{"id":260105,"date":"2022-01-14T16:16:24","date_gmt":"2022-01-14T10:46:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=260105"},"modified":"2022-01-14T16:16:22","modified_gmt":"2022-01-14T10:46:22","slug":"judgments-uploaded-on-scc-online","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/judgments-uploaded-on-scc-online\/","title":{"rendered":"Judgments uploaded on SCC Online"},"content":{"rendered":"

2019 SCC OnLine All 6936<\/strong><\/p>\n

Abdul Malik v. Nafeesa Khatoon<\/strong><\/p>\n

In the High Court of Allahabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

(Before Jaspreet Singh<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

Abdul Malik and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant;<\/p>\n

Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

Nafeesa Khatoon and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

Second Appeal No. 317 of 2014, Decided on January 9, 2019<\/p>\n

Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

\n

2021 SCC OnLine All 956<\/strong><\/p>\n

Imtiyaj Ali v. Addl. Commissioner Faizabad-I<\/strong><\/p>\n

In the High Court of Allahabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

(Before J.J. Munir<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

Imtiyaj Ali and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

Addl. Commissioner Faizabad-I and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

Misc. Single No. 28555 of 2021, Decided on December 23, 2021<\/p>\n

Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

\n

2022 SCC OnLine All 14<\/strong><\/p>\n

Mahendra Pal Singh Lekhpal v. State of U.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

In the High Court of Allahabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

(Before Chandra Kumar Rai<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

Mahendra Pal Singh Lekhpal and Another\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Applicant;<\/p>\n

Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

State of U.P. and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Opposite Party.<\/p>\n

Application U\/S 482 No. 15266 of 2007, Decided on January 10, 2022, [Reserved on: 17.12.2021]<\/p>\n

Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

\n

2022 SCC OnLine All 15<\/strong><\/p>\n

Lot Prasad v. State of U.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

In the High Court of Allahabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

(Before Ramesh Sinha<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

Lot Prasad\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant;<\/p>\n

Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

State of U.P.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

Criminal Appeal No. 423 of 1995, Decided on January 10, 2022, [Reserved on: 28.10.2021]<\/p>\n

Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

\n

2021 SCC OnLine AP 4094<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Raja Gopal v. Govt. of A.P.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

    (Before K. Suresh Reddy<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Raja Gopal and Others<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

      Government of A.P. and Others<\/p>\n

      W.P. Nos. 33735 of 2010, 16991 & 29952 of 2011 and 10046, 17757, 17831 & 18590 of 2012, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

      Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

      \n

      2021 SCC OnLine AP 4095<\/strong><\/p>\n

        \n
      1. Naveen Seshu v. State of A.P.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

        (Before D.V.S.S. Somayajulu<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

        WP No. 17750 of 2021<\/p>\n

          \n
        1. Naveen Seshu \u2026 Petitioner;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

          State of Andhra Pradesh, through its Principal Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

          With<\/p>\n

          WP No. 14706 of 2021<\/p>\n

          Llaka Vijayarani \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

          State of Andhra Pradesh, Through Its Chief Secretary and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

          With<\/p>\n

          W.P. No. 14801 of 2021<\/p>\n

          Thota Rama Devi\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

          State of Andhra Pradesh, Through Its Chief Secretary and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

          With<\/p>\n

          WP No. 14802 of 2021<\/p>\n

          Kancharana Rohan Kumar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

          State of Andhra Pradesh, Through Its Chief Secretary and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

          With<\/p>\n

          W.P. No. 16641 of 2021<\/p>\n

            \n
          1. Bala Subrahmanyam \u2026 Petitioner;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

            Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary, R & B Buildings and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

            With<\/p>\n

            W.P. No. 16643 of 2021<\/p>\n

              \n
            1. Hanuma Naik \u2026 Petitioner;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

              Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

              With<\/p>\n

              W.P. No. 16663 of 2021<\/p>\n

                \n
              1. Upendra Rao \u2026 Petitioner;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                With<\/p>\n

                W.P. No. 16669 of 2021<\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. Bujji Babu \u2026 Petitioner;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                  Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                  With<\/p>\n

                  W.P. No. 17011 of 2021<\/p>\n

                  Bodapati Satyanarayana\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                  Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                  With<\/p>\n

                  W.P. No. 17056 of 2021<\/p>\n

                  Suneetha Mopuri\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                  Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                  With<\/p>\n

                  W.P. No. 17058 of 2021<\/p>\n

                  Boora Kalyani\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                  Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                  With<\/p>\n

                  W.P. No. 17078 of 2021<\/p>\n

                  Shaik Kareema Begum\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                  Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                  With<\/p>\n

                  W.P. No. 17081 of 2021<\/p>\n

                  Khajabi Karumanchi\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                  Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                  With<\/p>\n

                  W.P. No. 17086 of 2021<\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. Kalyani \u2026 Petitioner;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                    Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                    With<\/p>\n

                    W.P. No. 17101 of 2021<\/p>\n

                    Bizza Sumana Jayanthi \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                    Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                    With<\/p>\n

                    W.P. No. 17102 of 2021<\/p>\n

                    Raj Manoj Gangi \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                    Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                    With<\/p>\n

                    W.P. No. 17103 of 2021<\/p>\n

                    Munnangi Kanakamahalakshmi Gayathri\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                    Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                    With<\/p>\n

                    W.P. No. 17104 of 2021<\/p>\n

                    Immadi Satyanarayana Rao\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                    Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                    With<\/p>\n

                    W.P. No. 17107 of 2021<\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. Appa Rao \u2026 Petitioner;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                      State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                      With<\/p>\n

                      W.P. No. 17108 of 2021<\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. Hanumantha Rao \u2026 Petitioner;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                        State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, General Administration Department (Services) and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                        With<\/p>\n

                        W.P. No. 17111 of 2021<\/p>\n

                        Panthangi Mallikarjuna \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                        Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                        State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Chief Secretary, General Administration Department and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                        With<\/p>\n

                        W.P. No. 17113 of 2021<\/p>\n

                        Marturi Sreeram Prasad\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                        Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                        Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                        With<\/p>\n

                        W.P. No. 17137 of 2021<\/p>\n

                        Kum. Seelam Indira Devi\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                        Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                        State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                        With<\/p>\n

                        W.P. No. 17144 of 2021<\/p>\n

                        Nanneboyina Nagalakshmi\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                        Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                        Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                        With<\/p>\n

                        W.P. No. 17146 of 2021<\/p>\n

                        Mylabathula Rajababu\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                        Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                        State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                        With<\/p>\n

                        W.P. No. 17148 of 2021<\/p>\n

                        Asapu Bhavani\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                        Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                        Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                        With<\/p>\n

                        W.P. No. 17152 of 2021<\/p>\n

                        Sujatha Netheti\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                        Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                        Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                        With<\/p>\n

                        W.P. No. 17170 of 2021<\/p>\n

                        Merugu Abraham\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                        Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                        Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                        With<\/p>\n

                        W.P. No. 17175 of 2021<\/p>\n

                        Garudadri Hyma Raviteja\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                        Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                        Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                        With<\/p>\n

                        W.P. No. 17181 of 2021<\/p>\n

                        Suryanarayana Anusuri\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                        Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                        Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                        With<\/p>\n

                        W.P. No. 17196 of 2021<\/p>\n

                        Padmavathi Mamidi\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                        Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                        Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                        With<\/p>\n

                        W.P. No. 17197 of 2021<\/p>\n

                        Sabbella Venkata Krishna Reddy\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                        Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                        Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                        With<\/p>\n

                        W.P. No. 17203 of 2021<\/p>\n

                        Tekke Mahammad Haneef Sab\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                        Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                        Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                        With<\/p>\n

                        W.P. No. 17231 of 2021<\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. Ravinder Kumar \u2026 Petitioner;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                          Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                          With<\/p>\n

                          W.P. No. 17236 of 2021<\/p>\n

                          Bandaru (Yarra) Naga Jyothi\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                          Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                          With<\/p>\n

                          W.P. No. 17268 of 2021<\/p>\n

                          Chinta Sireesha\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                          State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, General Administration Department and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                          With<\/p>\n

                          W.P. No. 17283 of 2021<\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. Sreedhar Babu \u2026 Petitioner;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                            Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                            State of Andhra Pradesh, through its Principal Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                            With<\/p>\n

                            W.P. No. 17299 of 2021<\/p>\n

                            Galam Bhaskara Rao\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                            Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                            State of Andhra Pradesh, through its Principal Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                            With<\/p>\n

                            W.P. No. 17302 of 2021<\/p>\n

                              \n
                            1. Nagaveni \u2026 Petitioner;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              State of Andhra Pradesh, through its Principal Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              With<\/p>\n

                              W.P. No. 17306 of 2021<\/p>\n

                              B.N. Subbanna\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              State of Andhra Pradesh, through its Principal Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              With<\/p>\n

                              W.P. No. 17330 of 2021<\/p>\n

                              Kalyani Adi\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              With<\/p>\n

                              W.P. No. 17331 of 2021<\/p>\n

                              Killi Murthy Babu\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              State of Andhra Pradesh, through its Principal Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              With<\/p>\n

                              W.P. No. 17361 of 2021<\/p>\n

                              P.V. Narayana\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              With<\/p>\n

                              W.P. No. 17761 of 2021<\/p>\n

                              A Pushpa Latha\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Represented by Its Chairman and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              With<\/p>\n

                              W.P. No. 17781 of 2021<\/p>\n

                              Ponturu Deva Kumar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              With<\/p>\n

                              W.P. No. 17782 of 2021<\/p>\n

                              B Pentan Naidu\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              With<\/p>\n

                              W.P. No. 17819 of 2021<\/p>\n

                              Lakshmi Ravindra Bheema\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              With<\/p>\n

                              W.P. No. 18054 of 2021<\/p>\n

                              Padmaja Gurigundla\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              With<\/p>\n

                              W.P. No. 18056 of 2021<\/p>\n

                              Annepu Dhanunjaya Rao\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              With<\/p>\n

                              W.P. No. 18091 of 2021<\/p>\n

                              Mahesh Kumar Vukkum\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              With<\/p>\n

                              W.P. No. 18100 of 2021<\/p>\n

                              Paravada Syamala Devi\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              With<\/p>\n

                              W.P. No. 18146 of 2021<\/p>\n

                              Allavarapu B.V.S.B. Srinivas\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, rep. by its Secretary and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              With<\/p>\n

                              W.P. No. 18168 of 2021<\/p>\n

                              Subramaniyam Revathi \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              With<\/p>\n

                              W.P. No. 18169 of 2021<\/p>\n

                              Presingu Sreenivasa Mahesh\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              And<\/p>\n

                              W.P. No. 19128 of 2021<\/p>\n

                              Gundala Vijaya Bhaskar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              WP\/17750\/2021, WP\/14706\/2021, WP\/14801\/2021, WP\/14802\/2021, WP 16641\/2021, WP 16643\/2021, WP 16663\/2021, WP\/16669\/2021, WP\/17011\/2021, WP\/17056\/2021, WP\/17058\/2021, WP\/17078\/2021, WP\/17081\/2021, WP\/17086\/2021, WP\/17101\/2021, WP\/17102\/2021, WP\/17103\/2021, WP\/17104\/2021, WP\/17107\/2021, WP\/17108\/2021, WP\/17111\/2021, WP\/17113\/2021, WP\/17137\/2021, WP\/17144\/2021, WP\/17146\/2021, WP\/17148\/2021, WP\/17152\/2021, WP\/17170\/2021, WP\/17175\/2021, WP\/17181\/2021, WP\/17196\/2021, WP\/17197\/2021, WP\/17203\/2021, WP\/17231\/2021, WP\/17236\/2021, WP\/17268\/2021, WP\/17283\/2021, WP\/17299\/2021, WP\/17302\/2021, WP\/17306\/2021, WP\/17330\/2021, WP\/17331\/2021, WP\/17361\/2021, WP 17761\/2021, WP\/17781\/2021, WP\/17782\/2021, WP\/17819\/2021, WP\/18054\/2021, WP 18056\/2021, WP\/18091\/2021, WP\/18100\/2021, WP\/18146\/2021, WP\/18168\/2021, WP\/18169\/2021 and WP\/19128\/2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                              \n

                              2021 SCC OnLine AP 4096<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              Salapu Ramana v. Andhra University<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              (Before A.V. Sesha Sai<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                              W.P. No. 23360 of 2020<\/p>\n

                              Salapu Ramana and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              Andhra University, rep. by it’s Registrar and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              With<\/p>\n

                              Writ Petition No. 20099 of 2020<\/p>\n

                              Salapu Ramana and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by it’s Principal Secretary, rep. by it’s Prl. Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              And<\/p>\n

                              Writ Petition No. 20674 of 2020<\/p>\n

                              Chelluboina Venkanna and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, rep. by its Prl. Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              Writ Petition Nos. 23360, 20099 & 20674 of 2020, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                              \n

                              2021 SCC OnLine AP 4097<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              Kollimarla Venkata Sivannarayana v. State of A.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              (Before D.V.S.S. Somayajulu<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                              Kollimarla Venkata Sivannarayana and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              Writ Petition No. 21920 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                              \n

                              2021 SCC OnLine AP 4098<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              B.K. Manjunath v. State of A.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              (Before U. Durga Prasad Rao<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                              B.K. Manjunath and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              Writ Petition No. 22591 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                              \n

                              2021 SCC OnLine AP 4099<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              Shaik Baji Shaheed v. State of A.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              (Before A.V. Sesha Sai<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                              Shaik Baji Shaheed and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary – Municipal Administration and Urban Development and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              Writ Petition No. 23006 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                              \n

                              2021 SCC OnLine AP 4100<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              YSR Vocational Junior College v. State of A.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              (Before U. Durga Prasad Rao<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                              Dr. YSR Vocational Junior College, Rep by its Principal, M. Kondalarao \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              Writ Petition No. 24788 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                              \n

                              2021 SCC OnLine AP 4101<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pragati Grameena Bank v. Before the Appellate Authority<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              (Before D.V.S.S. Somayajulu<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pragati Grameena Bank, Rep. by its Chairman\/Authorized Signatory \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              Before the Appellate Authority and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              Writ Petition No. 25495 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                              \n

                              2021 SCC OnLine AP 4102<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pragati Grameena Bank v. Before the Appellate Authority<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              (Before D.V.S.S. Somayajulu<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pragati Grameena Bank, Rep. by its Chairman\/Authorized Signatory \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              Before the Appellate Authority and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              Writ Petition No. 25498 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                              \n

                              2021 SCC OnLine AP 4103<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pragati Grameena Bank v. Before the Appellate Authority<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              (Before D.V.S.S. Somayajulu<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pragati Grameena Bank, Rep. by its Chairman\/Authorized Signatory \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              Before the Appellate Authority and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              Writ Petition No. 25501 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                              \n

                              2021 SCC OnLine AP 4104<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pragati Grameena Bank v. Before the Appellate Authority<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              (Before D.V.S.S. Somayajulu<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pragati Grameena Bank, Rep. by its Chairman\/Authorized Signatory \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              Before the Appellate Authority and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              Writ Petition No. 25502 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                              \n

                              2021 SCC OnLine AP 4105<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pragati Grameena Bank v. Before the Appellate Authority<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              (Before D.V.S.S. Somayajulu<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pragati Grameena Bank, Rep. by its Chairman\/Authorized Signatory \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              Before the Appellate Authority and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              Writ Petition No. 25506 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                              \n

                              2021 SCC OnLine AP 4106<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              Muppa Sailaja v. State of A.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              (Before M. Satyanarayana Murthy<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                              Muppa Sailaja\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government Revenue Department and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              Writ Petition No. 25507 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                              \n

                              2021 SCC OnLine AP 4107<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pragati Grameena Bank v. Before the Appellate Authority<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              (Before D.V.S.S. Somayajulu<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pragati Grameena Bank, Rep. by its Chairman\/Authorized Signatory \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              Before the Appellate Authority and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              Writ Petition No. 25508 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                              \n

                              2021 SCC OnLine AP 4108<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pragati Grameena Bank v. Before the Appellate Authority<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              (Before D.V.S.S. Somayajulu<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                              Andhra Pragati Grameena Bank, Rep. by its Chairman\/Authorized Signatory \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              Before the Appellate Authority and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              Writ Petition No. 25513 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                              \n

                              2021 SCC OnLine AP 4109<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              Manchena Anjitha v. State of A.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              (Before R. Raghunandan Rao<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                              W.P. No. 25517 of 2021<\/p>\n

                              Manchena Anjitha\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary (Endowments) and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              And<\/p>\n

                              W.P. No. 25497 of 2021<\/p>\n

                              Ponnnuru Gayatri Devi \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary (Endowments) and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              Writ Petition Nos. 25517 & 25497 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                              \n

                              2021 SCC OnLine AP 4110<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              Hindustan Colas (P) Ltd. v. Jt. Chief Environmental Engineer<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              (Before Ahsanuddin Amanullah<\/strong> and B. Krishna Mohan, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                              Hindustan Colas Pvt. Ltd., rep. by its Plant Manager, Mr. J. Murali Krishnan\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              Jt. Chief Environmental Engineer, A.P. Pollution Control Board\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              Writ Petition No. 25521 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                              \n

                              2021 SCC OnLine AP 4111<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              Sigma Granites v. State of A.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              (Before U. Durga Prasad Rao<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                              Sigma Granites, rep. by its Partner A. Mahendra\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              State of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Industries and Commerce Department and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              Writ Petition No. 25535 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                              \n

                              2021 SCC OnLine AP 4112<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              Vaishnav Granite Office v. State of A.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              (Before U. Durga Prasad Rao<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                              Vaishnav Granite Office, rep., by its Proprietor C. Siva Kumar Reddy and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              State of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Industries and Commerce Department and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              Writ Petition No. 25538 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                              \n

                              2021 SCC OnLine AP 4113<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              Bantrothu Ramachandra Rao v. State of A.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              (Before M. Venkata Ramana<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                              Bantrothu Ramachandra Rao\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              Writ Petition No. 25556 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                              \n

                              2021 SCC OnLine AP 4114<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              Burla Veeresh v. State of A.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              (Before Ninala Jayasurya<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                              Burla Veeresh and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              Writ Petition No. 25557 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                              \n

                              2021 SCC OnLine AP 4115<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              Gajji Bala Maddaiah v. State of A.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                              (Before M. Venkata Ramana<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                              Gajji Bala Maddaiah\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                              State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                              Writ Petition No. 25561 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                              \n

                              2021 SCC OnLine AP 4116<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                \n
                              1. Sirisha Kalpana v. SBI<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                (Before C. Praveen Kumar<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                  \n
                                1. Sirisha Kalpana \u2026 Petitioner;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                  State Bank of India, Rep. by its Manager and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                  Writ Petition No. 25562 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                  \n

                                  2021 SCC OnLine AP 4117<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                  1. Sandeep v. State of A.P.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                    In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                    (Before U. Durga Prasad Rao<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                      \n
                                    1. Sandeep \u2026 Petitioner;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                      Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                      State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By its Principal Secretary Industries and Commerce Department and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                      Writ Petition No. 25574 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                                      Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                      \n

                                      2021 SCC OnLine AP 4118<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                        \n
                                      1. Rajarajeswari Devi v. State of A.P.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                        In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                        (Before R. Raghunandan Rao<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                          \n
                                        1. Rajarajeswari Devi \u2026 Petitioner;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                          State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Endowments) Department and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                          Writ Petition No. 25576 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                          \n

                                          2021 SCC OnLine AP 4119<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                          Pokarna Ltd. v. State of A.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                          In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                          (Before U. Durga Prasad Rao<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                          Pokarna Ltd. rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, Gautam Chand Jain\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                          State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                          Writ Petition No. 25608 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                          \n

                                          2021 SCC OnLine AP 4120<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                          Pokarna Ltd. v. State of A.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                          In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                          (Before U. Durga Prasad Rao<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                          Pokarna Ltd., rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, Gautam Chand Jain\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                          State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Industries and Commerce (Mines) Department and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                          Writ Petition No. 25613 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                          \n

                                          2021 SCC OnLine AP 4121<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                          Pokarna Ltd. v. State of A.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                          In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                          (Before U. Durga Prasad Rao<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                          Pokarna Ltd., rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, Gautam Chand Jain\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                          State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Industries and Commerce (Mines) Department and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                          Writ Petition No. 25624 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                          \n

