{"id":260627,"date":"2022-01-26T14:00:28","date_gmt":"2022-01-26T08:30:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=260627"},"modified":"2022-01-28T11:52:39","modified_gmt":"2022-01-28T06:22:39","slug":"ph-hc-directs-state-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-government-medical-dental-colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision-such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/26\/ph-hc-directs-state-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-government-medical-dental-colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision-such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"P&#038;H HC directs State to provide sports quota of 3% in Government Medical\/Dental Colleges instead of 1% provided in policy decision. Such mandamus impermissible, holds SC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Supreme Court<\/strong>: Explaining the scope of writ jurisdiction, the bench of <strong>MR Shah*<\/strong> and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that the State Government\u2019s action taking a policy decision to prescribe a particular percentage of reservation\/quota for a particular category of persons, cannot be interfered with by issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the State Government to provide for a particular percentage of reservation for a particular category of persons other than what has been provided in the policy decision taken by the State Government.<\/p>\n<p>The Court was deciding the appeal against the Punjab and Haryana High Court verdict where the High Court had directed the State to issue a fresh notification providing for 1% reservation\/quota for children\/grand children of terrorist affected persons\/Sikh riots affected persons in all private unaided nonminority Medical\/Dental institutions in the State of Punjab and had further directed that the said reservation\/quota shall apply to management quota seats as well and further directed that the fresh notification shall also provide for a sports quota of 3% in Government Medical\/Dental Colleges.<\/p>\n<p>The State of Punjab framed its Sports Policy in the year 2018 which provided that 3% reservation in admissions will be provided for graded sports persons. However, by order dated 25.07.2019, a conscious decision was taken by the Government of Punjab to provide 1% reservation for sports persons. The said order was passed taking into consideration Clause 10 of the Sporty Policy, 2018.<\/p>\n<p>The Court noticed that while it was true that as per clause 8.11(v), 3% reservation for sports persons has been provided, however, it is to be noted that clause 10 permits\/allows any other department to have specific policy providing for reservation for sports persons other than 3%. Also, the order has been issued and 1% reservation\/quota for sports persons is provided after taking into consideration the Sports Policy, 2018. Therefore, a conscious policy decision has been taken by the State Government to provide for only 1% reservation\/quota for sports persons.<\/p>\n<p>The Court, hence, held that the High Court has committed a grave error in issuing a writ of mandamus and directing the State Government to provide for 3% reservation\/quota for sports persons, instead of 1% as provided by the State Government.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cThe High Court has exceeded its jurisdiction while issuing a writ of mandamus directing the State to provide a particular percentage of reservation for sports persons, namely, in the present case, 3% reservation instead of 1% provided by the State Government, while exercising powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Therefore, the impugned common judgment and order passed by the High Court insofar as directing the State to provide for 3% reservation for sports persons and\/or provide for a sports quota of 3% in the Government Medical\/Dental Colleges was found to be unsustainable and was hence, set aside.<\/p>\n<p>[State of Punjab v. Anshika Goyal, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/36jqTZ3y\"><b>2022 SCC OnLine SC 86<\/b><\/a>, decided on 25.01.2022]<\/p>\n<p>*Judgment by: Justice MR Shah<\/p>\n<p>Counsels<\/p>\n<p>For State: Senior Advocate Meenakshi Arora<\/p>\n<p>For writ petitioners: Senior Advocate P.S. Patwalia<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: Explaining the scope of writ jurisdiction, the bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that the State <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":260628,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[20531,3043,16421,2672,35633,7272],"class_list":["post-260627","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-high-courts","tag-Mandamus","tag-policy-decision","tag-reservation","tag-sports-quota","tag-writ-jurisdiction"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>P&amp;H HC directs State to provide sports quota of 3% in Government Medical\/Dental Colleges instead of 1% provided in policy decision. Such mandamus impermissible, holds SC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/26\/ph-hc-directs-state-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-government-medical-dental-colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision-such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P&amp;H HC directs State to provide sports quota of 3% in Government Medical\/Dental Colleges instead of 1% provided in policy decision. Such mandamus impermissible, holds SC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: Explaining the scope of writ jurisdiction, the bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that the State\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/26\/ph-hc-directs-state-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-government-medical-dental-colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision-such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-01-26T08:30:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-01-28T06:22:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/HC-directs-State-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-Government-MedicalDental-Colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision.-Such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-SC.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/26\/ph-hc-directs-state-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-government-medical-dental-colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision-such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-sc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/26\/ph-hc-directs-state-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-government-medical-dental-colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision-such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-sc\/\",\"name\":\"P&H HC directs State to provide sports quota of 3% in Government Medical\/Dental Colleges instead of 1% provided in policy decision. Such mandamus impermissible, holds SC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/26\/ph-hc-directs-state-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-government-medical-dental-colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision-such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/26\/ph-hc-directs-state-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-government-medical-dental-colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision-such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/HC-directs-State-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-Government-MedicalDental-Colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision.-Such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-SC.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-01-26T08:30:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-01-28T06:22:39+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/26\/ph-hc-directs-state-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-government-medical-dental-colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision-such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-sc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/26\/ph-hc-directs-state-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-government-medical-dental-colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision-such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-sc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/26\/ph-hc-directs-state-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-government-medical-dental-colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision-such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-sc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/HC-directs-State-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-Government-MedicalDental-Colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision.-Such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-SC.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/HC-directs-State-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-Government-MedicalDental-Colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision.-Such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-SC.png\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/26\/ph-hc-directs-state-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-government-medical-dental-colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision-such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-sc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P&#038;H HC directs State to provide sports quota of 3% in Government Medical\/Dental Colleges instead of 1% provided in policy decision. Such mandamus impermissible, holds SC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P&H HC directs State to provide sports quota of 3% in Government Medical\/Dental Colleges instead of 1% provided in policy decision. Such mandamus impermissible, holds SC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/26\/ph-hc-directs-state-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-government-medical-dental-colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision-such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-sc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P&H HC directs State to provide sports quota of 3% in Government Medical\/Dental Colleges instead of 1% provided in policy decision. Such mandamus impermissible, holds SC","og_description":"Supreme Court: Explaining the scope of writ jurisdiction, the bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that the State","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/26\/ph-hc-directs-state-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-government-medical-dental-colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision-such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-sc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-01-26T08:30:28+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-01-28T06:22:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/HC-directs-State-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-Government-MedicalDental-Colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision.