{"id":260570,"date":"2022-01-25T13:30:40","date_gmt":"2022-01-25T08:00:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=260570"},"modified":"2022-01-25T13:32:21","modified_gmt":"2022-01-25T08:02:21","slug":"objection-with-regard-to-pecuniary-jurisdiction-shall-be-taken-at-the-first-instance-at-the-earliest-possible-opportunity-in-accordance-with-s-21-cpc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/objection-with-regard-to-pecuniary-jurisdiction-shall-be-taken-at-the-first-instance-at-the-earliest-possible-opportunity-in-accordance-with-s-21-cpc\/","title":{"rendered":"Raj HC | Objection with regard to pecuniary jurisdiction shall be taken at the first instance at the earliest possible opportunity in accordance with S. 21 CPC"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court: <\/strong>Anoop Kumar Dhand J. allowed the appeal and quashed the impugned order dated 17-08-2021 passed by the Court of Additional District and Sessions Judge No. 9, Jaipur Metropolitan-II, Jaipur.<\/p>\n

The facts of the case are such that the disputed property was purchased by the plaintiff from one Balram vide agreement and the possession of the same was handed over to the plaintiff by said Balram. On 15-06-1996, allotment letter was also transferred in favour of the plaintiff by the defendant. Thereafter, boundary wall was constructed around the disputed property. When the father of the plaintiff visited the site on 03-02-2006, then he found that certain Land Mafias had broken the locks of the plot by trespassing upon it. When he asked them about the right, title of the property in question, then they started quarrelling with the father of the plaintiff. An FIR was also lodged in this regard and finally the instant suit has been filed for declaration, possession, damages, mandatory and permanent injunction with regard to the disputed property. Counsel for the petitioners submitted that after recording the evidence of both the sides on all the issues, the case was posted for final arguments and at that stage the learned court has no pecuniary jurisdiction to hear and decide the suit, hence, the suit is liable to be dismissed. It was further submitted that that 13 years have passed after filing of the suit and in case the impugned order is allowed to stand as it is then the plaintiff would be seriously prejudiced. Hence, the impugned order be quashed and set aside.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the respondents submitted that the court has ample jurisdiction under Order 14 Rule 5 to frame any additional issue at any stage before disposal of the suit. So, rejection of the appeal was prayed. It was further submitted that from bare perusal of the contents of the plaint it was clear that the court has no pecuniary jurisdiction to hear and decide the suit. Hence, the court has rightly passed the impugned order. It was also submitted that the objection regarding the pecuniary jurisdiction can be taken at any stage even before the pronouncement of the judgment.<\/p>\n

The Court stated \u201cno such objection was taken by the defendants at the earliest stage or not during the course of trial when it reached to its final stage. Now at the stage of final disposal, the application has been submitted which has been accepted by the learned court below by overlooking the mandatory provisions contained under Section 21 of the Code of Civil Procedure.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

The Court observed that the suit was filed in the year 2008 and on bare perusal of the plaint, it is clear that the valuation of the suit was mentioned and the plea was also taken therein that the court below is competent to hear and decide the controversy in question on the basis of the valuation determined in the plaint by the plaintiff. and it is settled position of law as per Section 21 of the Code of Civil Procedure that the objection with regard to pecuniary jurisdiction shall be taken at the first instance at the earliest possible opportunity.<\/p>\n

The Court held \u201cthe impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law and the same is liable to be quashed and set aside.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

[Meeta Agarwal v. Hathroigiri, S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1566\/2021, decided on 04-01-2022 ]<\/p>\n

\n

Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n

Appearances<\/strong><\/p>\n

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Behari Lal Agarwal and Mr. Akash Gupta<\/p>\n