                                          2021 SCC OnLine AP 4122<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                          Kondru Srinu v. State of A.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                          In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                          (Before M. Satyanarayana Murthy<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                          Kondru Srinu\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                          State of A.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                          Writ Petition No. 25639 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                          \n

                                          2021 SCC OnLine AP 4123<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                          Agarwal Industries (P) Ltd. v. Eastern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Limited<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                          In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                          (Before C. Praveen Kumar<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                          Agarwal Industries Pvt. Limited, Represented by Mr. Amit Agarwal\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                          Eastern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Limited, Rept. by its Chairman and Managing Director and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                          Writ Petition No. 25650 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                          \n

                                          2021 SCC OnLine AP 4124<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                          Medarametla Venkata Sesha Reddy v. Chairman & Managing Director<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                          In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                          (Before C. Praveen Kumar<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                          Medarametla Venkata Sesha Reddy\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                          Chairman & Managing Director, APSPDCL and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                          Writ Petition No. 25684 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                          \n

                                          2021 SCC OnLine AP 4125<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                          Chagarlamudi Madhubabu v. State of A.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                          In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                          (Before A.V. Sesha Sai<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                          Chagarlamudi Madhubabu\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                          State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                          Writ Petition No. 25739 of 2021, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                          \n

                                          2021 SCC OnLine AP 4126<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                            \n
                                          1. Andalamma v. State of A.P.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                            In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                            (Before M. Atyanarayana Murthy<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              \n
                                            1. Andalamma<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Andhra Pradesh<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 30165 of 2018, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine AP 4127<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Chintha Jojivaram, Visakhapatnam v. Prl Secy, Revenue Dept.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before M. Atyanarayana Murthy<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Chintha Jojivaram, Visakhapatnam<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Prl Secy, Revenue Dept. and Others<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 32398 of 2016, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine AP 4128<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Vedicherla Venkata Chalapati v. State of A.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Andhra Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Kongara Vijaya Lakshmi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Vedicherla Venkata Chalapati<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Andhra Pradesh<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 43056 of 2015, Decided on November 3, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2014 SCC OnLine Bom 5111<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              I Pay Clearing Services (P) Ltd. v. ICICI Bank Ltd.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Roshan Dalvi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              I Pay Clearing Services Pvt. Ltd.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Plaintiff;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              ICICI Bank Ltd. and Another\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Defendants.<\/p>\n

                                              Notice of Motion No. 2325 of 2012 and Suit No. 1094 of 2012, Decided on May 8, 2014<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2018 SCC OnLine Bom 21216<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Chief Executive Officer v. Janardhan Appasaheb Badre<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Ravindra V. Ghuge<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2823 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              Chief Executive Officer and Another<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Janardhan Appasaheb Badre<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2824 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad Ahmednagar and Another<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Adinath Khanderao Pagire<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2825 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad Ahmednagar and Another<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Suleman Shaikh Khudbaksha Shaikh<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2826 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad Ahmednagar and Another<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Arjun Dada Ghadge<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2827 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad Ahmednagar and Another<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Bhausaheb Martand Landge<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2828 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad Ahmednagar and Another<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Anant Dashrath Bidve<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2831 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad Ahmednagar and Another<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Prabhawati Prabhakar Kaldante<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2832 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad Ahmednagar and Another<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Bhagwan Tribak Deokar<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2823 of 2018, Writ Petition No. 2824 of 2018, Writ Petition No. 2825 of 2018, Writ Petition No. 2826 of 2018, Writ Petition No. 2827 of 2018, Writ Petition No. 2828 of 2018, Writ Petition No. 2831 of 2018 and Writ Petition No. 2832 of 2018, Decided on March 27, 2018<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2018 SCC OnLine Bom 21217<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Chief Executive Officer v. Janardhan Appasaheb Barde<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Ravindra V. Ghuge<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Civil Application No. 11178 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              Chief Executive Officer and Another<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Janardhan Appasaheb Barde<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Review Application Stamp No. 25431 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Civil Application Stamp No. 25656 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Review Application Stamp No. 25655 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Civil Application Stamp No. 25664 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Review Application Stamp No. 25662 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Civil Appication Stamp No. 25651 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Review Application Stamp No. 25650 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Civil Application Stamp No. 25659 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Review Application Stamp No. 25658 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Civil Application Stamp No. 25649 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Review Application Stamp No. 25648 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Civil Application Stamp No. 25647 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Review Application Stamp No. 25646 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Civil Application Stamp No. 25653 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Review Application Stamp No. 25652 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              Civil Application No. 11178 of 2018, Review Application Stamp No. 25431 of 2018, Civil Application Stamp No. 25656 of 2018, Review Application Stamp No. 25655 of 2018, Civil Application Stamp No. 25664 of 2018, Review Application Stamp No. 25662 of 2018, Civil Appication Stamp No. 25651 of 2018, Review Application Stamp No. 25650 of 2018, Civil Application Stamp No. 25659 of 2018, Review Application Stamp No. 25658 of 2018, Civil Application Stamp No. 25649 of 2018, Review Application Stamp No. 25648 of 2018, Civil Application Stamp No. 25647 of 2018, Review Application Stamp No. 25646 of 2018, Civil Application Stamp No. 25653 of 2018 and Review Application Stamp No. 25652 of 2018, Decided on September 7, 2018<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6817<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Rushabh Outdoors v. State of Maharashtra<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Rushabh Outdoors and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra, Through Government Pleader and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 227 of 2017, Decided on March 19, 2021, [Judgment Reserved on: March 2, 2021]<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6818<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Satra Plaza Premises Co-Op. Society Ltd. v. Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 1374 of 2017<\/p>\n

                                              Satra Plaza Premises Co-Op. Society Ltd.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              And<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 1184 of 2017<\/p>\n

                                              Satra Properties (India) Ltd.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 1374 of 2017 and Writ Petition No. 1184 of 2017, Decided on March 30, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6819<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Instakart Services (P) Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Instakart Services Pvt. Ltd.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2565 of 2017, Decided on March 30, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6820<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Board of Trustees v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Board of Trustees of the Temples Charitable Institution and Funds of Gaud Saraswat Brahman Community of Mumbai and Another\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 393 of 2021, Decided on March 30, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6821<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Vikrant Bhimsen Chavan v. State of Maharashtra<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 448 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Vikrant Bhimsen Chavan\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              And<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 615 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Ashraf U. Shanu Pathan\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 448 of 2021 and Writ Petition No. 615 of 2021, Decided on March 16, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6822<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Kotia Nirman Cooperative Commercial Premises Society Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Kotia Nirman Cooperative Commercial Premises Society Ltd.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Applicant\/Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 546 of 2018, Interim Application No. 1 of 2020, Writ Petition No. 546 of 2018, Notice of Motion No. 608 of 2017 and Writ Petition No. 546 of 2018, Decided on March 16, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6823<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Shashank Raghuveer Patil v. State Election Commission<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Shashank Raghuveer Patil\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State Election Commission and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition Stamp No. 97481 of 2020, Decided on March 30, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6824<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Uttamkumar Shivnath Mallah v. Union of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Public Interest Litigation (L) No. 2688 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Uttamkumar Shivnath Mallah and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Union of India and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              And<\/p>\n

                                              Interim Application No. 443 of 2019<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Civil Application No. 84 of 2016<\/p>\n

                                              Zoru Darayus Bhathena\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Applicant;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              And<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (Lodg) No. 5983 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Union of India\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Interim Application (Lodg.) No. 6943 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (Lodg) No. 5983 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Zoru Darayus Bhathena\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Applicant.<\/p>\n

                                              In the matter between<\/p>\n

                                              Union of India\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Interim Application No. 262 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (Lodg) No. 5983 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Applicant.<\/p>\n

                                              In the matter between<\/p>\n

                                              Union of India\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Interim Application (L.) No. 6943 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (Lodg) No. 5983 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Zoru Darayus Bhathena\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Applicant.<\/p>\n

                                              In the matter between<\/p>\n

                                              Union of India\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              And<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (Lodg) No. 3523 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Union of India\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Interim Application (L.) No. 7188 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (Lodg) No. 3523 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Prema alias Dr. Kanta Motiram Patil and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Applicants;<\/p>\n

                                              In the matter between<\/p>\n

                                              Union of India\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              And<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 471 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Maheshkumar G. Garodia\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Interim Application (L.) No. 6941 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 471 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Zoru Darayus Bhathena\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Applicant.<\/p>\n

                                              In the matter between<\/p>\n

                                              Maheshkumar G. Garodia\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Interim Application No. 408 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 471 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Applicant;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Maheshkumar G. Garodia and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Public Interest Litigation (L) No. 2688 of 2021, Interim Application No. 443 of 2019, Civil Application No. 84 of 2016, Writ Petition (Lodg) No. 5983 of 2020, Interim Application (Lodg.) No. 6943 of 2021, Writ Petition (Lodg) No. 5983 of 2020, Interim Application No. 262 of 2021, Writ Petition (Lodg) No. 5983 of 2020, Interim Application (L.) No. 6943 of 2021, Writ Petition (Lodg) No. 5983 of 2020, Writ Petition (Lodg) No. 3523 of 2020, Interim Application (L.) No. 7188 of 2021, Writ Petition (Lodg) No. 3523 of 2020, Writ Petition No. 471 of 2021, Interim Application (L.) No. 6941 of 2021, Writ Petition No. 471 of 2021, Interim Application No. 408 of 2021 and Writ Petition No. 471 of 2021, Decided on March 19, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6825<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Rahul v. CEO<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Rahul\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              CEO, Vita Nagarparishad Vita and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Public Interest Litigation (St) No. 1390 of 2021, Decided on March 17, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6826<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Param Bir Singh v. State of Maharashtra<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Public Interest Litigation No. 6 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Param Bir Singh \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Interim Application St. No. 6356 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              (Not on Board, Taken on Board)<\/p>\n

                                              (For Intervention)<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Public Interest Litigation No. 6 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Vinod Anand Dubey\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Applicant.<\/p>\n

                                              In the Matter Between:<\/p>\n

                                              Param Bir Singh \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 1541 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              (Not on Board, Taken on Board)<\/p>\n

                                              Dr. Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil (Advocate)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Public Interest Litigation St. No. 6072 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              (Not on Board, Taken on Board)<\/p>\n

                                              Ghanshyam Upadhyay \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Public Interest Litigation St. No. 6166 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Mohan Prabhakar Bhide\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Public Interest Litigation No. 6 of 2021, Interim Application St. No. 6356 of 2021, Public Interest Litigation No. 6 of 2021, Writ Petition No. 1541 of 2021, Public Interest Litigation St. No. 6072 of 2021 and Public Interest Litigation St. No. 6166 of 2021, Decided on March 31, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6827<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Nitin Sardesai v. State of Maharashtra<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Public Interest Litigation No. 85 of 2013<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Public Interest Litigation No. 66 of 2013<\/p>\n

                                              Nitin Sardesai and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              And<\/p>\n

                                              Public Interest Litigation No. 38 of 2017<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Civil Application No. 24 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Civil Application No. 60 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Civil Application No. 54 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Civil Application No. 60 of 2019<\/p>\n

                                              Pravin Wategaonkar and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Chief Minister, State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              And<\/p>\n

                                              Public Interest Litigation No. 21 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Pravin P. Wategaonkar and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Chief Secretary, State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Public Interest Litigation No. 85 of 2013, Public Interest Litigation No. 66 of 2013, Public Interest Litigation No. 38 of 2017, Civil Application No. 24 of 2018, Civil Application No. 60 of 2018, Civil Application No. 54 of 2018, Civil Application No. 60 of 2019 and Public Interest Litigation No. 21 of 2020, Decided on March 17, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6828<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Union of India v. Kamala Laxman Waghela<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (L) No. 2958 of 2016<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 1796 of 2011<\/p>\n

                                              Union of India and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Kamala Laxman Waghela and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Interim Application (L) No. 3688 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 1796 of 2011<\/p>\n

                                              Union of India and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Applicants;<\/p>\n

                                              In the Matter Between:<\/p>\n

                                              Union of India and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Kamala Laxman Waghela and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (L) No. 2958 of 2016, Writ Petition No. 1796 of 2011 and Interim Application (L) No. 3688 of 2021, Decided on March 19, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6829<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Shree Laxmi Ashish IPCS Limited Co-Operative Society Limited v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (L) No. 3733 of 2019<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Interim Application (L) No. 7154 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Shree Laxmi Ashish IPCS Limited Co-Operative Society Limited and Another \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (L) No. 3754 of 2019<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Interim Application (L) No. 6626 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Shree Laxmi Krupa Ipcs Limited and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (L) No. 3768 of 2019<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Interim Application (L) No. 6606 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Shree Laxmi Ipcs Limited and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (L) No. 3733 of 2019, Interim Application (L) No. 7154 of 2021, Writ Petition (L) No. 3754 of 2019, Interim Application (L) No. 6626 of 2021, Writ Petition (L) No. 3768 of 2019 and Interim Application (L) No. 6606 of 2021, Decided on March 16, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6830<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Bhopal Singh Rathour v. State of Maharashtra<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Bhopal Singh Rathour and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (St) No. 7076 of 2021, Decided on March 18, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6831<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Nibir Jyoti Das v. State of Maharashtra<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (ST) No. 93476 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Nibir Jyoti Das\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (St) No. 93473 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Satyanidhi D. Dalal\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (St) No. 92812 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Vedantaa Institute of Academic Excellence Pvt. Ltd. and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 10158 of 2016<\/p>\n

                                              Mahatma Gandhi Vidyamandir and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Civil Application No. 2692 of 2016<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 10158 of 2016<\/p>\n

                                              Nihar Girish Kulkarni and Another\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Applicants;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Mahatma Gandhi Vidyamandir, Through Joint Secretary and Another\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Civil Application No. 24994 of 2016<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 10158 of 2016<\/p>\n

                                              Shivani Kishore Bele and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Applicants;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Mahatma Gandhi Vidyamandir, Through Joint Secretary and Another\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Civil Application No. 24995 of 2016<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 10158 of 2016<\/p>\n

                                              Tarang Anuj Gupta and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Applicants;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Mahatma Gandhi Vidyamandir, Through Joint Secretary and Another\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 10506 of 2016<\/p>\n

                                              Sinhgad Technical Education Society and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 10507 of 2016<\/p>\n

                                              Association of Managements of Unaided Private Medical and Dental Colleges \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (ST) No. 93476 of 2020, Writ Petition (St) No. 93473 of 2020, Writ Petition (St) No. 92812 of 2020, Writ Petition No. 10158 of 2016, Civil Application No. 2692 of 2016, Writ Petition No. 10158 of 2016, Civil Application No. 24994 of 2016 Writ Petition No. 10158 of 2016, Civil Application No. 24995 of 2016, Writ Petition No. 10158 of 2016, Writ Petition No. 10506 of 2016 and Writ Petition No. 10507 of 2016, Decided on March 19, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6832<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Tejas Balasaheb Suryawanshi v. State of Maharashtra<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Tejas Balasaheb Suryawanshi and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (St) No. 99090 of 2020, Decided on March 19, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6833<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Arizona Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (St.) No. 94600 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Arizona Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Interim Application No. 718 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              And<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (St.) No. 94600 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Vikashkumar Shantilalji Jain and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Applicants;<\/p>\n

                                              In the matter between<\/p>\n

                                              Arizona Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (St.) No. 94600 of 2020, Interim Application No. 718 of 2021 and Writ Petition (St.) No. 94600 of 2020, Decided on March 16, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6834<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Amarnath Builders and Developers v. Executive Engineer Building Permission and Development<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Amarnath Builders and Developers\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Executive Engineer Building Permission and Development and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (St) No. 95265 of 2020, Decided on March 16, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6835<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Baraiya Babu Deva v. Union of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 12867 of 2019<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Interim Application No. 1245 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Baraiya Babu Deva\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Applicant;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Union of India, Through The Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                              And<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 1486 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Bina Ranjitbhai Patel and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Union of India Through the Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 12867 of 2019, Interim Application No. 1245 of 2020 and Writ Petition No. 1486 of 2020, Decided on March 19, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6836<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Akhil Bharat Krishi Seva Sangh v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 1802 of 1994<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Chamber Summons No. 56 of 1995<\/p>\n

                                              Akhil Bharat Krishi Seva Sangh\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Public Interest Litigation No. 28 of 2010<\/p>\n

                                              And<\/p>\n

                                              Chamber Summons No. 111 of 2010<\/p>\n

                                              Viniyog Parivar Trust\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 1802 of 1994, Chamber Summons No. 56 of 1995, Public Interest Litigation No. 28 of 2010 and Chamber Summons No. 111 of 2010, Decided on March 18, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6837<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Manmohan Ranbirsen Mehra v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 55 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Show Cause Notice No. 3 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 55 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              Manmohan Ranbirsen Mehra\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Interim Application (L) No. 1331 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 55 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                              Mohammed Shoeb and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Applicants;<\/p>\n

                                              In the Matter Between:<\/p>\n

                                              Manmohan Ranbirsen Mehra\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              And<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (L) No. 6214 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Mohammed Shoeb and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 55 of 2018, Show Cause Notice No. 3 of 2020, Writ Petition No. 55 of 2018, Interim Application (L) No. 1331 of 2021, Writ Petition No. 55 of 2018 and Writ Petition (L) No. 6214 of 2021, Decided on March 30, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6838<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Gera Developments (P) Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 896 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Gera Developments Pvt. Ltd. and Another\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary (UD-1) and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Interim Application No. 768 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 896 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Rajendra Sunil Bodke\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Applicant.<\/p>\n

                                              In the Matter Between<\/p>\n

                                              Gera Developments Pvt. Ltd. and Another\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 896 of 2021, Interim Application No. 768 of 2021 and Writ Petition No. 896 of 2021, Decided on March 19, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6839<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Gera Developments (P) Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 896 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Gera Developments Pvt. Ltd. and Another\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Interim Application No. 768 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 896 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Rajendra Sunil Bodke\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Applicant.<\/p>\n

                                              In the Matter Between:<\/p>\n

                                              Gera Developments Pvt. Ltd. and Another\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Interim Application (St) No. 7282 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 896 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Prabhakar Dagadu Buchade through Poa Kapil Prabhkar Buchade\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Applicant.<\/p>\n

                                              In the Matter Between:<\/p>\n

                                              Gera Developments Pvt. Ltd. and Another\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 896 of 2021, Interim Application No. 768 of 2021, Writ Petition No. 896 of 2021, Interim Application (St) No. 7282 of 2021 and Writ Petition No. 896 of 2021, Decided on March 30, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6840<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Shivajinagar Vyayamshala Gramasta Mandal Bhairavgad v. Commissioner of Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Shivajinagar Vyayamshala Gramasta Mandal Bhairavgad, through Chairman, Bajirao S. Salunkhe and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Commissioner of Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (L) No. 257 of 2020, Decided on March 19, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6841<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Shirodkar Mandai Vyapari Welfare Association v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Dr. Shirodkar Mandai Vyapari Welfare Association\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (L) No. 7338 of 2021, Decided on March 30, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6842<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Citizencredit Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (L) No. 8080 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Citizencredit Cooperative Bank Ltd.\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Interim Application (L) No. 1591 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (L) No. 8080 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Nadeem Abdul Hafeez Sayyad\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Applicant.<\/p>\n

