{"id":260982,"date":"2022-02-02T13:00:04","date_gmt":"2022-02-02T07:30:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=260982"},"modified":"2022-02-02T18:44:34","modified_gmt":"2022-02-02T13:14:34","slug":"ola-googles-dominant-position-service-charge-medical-negligence-war-injury-pension-and-more","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/02\/ola-googles-dominant-position-service-charge-medical-negligence-war-injury-pension-and-more\/","title":{"rendered":"24 Reports to Read: Ola & Google’s Dominant Position, Service Charge, Medical Negligence, War Injury Pension and more | Tribunals and Commissions Roundup of January 2022"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL)<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

State commission disallows benefit of increase in the tariff based on the change in law provision; Tribunal directs reconsideration<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

A Coram of R.K. Gauba (Officiating Chairperson) and Sandesh Kumar Sharma (Technical Member) decided on an appeal which was filed by Solar Power Project Developer (\u201cSPD\u201d) assailing order passed by respondent Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission (\u201cthe State Commission\u201d) disallowing the benefit of increase in the tariff based on the change in law provision with respect to increased Operation and Maintenance (O&M) costs of its 10MW solar power generating system.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT)<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

AFT grants war injury pension to soldier who sustained injuries resulting in disability during Operation Hifazat<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

The Bench of Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary (Member J) and Vice Admiral HCS Bisht (Member A), granted war injury pension to the ex-serviceman who had sustained injuries resulting in disability during Operation Hifazat.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Arbitral Tribunal, New Delhi<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Arbitral Tribunal finds SJDA at fault; directs to refund bid amount of Rs 84.24 crores to the claimant in New Township Project<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cNo permission for conversion of land was obtained and, therefore, even if all other conditions were fulfilled, the Claimant-Developer could not have commenced construction activities on the agricultural lands without obtaining conversion of land use.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Competition Commission of India (CCI)<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Apple charging a commission of up to 30% on all payments made through its in-app purchase system, is a violation of its dominant position? CCI orders investigation<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cSome consumers may have preference for closed ecosystem like Apple and others may have a preference for open ecosystems like that of Google.\u201d\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Why did CCI suspend the Amazon-Future deal? Detailed analysis of CCI order imposing Rs 202 crores penalty on Amazon<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

“Amazon had misled the Commission to believe, through false statements and material omissions, that the Combination and its purpose were the interest of Amazon in the business of FCPL.”<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Is Google abusing dominant position in news aggregation? CCI gives prima facie findings; discusses Snippets, Mirror Image Websites, Paywall Options, etc.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cGoogle appears to operate as a gateway between various news publishers on the one hand and news readers on the other. Another alternative for the news publisher is to forgo the traffic generated by Google for them, which would be unfavourable to their revenue generation.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

\u201cObiter dictum\u201d not legally binding as precedent; jurisdictional commissioner cautioned for filing frivolous applications<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Suvendu Kumar Pati (Judicial Member) dismissed an appeal which was filed in response to the order passed by this Tribunal for rectification of mistake on the ground that the order to the extent of availment of service of outdoor catering was not proper.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Jurisdiction for claim of refund filed\/initiated to be dealt under the provision Central Excise law and not by the provision of CGST law<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Ashok Jindal (Judicial Member) dismissed the application filed by the Revenue (CCE & ST, Panchkula) for ratification of mistake in a final order by the Tribunal which was noticed by the Applicant. The Tribunal dealt with two issues (a) whether to ratify previous order & (b) to deal with the jurisdiction<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Is there any provision under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 or Finance Act, 1994 for reversal of CENVAT credit for services provided for which no consideration is received by an assessee? CESTAT analyses<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cCENVAT Credit Rules or Finance Act there was no provision for reversal of CENVAT credit for the services provided for which no consideration for service provided was received by an assessee.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolkata<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Consumer cannot be forced to pay \u201cservice charge\u201d in a restaurant: Consumer Forum finds conduct of restaurant contrary to principles of Consumer Protection Act<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThe OPs must have been aware of the guidelines of Fair Trade Practice related to changing of service charge from the consumers by hotels\/restaurant issued by Department of Consumer Affairs, Government of India, inter alia, stipulating that service charge on hotel and restaurant bill is \u201ctotally voluntarily\u201d and not mandatory.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

If lessee is not actual owner of property, can actual rental expenses be claimed on return of income? ITAT decides<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThe assessee-company has merely taken the assets on lease from the owner, and it is accordingly eligible to claim actual rental expenses in the return of income.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Can merely disowning bank accounts exempt assessee from paying tax? Read why ITAT approved addition of Rs 12.81 Crores under S.68 of Income Tax Act<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cMerely disowning the bank accounts by the assessee does not lead to the conclusion that the accounts are not maintained by him when there is a direct evidence contrary to the contention of the assessee.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

