when heirs of father of a female are included as person who can possibly succeed, it cannot be held that they are strangers and not the members of the family qua the female. Factual Summary\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":184494,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/29\/husband-not-entitled-wifes-property-death-property-inherited-deceaseds-parents\/","url_meta":{"origin":261092,"position":5},"title":"Husband not entitled to wife\u2019s property after her death if property had been inherited from the deceased\u2019s parents","author":"Saba","date":"January 29, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, J. heard a petition filed against the husband (respondent) of deceased Sundarabai who died intestate. The petitioners contended that the suit property was received by the deceased from her parents and that the husband\u2019s children were not her\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/261092","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=261092"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/261092\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/261093"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=261092"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=261092"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=261092"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}