                                              In the matter between<\/p>\n

                                              Citizencredit Cooperative Bank Ltd.\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (L) No. 8080 of 2020, Interim Application (L) No. 1591 of 2021 and Writ Petition (L) No. 8080 of 2020, Decided on March 19, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6843<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Vijay Gajanan Jadhav v. Union of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Vijay Gajanan Jadhav\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Union of India and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (L) No. 8358 of 2021, Decided on March 30, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6844<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Shirodkar Mandai Vyapari Welfare Association v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Dr. Shirodkar Mandai Vyapari Welfare Association\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (L) No. 7338 of 2021, Decided on March 16, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6845<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Mohammed Yahya Yusuf Sayani v. State of Maharashtra<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Mohammed Yahya Yusuf Sayani\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (L) No. 8161 of 2021, Decided on March 30, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6846<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Alcon v. Pune Municipal Corporation<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (St) No. 3389 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Alcon through Partner Jagishprasad Agarwal\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Pune Municipal Corporation and Another\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 875 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Alcon Through Partner J. Agarwal\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Pune Municipal Corporation and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              And<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (St) No. 4850 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Alcon Group through Partner S.J. Agarwal\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Pune Municipal Corporation and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (St) No. 3389 of 2020, Writ Petition No. 875 of 2021 and Writ Petition (St) No. 4850 of 2020, Decided on March 30, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6847<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Nagar Yuwak Shikshan Sanstha Airoli v. Municipal Corporation of Thane<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Nagar Yuwak Shikshan Sanstha Airoli\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Municipal Corporation of Thane and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (St) No. 3526 of 2021, Decided on March 17, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6848<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Bhikaji Anant Bendke v. State of Maharashtra<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Bhikaji Anant Bendke\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (St) No. 3656 of 2021, Decided on March 30, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6849<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              A.M. Ramchandani v. Thane Municipal Corporation<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              A.M. Ramchandani\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Thane Municipal Corporation and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (St) No. 4044 of 2021, Decided on March 17, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Bom 6850<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Chandradevi Sureshkumar Sisodiya v. Vasai Virar City Municipal Corporation<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Dipankar Datta, C.J. and G.S. Kulkarni, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Chandradevi Sureshkumar Sisodiya and Another\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Vasai Virar City Municipal Corporation and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (St) No. 6502 of 2021, Decided on March 19, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Bom 50<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Laxmikant L. Sajji v. State of Goa<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay at Goa<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Sadhana S. Jadhav and Manish Pitale, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2206 of 2021(F)<\/p>\n

                                              Laxmikant L. Sajji\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Goa and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2561 of 2021 (F)<\/p>\n

                                              Pravin Mohan Asolkar\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Goa and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2574 of 2021 (F)<\/p>\n

                                              Shrikant Dhondu Govekar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Goa and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2583 of 2021 (F)<\/p>\n

                                              Vinod Keshav Shirvoikar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Goa and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2596 of 2021 (F)<\/p>\n

                                              Siddhesh Vaman Salgaonkar\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Goa and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2597 of 2021 (F)<\/p>\n

                                              Namdev Fati Dabhale\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2598 of 2021 (F)<\/p>\n

                                              Roshni Rupesh Mahale \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2599 of 2021 (F)<\/p>\n

                                              Sujata Sadashiv Parab\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2210 of 2021 (F)<\/p>\n

                                              Shamal Naik\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2600 of 2021 (F)<\/p>\n

                                              Reshma Narayan Paikakode\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2211 of 2021 (F)<\/p>\n

                                              Ranjit R. Bile\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2601 of 2021 (F)<\/p>\n

                                              Trupti Siddhesh Salgaonkar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2602 of 2021 (F)<\/p>\n

                                              Surekha Vilas Bandkar \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2212 of 2021 (F)<\/p>\n

                                              Bhagwan Vasant Kerkar Faras \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2603 of 2021 (F)<\/p>\n

                                              Sunil Manohar Morje\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2213 of 2021 (F)<\/p>\n

                                              Sindhu S. Hadkonkar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2214 of 2021 (F)<\/p>\n

                                              Santosh Sitaram Harijan\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2604 of 2021 (F)<\/p>\n

                                              Deelip Madhukar Naik \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2215 of 2021 (F)<\/p>\n

                                              Kavita K. Velip\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2605 of 2021 (F)<\/p>\n

                                              Babani Manohar Asolkar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2606 of 2021 (F)<\/p>\n

                                              Sudip Babi Thakur\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2216 of 2021 (F)<\/p>\n

                                              Gauri G. Jalmi\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2217 of 2021 (F)<\/p>\n

                                              Savita R. Kankonkar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2607 of 2021 (F)<\/p>\n

                                              Vishwanath Shankar Gad\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2608 of 2021 (F)<\/p>\n

                                              Kashinath Govind Parab\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 2206 of 2021(F) With Writ Petition No. 2561 of 2021 (F) With Writ Petition No. 2574 of 2021 (F) With Writ Petition No. 2583 of 2021 (F) With Writ Petition No. 2596 of 2021 (F) With Writ Petition No. 2597 of 2021 (F) With Writ Petition No. 2598 of 2021 (F) With Writ Petition No. 2599 of 2021 (F) With Writ Petition No. 2210 of 2021 (F) With Writ Petition No. 2600 of 2021 (F) With Writ Petition No. 2211 of 2021 (F) With Writ Petition No. 2601 of 2021 (F) With Writ Petition No. 2602 of 2021 (F) With Writ Petition No. 2212 of 2021 (F) With Writ Petition No. 2603 of 2021 (F) With Writ Petition No. 2213 of 2021 (F) With Writ Petition No. 2214 of 2021 (F) With Writ Petition No. 2604 of 2021 (F) With Writ Petition No. 2215 of 2021 (F) With Writ Petition No. 2605 of 2021 (F) With Writ Petition No. 2606 of 2021 (F) With Writ Petition No. 2216 of 2021 (F) With Writ Petition No. 2217 of 2021 (F) With Writ Petition No. 2607 of 2021 (F) With Writ Petition No. 2608 of 2021 (F), Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Bom 51<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Manohar Chowgule v. Gauri D. Honavarkar<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay at Goa<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Manish Pitale<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Manohar Chowgule and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Gauri D. Honavarkar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 513 of 2019, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Bom 52<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Parvathi Venkatesh v. State of Maharashtra<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before R.D. Dhanuka<\/strong> and Abhay Ahuja, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                              Dr. (Mrs.) Parvathi Venkatesh \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra Through the Principal Secretary, Department of Higher & Technical Education and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 691 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022, [Reserved on: 26th<\/sup> October, 2021]<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Bom 53<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Kishor Gangadhar Patil v. State of Maharashtra<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Bharati Dangre<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 14991 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Kishor Gangadhar Patil \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Cooperative and Textile Minister and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 14993 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Prabhakar Karbhari Kamble\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Cooperative and Textile Minister and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 14998 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Sarjerao Kisanrao Kapse\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Cooperative and Textile Minister and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 14991 of 2021, Writ Petition No. 14993 of 2021 and Writ Petition No. 14998 of 2021, Decided on January 3, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Bom 54<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra v. XYZ<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before S.S. Shinde<\/strong> and S.P. Tavade, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                              State of Maharashtra\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant (Orig. Complainant);<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              XYZ\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent (Orig. Accused).<\/p>\n

                                              Criminal Appeal No. 475 of 2001, Decided on January 10, 2022, [Reserved on: 8th<\/sup> December, 2021]<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Bom 55<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Keshar Gopal Singh Thakur<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before N.J. Jamadar<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Keshar Gopal Singh Thakur and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              First Appeal No. 102 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022, [Reserved for Order on: 16th<\/sup> November 2021]<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Bom 56<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Angre Port (P) Ltd. v. TAG 15 (IMO. 9705550)<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before B.P. Colabawalla<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Angre Port Private Ltd. \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Applicant\/Plaintiff;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              TAG 15 (IMO. 9705550) and Another \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Defendants.<\/p>\n

                                              Interim Application (L) No. 112 of 2021 and Commercial Admiralty Suit (L) No. 4 of 2020, Decided on January 3, 2022, [Reserved on: December 20, 2021]<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Bom 57<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Vithoba Gaonkar v. State of Goa<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay at Goa<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Sadhana S. Jadhav<\/strong> and Manish Pitale, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                              Vithoba Gaonkar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Goa, Thr. the Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 1734 of 2021 (F), Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Bom 58<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Vodafone Idea Ltd. v. CIT<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before K.R. Shriram<\/strong> and R.N. Laddha, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                              Vodafone Idea Ltd.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition No. 3560 of 2019, Decided on January 3, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Bom 59<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Maha Active Engineers India (P) Ltd. v. Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Bombay<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before S.J. Kathawalla and Milind N. Jadhav, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                              Maha Active Engineers India Pvt. Ltd.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd. (through its Chairman and Managing Director) and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (L) No. 21635 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022, [Reserved on: 28th<\/sup> October, 2021]<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Cal 3169<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Knight Riders Sports (P) Ltd. v. Adjudicating Authority<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Calcutta<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Knight Riders Sports Private Limited<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Adjudicating Authority (PMLA) and Others<\/p>\n

                                              W.P.A. No. 4845 of 2021, Decided on April 9, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Cal 3168<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Nodal Officer v. Das Auto Centre<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Calcutta<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before T.S. Sivagnanam<\/strong> and Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                              M.A.T. 552 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              IA No. CAN 1 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              IA No. CAN 2 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Nodal Officer<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Das Auto Centre<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              M.A.T 677 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              IA No. CAN 1 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Commissioner<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Joydev Ghosh and Others<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              M.A.T. 566 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Nodal Officer<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Rudra Autoparts Distributor and Others<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              M.A.T. 567 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Principal Commissioner of GST<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Excel Composites Pvt. Ltd. and Others<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              M.A.T. 528 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020 (Old CAN 5765 of 2020)<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020 (Old CAN 5769 of 2020)<\/p>\n

                                              Nodal Officer<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Sony Hydraulics Pvt. Ltd. and Others<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              M.A.T. 531 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020 (Old CAN 5822 of 2020)<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020 (Old CAN 5824 of 2020)<\/p>\n

                                              Commissioner of CGST & Central Tax<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Rishi Graphics Pvt. Ltd. and Others<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              M.A.T. 534 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020 (Old CAN 5829 of 2020)<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020 (Old CAN 5832 of 2020)<\/p>\n

                                              Commissioner of CGST, West Bengal CGST & CX Bidhannagar Division<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Vertiv Engergy Pvt. Ltd. and Others<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              M.A.T. 535 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020 (Old CAN 5837 of 2020)<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020 (Old CAN 5840 of 2020)<\/p>\n

                                              Commissioner of CGST<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Heera Metals Pvt. Ltd. and Others<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              M.A.T. 543 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Union of India<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              OSL Prestige Pvt. Ltd. and Others<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              M.A.T. 544 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Deputy Commissioner (Technical)<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Chandras Chemical Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. and Others<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              M.A.T. 546 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Commissioner of CGST and Central Tax<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Print Sales Company and Others<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              M.A.T. 549 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Nodal Officer<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Sanajy Kr. Karn and Others<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              M.A.T. 550 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Union of India<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Amitava Biswas and Others<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              M.A.T. 551 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Union of India<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Ray Indra Chandra and Others<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              M.A.T. 558 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Principal Commissioner<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Hazemag India Pvt. Ltd. and Others<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              M.A.T. 568 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Union of India<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Amit Tibrewal and Others<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              M.A.T. 573 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Nodal Officer<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Sumita Ghosh and Others<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              M.A.T. 575 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Union of India<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Krishna Hi-tech Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and Others<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              M.A.T. 576 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Union of India<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Rene Impex Pvt. Ltd. and Others<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              M.A.T. 526 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020 (Old CAN 5758 of 2020)<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020 (Old CAN 5760 of 2020)<\/p>\n

                                              Commissioner<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Indo East Corporation Pvt. Ltd. and Others<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              M.A.T. 578 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. CAN 3 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Union of India<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Mrinal Ghosh and Others<\/p>\n

                                              M.A.T. 552 of 2020, IA No. CAN 1 of 2020, IA No. CAN 2 of 2020, M.A.T 677 of 2020, IA No. CAN 1 of 2020, M.A.T. 566 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020, M.A.T. 567 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020, M.A.T. 528 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020, (Old CAN 5765 of 2020), I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020, (Old CAN 5769 of 2020), M.A.T. 531 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020, (Old CAN 5822 of 2020), I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020, (Old CAN 5824 of 2020), M.A.T. 534 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020, (Old CAN 5829 of 2020), I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020, (Old CAN 5832 of 2020), M.A.T. 535 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020, (Old CAN 5837 of 2020), I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020, (Old CAN 5840 of 2020), M.A.T. 543 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020, M.A.T. 544 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020, M.A.T. 546 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020, M.A.T. 549 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020, M.A.T. 550 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020, M.A.T. 551 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020, M.A.T. 558 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020, M.A.T. 568 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020, M.A.T. 573 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020, M.A.T. 575 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020, M.A.T. 576 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020, M.A.T. 526 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020, (Old CAN 5758 of 2020), I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020, (Old CAN 5760 of 2020), M.A.T. 578 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2020, I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2020 and I.A. No. CAN 3 of 2020, Decided on December 14, 2021, [Heard on: 14.12.2021]<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Cal 118<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Supratik Ghosh v. State of W.B.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Calcutta<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Ananda Kumar Mukherjee<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Supratik Ghosh<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of West Bengal and Another<\/p>\n

                                              C.R.R. No. 188 of 2020, Decided on January 10, 2022, [Heard on: 08.12.2021]<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Cal 119<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Rustom Khan v. State of W.B.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Calcutta<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Prakash Shrivastava<\/strong>, C.J. and Kesang Doma Bhutia, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Rustom Khan\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of West Bengal and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              MAT 1192 of 2021 With CAN 1 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022, [Reserved on: 04.01.2022]<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Cal 120<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Sanjit Kumar Paul v. Bhaskar Paul<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Calcutta<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Prakash Shrivastava<\/strong>, C.J. and Kesang Doma Bhutia, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Sanjit Kumar Paul\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Bhaskar Paul and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              MAT 1337 of 2021 With IA No : CAN 1 of 2021 CAN 2 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022, [Reserved on: 05.01.2022]<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Cal 121<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Sumana Layek v. State of W.B.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Calcutta<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Abhijit Gangopadhyay<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Sumana Layek<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of West Bengal and Others<\/p>\n

                                              WPA 5287 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022, [Heard on: 24.11.2021 and 03.01.2022]<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Cal 122<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Sony Pictures Networks India (P) Ltd. v. National Company Law Tribunal<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Calcutta<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Rajasekhar Mantha<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Sony Pictures Networks India Private Limited<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              National Company Law Tribunal and Others<\/p>\n

                                              WPO 1767 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2019 SCC OnLine Chh 144<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Shiris Kumar Gupta v. Keshav Prasad Sinha<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Prashant Kumar Mishra and Parth Prateem Sahu<\/strong>, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                              Shiris Kumar Gupta\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Keshav Prasad Sinha and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              First Appeal No. 169 of 2014, Decided on June 21, 2019, [Judgment Reserved on: 11.04.2019]<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Chh 22<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Balduram Sahu v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Rajani Dubey<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Balduram Sahu through his Legal Heir, Sheelmani Prasad\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Madhya Pradesh, Through Police Station\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                              CRA No. 2212 of 1998, Decided on January 10, 2022, [Order Reserved on: 01\/10\/2021]<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Chh 23<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Shakuntala Mishra v. State of Chhattisgarh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Rajani Dubey<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Shakuntala Mishra\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Chhattisgarh\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                              CRA No. 566 of 2001, Decided on January 10, 2022, [Order Reserved on: 15\/09\/2021]<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Chh 24<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Siyaram Kurre v. State of Chhattisgarh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Narendra Kumar Vyas<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              WPCR No. 674 of 2019<\/p>\n

                                              Siyaram Kurre and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary to the Government of Chhattisgarh : Department of Revenue and Disaster Management and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              WPCR No. 979 of 2019<\/p>\n

                                              Neelima Belsaria and Another \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Station House Officer (SHO) and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              WPCR No. 1031 of 2019<\/p>\n

                                              Bali Nagwanshi\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Revenue and Disaster Management and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              WPCR No. 1096 of 2019<\/p>\n

                                              Koushal Kumar Thakur\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Department of Revenue and Disaster Management and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              WPCR No. 751 of 2019<\/p>\n

                                              Neelima Belsaria\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary to the Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Revenue and Disaster Management and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              WPCR No. 828 of 2019<\/p>\n

                                              Suresh B. Matali and Another\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary to the Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Revenue and Disaster Management and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              WPC No. 3355 of 2019<\/p>\n

                                              Bastar Railway Private Limited, through its Executive Director\/CEO\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary, Department of Revenue and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              And<\/p>\n

                                              WPCR No. 1037 of 2019<\/p>\n

                                              Hira Lal Nayak\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Revenue and Disaster Management and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              WPCR No. 674 of 2019, WPCR No. 979 of 2019, WPCR No. 1031 of 2019, WPCR No. 1096 of 2019, WPCR No. 751 of 2019, WPCR No. 828 of 2019, WPC No. 3355 of 2019 and WPCR No. 1037 of 2019, Decided on January 10, 2022, [Reserved on: 16.11.2021]<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Chh 25<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Royden Harold Buthello v. State of Chhattisgarh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Narendra Kumar Vyas<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Royden Harold Buthello and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Home and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              WPCR No. 686 of 2020, Decided on January 10, 2022, [Reserved on: 17-11-2021]<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Chh 26<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Aman Kumar Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Narendra Kumar Vyas<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              WPCR No. 88 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Aman Kumar Singh\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              WPCR No. 154 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Yasmin Singh\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              And<\/p>\n

                                              WPCR No. 206 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Aman Kumar Singh and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Chhattisgarh, Through its Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              WPCR No. 88 of 2020, WPCR No. 154 of 2020 and WPCR No. 206 of 2020, Decided on January 10, 2022, [Reserved on: 04.10.2021]<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              1982 SCC OnLine Del 420<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Amba Lal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. v. Sara Pharmaceuticals<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Delhi<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Gian Chand Jain<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Amba Lal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd.<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Sara Pharmaceuticals and Others<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. 3465 of 1981 in 1133\/81, Decided on April 8, 1982<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Del 5577<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Directorate of Enforcement v. Vikas WSP Ltd.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before D.N. Patel, C.J. and Jyoti Singh, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Directorate of Enforcement and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellants;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Vikas WSP Ltd. and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              LPA 362\/2020 and CM APPL.30675\/2020, Decided on January 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Del 75<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Hero Fincorp Limited v. S.R. Store<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Suresh Kumar Kait<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Hero Fincorp Limited\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              S.R. Store and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              ARB.P. 594\/2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Del 76<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Sumer Singh Salkan v. Vikram Singh Mann<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Amit Bansal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Sumer Singh Salkan\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Vikram Singh Mann and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              CM(M) 37\/2019, Decided on January 10, 2022, [Reserved on: 16th<\/sup> December, 2021]<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Del 77<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Indian Oil Corporation Limited v. All India Petroleum Dealers Association<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before D.N. Patel<\/strong>, C.J. and Jyoti Singh, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              LPA 24\/2021 & CM APPL. 1843\/2021 (stay)<\/p>\n

                                              Indian Oil Corporation Limited and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellants;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              All India Petroleum Dealers Association Registered and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              LPA 30\/2021& CM APPL. 2389\/2021 (stay)<\/p>\n

                                              Indian Oil Corporation Limited and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellants;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              All Haryana Petroleum Dealers Association Registered and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              With<\/p>\n

                                              LPA 31\/2021& CM APPL. 2392\/2021 & 12432\/2021<\/p>\n

                                              Indian Oil Corporation Limited and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellants;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Bihar Petroleum Dealers Association and Another \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              LPA 24\/2021, CM APPL. 1843\/2021 (stay), LPA 30\/2021, CM APPL. 2389\/2021 (stay), LPA 31\/2021, CM APPL. 2392\/2021 and 12432\/2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Del 78<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Future Retail Ltd. v. Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Delhi<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before D.N. Patel, C.J. and Jyoti Singh, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              LPA 6\/2022<\/p>\n

                                              Future Retail Ltd.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Amazon. Com NV Investment Holdings LLC and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              And<\/p>\n

