{"id":260047,"date":"2022-01-14T18:00:06","date_gmt":"2022-01-14T12:30:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=260047"},"modified":"2022-01-20T15:35:21","modified_gmt":"2022-01-20T10:05:21","slug":"jurisdiction-for-claim-of-refund-filed-initiated-to-be-dealt-under-the-provision-central-excise-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/jurisdiction-for-claim-of-refund-filed-initiated-to-be-dealt-under-the-provision-central-excise-law\/","title":{"rendered":"CESTAT | Jurisdiction for claim of refund filed\/initiated to be dealt under the provision Central Excise law and not by the provision of CGST law"},"content":{"rendered":"

Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): <\/strong>Ashok Jindal (Judicial Member) dismissed the application filed by the Revenue (CCE & ST, Panchkula) for ratification of mistake in a final order by the Tribunal which was noticed by the Applicant. The Tribunal dealt with two issues (a) whether to ratify previous order & (b) to deal with the jurisdiction.<\/p>\n

The Department’s contention was that while deciding in the instant matters has wrongly relied upon the case of M\/s. Sandvik Asia Ltd. v. CIT Pune as in this case the Apex Court was dealing with Section 214 and 244(1A) of the Income tax Act 1961 whereas nothing has been provided in the Central Excise Act, 1944\/ Service Tax Act, 1994 at the relevant time. Authorized Representative while presenting this contention relied on a SC case where the Court had held that even there is mistake of law which however should be apparent on the face of record which does not need long drawn process of reasoning and can be subject matter of rectification of mistake.<\/p>\n

For this the Tribunal held that it found no mistake apparent on the face of record after examining the definition of the phrase \u201cerror apparent on face of records<\/em>\u201d. Further, it held that “the applicant is seeking to challenge the merits of the order dated 07-01-2020 to recall the same which is not permissible in law as the same shall amounts to review of its own order.”<\/p>\n

The Revenue also filed miscellaneous application for modification in order by this Tribunal to implead the Commissioner, CGST, Rohtak as the respondent in the final order dated 7-1-2020, the appellant had wrongly impleaded the Commissioner, CGST, CE & ST, Panchkula, as the correct respondent should have been the Commissioner of CGST & CE, Rohtak and asked that the order be recalled. The Respondents submitted that the Tribunal doesn’t have the power to hear at this stage- the issue of jurisdiction. It was further submitted that the jurisdiction of the appellant\/respondent to the application lies with CGST, Panchkula Commissionerate.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal held that “the jurisdiction for the purpose of every claim of refund, every proceeding of appeal, review or reference before this Tribunal shall be dealt under the provision Central Excise law and not by the provision of CGST law<\/em>.” The jurisdiction of the appellant falls under the jurisdiction of DC Range Panipat and the DC Range, Panipat is under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of CGST, Panchkula. The Tribunal found no merit in the application and it was subsequently dismissed.[Riba Textiles v. CCE & ST, Panchkula, 2021 SCC OnLine CESTAT 2635<\/b><\/a>, decided on 30-12-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n