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bajrang Lal Choudhary<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court: Anoop Kumar Dhand J. allowed the appeal and quashed the impugned order dated 17-08-2021 passed by the Court of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8331,27414,38393,2943,30271,3590,22424,48433],"class_list":["post-260570","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-civil-procedure-code","tag-cpc","tag-declaration-of-title","tag-injunction","tag-pecuniary-jurisdiction","tag-property","tag-rejection-of-plaint","tag-s-21-cpc"],"yoast_head":"\nRaj HC | Objection with regard to pecuniary jurisdiction shall be taken at the first instance at the earliest possible opportunity in accordance with S. 21 CPC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Objection with regard to pecuniary jurisdiction shall be taken at the first instance at the earliest possible opportunity in accordance with S. 21 CPC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/objection-with-regard-to-pecuniary-jurisdiction-shall-be-taken-at-the-first-instance-at-the-earliest-possible-opportunity-in-accordance-with-s-21-cpc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Raj HC | Objection with regard to pecuniary jurisdiction shall be taken at the first instance at the earliest possible opportunity in accordance with S. 21 CPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Objection with regard to pecuniary jurisdiction shall be taken at the first instance at the earliest possible opportunity in accordance with S. 21 CPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/objection-with-regard-to-pecuniary-jurisdiction-shall-be-taken-at-the-first-instance-at-the-earliest-possible-opportunity-in-accordance-with-s-21-cpc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-01-25T08:00:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-01-25T08:02:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/objection-with-regard-to-pecuniary-jurisdiction-shall-be-taken-at-the-first-instance-at-the-earliest-possible-opportunity-in-accordance-with-s-21-cpc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/objection-with-regard-to-pecuniary-jurisdiction-shall-be-taken-at-the-first-instance-at-the-earliest-possible-opportunity-in-accordance-with-s-21-cpc\/\",\"name\":\"Raj HC | Objection with regard to pecuniary jurisdiction shall be taken at the first instance at the earliest possible opportunity in accordance with S. 21 CPC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-01-25T08:00:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-01-25T08:02:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Objection with regard to pecuniary jurisdiction shall be taken at the first instance at the earliest possible opportunity in accordance with S. 21 CPC\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/objection-with-regard-to-pecuniary-jurisdiction-shall-be-taken-at-the-first-instance-at-the-earliest-possible-opportunity-in-accordance-with-s-21-cpc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/objection-with-regard-to-pecuniary-jurisdiction-shall-be-taken-at-the-first-instance-at-the-earliest-possible-opportunity-in-accordance-with-s-21-cpc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/objection-with-regard-to-pecuniary-jurisdiction-shall-be-taken-at-the-first-instance-at-the-earliest-possible-opportunity-in-accordance-with-s-21-cpc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Raj HC | Objection with regard to pecuniary jurisdiction shall be taken at the first instance at the earliest possible opportunity in accordance with S. 21 CPC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raj HC | Objection with regard to pecuniary jurisdiction shall be taken at the first instance at the earliest possible opportunity in accordance with S. 21 CPC | SCC Times","description":"Objection with regard to pecuniary jurisdiction shall be taken at the first instance at the earliest possible opportunity in accordance with S. 21 CPC","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/objection-with-regard-to-pecuniary-jurisdiction-shall-be-taken-at-the-first-instance-at-the-earliest-possible-opportunity-in-accordance-with-s-21-cpc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Raj HC | Objection with regard to pecuniary jurisdiction shall be taken at the first instance at the earliest possible opportunity in accordance with S. 21 CPC","og_description":"Objection with regard to pecuniary jurisdiction shall be taken at the first instance at the earliest possible opportunity in accordance with S. 21 CPC","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/objection-with-regard-to-pecuniary-jurisdiction-shall-be-taken-at-the-first-instance-at-the-earliest-possible-opportunity-in-accordance-with-s-21-cpc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-01-25T08:00:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-01-25T08:02:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/objection-with-regard-to-pecuniary-jurisdiction-shall-be-taken-at-the-first-instance-at-the-earliest-possible-opportunity-in-accordance-with-s-21-cpc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/objection-with-regard-to-pecuniary-jurisdiction-shall-be-taken-at-the-first-instance-at-the-earliest-possible-opportunity-in-accordance-with-s-21-cpc\/","name":"Raj HC | Objection with regard to pecuniary jurisdiction shall be taken at the first instance at the earliest possible opportunity in accordance with S. 21 CPC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-01-25T08:00:40+00:00","dateModified":"2022-01-25T08:02:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Objection with regard to pecuniary jurisdiction shall be taken at the first instance at the earliest possible opportunity in accordance with S. 21 CPC","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/objection-with-regard-to-pecuniary-jurisdiction-shall-be-taken-at-the-first-instance-at-the-earliest-possible-opportunity-in-accordance-with-s-21-cpc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/objection-with-regard-to-pecuniary-jurisdiction-shall-be-taken-at-the-first-instance-at-the-earliest-possible-opportunity-in-accordance-with-s-21-cpc\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/objection-with-regard-to-pecuniary-jurisdiction-shall-be-taken-at-the-first-instance-at-the-earliest-possible-opportunity-in-accordance-with-s-21-cpc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Raj HC | Objection with regard to pecuniary jurisdiction shall be taken at the first instance at the earliest possible