                                              LPA 7\/2022<\/p>\n

                                              Future Coupons Private Limited and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellants;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Amazon. Com NV Investment Holdings LLC and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              LPA 6\/2022 and LPA 7\/2022, Decided on January 5, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Del 79<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Union of India v. APS Structures (P) Ltd.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vibhu Bakhru<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Union of India\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              APS Structures Pvt. Ltd.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                              O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 2\/2022 & IA No. 198\/2022, Decided on January 6, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Del 80<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Atul Dhariya v. Union of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Manmohan and Navin Chawla<\/strong>, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                              Atul Dhariya\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Union of India and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              W.P.(C) 13697\/2021, Decided on January 6, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Del 81<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Aradhya v. State (NCT of Delhi)<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Sanjeev Sachdeva<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Aradhya\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Transport Department Govt. of NCT of Delhi\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                              W.P.(C) 175\/2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Del 82<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Sheena Overseas (P) Ltd. v. Assets Care & Reconstruction Enterprise Ltd.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Manmohan and Navin Chawla<\/strong>, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                              Sheena Overseas Pvt. Ltd. and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Assets Care & Reconstruction Enterprise Ltd. (ACRE)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                              W.P.(C) 2826\/2017 & CM APPLs. 35339\/2017, 29530\/2018, 32209\/2020, 21902\/2021, 46752\/2021, Decided on January 5, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Del 83<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Pulate Rajesh Sopan v. Union of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Manmohan and Navin Chawla<\/strong>, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                              Pulate Rajesh Sopan\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Union of India and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              W.P.(C) 295\/2022 & CM No. 837\/2022, Decided on January 7, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2011 SCC OnLine SC 1591<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Govt. of A.P. v. Obulapuram Minig.Co.P. Ltd.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the Supreme Court of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before S.H. Kapadia, C.J. and Aftab Alam and K.S.P. Radhakrishnan, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                              Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) Nos. 7366-7367\/2010<\/p>\n

                                              (From the judgment and order dated 26\/02\/2010 in WP No. 25910\/2009 and WP No. 26083\/2009 of the High Court of A.P. at Hyderabad)<\/p>\n

                                              Govt. of A.P. and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner(s);<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Obulapuram Minig.Co.P. Ltd. and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent(s).<\/p>\n

                                              (With appln(s) for exemption from filing c\/c of the impugned judgment, directions, impleadment, prayer for interim relief and office report)<\/p>\n

                                              With S.L.P. (C) Nos. 32690-32691\/2010<\/p>\n

                                              (With prayer for interim relief and office report)<\/p>\n

                                              W.P. (Crl.) No. 66 of 2010<\/p>\n

                                              (With appln(s) for directions and office report)<\/p>\n

                                              S.L.P. (C) Nos. 17064-17065 of 2010<\/p>\n

                                              (With prayer for interim relief and office report)<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (C) No. 562 of 2009<\/p>\n

                                              (With appln(s) for ex-parte stay, permission to file additional documents and exemption from filing O.T.)<\/p>\n

                                              S.L.P. (C) No\u2026\u2026\u2026..\/2010 (CC 16829\/2010)<\/p>\n

                                              (With appln(s) for c\/delay in filing SLP and office report)<\/p>\n

                                              S.L.P. (C) No\u2026\u2026\u2026.\/2010 (CC 16830\/2010)<\/p>\n

                                              (With appln(s) for c\/delay in filing SLP and office report)<\/p>\n

                                              [For directions]<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (C) No. 411 of 2010<\/p>\n

                                              (With appln.(s) for directions and office report)<\/p>\n

                                              S.L.P. (C) No. 353 of 2011<\/p>\n

                                              (With prayer for interim relief and office report)<\/p>\n

                                              Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) Nos. 7366-7367\/2010, WP No. 25910\/2009, WP No. 26083\/2009, S.L.P. (C) Nos. 32690-32691\/2010, W.P. (Crl.) No. 66 of 2010, S.L.P. (C) Nos. 17064-17065 of 2010, Writ Petition (C) No. 562 of 2009, S.L.P. (C) No\u2026\u2026\u2026..\/2010 (CC 16829\/2010), S.L.P. (C) No\u2026\u2026\u2026.\/2010 (CC 16830\/2010), Writ Petition (C) No. 411 of 2010 and S.L.P. (C) No. 353 of 2011, Decided on February 25, 2011<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2019 SCC OnLine SC 2108<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Union of India v. Virendra Dutt Gyani<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the Supreme Court of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Ranjan Gogoi, C.J. and Deepak Gupta and Aniruddha Bose, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                              Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 18133\/2019<\/p>\n

                                              Union of India and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Virendra Dutt Gyani\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                              (For Admission and I.R. and IA No. 84980\/2019-Condonation of Delay in Filing and IA No. 84981\/2019-Exemption From Filing C\/C of the Impugned Judgment)<\/p>\n

                                              Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 18133\/2019, WPC No. 4224\/2016, IA No. 84980\/2019 and IA No. 84981\/2019, Decided on July 8, 2019<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine SC 1331<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Delhi State GST Department v. Aagman Services (P) Ltd.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the Supreme Court of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before D.Y. Chandrachud, Indira Banerjee and Sanjiv Khanna, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                              Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 22386\/2020<\/p>\n

                                              Nodal Officer Delhi State GST Department\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner(s);<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Aagman Services Private Limited and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent(s).<\/p>\n

                                              (With appln.(s) for I.R. and IA No. 117253\/2020-Condonation of Delay in Filing and IA No. 117254\/2020-Exemption From Filing C\/C of the Impugned Judgment)<\/p>\n

                                              Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 22386\/2020, WPC No. 1329\/2019, IA No. 117253\/2020 and IA No. 117254\/2020, Decided on January 7, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine SC 42<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Lawyers Voice v. State of Punjab<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the Supreme Court of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before N.V. Ramana, C.J. and Surya Kant and Hima Kohli, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                              Lawyers Voice\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner(s);<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Punjab and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent(s).<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (Civil) No. 13 of 2022, Decided on January 12, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine SC 43<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Vasudha Sethi v. Kiran V. Bhaskar<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the Supreme Court of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Ajay Rastogi and Abhay S. Oka<\/strong>, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                              Vasudha Sethi and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellants;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Kiran V. Bhaskar and Another \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Criminal Appeal No. 82 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 7129 of 2021), Decided on January 12, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine SC 44<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Phoenix ARC (P) Ltd. v. Vishwa Bharati Vidya Mandir<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the Supreme Court of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before M.R. Shah<\/strong> and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                              Phoenix ARC Private Limited \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant(s);<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Vishwa Bharati Vidya Mandir and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent(s).<\/p>\n

                                              Civil Appeal Nos. 257-259 of 2022, Decided on January 12, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine SC 39<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Surender Mohan v. State of Haryana<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the Supreme Court of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Uday U. Lalit and Ajay Rastogi, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                              Review Petition (Civil) No. 1407 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Spcial Leave Petition (Civil) D. No. 6715 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Surender Mohan \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Haryana and Another \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Review Petition (Civil) No. 1407 of 2021 and Spcial Leave Petition (Civil) D. No. 6715 of 2020, Decided on January 11, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine SC 40<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Sunil Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the Supreme Court of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Uday U. Lalit and Ajay Rastogi, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                              Review Petition (Civil) No. of 2022<\/p>\n

                                              (D. No. 26389 of 2021)<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 11323 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Sunil Kumar Yadav and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Uttar Pradesh and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Review Petition (Civil) No. of 2022 (D. No. 26389 of 2021) and Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 11323 of 2021, Decided on January 11, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine SC 41<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Abhinitam Upadhyay v. Allahabad High Court<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the Supreme Court of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Uday U. Lalit and Ajay Rastogi, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                              Review Petition (Civil) No. 1353 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              In<\/p>\n

                                              Spcial Leave Petition (Civil) No. 849 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Abhinitam Upadhyay\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Hon’ble Allahabad High Court through its Registrar General\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                              Review Petition (Civil) No. 1353 of 2021 and Spcial Leave Petition (Civil) No. 849 of 2021, Decided on January 11, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine SC 38<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              N.C.C.F. Employees Union v. Union of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the Supreme Court of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Uday U. Lalit and S. Ravindra Bhat, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (Civil) No. 512 of 2017<\/p>\n

                                              N.C.C.F. Employees Union (Regd) (Recognized) and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Union of India and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              And<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1221 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Sanjay Singh\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Union of India and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Petition (Civil) No. 512 of 2017 and Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1221 of 2020, Decided on January 7, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine SC 37<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Uma Priyadarshini S. v. Suchith K. Nair<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the Supreme Court of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Indira Banerjee and J.K. Maheshwari, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                              Uma Priyadarshini S.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant(s);<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Suchith K. Nair\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent(s).<\/p>\n

                                              Civil Appeal Nos. 204-206 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 33511-33513\/2018), Decided on January 6, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Gau 23<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Surendra Nath Dihingia v. State of Assam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gauhati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Devashis Baruah<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Surendra Nath Dihingia<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Assam, Rep. by the Commissioner and Secretary to the Govt. of Assam and Others<\/p>\n

                                              WP(C)\/128\/2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Gau 24<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Ali Hussain v. State of Assam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gauhati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Achintya Malla Bujor Barua<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Ali Hussain<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Assam, Represented by the Commissioner and Secretary to the Govt. of Assam and Others<\/p>\n

                                              WP(C)\/131\/2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Gau 25<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              SSK Exports Limited v. State of Assam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gauhati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Devashis Baruah<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              SSK Exports Limited, Represented by one of Its Director Ashok Trivedi<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Assam, Represented by the Commissioner and Secretary to the Govt. of Assam and Others<\/p>\n

                                              WP(C)\/158\/2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Gau 26<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Nripendra Kr. Deka v. State of Assam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gauhati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Sanjay Kumar Medhi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Nripendra Kr. Deka<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Assam, Rep. by the Secy. to the Govt. of Assam and Others<\/p>\n

                                              WP(C)\/2368\/2020, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Gau 27<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Mainul Haque v. State of Assam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gauhati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Devashis Baruah<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Mainul Haque<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Assam, Rep. by Secy. to the Govt. of Assam and Others<\/p>\n

                                              WP(C)\/2907\/2019, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Gau 28<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Faizul Haque Barbhuiya v. Union of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gauhati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Devashis Baruah<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Faizul Haque Barbhuiya<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, Department of Surface Transport and Others<\/p>\n

                                              WP(C)\/3472\/2020, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Gau 29<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Romjan Ali v. State of Assam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gauhati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Devashis Baruah<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Romjan Ali<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Assam, Rep. by the Chief Secy. to the Govt. of Assam and Others<\/p>\n

                                              WP(C)\/3591\/2020, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Gau 30<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Golap Sarma v. Union of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gauhati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Kalyan Rai Surana<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              WP(C)\/3901\/2020<\/p>\n

                                              Golap Sarma<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Union of India, Rep. by the Secy. to the Govt. of India and Others<\/p>\n

                                              And<\/p>\n

                                              WP(C)\/3911\/2020<\/p>\n

                                              Ajit Singh<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Union of India, Rep. by the Secy. to the Govt. of India and Others<\/p>\n

                                              WP(C)\/3901\/2020 and WP(C)\/3911\/2020, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Gau 31<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Dilip Das v. State of Assam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gauhati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Kalyan Rai Surana<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Dilip Das<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Assam, Represented by the Commissioner and Secy. to the Govt. of Assam and Others<\/p>\n

                                              WP(C)\/4092\/2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Gau 32<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Salma Sultana v. State of Assam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gauhati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Manash Ranjan Pathak<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Salma Sultana<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Assam, Rep. by the Comm. and Secy. to the Govt. of Assam and Others<\/p>\n

                                              WP(C)\/4146\/2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Gau 33<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Saurabh Kumar Kalita v. SBI<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gauhati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Devashis Baruah<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Saurabh Kumar Kalita<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State Bank of India, Represented by Chief General Manager and Others<\/p>\n

                                              WP(C)\/4175\/2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Gau 34<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Mrinal Kalita v. State of Assam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gauhati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Achintya Malla Bujor Barua<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Mrinal Kalita<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Assam, Represented by the Commissiner and Secretary, Education Department and Others<\/p>\n

                                              WP(C)\/4297\/2020, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Gau 35<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Parvez Sultan Mazumdar v. State of Assam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gauhati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Manash Ranjan Pathak<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Parvez Sultan Mazumdar<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Assam, to be Represented by the Commissioner and Secretary to the Govt. of Assam and Others<\/p>\n

                                              WP(C)\/4801\/2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Gau 36<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Salima Khatun Barbhuiya v. State of Assam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gauhati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Kalyan Rai Surana<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Salima Khatun Barbhuiya and Others<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Assam, Rep. by the Comm. and Secy. to the Govt. of Assam and Others<\/p>\n

                                              WP(C)\/5119\/2020, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Gau 37<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Anowar Hussain Mughal v. State of Assam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gauhati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Achintya Malla Bujor Barua<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Anowar Hussain Mughal and Others<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Assam, Rep. by the Comm. and Secy. to the Govt. of Assam and Others<\/p>\n

                                              WP(C)\/5295\/2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Gau 38<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Pramila Medhi v. State of Assam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gauhati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Achintya Malla Bujor Barua<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Pramila Medhi<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Assam, Rep. by Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Elementary Education Deptt. and Others<\/p>\n

                                              WP(C)\/5530\/2020, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Gau 39<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Manorama Rai v. State of Assam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gauhati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Manash Ranjan Pathak<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Manorama Rai<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Assam, Represented by the Commissioner and Secretary to the Government of Assam and Others<\/p>\n

                                              WP(C)\/5555\/2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Gau 40<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Nargis Sultana Laskar v. State of Assam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gauhati<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Achintya Malla Bujor Barua<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Nargis Sultana Laskar<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Assam, Rep. by the Comm. and Secy. to the Govt. of Assam and Others<\/p>\n

                                              WP(C)\/85\/2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2020 SCC OnLine Guj 3438<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Krishna Oleo Chemical India Limited v. Union of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before J.B. Pardiwala and Bhargav D. Karia<\/strong>, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                              Krishna Oleo Chemical India Limited<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Union of India<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Civil Application No. 12297 of 2019, Decided on February 26, 2020<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2153<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Dhansingbhai Vestabhai Rathva v. Chandubhai Manibhai Parmar<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Dhansingbhai Vestabhai Rathva<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Chandubhai Manibhai Parmar<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Criminal Misc. Application No. 9888 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2154<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Kanubhai Chhotabhai Parmar v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Kanubhai Chhotabhai Parmar and Others<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat and Others<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Criminal Misc. Application No. 9022 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2155<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Mohammed Riyaz Harunbhai Chauhan v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Mohammed Riyaz Harunbhai Chauhan<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Criminal Misc. Application No. 9844 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2156<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Dilipbhai Dhanjibhai Makwana v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Dilipbhai Dhanjibhai Makwana<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 2164 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2157<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Becharlal Velabhai Damor v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Becharlal Velabhai Damor<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat and Others<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 3015 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2158<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Pramod Nagendra Chaudhary v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Pramod Nagendra Chaudhary<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 3323 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2159<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Bhaylabhai Narsubhai Damor v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Bhaylabhai Narsubhai Damor<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 3440 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2160<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Kadi Sarva Vishwavidhyalay v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Kadi Sarva Vishwavidhyalay Thro Pankajkumar Prahladbhai Patel<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 3915 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2161<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Kahar Minuben Deepakbhai v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Kahar Minuben Deepakbhai<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 3980 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2162<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Rajubhai Ratilal Talpada v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Rajubhai Ratilal Talpada<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 4128 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2163<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Sharvankumar Mangalaram Vishnoi v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Sharvankumar Mangalaram Vishnoi<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5431 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2164<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Tarunkumar Rameshbhai Rana v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Tarunkumar Rameshbhai Rana<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5439 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2165<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Thakor Babalusingh Avadheshsingh v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Thakor Babalusingh Avadheshsingh<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5443 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2166<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Thakor Nikunj v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Thakor Nikunj<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5459 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2167<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Melsibhai Narsinhbhai Du Bhill v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Melsibhai Narsinhbhai Du Bhill<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat and Others<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5464 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2168<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Bhavesh Ramjibhai Borad v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Bhavesh Ramjibhai Borad<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5471 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2169<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Akhtarhusen Tajmohmad Rangrej v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Akhtarhusen Tajmohmad Rangrej<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5473 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2170<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Santoshkumar Pursottambhai Parmar v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Santoshkumar Pursottambhai Parmar<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5477 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2171<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Sagarbhai Arvindbhai Vinjuda v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Sagarbhai Arvindbhai Vinjuda<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5481 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2172<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Murtuja Ajagarbhai Chokwala v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Murtuja Ajagarbhai Chokwala<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5482 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2173<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Solanki Dineshbhai Khimabhai v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Solanki Dineshbhai Khimabhai<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5486 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2174<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Bhaveshbhai Dadubhai Vasra v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Bhaveshbhai Dadubhai Vasra<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5487 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2175<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Chanv Chandresh Jagdishbhai v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Chanv Chandresh Jagdishbhai<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5488 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2176<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Thakor Vijay Baldevbhai v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Thakor Vijay Baldevbhai<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat and Others<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5490 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2177<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Solanki Popatsang Hathisang v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Solanki Popatsang Hathisang<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat and Others<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5491 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2178<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Jariya Sagar Lakhmanbhai v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Jariya Sagar Lakhmanbhai<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5492 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2179<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Ajitbhai Muljibhai Kunatiya v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Ajitbhai Muljibhai Kunatiya<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5493 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2180<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Rahul Rajubhai Bhana v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Rahul Rajubhai Bhana<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5494 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2181<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Gulammohundin Umardin Sanghvani v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Gulammohundin Umardin Sanghvani<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5504 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2182<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Pathan Salimkhan Rasulkhan v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Pathan Salimkhan Rasulkhan<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5506 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2183<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Vikrambhai Bhopatbhai Baria v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Vikrambhai Bhopatbhai Baria<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5507 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2184<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Haiyaz Hasanbhai Thaiyam v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Haiyaz Hasanbhai Thaiyam<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5508 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2185<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Vikas Hareram Kashyap v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Vikas Hareram Kashyap<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5509 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2186<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Solanki Surajsinh Nagendrasinh v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Solanki Surajsinh Nagendrasinh<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5512 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2187<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Vijaykumar Mohanlal Menan v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Vijaykumar Mohanlal Menan<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5513 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2188<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Girishkumar Laxmansinh Zala v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Girishkumar Laxmansinh Zala<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5531 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2189<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Rathva Ranajitbhai Rumalabhai v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Rathva Ranajitbhai Rumalabhai<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5539 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2190<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Kevjibhai Madanbhai Bhil v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Kevjibhai Madanbhai Bhil<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 5546 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2191<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Saurav Dharmendra Malawat v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Saurav Dharmendra Malawat<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 8038 of 2020, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2192<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Vijaykumar Sureshgiri Goswami v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Vijaykumar Sureshgiri Goswami<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 8281 of 2020, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2193<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Parmar Prafulkumar Kalusinh v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Parmar Prafulkumar Kalusinh<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 8645 of 2020, Criminal Misc. Application (For Fixing Date of Hearing) No. 1 of 2021 and R\/Special Criminal Application No. 8645 of 2020, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine Guj 2194<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Hardevsinh Jashubha Zala v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Vipul M. Pancholi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Hardevsinh Jashubha Zala<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Criminal Application No. 8720 of 2020, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Guj 31<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Tapodhan Prabhudas Khodidas v. Deputy Collector<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before A.G. Uraizee<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Tapodhan Prabhudas Khodidas Since Decd Through Heirs<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Deputy Collector Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Civil Application No. 23 of 2022 in F\/First Appeal No. 24485 of 2020, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Guj 32<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Deputy Collector v. Pagi Rupsinh Laxmanbhai<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before A.G. Uraie<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Pagi Rupsinh Laxmanbhai<\/p>\n

                                              R\/First Appeal No. 4013 of 2021 with Civil Application (For Stay) No. 1 of 2021 in R\/First Appeal No. 4013 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Guj 33<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Rana Anvarbhai Vajesinh v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Bhargav D. Karia<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Rana Anvarbhai Vajesinh and Others<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat and Others<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Civil Application No. 13325 of 2017, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine Guj 34<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Champaner Road Cooperative Cotton Sale Society Limited v. State of Gujarat<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Bhargav D. Karia<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Champaner Road Cooperative Cotton Sale Society Limited and Others<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Gujarat snd Other(s)<\/p>\n