\u00a0<\/strong>National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC)<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Homebuyers cannot be expected to wait indefinitely for taking possession: NCDRC allows consumer complaint against Builder, directs refund, imposes costs<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Commission dealt with a complaint filed under Section 21 read with Section 2(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by the complainant in respect of a plot allotted to him promoted by the OP, claiming deficiency of service due to delay in handing over possession of the plot allotted and claiming refund of amount deposited with compensation.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Insurer refuses to issue insurance policy as Risk Confirmation letter obtained on concealment of material fact by Insurance Broker: Policy will be vitiated? NCDRC answers<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cSection 19 of Contract Act, 1872, provides that when the consent of an agreement is caused by coercion, fraud, or misrepresentation, the agreement is voidable at the option of the party whose consent is so caused.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Plastic pieces found in slices of bread, but compensation denied to consumer. Read why NCDRC set aside State Commission\u2019s order of compensation<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Ram Surat Maurya (Presiding Member) addressed a matter wherein Britannia was alleged to have pieces of plastic in its bread, but the complainant failed to prove that the bread was manufactured by the said company.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Minor treated for \u201cMeasles\u201d instead of \u201cStevens-Johnson Syndrome\u201d due to wrong diagnosis and leading to medical negligence: Read detailed report on NCDRC\u2019s decision<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThe patient at her young age of 12 years suffered very serious and potentially fatal SJ syndrome. It was the patient\u2019s sheer good luck that she survived in spite of such grossly inappropriate\/inadequate treatment at every stage.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Is it proper for NCLT to record finding regarding default when RP is yet to consider it and submit report? NCLAT discusses Ss. 95, 97, 99 IBC<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026there cannot be any dispute with the statutory scheme as contained in Section 97 that when application is filed by the Resolution Professional under Section 95, the Adjudicating Authority shall direct the Board within seven days of the date of the application to confirm that disciplinary proceedings pending against the Resolution Professional or not and the Board was required within seven days to communicate in writing either confirming the appointment of the Resolution Professional or rejecting the appointment of the Resolution Professional and nominating another Resolution Professional.\u201d\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Aggrieved with the categorisation as \u2018unsecured creditor\u2019, Tribunal secures \u2018secured creditor\u2019, having relinquished the security interest<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

The Coram of Ashok Bhushan J, (Chairperson), and Dr Alok Srivastava (Technical Member) while accepting the appeal and rejecting the claim of the respondent, the Tribunal was of the opinion that the Adjudicating Authority committed an error in rejecting the claim of the appellant to be \u2018secured creditor\u2019.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Is approval with 90% vote of CoC required before allowing withdrawal of CIRP application even where CoC was not yet constituted? NCLAT clarifies law on S. 12-A IBC<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026when the application is filed prior to the constitution of Committee of Creditors, the requirement of ninety percent vote of Committee of Creditors is not applicable and the Adjudicating Authority has to consider the Application without requiring approval by ninety percent vote of the Committee of Creditors.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Dominant position and Predatory Pricing or Win-Win for riders and drivers? NCLAT upholds CCI\u2019s decision<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cWe do not think that Ola could operate independently of other competitors in the relevant market, and hence it did not enjoy a dominant position in the market.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Once Adjudicating Authority approves Resolution Plan, does it still remains a confidential document? Read what NCLAT says<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThe category of creditors including the Members of the suspended Board of Directors or the partners of the corporate persons, who are entitled to participate in the meeting of the Committee of Creditors are entitled to receive copies of all documents.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

\u00a0<\/strong>National Green Tribunal (NGT)<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Rampant noise pollution, incessant use of horns; a Deplorable state of affairs! NGT finds Rajasthan in contempt of Supreme Court\u2019s order<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

While addressing the issue of pressure\/air horns and motor vehicles being driven with intolerable sound in Rajasthan, the Bench comprising of Justice Sheo Kumar Singh (Judicial Member) and Dr. Arun Kumar Verma (Expert Member) found the State of Rajasthan in contempt of the Supreme Court\u2019s order and issued notice to the state government to reply within three weeks.<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI)<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n

Twitter, Telegram and the tattered chances-Illicit act of swindlers recommending stock tips on social media; Tribunal acts immediately<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThe tips circulated through the Channel create an inducing impact which are then followed by the subscribers and ironically, such stock tips may also prove to be true, if large number of recipients of such tips believe it and collectively act on it. Slowly and gradually, after seeing the price of the said thinly traded scrip actually rising, more and more subscribers start believing in the tips and start acting on it, which further strengthens the belief of such tips being genuine, as large number of individuals end up acting on such tips and by their collective buying actions, convert the deceitful, specious and baseless tips to realty\u201d<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\u2018Billionaire\u2019 dream turns into dread-Unauthorsied investment advisory amounted to fraud & misrepresentation<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