opportunity in accordance with S. 21 CPC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":253689,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/04\/section-100-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":260570,"position":0},"title":"Mere reference to factual aspects to conclude question of law does not mean facts and evidence have been reappreciated: SC restates law on second appeal under S. 100 CPC","author":"Editor","date":"September 4, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: A 3-Judge Bench of N.V. Ramana, CJI and A.S. Bopanna and Hrishikesh Roy, JJ. upheld the judgment of the Madras High Court passed in a second appeal whereby it had reversed the order of the first appellate court granting injunction in favour of the appellant\u2212plaintiff in a property\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276423,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/20\/counter-claim-under-order-8-rule-6-cpc-can-only-be-filed-against-plaintiff-supreme-court-property-dispute-defendant-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":260570,"position":1},"title":"Explained| Can an independent counter claim under Order VIII Rule 6A CPC having nothing to do with the plaintiffs be allowed?\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of UU Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat and Sudhanshu Dhulia*, JJ has held that a counter claim under Order VIII, Rule 6A of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (CPC) can be set up only \u201cagainst the claim of the plaintiffs\u201d. The Court was dealing with\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Can-an-independent-counter-claim-under-Order-VIII-Rule-6A-CPC-having-nothing-to-do-with-the-plaintiffs-be-allowed-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Can-an-independent-counter-claim-under-Order-VIII-Rule-6A-CPC-having-nothing-to-do-with-the-plaintiffs-be-allowed-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Can-an-independent-counter-claim-under-Order-VIII-Rule-6A-CPC-having-nothing-to-do-with-the-plaintiffs-be-allowed-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Can-an-independent-counter-claim-under-Order-VIII-Rule-6A-CPC-having-nothing-to-do-with-the-plaintiffs-be-allowed-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Can-an-independent-counter-claim-under-Order-VIII-Rule-6A-CPC-having-nothing-to-do-with-the-plaintiffs-be-allowed-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":373438,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/22\/once-plaint-returned-for-lack-of-pecuniary-jurisdiction-suit-proceeds-de-novo-jk-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":260570,"position":2},"title":"Once plaint is returned for lack of pecuniary jurisdiction, suit proceeds de novo; Earlier pleadings and evidence are non est: J&K and Ladakh HC","author":"Sunaina","date":"January 22, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cOnce it is concluded that the initial proceedings were held before a court that lacked jurisdiction, the written statement and other evidence that may have been led by the parties before the said court become non-est in the eyes of law.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"suit proceeds de novo","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/suit-proceeds-de-novo.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/suit-proceeds-de-novo.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/suit-proceeds-de-novo.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/suit-proceeds-de-novo.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":256794,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/06\/attachment-before-judgment-drastic-and-extraordinary-faculty-envisioned-to-succour-justice-dispensation\/","url_meta":{"origin":260570,"position":3},"title":"Attachment Before Judgment: Drastic and Extraordinary Faculty, Envisioned to Succour Justice Dispensation","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 6, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Abhishek Goyal\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "OP. ED."","block_context":{"text":"OP. ED.","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-116.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-116.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-116.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-116.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-116.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280397,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/26\/delhi-high-court-courts-are-duty-bound-to-lean-towards-an-interpretation-which-would-uphold-the-jurisdiction-of-a-civil-court-in-case-of-suspicion\/","url_meta":{"origin":260570,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court| Courts are duty bound to lean towards an interpretation which uphold jurisdiction of a Civil Court in case of suspicion","author":"Editor","date":"December 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Section 9 of CPC is also symbolised as the gateway to the civil Courts as it envisages not only the inherent powers of the Civil Courts to entertain any suit of a civil nature, but also the inherent rights of the disgruntled yet hopeful litigants to approach the civil Courts\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":213962,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/25\/ori-hc-court-may-appoint-a-survey-knowing-commissioner-only-if-dispute-pertains-to-area-of-the-land-or-identification-or-location-or-measurement-of-the-land\/","url_meta":{"origin":260570,"position":5},"title":"Ori HC | Court may appoint a survey knowing commissioner, only if dispute pertains to area of the land or identification or location or measurement of the land","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 25, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: The Bench of A.K. Rath, J. allowed the petition filed that challenged the order which allowed the appointment of an Amin Commissioner for local investigation under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC for the suit land. The facts of the case were that the plaintiff-opposite party instituted the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260570","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=260570"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260570\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=260570"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=260570"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=260570"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}