                                              R\/Special Civil Application No. 8161 of 2017, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine HP 154<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Anuradha Sood v. State of H.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Sandeep Sharma<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Anuradha Sood\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Himachal Pradesh Through Principal Secretary (Higher Education) and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Civil Writ Petition No. 304 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine HP 155<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Raj Kumari v. State of H.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before Sandeep Sharma<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                              Raj Kumari\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              State of Himachal Pradesh Through Secretary (Education) and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              Civil Writ Petition No. 308 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2021 SCC OnLine TS 1893<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Akku Laxman Rao v. IDPL Employees Cooperative Housing Society Limited<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before A. Rajasheker Reddy and Shameem Akther<\/strong>, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                              Akku Laxman Rao\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              IDPL Employees Cooperative Housing Society Limited\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                              Writ Appeal Nos. 400 and 407 of 2020, Decided on February 9, 2021<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine TS 38<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              Kshitij Infraventures (P) Ltd. v. Khorshed Shapoor Chenai<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              In the High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                              (Before P. Naveen Rao<\/strong> and P. Sree Sudha, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                              Kshitij Infraventures Pvt. Ltd. rep. by its Director Sri. Rajkumar Malpani\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant;<\/p>\n

                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                              Khorshed Shapoor Chenai and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                              I.A. No. 1 of 2020 and CCCA No. 66 of 2020, Decided on January 7, 2022<\/p>\n

                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                              \n

                                              2022 SCC OnLine TS 39<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                \n
                                              1. Narasimha Reddy v. District Collector<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                In the High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                (Before Satish Chandra Sharma<\/strong>, C.J. and Abhinand Kumar Shavili, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                  \n
                                                1. Narasimha Reddy<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                  District Collector<\/p>\n

                                                  W.A. No. 149 of 2019, Decided on January 7, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                  \n

                                                  2022 SCC OnLine TS 40<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                  National Thermal Power Corporation Limited v. A. Venkata Reddy<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                  In the High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                  (Before Satish Chandra Sharma<\/strong>, C.J. and N. Tukaramji, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                  National Thermal Power Corporation Limited and Others<\/p>\n

                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                    \n
                                                  1. Venkata Reddy<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                    Writ Appeal No. 101 of 2020, Decided on January 7, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                    \n

                                                    2022 SCC OnLine TS 41<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                    Secy T.R. & B. Ports Dept. v. K. Muthaiah<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                    In the High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                    (Before Satish Chandra Sharma<\/strong>, C.J. and Abhinand Kumar Shavili, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                    Secy T.R. & B. Ports Dept. and Others<\/p>\n

                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                      \n
                                                    1. Muthaiah<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                      Writ Appeal No. 1679 of 2013, Decided on January 7, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                      Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                      \n

                                                      2022 SCC OnLine TS 42<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                      Narsing Ravi v. State of Telangana<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                      In the High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                      (Before Satish Chandra Sharma<\/strong>, C.J. and N. Tukaramji, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                      Narsing Ravi<\/p>\n

                                                      Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                      State of Telangana<\/p>\n

                                                      Writ Petition (PIL) No. 38 of 2019, Decided on January 7, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                      Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                      \n

                                                      2022 SCC OnLine TS 43<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                      Syed Farees Ahmed v. State of Telangana<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                      In the High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                      (Before Satish Chandra Sharma<\/strong>, C.J. and Abhinand Kumar Shavili, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                      Syed Farees Ahmed<\/p>\n

                                                      Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                      State of Telangana<\/p>\n

                                                      Writ Petition (Pil) No. 132 of 2021, Decided on January 7, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                      Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                      \n

                                                      2021 SCC OnLine Jhar 864<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                      Lal Badrinath Shahdeo v. State of Jharkhand<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                      In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                      (Before Rajesh Shankar<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                      Lal Badrinath Shahdeo \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                      Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                      State of Jharkhand and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                      W.P. (C) No. 7518 of 2017, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                      Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                      \n

                                                      2021 SCC OnLine Jhar 865<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                      Jagari Sonar v. State of Jharkhand<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                      In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                      (Before Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                      Jagari Sonar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                      Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                      State of Jharkhand and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                      W.P. (S) No. 6171 of 2019, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                      Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                      \n

                                                      2021 SCC OnLine Jhar 866<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                        \n
                                                      1. Kujur v. Union of India<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                        In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                        (Before Deepak Roshan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          \n
                                                        1. Kujur \u2026 Petitioner;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          Union of India and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                          W.P. (S) No. 5386 of 2014, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Jhar 867<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Jagari Sonar v. State of Jharkhand<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Jagari Sonar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Jharkhand and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                          W.P. (S) No. 6171 of 2019, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Jhar 868<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Dewan Soren v. State of Jharkhand<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before Deepak Roshan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Dewan Soren\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Jharkhand and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                          W.P. (S) No. 7280 of 2013, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2022 SCC OnLine Jhar 10<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Arun Kumar Prajapati v. State of Jharkhand<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before Anubha Rawat Choudhary<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Arun Kumar Prajapati\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Jharkhand\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Opp. Party.<\/p>\n

                                                          Cr. Revision No. 585 of 2012, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2022 SCC OnLine Jhar 11<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Mahesh Kumar v. State of Jharkhand<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before Anubha Rawat Choudhary<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Mahesh Kumar and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Jharkhand\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Opp. Party.<\/p>\n

                                                          Cr. Revision No. 763 of 2012, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2022 SCC OnLine J&K 1<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Nand Kishore v. UT, J&K<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before Puneet Gupta<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Nand Kishore and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant(s)\/Petitioner(s);<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          UT of J&K and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent(s).<\/p>\n

                                                          WP (C) No. 2929\/2021 and CM No. 9714\/2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2020 SCC OnLine Ker 25876<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Kerala State Beverages (Manufactoring and Marketing) Corporation Limited v. CIT<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before C.K. Abdul Rehim<\/strong> and T.V. Anilkumar, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                                          ITA. No. 135 of 2019<\/p>\n

                                                          Kerala State Beverages (Manufactoring and Marketing) Corporation Limited, Represented by its Managing Director, Sparjan Kumar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-1 (I) \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                          And<\/p>\n

                                                          ITA. No. 146 of 2019<\/p>\n

                                                          Kerala State Beverages (Manufacturing and Marketing) Corporation Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director, Sparjan Kumar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-1 (1) \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                          And<\/p>\n

                                                          ITA. No. 313 of 2019<\/p>\n

                                                          Kerala State Beverages (Manufacturing and Marketing) Corporation Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director G. Sparjan Kumar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1 (1) \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                          ITA. No. 135 of 2019, ITA. No. 146 of 2019 and ITA. No. 313 of 2019, Decided on April 30, 2020<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6525<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Meenakumari<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before C.S. Dias<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., represented by its Manager \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          Meenakumari and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                          MACA No. 1675 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6468<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Mohammed Faris v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before Shircy V.<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Mohammed Faris\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala, represented by Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 2838 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6469<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Sabu P.S. v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Sabu P.S.\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 3139 of 2021, Decided on July 9, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6470<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Vijayan S. v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before Shircy V.<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Vijayan S. \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/3rd<\/sup> Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/Defacto Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 3324 of 2021, Decided on July 9, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6471<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Sivakumar v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before Shircy V.<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Sivakumar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala, represented by Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/State.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 3442 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6472<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          P.V. Biju v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          P.V. Biju\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 3450 of 2021, Decided on July 9, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6473<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Sreejith v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before Shircy V.<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Sreejith and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 3460 of 2021, Decided on July 9, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6474<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Jayan S. v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before Shircy V.<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Jayan S.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/State & Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 3558 of 2021, Decided on July 9, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6475<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Anil Kumar v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before Shircy V.<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Anil Kumar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala, represented by Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 3709 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6476<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Ashraf v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Ashraf\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Applicant\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala Represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 3947 of 2021, Decided on July 9, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6477<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Jinesh v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Jinesh\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala and Another \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 3966 of 2021, Decided on July 9, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6478<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Sreejith T. v. Station House Officer<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Sreejith T. \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/3rd<\/sup> Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          Station House Officer Kadakkavoor Police Station and Another\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/Complainant and the State.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 3970 of 2021, Decided on July 9, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6479<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Noushad v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Noushad\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala Represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 3971 of 2021, Decided on July 9, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6480<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Harshad v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Harshad\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala Represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 3973 of 2021, Decided on July 9, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6481<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Suneesh K. v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Suneesh K.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 3991 of 2021, Decided on July 9, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6482<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Jibin v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Jibin\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 3999 of 2021, Decided on July 9, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6483<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Saji P. v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Saji P.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala Represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/State & Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 4001 of 2021, Decided on July 9, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6484<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Shaiju N. v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Shaiju N.\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala and Another\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 4011 of 2021, Decided on July 9, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6485<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Manoj v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Manoj\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala, represented by Public\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/State.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 4026 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6486<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Ravishankar v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before Shircy V.<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Ravishankar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners\/Accused Nos. 1 to 3;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/Compalaintant.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 4027 of 2021, Decided on July 9, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6487<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Noushad M. v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Noushad M. and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners\/Accused 1, 4, 7 and 8;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala, represented by Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 4035 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6488<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Sarath Shaji v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Sarath Shaji\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala, represented by Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 4043 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6489<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Vaisakhan v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Vaisakhan\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala Represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 4084 of 2021, Decided on July 9, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6490<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Anilkumar v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Anilkumar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala Represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 4086 of 2021, Decided on July 9, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6491<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Praveen v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Praveen\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/1st<\/sup> Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/Complainant:.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 4099 of 2021, Decided on July 9, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6492<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Omar Haroon v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Omar Haroon\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/3rd<\/sup> Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala, represented by the Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/State & Defacto Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 4196 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6493<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Manunath v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Manunath\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala, represented by Public Prosecutor and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 4222 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6494<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Anoop v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Anoop\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala, represented by Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/State.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 4280 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6495<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Mohammed Anas v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Mohammed Anas\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala, represented by the Public Prosecutor and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/State & Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 4626 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6496<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Akshaya Das C.S. v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before Shircy V.<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Akshaya Das C.S. and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners\/Accused 1 to 5;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala, represented by the Public Prosecutor and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/Complainants.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 4738 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6497<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Rajesh A.S v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Rajesh A.S\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala, represented by Public Prosecutor and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/State & Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 4888 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6498<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Rahul R. Nair v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before P.V. Kunhikrishnan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Rahul R. Nair\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala, represented by Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 4902 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6499<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Johnson A.G. v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before Shircy V.<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Johnson A.G.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala, represented by Station House Officer\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/State.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 4908 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6500<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Ashokan V. V. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Ashokan V.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused 2;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala, represented by Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 5076 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6501<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Shibin Jose v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Shibin Jose\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused No. 7;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala, rep. by the Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/State.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 5084 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6502<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          Abhilash v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                          (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                          Abhilash\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                          State of Kerala, represented by the Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/State.<\/p>\n

                                                          Bail Appl. No. 5086 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                          \n

                                                          2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6503<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                            \n
                                                          1. Saji v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                            In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                            (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                              \n
                                                            1. Saji \u2026 Petitioner\/Sole Accused;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                              State of Kerala, represented by Public Prosecutor and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/Complainant\/State.<\/p>\n

                                                              Bail Appl. No. 5089 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                              \n

                                                              2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6504<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              Muhammed Haris Ok v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                              Muhammed Haris Ok\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused No. 2;<\/p>\n

                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                              State of Kerala, represented by the Public Prosecutor and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/State.<\/p>\n

                                                              Bail Appl. No. 5091 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                              \n

                                                              2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6505<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              Ajmal Kurikkal v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                              Ajmal Kurikkal and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners\/Accused Nos. 9, 10 & 12;<\/p>\n

                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                              State of Kerala, represented by Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/State.<\/p>\n

                                                              Bail Appl. No. 5096 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                              \n

                                                              2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6506<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              Rajeev Balakrishnan v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                              Rajeev Balakrishnan\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                              State of Kerala, represented by the Public Prosecutor and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/State\/Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                              Bail Appl. No. 5123 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                              \n

                                                              2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6507<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              Maneesh v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                              Maneesh\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                              State of Kerala, rep. by the Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/State.<\/p>\n

                                                              Bail Appl. No. 5132 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                              \n

                                                              2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6508<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              Velayudhan v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                              Velayudhan\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                              State of Kerala, represented by Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                              Bail Appl. No. 5143 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                              \n

                                                              2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6509<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              Najmal v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                              Najmal\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                              State of Kerala, represented by Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                              Bail Appl. No. 9076 of 2020, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                              \n

                                                              2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6510<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              Manoj v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              (Before K. Babu<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                              Manoj\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                              State of Kerala, represented by Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                              Crl.A No. 1169 of 2008, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                              \n

                                                              2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6511<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              Rajan v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              (Before K. Babu<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                              Rajan\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                              State of Kerala, represented by (Sho Edachery Police Station in crime No. 42\/2006), by Public Prosecutor\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                              Crl.A No. 1170 of 2008, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                              \n

                                                              2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6512<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              Aji v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              (Before P. Somarajan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                              Crl.A No. 1209 of 2006<\/p>\n

                                                              Aji \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant\/2nd<\/sup> Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                              State of Kerala, represented by the Public Prosecutor and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                              And<\/p>\n

                                                              Crl.A No. 1311 of 2006<\/p>\n

                                                              Njanadurai\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant\/1st<\/sup> Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                              State of Kerala, represented by the Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/Complainants.<\/p>\n

                                                              Crl.A No. 1209 of 2006 and Crl.A No. 1311 of 2006, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                              \n

                                                              2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6513<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              Panachikkal Thankachan v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              (Before Kauser Edappagath<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                              Panachikkal Thankachan and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellants\/Accused 1 & 2;<\/p>\n

                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                              State of Kerala, represented by the Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/Complainant;<\/p>\n

                                                              Crl.A No. 1418 of 2007, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                              \n

                                                              2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6514<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              Thottathan Manoharan v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              (Before K. Babu<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                              Thottathan Manoharan \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                              State of Kerala, represented by the Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                              Crl.A No. 1857 of 2006, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                              \n

                                                              2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6515<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              Bharathan v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              (Before K. Babu<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                              Bharathan\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                              State of Kerala, represented by the Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                              Crl.A No. 2332 of 2006, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                              \n

                                                              2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6516<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              Akhil P.M. v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              (Before P. Somarajan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                              Akhil P.M.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                              State of Kerala, represented by Public Prosecutor and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/State and Defacto Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                              Crl.A No. 442 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                              \n

                                                              2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6517<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              Gokul Krishna v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              (Before Shircy V.<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                              Gokul Krishna and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners\/Accused Nos. 1 to 3;<\/p>\n

                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                              State of Kerala, Rep.By Public Prosecutor and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/State and Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                              CRL.MC No. 2779 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                              \n

                                                              2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6518<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              Hamsa v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                              Hamsa\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                              State of Kerala, represented by Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                              CRL.MC No. 2827 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                              \n

                                                              2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6519<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              Chandrasenan v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              (Before P. Somarajan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                              Chandrasenan\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused Nos. 1 to 6;<\/p>\n

                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                              State of Kerala, represented by the Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/State & Defacto Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                              CRL.MC No. 2995 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                              \n

                                                              2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6520<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              Adeeb v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              (Before K. Haripal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                              Adeeb\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                              State of Kerala, represented by the Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                              CRL.MC No. 2998 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                              \n

                                                              2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6521<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              Tomy Mathew v. Executive Officer<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              (Before V.G. Arun<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                              Tomy Mathew, represented by Power of Attorney Holder K.D. Francis \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                              Executive Officer and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                              CRP(LR) No. 438 of 2017, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                              \n

                                                              2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6522<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              Cochin Air Cargo Clearing House v. Commissioner of Customs<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              (Before S.V. Bhatti<\/strong> and Bechu Kurian Thomas, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                                              Cochin Air Cargo Clearing House, represented by its Managing Partner Kochurani\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                              Commissioner of Customs\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                              CUS. Appeal No. 5 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                              \n

                                                              2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6523<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              Johny Kochuthazhath v. K. Mohammed<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                              (Before C.S. Dias<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                              Johny Kochuthazhath\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant\/S\/Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                \n
                                                              1. Mohammed and Another \u2026 Respondent\/S\/Respodents in O.P.(MV).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                MACA No. 1392 of 2009, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                \n

                                                                2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6524<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                Mohammed P. v. Managing Partner<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                (Before C.S. Dias<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                Mohammed P.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant\/Claimant;<\/p>\n

                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                Managing Partner and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                MACA No. 1420 of 2009, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                \n

                                                                2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6526<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                K.N. Narayanan v. Babu<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                (Before C.S. Dias<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                K.N. Narayanan \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                Babu and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                MACA No. 1853 of 2009, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                \n

                                                                2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6527<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                Nabeesa v. Sebastian Joseph<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                (Before C.S. Dias<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                Nabeesa\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant\/Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                Sebastian Joseph and Another \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                MACA No. 1900 of 2009, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                \n

                                                                2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6528<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                Subaida v. T.T. Jaison<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                (Before C.S. Dias<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                Subaida and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellants\/Claimants;<\/p>\n

                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                T.T. Jaison and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                MACA No. 1940 of 2009, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                \n

                                                                2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6529<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                Thomas K. Thomas v. P. Kaliappan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                (Before C.S. Dias<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                Thomas K. Thomas\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant\/Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                  \n
                                                                1. Kaliappan and Others \u2026 Respondents\/Respondents.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                  MACA No. 1947 of 2009, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                  \n

                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6531<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                  Rathidevi M. v. Padmakumar<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                  In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                  (Before V.G. Arun<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                  Rathidevi M.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                  Padmakumar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                  OP(C) No. 250 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                  \n

                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6532<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                    \n
                                                                  1. Vijayakumari v. P.K. Ramesh<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                    (Before V.G. Arun<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                      \n
                                                                    1. Vijayakumari and Another \u2026 Petitioner\/s;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                      Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                      P.K. Ramesh and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                      OP(C) No. 751 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                      Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                      \n

                                                                      2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6533<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                      Thomas Augustine v. Babu<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                      In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                      (Before P. Somarajan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                      Thomas Augustine\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                      Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                      Babu and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                      OP(CRL.) No. 235 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                      Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                      \n

                                                                      2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6534<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                        \n
                                                                      1. Keshavadas v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                        In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                        (Before Sunil Thomas<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                        Dr. K. Keshavadas\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                        Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                        State of Kerala, Rep.By Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                        OP(CRL.) No. 685 of 2016, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                        Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                        \n

                                                                        2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6537<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                        Suresh v. C. Rajan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                        In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                        (Before Alexander Thomas<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                        RP No. 100 of 2019<\/p>\n

                                                                        Suresh\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Review petitioner\/3rd<\/sup> Party;<\/p>\n

                                                                        Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                          \n
                                                                        1. Rajan and Others \u2026 Respondents\/Petitioner & Respondents 1 to 3.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                          And<\/p>\n

                                                                          WP(C) No. 32669 of 2018<\/p>\n

                                                                            \n
                                                                          1. Rajan \u2026 Petitioner;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                            Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                            District Collector and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                            RP No. 100 of 2019 and WP(C) No. 32669 of 2018, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                            Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                            \n

                                                                            2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6538<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                            District Collector v. Shinto Simon<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                            In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                            (Before Alexander Thomas<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                            RP No. 1025 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                                                            District Collector and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Review petitioners\/Respondents 1 to 4 in WP(C);<\/p>\n

                                                                            Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                            Shinto Simon\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/Petitioner in WP(C).<\/p>\n

                                                                            And<\/p>\n

                                                                            WP(C) No. 2774 of 2020<\/p>\n

                                                                            Shinto Simon\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                            Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                            District Collector and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                            RP No. 1025 of 2020 and WP(C) No. 2774 of 2020, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                            Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                            \n

                                                                            2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6539<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                            K.R. Rarayanan National Institute of Visual Science and Arts v. Vinod Veerakumar<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                            In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                            (Before Amit Rawal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                            K.R. Rarayanan National Institute of Visual Science and Arts, represented by its Chairman\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Review petitioners\/Respondents 1 and 2 in the Writ Petition;<\/p>\n

                                                                            Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                            Vinod Veerakumar, represented by the Secretary to Government\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/Petitioner\/3rd<\/sup> Respondent in the Writ Petition.<\/p>\n

                                                                            RP No. 371 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                            Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                            \n

                                                                            2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6540<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                            C.U. Sivaraman v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                            In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                            (Before T.R. Ravi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                            C.U. Sivaraman\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Review petitioner\/Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                            Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                            State of Kerala, represented by the Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                            RP No. 374 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                            Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                            \n

                                                                            2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6541<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                            Drisya D.T. v. Kiren T.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                            In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                            (Before V.G. Arun<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                            Dr. Drisya D.T.\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Review petitioner\/3rd<\/sup> Respondent;<\/p>\n