S.K. Mohanty, Whole Time Member while affirming an ex-parte interim order of SEBI, was of the view that the activities of the Noticees, Billionaire Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (Sole proprietor Akash Jaiswal) was covered within the definition of \u201cfraud\u201d defined under regulation 2(1)(c) of the PFUTP Regulations, 2003. And therefore was held liable for the violation of provisions of Section 12A (a), (b), (c) of the SEBI Act, 1992, Regulations 3 (b), (c) & (d), 4(1), 4(2)(k) of the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003 (PFUTP Regulations, 2003).<\/p>\n

Read full report here\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) State commission disallows benefit of increase in the tariff based on the change in law provision; Tribunal <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":261015,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[45673,46957],"tags":[32094,3226,5461,46392,31350,14601,2582,2891,10141,2889,42845,2592,30953,3485,33557,3095,5381,3734,33631,20611,48499],"class_list":["post-260982","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-columns-for-roundup","category-tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup","tag-amazon","tag-arbitration","tag-cci","tag-commissions","tag-competition","tag-consumer","tag-Disability","tag-Environment","tag-fraud","tag-google","tag-homebuyer","tag-Income_Tax","tag-itat","tag-medical_negligence","tag-monthly-roundup","tag-NCDRC","tag-ngt","tag-Ola","tag-service-charge","tag-tribunals","tag-war-injury"],"yoast_head":"\n24 Reports to Read: Ola & Google's Dominant Position, Service Charge, Medical Negligence, War Injury Pension and more | Tribunals and Commissions Roundup of January 2022 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Ola & Google's Dominant Position, Service Charge, Medical Negligence, War Injury Pension and more\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/02\/ola-googles-dominant-position-service-charge-medical-negligence-war-injury-pension-and-more\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"24 Reports to Read: Ola & Google's Dominant Position, Service Charge, Medical Negligence, War Injury Pension and more | Tribunals and Commissions Roundup of January 2022\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Ola & Google's Dominant Position, Service Charge, Medical Negligence, War Injury Pension and more\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/02\/ola-googles-dominant-position-service-charge-medical-negligence-war-injury-pension-and-more\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-02-02T07:30:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-02-02T13:14:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Tribunals-Roundup.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/02\/ola-googles-dominant-position-service-charge-medical-negligence-war-injury-pension-and-more\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/02\/ola-googles-dominant-position-service-charge-medical-negligence-war-injury-pension-and-more\/\",\"name\":\"24 Reports to Read: Ola & Google's Dominant Position, Service Charge, Medical Negligence, War Injury Pension and more | Tribunals and Commissions Roundup of January 2022 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/02\/ola-googles-dominant-position-service-charge-medical-negligence-war-injury-pension-and-more\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/02\/ola-googles-dominant-position-service-charge-medical-negligence-war-injury-pension-and-more\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Tribunals-Roundup.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-02-02T07:30:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-02-02T13:14:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Ola & Google's Dominant Position, Service Charge, Medical Negligence, War Injury Pension and more\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/02\/ola-googles-dominant-position-service-charge-medical-negligence-war-injury-pension-and-more\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/02\/ola-googles-dominant-position-service-charge-medical-negligence-war-injury-pension-and-more\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/02\/ola-googles-dominant-position-service-charge-medical-negligence-war-injury-pension-and-more\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Tribunals-Roundup.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Tribunals-Roundup.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/02\/ola-googles-dominant-position-service-charge-medical-negligence-war-injury-pension-and-more\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"24 Reports to Read: Ola & Google’s Dominant Position, Service Charge, Medical Negligence, War Injury Pension and more | Tribunals and Commissions Roundup of January 2022\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"24 Reports to Read: Ola & Google's Dominant Position, Service Charge, Medical Negligence, War Injury Pension and more | Tribunals and Commissions Roundup of January 2022 | SCC Times","description":"Ola & Google's Dominant Position, Service Charge, Medical Negligence, War Injury Pension and more","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/02\/ola-googles-dominant-position-service-charge-medical-negligence-war-injury-pension-and-more\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"24 Reports to Read: Ola & Google's Dominant Position, Service Charge, Medical Negligence, War Injury Pension and more | Tribunals and Commissions Roundup of January 2022","og_description":"Ola & Google's Dominant Position, Service Charge, Medical Negligence, War Injury Pension and more","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/02\/ola-googles-dominant-position-service-charge-medical-negligence-war-injury-pension-and-more\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-02-02T07:30:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-02-02T13:14:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Tribunals-Roundup.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/02\/ola-googles-dominant-position-service-charge-medical-negligence-war-injury-pension-and-more\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/02\/ola-googles-dominant-position-service-charge-medical-negligence-war-injury-pension-and-more\/","name":"24 Reports to Read: Ola & Google's Dominant Position, Service Charge, Medical Negligence, War Injury Pension and more | Tribunals and Commissions Roundup of January 2022 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/02\/ola-googles-dominant-position-service-charge-medical-negligence-war-injury-pension-and-more\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/02\/ola-googles-dominant-position-service-charge-medical-negligence-war-injury-pension-and-more\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Tribunals-Roundup.jpg","datePublished":"2022-02-02T07:30:04+00:00","dateModified":"2022-02-02T13:14:34+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Ola & Google's Dominant Position, Service Charge, Medical Negligence, War Injury Pension and more","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/02\/ola-googles-dominant-position-service-charge-medical-negligence-war-injury-pension-and-more\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/02\/ola-googles-dominant-position-service-charge-medical-negligence-war-injury-pension-and-more\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/02\/ola-googles-dominant-position-service-charge-medical-negligence-war-injury-pension-and-more\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Tribunals-Roundup.