-Such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-SC.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/26\/ph-hc-directs-state-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-government-medical-dental-colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision-such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-sc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/26\/ph-hc-directs-state-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-government-medical-dental-colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision-such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-sc\/","name":"P&H HC directs State to provide sports quota of 3% in Government Medical\/Dental Colleges instead of 1% provided in policy decision. Such mandamus impermissible, holds SC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/26\/ph-hc-directs-state-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-government-medical-dental-colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision-such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-sc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/26\/ph-hc-directs-state-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-government-medical-dental-colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision-such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-sc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/HC-directs-State-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-Government-MedicalDental-Colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision.-Such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-SC.png","datePublished":"2022-01-26T08:30:28+00:00","dateModified":"2022-01-28T06:22:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/26\/ph-hc-directs-state-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-government-medical-dental-colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision-such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-sc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/26\/ph-hc-directs-state-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-government-medical-dental-colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision-such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-sc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/26\/ph-hc-directs-state-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-government-medical-dental-colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision-such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-sc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/HC-directs-State-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-Government-MedicalDental-Colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision.-Such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-SC.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/HC-directs-State-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-Government-MedicalDental-Colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision.-Such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-SC.png","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/26\/ph-hc-directs-state-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-government-medical-dental-colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision-such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-sc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P&#038;H HC directs State to provide sports quota of 3% in Government Medical\/Dental Colleges instead of 1% provided in policy decision. Such mandamus impermissible, holds SC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/HC-directs-State-to-provide-sports-quota-of-3-in-Government-MedicalDental-Colleges-instead-of-1-provided-in-policy-decision.-Such-mandamus-impermissible-holds-SC.png","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":215023,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/24\/utt-hc-reservations-in-favor-of-sportsperson-is-traceable-to-article-161-atrocities-of-exhaustiveness-of-reservation-under-art-164-observed-by-the-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":260627,"position":0},"title":"Utt HC | Reservations in favor of sportsperson is traceable to Article 16(1); atrocities of exhaustiveness of reservation under Art. 16(4) observed by the Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 24, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Full Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan CJ and Sudhanshu Dhulia and Alok Singh, JJ. entertained a writ petition calling into question the exhaustiveness of Article 16(4) of the Constitution of India. The petitioners in the aforementioned writ questioned the Court, that whether reservation for the \u2018sports\u2019 category\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6452,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/12\/courts-cannot-interfere-with-policy-decision-by-adding-something-to-the-policy-by-way-of-mandamus\/","url_meta":{"origin":260627,"position":1},"title":"Courts cannot interfere with policy decision by adding something to the policy by way of mandamus","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 12, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Holding the decision of the Madras High Court where the authorities were directed to take measures to conduct caste-wise census in the country, the 3-judge bench of Dipak Misra, R.F. Nariman and U.U. Lalit held that the said direction was irrefragably against the power conferred on the court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Supreme Court&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276150,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/26\/jammu-kashmir-hc-reservation-pahari-speaking-people-petition-challenging-dismissed-writs-legal-news-and-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":260627,"position":2},"title":"J&#038;K and Ladakh HC | Petition challenging 4% reservation for Pahari Speaking People in State\/UT Services dismissed as petitioners failed to qualify as \u2018aggrieved persons\u2019 for the purposes of Art 226","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court: While deliberating over the instant writ petition concerning reservation provided to Pahari Speaking People, the Sanjay Dhar, J., had to look into the question as to who can invoke the jurisdiction of the High Court under Art. 226 of the Constitution seeking a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6221,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/05\/no-separate-category-for-physically-handicapped-in-reservation\/","url_meta":{"origin":260627,"position":3},"title":"No separate category for physically handicapped in reservation","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 5, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Dismissing a petition, a division bench comprising of Amitava Roy, CJ and Vijay Bishnoi, J concluded that there should be no separate category of the physically handicapped persons for the purpose of reservation. In the present case, a physically handicapped\u00a0 candidate who appeared for the preliminary examination\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Courts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6434,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/05\/no-separate-category-for-physically-handicapped-in-reservation1\/","url_meta":{"origin":260627,"position":4},"title":"No separate category for physically handicapped in reservation","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 5, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Dismissing a petition, a division bench comprising of Amitava Roy, CJ and Vijay Bishnoi, J concluded that there should be no separate category of the physically handicapped persons for the purpose of reservation. In the present case, a physically handicapped\u00a0 candidate who appeared for the preliminary examination\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Courts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":379818,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/31\/bombay-high-court-body-building-eligible-for-reservation\/","url_meta":{"origin":260627,"position":5},"title":"Bombay High Court Restores Body Building to List of Eligible Sports for Government Job Reservation","author":"Editor","date":"March 31, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The Bombay High Court held that as \u2018Body Building\u2019 had state recognition earlier and is nationally recognized, its exclusion violated Article 14 of the Constitution of India.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"body building eligible for reservation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/body-building-eligible-for-reservation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/body-building-eligible-for-reservation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/body-building-eligible-for-reservation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/body-building-eligible-for-reservation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260627","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=260627"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260627\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/260628"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=260627"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=260627"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=260627"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}