                                                                            Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                            Dr. Kiren T. and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/Petitioner & Respondents 1 & 2.<\/p>\n

                                                                            RP No. 375 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                            Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                            \n

                                                                            2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6542<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                            Radhakrishnan Mullath v. Union of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                            In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                            (Before A.M. Badar<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                            Radhakrishnan Mullath and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Review petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                            Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                            Union of India, represented by Secretary Department of Financial Services and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                            RP No. 427 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                            Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                            \n

                                                                            2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6543<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                            Sunil S. v. Anitha G. Kumar<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                            In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                            (Before P. Somarajan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                            Sunil S.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Respondent;<\/p>\n

                                                                            Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                            Anitha G. Kumar and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/Petitioners.<\/p>\n

                                                                            RPFC No. 252 of 2018, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                            Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                            \n

                                                                            2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6544<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                            Muhammed Abdurahman v. Ramla<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                            In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                            (Before P. Somarajan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                            Muhammed Abdurahman\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Revision petitioner\/Respondent;<\/p>\n

                                                                            Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                            Ramla\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/Peitioner.<\/p>\n

                                                                            RPFC No. 69 of 2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                            Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                            \n

                                                                            2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6545<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                              \n
                                                                            1. Sashi v. Kasthurbai<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                              In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                              (Before N. Anil Kumar<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                \n
                                                                              1. Sashi \u2026 Appellant\/Appellant\/Defendant;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                Kasthurbai\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/Respondent\/Plaintiff.<\/p>\n

                                                                                RSA No. 714 of 2020, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                \n

                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6546<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                Swetha R. v. V.S. Sandeep<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                (Before V.G. Arun<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                Dr. Swetha R.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Respondent in Court Below;<\/p>\n

                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                Dr. V.S. Sandeep \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/Petitioner in Court Below.<\/p>\n

                                                                                TR.P(C) No. 148 of 2020, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                \n

                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6547<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                P I Rajan v. Shan Haneefa<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                (Before V.G. Arun<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                P I Rajan\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                Shan Haneefa\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                TR.P(C) No. 186 of 2019, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                \n

                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6548<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                K.K. Kunhikrishnan v. Jagadhamma G.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                (Before C.S. Dias<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                K.K. Kunhikrishnan\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Plaintiff;<\/p>\n

                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                Jagadhamma G. and Another\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/Defendants.<\/p>\n

                                                                                TR.P(C) No. 3 of 2020, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                \n

                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6549<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                Binu E.B. v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                (Before K. Vinod Chandran<\/strong> and Ziyad Rahman A.A., JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                Binu E.B.\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                State of Kerala, Represented by the Public Prosecutor and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                W.P. (Crl.) No. 175 of 2021-S, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                \n

                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6551<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                Omana v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                (Before N. Nagaresh<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                Omana\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                State of Kerala Represented by Secretary to Government, Local Self Government Department and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                W.P. (C) No. 18057 of 2020, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                \n

                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6552<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                Korah John v. Station House Officer<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                (Before P.V. Kunhikrishnan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                Korah John\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                Station House Officer Vandiperiyar Police Station and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                W.P.(C). No. 18747 of 2019, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                \n

                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6553<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                E.G. Mohanan v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                (Before Devan Ramachandran<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                E.G. Mohanan\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                State of Kerala Rep. by the Secretary, Taxes Department, Government Secretariat and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                W.P. (C) No. 19095 of 2013, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                \n

                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6554<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                Anish Kumar A.N. v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                (Before N. Nagaresh<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                Anish Kumar A.N.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                State of Kerala Rep. by the Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                W.P. (C) No. 20186 of 2020, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                \n

                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6555<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                Gikku Kurian v. Secretary to Govt. of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                (Before A.M. Badar<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                Gikku Kurian\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                Secretary to Government of India Ministry of External Affairs and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                W.P. (C) No. 20430 of 2020, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                \n

                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6556<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                P.C. Unnikrishnan v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                (Before S. Manikumar, C.J. and Shaji P. Chaly<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                P.C. Unnikrishnan\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                State of Kerala Represented by the Principal Secretary to the Government, Higher Education (A) Department and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                W.P. (C) No. 21806 of 2017(S), Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                \n

                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6557<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                Vasumathi P. v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                (Before Devan Ramachandran<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                Vasumathi P.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                State of Kerala Represented by its Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Finance and Another \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                W.P. (C) No. 22076 of 2020, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                \n

                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6558<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                Rajendra Kumar Purohit v. Headload Workers Union<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                (Before P.V. Kunhikrishnan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                Rajendra Kumar Purohit\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                Secretary Headload Workers Union (CITU), Puthencruz Sub Committee and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                W.P.(C). No. 23585 of 2019, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                \n

                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6559<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                M.K. Suresh v. Assistant Registrar (General)<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                (Before Amit Rawal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                M.K. Suresh\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                Assistant Registrar (General), Co-operative Societies and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                W.P. (C) No. 23893 of 2015, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                \n

                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6560<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                Meledath Pothera Devaki Amma v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                (Before P.V. Kunhikrishnan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                Meledath Pothera Devaki Amma\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                State of Kerala Rep. by its Secretary, Department of Revenue and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                W.P. (C) No. 26654 of 2020, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                \n

                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6561<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                Abdul Jaleel v. Superintendent of Police<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                (Before P.V. Kunhikrishnan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                Abdul Jaleel and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                Superintendent of Police, Ernakulam Rural and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                W.P.(C). No. 26782 of 2019, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                \n

                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6562<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                Biju George v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                (Before P.V. Kunhikrishnan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                Biju George\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                State of Kerala Represented by the Secretary to the Government, Home Department and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                W.P. (C) No. 26984 of 2019, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                \n

                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6563<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                Jo Philip v. Superintendent of Police<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                (Before P.V. Kunhikrishnan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                Jo Philip and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                W.P. (C) No. 27536 of 2019, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                \n

                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6564<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                Islamic Cultural Association v. District Collector<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                (Before N. Nagaresh<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                Islamic Cultural Association, Rep. by its Secretary, K.M. Bava\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                District Collector, Collectorate and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                W.P. (C) No. 28789 of 2020, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                \n

                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6565<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                Latha P.G. v. Director of General Education<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                (Before Devan Ramachandran<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                Latha P.G. Vocational Teacher in General Insurance Sree Narayana Vilasam Vocational Higher Secondary School\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                Director of General Education (DGE) \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                W.P. (C) No. 29130 of 2019, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                \n

                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6566<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                  \n
                                                                                1. Manoj Kumar v. Channapetta Service Co-operative Bank Ltd.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                  In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                  (Before Amit Rawal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n
                                                                                  1. Manoj Kumar \u2026 Petitioner\/s;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Channapetta Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., Represented by its Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    W.P. (C) No. 30491 of 2015, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6567<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Abraham Koshy T. v. Malabar Regional Co-operative Milk Producers Union Ltd.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Amit Rawal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Abraham Koshy T.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Malabar Regional Co-operative Milk Producers Union Ltd. and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    W.P. (C) No. 30497 of 2012, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6568<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Venugopal v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before P.V. Kunhikrishnan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Venugopal\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala Represented by the Secretary to Government, Home Department and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    W.P. (C) No. 30547 of 2019, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6569<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    P.T.A. Bus Management Committee v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before P.V. Kunhikrishnan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    P.T.A. Bus Management Committee, Represented Manoj Kumar \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala Represented by the Secretary, Home Department of Kerala and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    W.P. (C) No. 30749 of 2019, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6570<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Shoukath A.P. v. District Police Chief<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before P.V. Kunhikrishnan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Shoukath A.P. and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    District Police Chief Office of the District Police Chief and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    W.P. (C). No. 31028 of 2019, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6571<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Manju V.S. v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Amit Rawal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Manju V.S.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    W.P. (C) No. 31239 of 2012, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6572<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Pramod M. v. District Police Chief<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before P.V. Kunhikrishnan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Pramod M.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    District Police Chief Uduma and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    W.P. (C). No. 33783 of 2019, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6573<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Manappuram Finance Limited v. Non Banking and (P) Finance Employees Association<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before P.V. Kunhikrishnan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Manappuram Finance Limited, Represented by its Manager-Legal, Priyalal N.G.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Non Banking and Private Finance Employees Association (CITU) and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    W.P. (C) No. 33794 of 2019, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6574<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Rosamma v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before P.V. Kunhikrishnan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Rosamma \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala, Represented by the Secretary to the Government, Home Department and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    W.P. (C) No. 35149 of 2019, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6575<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    C.V. Sebstian v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before S. Manikumar<\/strong>, C.J. and Shaji P. Chaly, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    C.V. Sebstian\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala Represented by secretary to Government, Government of Kerala and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    W.P. (C) No. 37230 of 2016, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6576<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Fr. Joseph Memorial Higher Secondary School v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Devan Ramachandran<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Manager Fr. Joseph Memorial Higher Secondary School and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala Represented by Secretary, General Education Department and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    W.P. (C) No. 39092 of 2015, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6577<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Ashok Kumar G. v. Travancore Devaswom Board<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Devan Ramachandran<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Ashok Kumar G.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Travancore Devaswom Board and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    W.P. (C) No. 39294 of 2015, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6530<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Union of India v. Ramesh Unnikrishnan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Alexander Thomas<\/strong> and Viju Abraham, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Union of India, Represented by Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Dr. Ramesh Unnikrishnan and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    O.P. (CAT) No. 57 of 2021, Decided on November 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6535<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala v. Justin Abraham<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Alexander Thomas<\/strong> and Viju Abraham, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Home Department and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Justin Abraham\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    O.P. (KAT) No. 310 of 2021, Decided on November 19, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2021 SCC OnLine Ker 5183<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Suseelan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before A. Badharudeen<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    MACA No. 2221 of 2012<\/p>\n

                                                                                    National Insurance Company Ltd., represented by its Manager\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant\/Respondent in O.P(MV);<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Suseelan and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/Petitioner and Respondents 1 & 2 in O.P(MV).<\/p>\n

                                                                                    And<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Co No. 40 of 2014<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Suseelan\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Cross Objector\/Respondent;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    National Insurance Co. Ltd., represented by its Manager\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/Appellant.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    MACA No. 2221 of 2012 and Co No. 40 of 2014, Decided on December 18, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6536<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Additional Chief Secretary v. P.R. Jayasree<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Alexander Thomas<\/strong> and Viju Abraham, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Additional Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    P.R. Jayasree\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    O.P. (KAT) No. 333 of 2021, Decided on December 2, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2021 SCC OnLine Ker 6550<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Gokul Sreekumar v. Punjab National Bank<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Alexander Thomas<\/strong> and Viju Abraham, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Gokul Sreekumar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Punjab National Bank, Represented by its Chairman and CMD and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    W.A. No. 1620 of 2021, Decided on December 4, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2022 SCC OnLine Ker 94<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    XXXX v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Gopinath P.<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    XXXX\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala rep. by Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/State.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Bail Appl. No. 10 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2022 SCC OnLine Ker 95<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Nithin Chandran v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Gopinath P.<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Nithin Chandran\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused No. 1;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala represented by the Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Bail Appl. No. 10089 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2022 SCC OnLine Ker 96<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Mohsin Sheikh v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Gopinath P.<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Mohsin Sheikh\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala represented by Public Prosecutor, through Excise Circle Inspector\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Bail Appl. No. 9249 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2022 SCC OnLine Ker 97<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Vijayan v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Gopinath P.<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Vijayan and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners\/Accused 1 to 5;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala represented by the Public Prosecutor and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/the State and the Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Bail Appl. No. 9319 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2022 SCC OnLine Ker 98<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Manoj M. v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Gopinath P.<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Manoj M. \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused No. 2;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala rep.by the Public Prosecutor and Another\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/State & Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Bail Appl. No. 9557 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2022 SCC OnLine Ker 99<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Yedhu Rejipth v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Shircy V.<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Yedhu Rejipth\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused No. 4;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala represented by the Public Prosecutor and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/Claimants.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Bail Appl. No. 9589 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2022 SCC OnLine Ker 100<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Binoy E. v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Gopinath P.<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Binoy E.\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Not Arrayed As Accused So Far;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala represented by Public Prosecutor and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/State & Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Bail Appl. No. 9760 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2022 SCC OnLine Ker 101<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    K.R. Sajid v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Shircy V.<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    K.R. Sajid \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused No. 2;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala rep. by Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Bail Appl. No. 9776 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2022 SCC OnLine Ker 102<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Pradeepchandran v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Gopinath P.<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Pradeepchandran\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala, represented by the Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Bail Appl. No. 9789 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2022 SCC OnLine Ker 103<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Vishnu Satheesh v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Gopinath P.<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Vishnu Satheesh \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala rep. by Public Prosecutor and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Bail Appl. No. 9924 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2022 SCC OnLine Ker 104<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Aneesh v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Gopinath P.<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Aneesh\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala represented by Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Bail Appl. No. 9982 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2022 SCC OnLine Ker 105<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Bineesh v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Gopinath P.<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Bineesh\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala rep. by Public Prosecutor and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/De Facto Complainanty.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Bail Appl. No. 9992 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2022 SCC OnLine Ker 106<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Farshad v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Gopinath P.<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Farshad\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala rep. by Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/State & Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Bail Appl. No. 9993 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2022 SCC OnLine Ker 107<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Nasimudheen v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Sophy Thomas<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Nasimudheen\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala, represented by the Public Prosecutor and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents\/State & Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Crl.MC No. 47 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2022 SCC OnLine Ker 108<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Cijoe M.P. v. Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before A. Badharudeen<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Cijoe M.P. and Another \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church, represented by its Sabha Secretary, Adv. Biju Ooman and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    TR.P(C) No. 789 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2022 SCC OnLine Ker 109<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Alangad Yogam Trust v. Travancore Devaswom Board<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Anil K. Narendran<\/strong> and P.G. Ajithkumar, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Alangad Yogam Trust, rep. by Chairman K. Ayyappa Dass S\/o. Pnk Menon\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Travancore Devaswom Board, represented by its Secretary and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    W.P.(C) No. 245 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2022 SCC OnLine Ker 110<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Aluva Municipality v. Jibi Thomas<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar<\/strong> and Mohammed Nias C.P., JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Aluva Municipality and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellants\/Respondents;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Jibi Thomas\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/Petitioner.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    WA No. 935 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2022 SCC OnLine Ker 111<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Nikitha Ajithkumar v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before P.V. Kunhikrishnan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Nikitha Ajithkumar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala rep. by Principal Secretary to General Educationa and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    WP(C) No. 2367 of 2016, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2022 SCC OnLine Ker 112<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Sulfikkar A. v. RTA<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Sathish Ninan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Sulfikkar A.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Secretary, Regional Transport Authority\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    WP(C) No. 342 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2022 SCC OnLine Ker 113<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Sanju Simon v. State of Kerala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar<\/strong> and Mohammed Nias C.P., JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    W.P. (C) No. 16701 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Sanju Simon and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala Represented by Additional Chief Secretary Department of Health and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    With<\/p>\n

                                                                                    W.P. (C) No. 16946 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Prithviraj and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala, Represented by Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Health and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    With<\/p>\n

                                                                                    W.P. (C) No. 17186 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Lechu S. Priya and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala, Represented by Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Health and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    And<\/p>\n

                                                                                    W.P. (C) No. 22776 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Amrutha S. and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    State of Kerala Represented by Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Health and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    W.P. (C) No. 16701 of 2021, W.P. (C) No. 16946 of 2021, W.P. (C) No. 17186 of 2021 and W.P. (C) No. 22776 of 2021, Decided on January 7, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2021 SCC OnLine Mad 7242<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    MMTC Limited v. Kamarajar Port Limited<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Madras<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before R. Mahadevan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    MMTC Limited Represented by the Additional General Manager E. Malar Vannan\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Kamarajar Port Limited and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Writ Petition No. 12950 of 2021 and WMP. Nos. 13757, 13759 and 18462 of 2021, Decided on November 30, 2021, [Order Reserved on: 02.11.2021]<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2021 SCC OnLine Mad 7240<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Balaprajapathy Adikalar v. Inspector of Police<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Madras<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before G.R. Swaminathan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Balaprajapathy Adikalar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Sole Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Inspector of Police and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 1st<\/sup> Respondent\/Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 5312 of 2021 and Crl.M.P.(MD) No. 8768 of 2021, Decided on December 20, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2021 SCC OnLine Mad 7241<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Goodsun Industries (P) Ltd. v. Govt. of T.N.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Madras<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Krishnan Ramasamy<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Goodsun Industries Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by its Managing Director, R. Jaganathan\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Tamil Nadu Energy Development Agency Government of Tamil Nadu Enterprises\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    W.P. No. 5004 of 2017 and W.M.P. No. 5362 of 2017, Decided on December 7, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2022 SCC OnLine Mad 77<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Sam G. Jeba Joselin v. Sisily<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Madras<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before P. Velmurugan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Dr. Sam G. Jeba Joselin \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Sisily and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    C.R.P(MD) No. 1885 of 2017 and C.M.P(MD) Nos. 9801 of 2017 and 2739 of 2020, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2022 SCC OnLine Mad 78<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    Kaizer Trade Ventures v. City Union Bank Ltd.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    In the High Court of Madras<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                    (Before Munishwar Nath Bhandari<\/strong>, A.C.J. and P.D. Audikesavalu, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Kaizer Trade Ventures and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                    City Union Bank Ltd., rep.by its Branch Manager Mr. U. Ravichandranand Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                    C.R.P. No. 2930 of 2021 and CMP. No. 21040 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                    Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                    \n

                                                                                    2022 SCC OnLine Mad 79<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                      \n
                                                                                    1. Sekar v. Shambhu Kallolikar<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                      In the High Court of Madras<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                      (Before M. Govindaraj<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                        \n
                                                                                      1. Sekar and Another \u2026 Petitioners;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                        Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                        Shambhu Kallolikar and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                        Contempt Petition No. 610 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                        Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                        \n

                                                                                        2022 SCC OnLine Mad 80<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                          \n
                                                                                        1. Dhanapal v. Shambhu Kallolikar<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                          In the High Court of Madras<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                          (Before M. Govindaraj<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                            \n
                                                                                          1. Dhanapal \u2026 Petitioner;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                            Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                            Shambhu Kallolikar and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                            Contempt Petition No. 611 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                            Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                            \n

                                                                                            2022 SCC OnLine Mad 81<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                              \n
                                                                                            1. George Ponnaiah v. Inspector of Police<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                              In the High Court of Madras<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                              (Before G.R. Swaminathan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                              Fr. P. George Ponnaiah \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/Accused;<\/p>\n

                                                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                              Inspector of Police and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 1st<\/sup> Respondent\/Complainant.<\/p>\n

                                                                                              Crl OP(MD) No. 11021 of 2021 and Crl MP(MD) No. 5632 of 2021, Decided on January 7, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                              \n

                                                                                              2022 SCC OnLine Mad 82<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                              Straight line Cinemas v. Dream Warrior Pictures<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                              In the High Court of Madras<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                              (Before Munishwar Nath Bhandari<\/strong>, A.C.J. and P.D. Audikesavalu, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                              Straight line Cinemas rep, by its Propreitor Mr. Sudhir V.K\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant;<\/p>\n

                                                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                              Dream Warrior Pictures, rep. by its Partner Mr. S.R. Prabhu\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                              OSA (CAD) Nos. 167 and 168 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                              \n

                                                                                              2022 SCC OnLine Mad 83<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                              Manickam v. K.T. Ragunath<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                              In the High Court of Madras<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                              (Before R. Pongiappan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                              Manickam and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellants;<\/p>\n

                                                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                              K.T. Ragunath and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                              S.A. No. 1049 of 2011 and M.P. No. 1 of 2013, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                              \n

                                                                                              2022 SCC OnLine Mad 84<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                \n
                                                                                              1. Chakrapani v. Principal Secretary to Govt.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                In the High Court of Madras<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                (Before M. Duraiswamy and J. Sathya Narayana Prasad<\/strong>, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                  \n
                                                                                                1. Chakrapani \u2026 Appellant;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                  Principal Secretary to Government and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                  W.A. No. 2913 of 2012, Decided on January 10, 2022, [Reserved on: 05.01.2022]<\/p>\n