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Tribunals-Roundup.jpg","width":1331,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/02\/ola-googles-dominant-position-service-charge-medical-negligence-war-injury-pension-and-more\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"24 Reports to Read: Ola & Google’s Dominant Position, Service Charge, Medical Negligence, War Injury Pension and more | Tribunals and Commissions Roundup of January 2022"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Tribunals-Roundup.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":252103,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/31\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-july-2021\/","url_meta":{"origin":260982,"position":0},"title":"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup | July 2021","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 31, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Here\u2019s a run-through of all the significant decisions covered in the month of July, 2021 under the Section of Tribunals\/Commission\/Regulatory Bodies. Appellate Tribunal for Electricity \u00a0 Solar Project Whether there was bona fide delay in commissioning the solar power project? \u201c\u2026allowed an appeal which was filed against the Order of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup"","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-37.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":303449,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/04\/tribunal-monthly-roundup-september-2023-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":260982,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal Monthly Roundup September 2023 | Top Stories on Estoppel by Election; compensation for lost property documents; ABC Bearings and Timken India amalgamation and more","author":"Editor","date":"October 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from Tribunals, Regulatory Bodies, Commissions this month.","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"tribunal monthly rounup sep 2023","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/tribunal-monthly-rounup-sep-2023.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/tribunal-monthly-rounup-sep-2023.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/tribunal-monthly-rounup-sep-2023.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/tribunal-monthly-rounup-sep-2023.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/tribunal-monthly-rounup-sep-2023.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250530,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-june-2021\/","url_meta":{"origin":260982,"position":2},"title":"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup | June 2021","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 30, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Here's a run-through of all the significant decisions covered in the month of June, 2021 under the Section of Tribunals\/Commission\/Regulatory Bodies. Armed Forces Tribunal \u2666 AFT | Pension cannot be denied for disability being less than 20% where the disability is assessed at 15-19%\u201c The assessment of disability to the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup"","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-5.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-5.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-5.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-5.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-5.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":262952,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/03\/tribunals-and-commissions-roundup-of-february-2022\/","url_meta":{"origin":260982,"position":3},"title":"17 Reports to Read: Medical Negligence, Zee Insider Trading, Membership Subscription charges for CENVAT Credit and more | Tribunals and Commissions Roundup of February 2022","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) State commission disallows benefit of increase in the tariff based on the change in law provision; Tribunal directs reconsideration A Coram of R.K. Gauba (Officiating Chairperson) and Sandesh Kumar Sharma (Technical Member) decided on an appeal which was filed by Solar Power Project Developer (\u201cSPD\u201d)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Legal-Roundup_Tribunals.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Legal-Roundup_Tribunals.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Legal-Roundup_Tribunals.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Legal-Roundup_Tribunals.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Legal-Roundup_Tribunals.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258031,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/02\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-november-2021\/","url_meta":{"origin":260982,"position":4},"title":"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup | November 2021","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Here\u2019s a run-through of all the significant decisions covered in the month of November 2021 under the Section of Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies.","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-129.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-129.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-129.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-129.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-129.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298109,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/31\/tribunal-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-july-2023-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":260982,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal Monthly Roundup July 2023 | Top Stories on Illegal Sand Mining on Yamuna Bank; Mumbai Floods 2005; Tata Power; and more","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 31, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from Tribunals, Regulatory Bodies, Commissions this month","rel":"","context":"In "Legal RoundUp"","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"tribunal monthly july 2023","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tribunal-monthly-july-2023.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tribunal-monthly-july-2023.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tribunal-monthly-july-2023.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tribunal-monthly-july-2023.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260982","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=260982"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260982\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/261015"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=260982"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=260982"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=260982"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}