                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Mad 85<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                    \n
                                                                                                  1. Subramanian v. Superintendent of Police<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                    In the High Court of Madras<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                    (Before G.R. Swaminathan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                      \n
                                                                                                    1. Subramanian \u2026 Petitioner;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                      Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                      Superintendent of Police and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                      W.P.(MD). No. 371 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                      Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                      \n

                                                                                                      2022 SCC OnLine Mad 86<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                        \n
                                                                                                      1. Narayanasamy v. District Collector & Inspector of Village Panchayat<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                        In the High Court of Madras<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                        (Before Munishwar Nath Bhandari<\/strong>, A.C.J. and P.D. Audikesavalu, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                          \n
                                                                                                        1. Narayanasamy \u2026 Petitioner;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                          District Collector & Inspector of Village Panchayat and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                          W.P. No. 194 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                          \n

                                                                                                          2022 SCC OnLine Mad 87<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                            \n
                                                                                                          1. Sundaramoorthi v. Tamil Nadu State Election Commissioner-cum-the Chairman<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                            In the High Court of Madras<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                            (Before Munishwar Nath Bhandari<\/strong>, A.C.J. and P.D. Audikesavalu, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                              \n
                                                                                                            1. Sundaramoorthi \u2026 Petitioner;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                              Tamil Nadu State Election Commissioner-cum-the Chairman, and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                              W.P. No. 226 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                              \n

                                                                                                              2022 SCC OnLine Mad 88<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                              Ramakrishnan Kandaraj v. Punjab National Bank<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                              In the High Court of Madras<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                              (Before Munishwar Nath Bhandari<\/strong>, A.C.J. and P.D. Audikesavalu, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                              Ramakrishnan Kandaraj\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                              Authorised Officer, Punjab National Bank\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                              W.P. No. 231 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                              \n

                                                                                                              2022 SCC OnLine Mad 89<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                              Jiji Mathew v. Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                              In the High Court of Madras<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                              (Before Munishwar Nath Bhandari<\/strong>, A.C.J. and P.D. Audikesavalu, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                              Jiji Mathew\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                              Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                              W.P. No. 241 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                              \n

                                                                                                              2022 SCC OnLine Mad 90<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                \n
                                                                                                              1. Sellan v. District Collector<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                                In the High Court of Madras<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                (Before Munishwar Nath Bhandari<\/strong>, A.C.J. and P.D. Audikesavalu, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                  \n
                                                                                                                1. Sellan \u2026 Petitioner;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                  District Collector and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                  W.P. No. 242 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Mad 91<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                  A.R. Annamalai v. Canara Bank<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madras<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                  (Before Munishwar Nath Bhandari<\/strong>, A.C.J. and P.D. Audikesavalu, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                  A.R. Annamalai\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                  Chief Manager\/Authorized Officer, Canara Bank\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                  W.P. No. 285 of 2022 and WMP. Nos. 311 and 312 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Mad 92<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                    \n
                                                                                                                  1. Pradeepa v. Authorised Officer<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                                    In the High Court of Madras<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                    (Before Munishwar Nath Bhandari<\/strong>, A.C.J. and P.D. Audikesavalu, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                      \n
                                                                                                                    1. Pradeepa and Others \u2026 Petitioners;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                                      Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                      Authorised Officer, Secured Creditor, Corporation Bank and Another\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                      W.P. No. 7669 of 2020, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                      Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                      \n

                                                                                                                      2022 SCC OnLine Mad 93<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                        \n
                                                                                                                      1. Shakila v. Registrar General<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                                        In the High Court of Madras<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                        (Before Munishwar Nath Bhandari<\/strong>, A.C.J. and P.D. Audikesavalu, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          \n
                                                                                                                        1. Shakila \u2026 Petitioner;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Registrar General and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          W.P. No. 7789 of 2021 and W.M.P. No. 8318 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          \n

                                                                                                                          2022 SCC OnLine Mad 94<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Hari and Co. v. Chennai Port Trust<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          In the High Court of Madras<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          (Before S.M. Subramaniam<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Hari and Co., represented by its Partner Mr. A. Hariharan, represented by its Power of Attorney Holder, Mr. R. Arul Murugan\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Chennai Port Trust, represented by its Chairman and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          WP No. 16365 of 2011 and MP No. 1 of 2011, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          \n

                                                                                                                          2022 SCC OnLine Mani 1<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Ngathem Sudhir Singh v. State of Manipur<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          In the High Court of Manipur at Imphal<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          (Before Ahanthem Bimol Singh<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Ngathem Sudhir Singh \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          State of Manipur and Another \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          W.P. (C) No. 1 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          \n

                                                                                                                          2022 SCC OnLine Mani 2<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Thokchom Manishana Singh v. State of Manipur<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          In the High Court of Manipur at Imphal<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          (Before Ahanthem Bimol Singh<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Thokchom Manishana Singh and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          State of Manipur and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          W.P. (C) No. 10 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          \n

                                                                                                                          2022 SCC OnLine Mani 3<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Malemkhomba Haorongbam v. Board of Secondary Education<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          In the High Court of Manipur at Imphal<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          (Before Ahanthem Bimol Singh<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Malemkhomba Haorongbam\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Board of Secondary Education, Manipur\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          W.P. (C) No. 12 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          \n

                                                                                                                          2022 SCC OnLine Mani 4<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Laishram Khumanleima Devi v. State of Manipur<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          In the High Court of Manipur at Imphal<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          (Before Ahanthem Bimol Singh<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Laishram Khumanleima Devi \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          State of Manipur and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          W.P. (C) No. 14 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          \n

                                                                                                                          2022 SCC OnLine Mani 5<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Chingakham Sana Devi v. State of Manipur<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          In the High Court of Manipur at Imphal<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          (Before Ahanthem Bimol Singh<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Chingakham Sana Devi and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          State of Manipur and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          W.P. (C) No. 15 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          \n

                                                                                                                          2022 SCC OnLine Mani 6<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Phairembam Bidyachand Singh v. State of Manipur<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          In the High Court of Manipur at Imphal<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          (Before Ahanthem Bimol Singh<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Phairembam Bidyachand Singh and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          State of Manipur and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          W.P. (C) No. 16 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                          \n

                                                                                                                          2022 SCC OnLine Mani 7<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            \n
                                                                                                                          1. Sadananda Singh v. State of Manipur<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                                            In the High Court of Manipur at Imphal<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                            (Before Ahanthem Bimol Singh<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              \n
                                                                                                                            1. Sadananda Singh \u2026 Petitioner\/s;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              State of Manipur and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              W.P. (C) No. 17 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              \n

                                                                                                                              2022 SCC OnLine Mani 8<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Waikhom Jiten Singh v. State of Manipur<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              In the High Court of Manipur at Imphal<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              (Before Ahanthem Bimol Singh<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Waikhom Jiten Singh\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              State of Manipur and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              W.P. (C) No. 18 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              \n

                                                                                                                              2022 SCC OnLine Mani 9<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Ngangom Bidyarani Devi v. Manipur Technical University Imphal<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              In the High Court of Manipur at Imphal<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              (Before Ahanthem Bimol Singh<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Ngangom Bidyarani Devi\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Manipur Technical University Imphal and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              W.P. (C) No. 19 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              \n

                                                                                                                              2022 SCC OnLine Mani 10<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Soram Amarjit Singh v. State of Manipur<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              In the High Court of Manipur at Imphal<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              (Before Ahanthem Bimol Singh<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Soram Amarjit Singh and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              State of Manipur and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              W.P. (C) No. 3 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              \n

                                                                                                                              2022 SCC OnLine Mani 11<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              XXXXXXXXX v. State of Manipur<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              In the High Court of Manipur at Imphal<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              (Before Ahanthem Bimol Singh<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              XXXXXXXXX\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              State of Manipur and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              W.P. (C) No. 4 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              \n

                                                                                                                              2022 SCC OnLine Mani 12<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Laishram Nongpoknganba Singh v. State of Manipur<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              In the High Court of Manipur at Imphal<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              (Before Ahanthem Bimol Singh<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Laishram Nongpoknganba Singh and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              State of Manipur and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              W.P. (C) No. 992 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              \n

                                                                                                                              2021 SCC OnLine MP 2754<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Bhure v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              (Before Sheel Nagu<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Bhure<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              State of M.P.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Cr. A. No. 37\/2021, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              \n

                                                                                                                              2021 SCC OnLine MP 2756<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Jitendra v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              (Before Shailendra Shukla<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Jitendra<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              State of M.P.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              M.CR.C. No. 52683\/2020, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              \n

                                                                                                                              2021 SCC OnLine MP 2758<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Dharmendra Singh Rana v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              (Before S.A. Dharmadhikari<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Dharmendra Singh Rana<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              State of Madhya Pradesh<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              M.Cr.C. No. 53408\/2020, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              \n

                                                                                                                              2021 SCC OnLine MP 2759<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Satendra Lahariya v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              (Before S.A. Dharmadhikari<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Satendra Lahariya<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              State of Madhya Pradesh<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              M.Cr.C. No. 53483\/2020, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              \n

                                                                                                                              2021 SCC OnLine MP 2760<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Prem Singh Baghel v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              (Before S.A. Dharmadhikari<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Prem Singh Baghel<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              State of Madhya Pradesh<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              M.Cr.C. No. 53509\/2020, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              \n

                                                                                                                              2021 SCC OnLine MP 2761<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Gulab Jatav v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              (Before S.A. Dharmadhikari<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Gulab Jatav<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              State of Madhya Pradesh<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              M.Cr.C. No. 53512\/2020, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              \n

                                                                                                                              2021 SCC OnLine MP 2765<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Ujali Shah v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              (Before Anand Pathak<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Ujali Shah and Another<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              State of M.P.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              M.Cr.C. No. 52830\/2020, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              \n

                                                                                                                              2021 SCC OnLine MP 2767<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Akash Gurjar v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              (Before Sheel Nagu<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Akash Gurjar<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              State of M.P.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              MCRC-53218-2020, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              \n

                                                                                                                              2021 SCC OnLine MP 2769<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Vishnu Prakash R Punglia Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation Gwalior<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              (Before Sheel Nagu and Anand Pathak, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Vishnu Prakash R Punglia Ltd.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                              Municipal Corporation Gwalior<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                \n
                                                                                                                              1. 20362.2020, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                \n

                                                                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine MP 2771<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Irshad Khan v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                (Before Sheel Nagu<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Irshad Khan<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                State of M.P. and Others<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                W.P. No.-20259-2020, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                \n

                                                                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine MP 2772<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Harchand v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                (Before Vivek Rusia<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Harchand<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                State of M.P. and Others<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                W.P. No. 20319\/2020, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                \n

                                                                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine MP 2773<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Lal Singh v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                (Before Vishal Mishra<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Lal Singh<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                State of M.P. and Others<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                W.P. No. 20235\/2020, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                \n

                                                                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine MP 2774<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Dhani Ram Jatav v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                (Before Vishal Mishra<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Dhani Ram Jatav<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                State of M.P. and Others<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                W.P. No. 20260\/2020, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                \n

                                                                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine MP 2775<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Nathan Singh v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                (Before G.S. Ahluwalia<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Nathan Singh and Others<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                State of M.P.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                W.P. 20312 of 2020 (S), Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                \n

                                                                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine MP 2781<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Aman Parmar v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                (Before Vijay Kumar Shukla<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Aman Parmar and Others<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                State of Madhya Pradesh and Others<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                WP-20666-2020, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                \n

                                                                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine MP 2782<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Priyammvada Higher Secondary School Birla Vikas v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                (Before Sanjay Dwivedi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Priyammvada Higher Secondary School Birla Vikas and Others<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                State of Madhya Pradesh and Others<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                WP-20678-2020, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                \n

                                                                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine MP 2783<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Suresh Verma v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                (Before Vishal Dhagat<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Suresh Verma<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                State of Madhya Pradesh and Others<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                WP-20790-2020, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                \n

                                                                                                                                2021 SCC OnLine MP 2784<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Khalil Ulla Khan v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                (Before Vishal Mishra<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Khalil Ulla Khan<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                State of M.P.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n
                                                                                                                                1. 20256.2020, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine MP 2785<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Vishnu Prakash R Punglia Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sheel Nagu and Anand Pathak, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Vishnu Prakash R Punglia Ltd.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Municipal Corporation Gwalior<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  W.P. 20362.2020, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine MP 2787<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Kamla Kanesh v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Rohit Arya<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Kamla Kanesh<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Madhya Pradesh and Others<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Writ Petition No. 20232\/2020, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine MP 2788<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Vinod Kumar v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Vivek Rusia<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Vinod Kumar<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Madhya Pradesh and Others<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Writ Petition No. 20236\/2020, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine MP 2789<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Ashabai Khandare v. Devi Ahilya University<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Vivek Rusia<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Ashabai Khandare<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Devi Ahilya University, Indore and Another<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Writ Petition No. 20242\/2020, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine MP 2790<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Bhura Ganawa v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Vivek Rusia<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Bhura Ganawa<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Madhya Pradesh and Others<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Writ Petition No. 20243\/2020, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine MP 2791<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Madhav Singh Solanki v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Rohit Arya<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Madhav Singh Solanki<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Madhya Pradesh and Others<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Writ Petition No. 20246\/2020, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine MP 2792<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Vimalabai Sirshath v. Devi Ahilya University<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Vivek Rusia<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Vimalabai Sirshath<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Devi Ahilya University and Another<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Writ Petition No. 20258\/2020, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine MP 2793<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Rajesh Patidar v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Rohit Arya<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Rajesh Patidar<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Madhya Pradesh and Another<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Writ Petition No. 20316\/2020, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine MP 2794<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Mandeep Singh Bhatia v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Rohit Arya<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Mandeep Singh Bhatia<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Madhya Pradesh and Another<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Writ Petition No. 20331\/2020, Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine MP 2795<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Rajesh Singh v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Mohammad Rafiq and Prakash Shrivastava, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Rajesh Singh<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of M.P. and Others<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Writ Petition No. 20672\/2020 (PIL), Decided on January 5, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine MP 2755<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Sajid Ahmed Khan v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Anil Verma<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Sajid Ahmed Khan<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of M.P.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Cr.A. No. 3963\/2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine MP 2757<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Jitendra Singh Bhadoria v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Vishal Mishra<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Jitendra Singh Bhadoria<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of M.P.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  M.Cr.C. No. 33413\/2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine MP 2762<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Manoj v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Anand Pathak<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Manoj<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of M.P.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  M.Cr.C. No. 33800\/2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine MP 2763<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Pankaj v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Rohit Arya<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Pankaj<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of M.P.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  M.Cr.C. No. 33445\/2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine MP 2764<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Lakhan Rajwaniya v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Rohit Arya<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Lakhan Rajwaniya<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of M.P.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  M.Cr.C. No. 33597\/2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine MP 2766<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Rambahadur Singh v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before G.S. Ahluwalia<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Rambahadur Singh<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of M.P.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  MCRC-33424-2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine MP 2768<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Pawan Kumar Jain v. Union of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Prakash Shrivastava and Vishal Dhagat, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Pawan Kumar Jain<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Union of India and Others<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  MP-2111-2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine MP 2770<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Bharti Shakya v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sheel Nagu and Deepak Kumar Agarwal, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Bharti Shakya<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of M.P. and Others<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  W.A. No. 586\/2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine MP 2776<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Arun Sharma v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before G.S. Ahluwalia<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Arun Sharma<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of M.P. and Others<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  W.P. No. 11767\/2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine MP 2777<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Sandhya Saxena v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sanjay Dwivedi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Dr. Sandhya Saxena<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Madhya Pradesh and Others<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  WP-11766-2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine MP 2778<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Kashi Prasad Gupta v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Vijay Kumar Shukla<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Kashi Prasad Gupta<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Madhya Pradesh and Others<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  WP-11780-2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine MP 2779<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Chandra Prakash Sen v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sheel Nagu and Deepak Kumar Agarwal, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Chandra Prakash Sen<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Madhya Pradesh and Others<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  WP-11812-2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine MP 2780<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Lal Bahadur Verma v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Vijay Kumar Shukla<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Lal Bahadur Verma<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Madhya Pradesh and Others<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  WP-11828-2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine MP 2786<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Yasir Pathan v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sujoy Paul and Anil Verma, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Yasir Pathan<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Madhya Pradesh and Others<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Writ Petition No. 11646\/2021, Decided on July 8, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine MP 43<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Jagdish Kumawat v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Subodh Abhyankar<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Jagdish Kumawat<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of M.P.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  M.Cr.C. No. 958\/2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine MP 44<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Lakhan v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Rajeev Kumar Dubey<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Lakhan<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Madhya Pradesh<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  MCRC No. 983 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine MP 45<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Rayadas v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Subodh Abhyankar<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Rayadas<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Madhya Pradesh<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 771\/2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine MP 46<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Victim A. v. State of M.P.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Madhya Pradesh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Nandita Dubey<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Victim A.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Madhya Pradesh and Others<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  W.P. No. 499 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Ori 79<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Harihar Nath v. State of Odisha<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before R.K. Pattanaik<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Harihar Nath\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Odisha\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Opposite Party.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  BLAPL No. 9573 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Ori 80<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Laxmidhara Mohanta v. State of Odisha<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before R.K. Pattanaik<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Laxmidhara Mohanta and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Odisha\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Opposite Party.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  BLAPL No. 9579 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Ori 81<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Binash Behera v. State of Odisha<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before R.K. Pattanaik<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Binash Behera\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Odisha\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Opposite Party.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  BLAPL No. 9580 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Ori 82<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Debasish Giri v. State of Odisha<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before R.K. Pattanaik<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Debasish Giri\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Odisha\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Opposite Party.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  BLAPL No. 9582 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Ori 83<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Hemanta Dash v. State of Odisha<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before R.K. Pattanaik<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Hemanta Dash\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Odisha\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Opposite Party.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  BLAPL No. 9584 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Ori 84<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Dara Singh v. State of Odisha<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before S. Muralidhar, C.J. and B.P. Routray<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Dara Singh\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Odisha\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Criminal Appeal No. 556 of 2007, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Ori 85<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Sarda Mines (P) Ltd. v. State of Odisha<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before S. Muralidhar<\/strong>, C.J. and B.P. Routray, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  W.P. (C) No. 17905 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Sarda Mines Pvt. Ltd. and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Odisha and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Opposite Parties.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  With<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  W.P.(C) No. 3115 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Sarda Mines Pvt. Ltd. and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Odisha and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Opposite Parties.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  With<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  W.P.(C) No. 6905 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Sarda Mines Pvt. Ltd. and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Joint Director of Mines, Joda and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Opposite Parties.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  And<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  CONTC No. 3650 of 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Sarda Mines Pvt. Ltd.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Sunil Kumar Behera\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Opposite Parties.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 17905, 3115, 6905 of 2021 and CONTC No. 3650 of 2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Pat 49<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Rajendra Ray v. State of Bihar<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Patna<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sanjay Karol<\/strong>, C.J. and S. Kumar, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Rajendra Ray\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Bihar through its Secretary, Food and Supply Department and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10261 of 2021, Decided on January 7, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Pat 50<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Rajendra Singh v. State of Bihar<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Patna<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sanjay Karol<\/strong>, C.J. and S. Kumar, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Rajendra Singh\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Bihar and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11422 of 2021, Decided on January 7, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Pat 51<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Khwaza Fruit and Vegetable v. State of Bihar<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Patna<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sanjay Karol<\/strong>, C.J. and S. Kumar, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Khwaza Fruit and Vegetable, through its Proprietor Md. Moijuddin and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11709 of 2021, Decided on January 7, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Pat 52<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Nabab Hussain v. State of Bihar<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Patna<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sanjay Karol<\/strong>, C.J. and S. Kumar, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Nabab Hussain\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Bihar and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11715 of 2021, Decided on January 7, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Pat 53<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Nandlal Ram v. State of Bihar<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Patna<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sanjay Karol<\/strong>, C.J. and S. Kumar, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Nandlal Ram\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Bihar through the Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11720 of 2021, Decided on January 7, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Pat 54<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Rajesh Kumar v. State of Bihar<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Patna<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sanjay Karol, C.J. and S. Kumar<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Rajesh Kumar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Bihar and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 12826 of 2021, Decided on January 7, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Pat 55<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Rajesh Ranjan v. State of Bihar<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Patna<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sanjay Karol, C.J. and S. Kumar<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Rajesh Ranjan\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Bihar through Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 20488 of 2021, Decided on January 7, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Pat 56<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Somesh Shashi v. Veer Kunwar Singh University<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Patna<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sanjay Karol<\/strong>, C.J. and S. Kumar, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Dr. Somesh Shashi\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Veer Kunwar Singh University Ara, through its Registrar and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 20489 of 2021, Decided on January 7, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Pat 57<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Ramanand Saw v. State of Bihar<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Patna<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sanjay Karol, C.J. and S. Kumar<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Ramanand Saw\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Bihar through Principal Secretary Rural Work Department and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 20578 of 2021, Decided on January 7, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Pat 58<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Praveen Kumar Jha v. State of Bihar<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Patna<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sanjay Karol, C.J. and S. Kumar<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Praveen Kumar Jha\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Bihar through Additional Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 20659 of 2021, Decided on January 7, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Pat 59<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Ramjee Prasad v. Union of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Patna<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sanjay Karol<\/strong>, C.J. and S. Kumar, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Ramjee Prasad and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Union of India through the Ministry of Communication and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 20672 of 2021, Decided on January 7, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Pat 60<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Manoranjan Mishra v. State of Bihar<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Patna<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sanjay Karol, C.J. and S. Kumar<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Manoranjan Mishra\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban and Housing Development Department and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 20717 of 2021, Decided on January 7, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Pat 61<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Shree Badi Devi Mandir v. State of Bihar<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Patna<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sanjay Karol<\/strong>, C.J. and S. Kumar, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Shree Badi Devi Mandir, Marufganj Prabhand Samiti, through its President namely Ghayan Shayam Sharma and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner\/s;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent\/s.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 20834 of 2021, Decided on January 7, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine P&H 2859<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Lovepreet Singh v. State of Punjab<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Manoj Bajaj<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Lovepreet Singh \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Applicant\/Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Punjab\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  CRM-15668-2021 and CRM-M-12873-2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine P&H 2860<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Bishan Kumar v. State of Haryana<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Lalit Batra<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Bishan Kumar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Haryana and Another \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  CRM-16236-2021 and CRM-M-10887-2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine P&H 2861<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Daya Ram v. State of Haryana<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Raj Mohan Singh<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Daya Ram\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Haryana \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  CRM-M No. 14328 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine P&H 2862<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Jugraj Singh v. State of Punjab<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Raj Mohan Singh<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Jugraj Singh\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Punjab\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  CRM-M No. 17363 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine P&H 2863<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Nirmal Singh v. State of Haryana<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Raj Mohan Singh<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Nirmal Singh\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Haryana \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  CRM-M No. 17926 of 2020 (O&M), Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine P&H 2864<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Himanshu Sharma v. State of Haryana<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Gurvinder Singh Gill<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Himanshu Sharma\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Haryana \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  CRM-M-14868-2021 (O&M), Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine P&H 2865<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Mandeep Singh v. State of Punjab<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Arun Kumar Tyagi<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Mandeep Singh\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Punjab\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  CRM-M-151-2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine P&H 2866<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Balihar Dhillon v. State of Punjab<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Harinder Singh Sidhu<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Balihar Dhillon\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Punjab and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  CRM-M-17547 of 2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine P&H 2867<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Sumit Jain v. State of Haryana<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Jasgurpreet Singh Puri<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Sumit Jain\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner(s);<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Haryana \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent(s).<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  CRM-M-17907-2019, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine P&H 2868<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Anil Chaudhary v. State of Haryana<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Manoj Bajaj<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Anil Chaudhary \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Haryana \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  CRM-M-18114-2021, Decided on July 1, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine P&H 2858<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Allahabad Bank v. DM, Ludhiana<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Jaswant Singh<\/strong> and Harinder Singh Sidhu, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Allahabad Bank, through its Chief Manager\/Authorised Officer Sh. Nishant Shukla\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  District Magistrate, Ludhiana and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  CM No. 3178-CWP of 2021 and CWP No. 4916 of 2020, Decided on September 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine P&H 82<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Gulzar Singh v. Manga Singh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Archana Puri<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Gulzar Singh and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Manga Singh and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  CR-3368-2021 (O&M), Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine P&H 83<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Pawandeep Kaur v. State of Punjab<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sudhir Mittal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Pawandeep Kaur\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Punjab and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  CW.P. No. 22257 of 2016, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine P&H 84<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Rajender v. State of Haryana<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before H.S. Madaan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Rajender\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Haryana and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  CW.P. No. 341 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine P&H 85<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Dalbir Singh v. State of Haryana<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before H.S. Madaan<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Dalbir Singh\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Haryana and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  CWP-13092-2020 (O&M), Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2875<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Omprakash v. State<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sabina and Rameshwar Vyas, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Omprakash, Through His Mother Smt. Valu Devi\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State, Through Secretary of Home Department and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  D.B. Criminal Parole Writ Petition No. 459\/2020, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2876<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Chajjiya v. State<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sabina and Rameshwar Vyas, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Chajjiya\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State, through Secretary Home and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2877<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Prateek v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sabina and Rameshwar Vyas, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Prateek, through his wife Smt. Priyanka Jain\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 227\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2878<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Joruram v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Joruram and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, Through P.P.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Misc (Pet.) No. 1767\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2879<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Priyanka Bhatt v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Priyanka Bhatt and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Misc (Pet.) No. 1962\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2880<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Baljinder Kumar v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Baljinder Kumar \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, Through P.P.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Misc (Pet.) No. 2362\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2881<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Shyam Lal v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Shyam Lal\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Misc (Pet.) No. 2436\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2882<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Mahendra Singh v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Mahendra Singh \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, Through PP and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Misc (Pet.) No. 2556\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2883<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Dashrath Das v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Dashrath Das\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, Through P.P.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Misc (Pet.) No. 2741\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2884<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Goverdhan Lal v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Goverdhan Lal\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, Through P.P.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Misc (Pet.) No. 2745\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2885<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Vinit Soni v. State<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Vinit Soni \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State, Through PP and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Misc (Pet.) No. 2880\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2886<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Ritik v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Ritik and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, Through PP\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Misc (Pet.) No. 3033\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2887<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Priyanka Bengani v. State<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Priyanka Bengani\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State, Through PP and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Misc (Pet.) No. 3050\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2888<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Gurpreet Singh v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Gurpreet Singh\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, Through PP\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Misc (Pet.) No. 3127\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2889<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Sunita v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Sunita and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, Through the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Misc (Pet.) No. 3140\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2890<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Aarti v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Aarti and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Misc (Pet.) No. 3142\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2891<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Bharat Singh v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Bharat Singh and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Misc (Pet.) No. 3145\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2892<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Parvati Kumari v. State<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Parvati Kumari and Another\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State, Through PP and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Misc (Pet.) No. 3146\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2893<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Sarita Beniwal v. State<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Sarita Beniwal and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State, Through Chief Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Misc (Pet.) No. 3149\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2894<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Sheetal Kumawat v. State<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Sheetal Kumawat and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State, Through Chief Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Misc (Pet.) No. 3150\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2895<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Subita v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Subita and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, Through the Secretary, Dept. of Home Affairs and Others\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Misc (Pet.) No. 3153\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2896<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Pawan Kumari v. State<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Pawan Kumari and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State, Through Chief Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Misc (Pet.) No. 3154\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2897<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Meena Kumari v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Meena Kumari and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Misc (Pet.) No. 3156\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2898<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Vikram Singh v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Vikram Singh and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, Through PP and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Misc (Pet.) No. 3180\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2899<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Vandana v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Vandana and Another\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Misc (Pet.) No. 3198\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2900<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Saroj v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Saroj and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department of Home Affairs and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Misc (Pet.) No. 3199\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2901<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Dimpal Bhati v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Dimpal Bhati and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Misc (Pet.) No. 3200\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2902<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Keshra Ram v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sandeep Mehta<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Keshra Ram\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, Through PP\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Misc (Pet.) No. 6506\/2019, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2903<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Prakash Rao v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sandeep Mehta<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Prakash Rao\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, Through P.p.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 143\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2904<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Chandan Kumar v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sandeep Mehta<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Chandan Kumar \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, Through PP and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1460\/2019, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2905<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Kalu Singh v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sandeep Mehta<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Kalu Singh\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 239\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2906<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Sarita v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sandeep Mehta<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Sarita\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, Through PP and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 351\/2019, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2907<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Kantilal v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sandeep Mehta<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Kantilal\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, Through P.p. and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 373\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2908<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  X v. State<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sandeep Mehta<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  X\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State, Through PP and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 510\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2909<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Shankar Lal v. State<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sandeep Mehta<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Shankar Lal\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State, Through PP and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 746\/2020, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2910<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  X v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sandeep Mehta<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  X, Through Legal Guardian-Kaluram Bhargav\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, Through PP and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 852\/2020, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2911<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Shivlal v. State<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Shivlal\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State, Through Secretary, Home Department and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 302\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2912<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Ram Singh v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Ram Singh\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, Dept. of Home and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 374\/2021, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2021 SCC OnLine Raj 2913<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Nand Lal Vyas v. State<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Nand Lal Vyas\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Home Department and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 387\/2019, Decided on July 6, 2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Raj 42<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Raja Singh v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sandeep Mehta and Vinod Kumar Bharwani, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Raja Singh\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, through PP and Another \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 771\/2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Raj 43<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Jitendra Kumar Mathur v. Rajasthan Agriculture University<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Sandeep Mehta and Vinod Kumar Bharwani, JJ.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Jitendra Kumar Mathur \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Rajasthan Agriculture University through its Registrar and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  D.B. Writ Misc Application No. 310\/2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Raj 44<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Ashok Kumar Sahu v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Rekha Borana<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Ashok Kumar Sahu and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, through the Secretary Medical and Health Department, Government of Rajasthan and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11199\/2019, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Raj 45<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Lalit Sharma v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Rekha Borana<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14301\/2016<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Lalit Sharma\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan through the Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Rajasthan and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Connected With<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12002\/2016<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Shrawan Kumar and Another \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of rajasthan through the Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Rajasthan and Others \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14301\/2016 and S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12002\/2016, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Raj 46<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Sandhya Bhati v. Union of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Dinesh Mehta<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Sandhya Bhati and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Union of India, through central Registrar of Co-Operative Societies, Ministry of Cooperation, Government of India and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17160\/2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Raj 47<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Chetan Choudhary v. Union of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Dinesh Mehta<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Chetan Choudhary\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Union of India, through its Joint Secretary (Co-Op.) and Central Registrar and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17451\/2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Raj 48<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Gaje Singh v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Dinesh Mehta<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Gaje Singh and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, through District Collector and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17541\/2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Raj 49<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Mukesh Bheel v. Bharat Petroleum Co. Ltd.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Dinesh Mehta<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Mukesh Bheel\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Bharat Petroleum Co. Ltd. and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17635\/2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Raj 50<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Anil Kumar v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Mahendar Kumar Goyal<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Anil Kumar\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, through its Additional Chief Secretary (Department of Home), Government of Rajasthan and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 189\/2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Raj 51<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Ladhuram v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Dinesh Mehta<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Ladhuram and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, through Secretary, Revenue Department, Govt. of Rajasthan and Others\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 229\/2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Raj 52<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Minakshi Kumari v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Minakshi Kumari\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, through the Secretary, Medical and Family Welfare Department and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 258\/2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Raj 53<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Ram Prasad Meena v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Pushpendra Singh Bhati<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Ram Prasad Meena\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, through the Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Rajasthan and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 266\/2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Raj 54<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Bheru Singh v. Union of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Dinesh Mehta<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Bheru Singh\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Union of India, through Ministry of Road, Transport and Highway, Government of India, through Secretary and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 270\/2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Raj 55<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Bhanwar Lal v. Union of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Dinesh Mehta<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Bhanwar Lal and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Union of India, through its Joint Secretary (Co-Op.) and Central Registrar and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 302\/2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Raj 56<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Bhanwar Lal Paliwal v. Union of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Dinesh Mehta<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Bhanwar Lal Paliwal\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Union of India, through its Joint Secretary (Co-Op.) and Central Registrar and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 319\/2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Raj 57<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Bhima Ram v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Dinesh Mehta<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Bhima Ram\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, through the Additional Divisional Commissioner and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 397\/2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Raj 58<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Saroj Bairwa v. State of Rajashtan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Rekha Borana<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Saroj Bairwa\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajashtan through Secretary Department of Ayurved and Indian Medicine, Government of Rajasthan and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6458\/2018, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Raj 59<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Amritlal Kothari v. Union of India<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Dinesh Mehta<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Amritlal Kothari and Another \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Union of India, through the Secretary, Finance Department, Government of India and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8379\/2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Raj 60<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Shivlal Meena v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Dinesh Mehta<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Shivlal Meena and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioners;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, through the Secretary, Department of Urban Development and Housing, Govt. of Raj. and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8501\/2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Raj 61<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Pradeep Singh v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Vinit Kumar Mathur<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Pradeep Singh\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Appellant;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, through PP and Another \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 300\/2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Raj 62<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Bheru Lal v. State of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Rajasthan<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Vinit Kumar Mathur<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7299\/2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Bheru Lal \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Rajasthan, through P.P.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Connected With<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14338\/2021<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Lalit\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State, through PP\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7299\/2021 and S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14338\/2021, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Tri 11<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Tripura v. Bimal Chakraborty<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Tripura at Agartala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Indrajit Mahanty<\/strong>, C.J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Tripura and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Applicant(s);<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Bimal Chakraborty\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent(s).<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  I.A. No. 01\/2021 and W.P. (C) No. 304\/2021(DO), Decided on January 7, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Tri 12<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Sekhar Ranjan Roy v. Tripura Road Transport Corporation<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Tripura at Agartala<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Indrajit Mahanty<\/strong>, C.J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Sekhar Ranjan Roy and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner(s);<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Tripura Road Transport Corporation and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondent(s).<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  W.P. (C) No. 778\/2021, Decided on January 7, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Utt 23<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Chandra Singh v. State of Uttarakhand<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Manoj Kumar Tiwari<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Chandra Singh\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Uttarakhand and Another\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Writ Petition (M\/S) No. 25 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n

                                                                                                                                  2022 SCC OnLine Utt 24<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Kohli Enterprises v. State of Uttarakhand<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  In the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital<\/strong><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  (Before Manoj Kumar Tiwari<\/strong>, J.)<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Kohli Enterprises A partnership Firm\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Petitioner;<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Versus<\/em><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  State of Uttarakhand and Others\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2026\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Respondents.<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Writ Petition (M\/S) No. 52 of 2022, Decided on January 10, 2022<\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  Read Full Judgment >><\/a><\/p>\n

                                                                                                                                  \n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                                                                                                                  2019 SCC OnLine All 6936 Abdul Malik v. Nafeesa Khatoon In the High Court of Allahabad (Before Jaspreet Singh, J.) Abdul Malik <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":260133,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-260105","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casesreported","category-supremecourtcases"],"yoast_head":"\nJudgments uploaded on SCC Online | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/judgments-uploaded-on-scc-online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Judgments uploaded on SCC Online\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"2019 SCC OnLine All 6936 Abdul Malik v. Nafeesa Khatoon In the High Court of Allahabad (Before Jaspreet Singh, J.) Abdul Malik\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/judgments-uploaded-on-scc-online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-01-14T10:46:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SCC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"157 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/judgments-uploaded-on-scc-online\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/judgments-uploaded-on-scc-online\/\",\"name\":\"Judgments uploaded on SCC Online | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/judgments-uploaded-on-scc-online\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/judgments-uploaded-on-scc-online\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SCC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-01-14T10:46:24+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/judgments-uploaded-on-scc-online\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/judgments-uploaded-on-scc-online\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/judgments-uploaded-on-scc-online\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SCC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SCC.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/judgments-uploaded-on-scc-online\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Judgments uploaded on SCC Online\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Judgments uploaded on SCC Online | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/judgments-uploaded-on-scc-online\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Judgments uploaded on SCC Online","og_description":"2019 SCC OnLine All 6936 Abdul Malik v. Nafeesa Khatoon In the High Court of Allahabad (Before Jaspreet Singh, J.) Abdul Malik","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/judgments-uploaded-on-scc-online\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-01-14T10:46:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SCC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"157 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/judgments-uploaded-on-scc-online\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/judgments-uploaded-on-scc-online\/","name":"Judgments uploaded on SCC Online | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/judgments-uploaded-on-scc-online\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/judgments-uploaded-on-scc-online\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SCC.jpg","datePublished":"2022-01-14T10:46:24+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/judgments-uploaded-on-scc-online\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/judgments-uploaded-on-scc-online\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/judgments-uploaded-on-scc-online\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SCC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SCC.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/judgments-uploaded-on-scc-online\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Judgments uploaded on SCC Online"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/SCC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":282441,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/25\/fundamental-right-to-speedy-trial-has-been-violated-allahabad-high-court-quashed-criminal-proceedings-in-electricity-theft-case-pending-for-more-than-18-years-legal-research-legal\/","url_meta":{"origin":260105,"position":0},"title":"\u201cFundamental Right to Speedy Trial has been violated\u201d: Allahabad High Court quashes criminal proceedings in electricity theft case, pending for more than 18 years","author":"Editor","date":"January 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Right of speedy trial is a fundamental right, and its violation causes prejudice even to the accused person","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image31.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":348384,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/20\/allahabad-high-court-upholds-naima-khatoon-amu-vice-chancellor\/","url_meta":{"origin":260105,"position":1},"title":"Allahabad High Court upholds appointment of Aligarh Muslim University’s first woman vice-chancellor Naima Khatoon","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 20, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn the history of the University for well over a century no women has ever been appointed as Vice-chancellor. Appointment of woman as Vice-Chancellor of a premier institution of higher learning sends a message that the constitutional objective of advancement of cause of women is being promoted.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":253117,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/23\/double-murder-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":260105,"position":2},"title":"Brutal and Heinous Double Murder Case of Wife & Daughter || Criminal Conspiracy, generally hatched in secrecy [All HC\u2019s critical ruling]","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Sanjay Kumar Singh, J. while addressing a bail application of an accused expressed that, \u201cA criminal conspiracy is generally hatched in secrecy, and it is difficult to obtain direct evidence.\u201d Instant bail application was filed to seek bail in a case filed under Sections 302, 201, 120-B\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":214634,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/14\/pat-hc-court-interference-with-quantum-of-compensation-granted-by-motor-accident-claims-tribunal-held-not-warranted\/","url_meta":{"origin":260105,"position":3},"title":"Pat HC | Court interference with\u00a0quantum of compensation granted by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, held not warranted","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: The Bench of S. Kumar, J. dismissed an appeal filed by the insurance company against the judgment and award passed by Motor Vehicle Accident Claim Tribunal, Bihar. The son of claimant died on the spot when a vehicle dashed against him. As a result, he filed a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":286490,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/06\/central-government-may-take-appropriate-decision-to-ban-cow-slaughtering-in-india-and-to-declare-cows-as-protected-national-animal-allahabad-high-court-legal-research-updates-new\/","url_meta":{"origin":260105,"position":4},"title":"Central Government may take appropriate decision to ban cow slaughtering in India and declare cows as \u2018protected national animal\u2019: Allahabad High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court said that anyone who kills cows or allows others to kill them is deemed to rot in hell as many years as there are hairs upon his body.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-476.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":330084,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/04\/utthc-dismisses-bail-plea-of-abdul-malik-haldwani-violence-as-non-maintainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":260105,"position":5},"title":"[Haldwani Violence] \u2018Appeal lies u\/s 21 of NIA Act before Division Bench\u2019; Uttaranchal HC dismisses bail plea of Abdul Malik","author":"Simranjeet","date":"September 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Under Section 21 of NIA Act, appeals are filed against Special Court\u2019s order and thus in view of the powers that are conferred on the Court of Session for exercising the jurisdiction of the Special Court, orders passed by the Court of Session under Section 22(3) shall also be appealable\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Uttaranchal High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Uttaranchal-High-Court-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Uttaranchal-High-Court-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Uttaranchal-High-Court-2.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Uttaranchal-High-Court-2.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260105","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=260105"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260105\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/260133"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=260105"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=260105"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=260105"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}