Present for the Appellant: Shri Dinesh Verma<\/p>\n

Present for the Respondent: Shri H.S. Brar<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): Ashok Jindal (Judicial Member) dismissed the application filed by the Revenue (CCE & ST, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":201689,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[39334,2554,2532,2531],"class_list":["post-260047","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-excise","tag-Jurisdiction","tag-Refund","tag-Revenue"],"yoast_head":"\nCESTAT | Jurisdiction for claim of refund filed\/initiated to be dealt under the provision Central Excise law and not by the provision of CGST law | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/jurisdiction-for-claim-of-refund-filed-initiated-to-be-dealt-under-the-provision-central-excise-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"CESTAT | Jurisdiction for claim of refund filed\/initiated to be dealt under the provision Central Excise law and not by the provision of CGST law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): Ashok Jindal (Judicial Member) dismissed the application filed by the Revenue (CCE & ST,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/jurisdiction-for-claim-of-refund-filed-initiated-to-be-dealt-under-the-provision-central-excise-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-01-14T12:30:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-01-20T10:05:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/jurisdiction-for-claim-of-refund-filed-initiated-to-be-dealt-under-the-provision-central-excise-law\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/jurisdiction-for-claim-of-refund-filed-initiated-to-be-dealt-under-the-provision-central-excise-law\/\",\"name\":\"CESTAT | Jurisdiction for claim of refund filed\/initiated to be dealt under the provision Central Excise law and not by the provision of CGST law | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/jurisdiction-for-claim-of-refund-filed-initiated-to-be-dealt-under-the-provision-central-excise-law\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/jurisdiction-for-claim-of-refund-filed-initiated-to-be-dealt-under-the-provision-central-excise-law\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-01-14T12:30:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-01-20T10:05:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/jurisdiction-for-claim-of-refund-filed-initiated-to-be-dealt-under-the-provision-central-excise-law\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/jurisdiction-for-claim-of-refund-filed-initiated-to-be-dealt-under-the-provision-central-excise-law\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/jurisdiction-for-claim-of-refund-filed-initiated-to-be-dealt-under-the-provision-central-excise-law\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/jurisdiction-for-claim-of-refund-filed-initiated-to-be-dealt-under-the-provision-central-excise-law\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"CESTAT | Jurisdiction for claim of refund filed\/initiated to be dealt under the provision Central Excise law and not by the provision of CGST law\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"CESTAT | Jurisdiction for claim of refund filed\/initiated to be dealt under the provision Central Excise law and not by the provision of CGST law | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/jurisdiction-for-claim-of-refund-filed-initiated-to-be-dealt-under-the-provision-central-excise-law\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"CESTAT | Jurisdiction for claim of refund filed\/initiated to be dealt under the provision Central Excise law and not by the provision of CGST law","og_description":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): Ashok Jindal (Judicial Member) dismissed the application filed by the Revenue (CCE & ST,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/jurisdiction-for-claim-of-refund-filed-initiated-to-be-dealt-under-the-provision-central-excise-law\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-01-14T12:30:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-01-20T10:05:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/jurisdiction-for-claim-of-refund-filed-initiated-to-be-dealt-under-the-provision-central-excise-law\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/jurisdiction-for-claim-of-refund-filed-initiated-to-be-dealt-under-the-provision-central-excise-law\/","name":"CESTAT | Jurisdiction for claim of refund filed\/initiated to be dealt under the provision Central Excise law and not by the provision of CGST law | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/jurisdiction-for-claim-of-refund-filed-initiated-to-be-dealt-under-the-provision-central-excise-law\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/jurisdiction-for-claim-of-refund-filed-initiated-to-be-dealt-under-the-provision-central-excise-law\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","datePublished":"2022-01-14T12:30:06+00:00","dateModified":"2022-01-20T10:05:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/jurisdiction-for-claim-of-refund-filed-initiated-to-be-dealt-under-the-provision-central-excise-law\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/jurisdiction-for-claim-of-refund-filed-initiated-to-be-dealt-under-the-provision-central-excise-law\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/jurisdiction-for-claim-of-refund-filed-initiated-to-be-dealt-under-the-provision-central-excise-law\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/14\/jurisdiction-for-claim-of-refund-filed-initiated-to-be-dealt-under-the-provision-central-excise-law\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"CESTAT | Jurisdiction for claim of refund filed\/initiated to be dealt under the provision Central Excise law and not by the provision of CGST law"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":264363,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/25\/excise-duty\/","url_meta":{"origin":260047,"position":0},"title":"P&H HC | Entitlement to compensation on general principles for inordinate delay in receiving monies due; Interest on refund of excise duty granted","author":"Editor","date":"March 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: The Division Bench of Ajay Tewari and Pankaj Jain, JJ., contemplated the appeal where the interest on refund of excise duty was rejected by the authorities. The main question before the Court was whether the assessee was entitled to interest. Factual Matrix of the case:\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":213864,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/bom-cestat-to-exercise-appellate-jurisdiction-as-a-fact-finding-authority-cryptic-order-with-a-single-observation-set-aside\/","url_meta":{"origin":260047,"position":1},"title":"Bom | CESTAT to exercise appellate jurisdiction as a fact finding authority; ‘cryptic order’ with a single observation set aside","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 23, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: S.C. Dharmadhikari and M.S. Karnik, JJ., allowed an appeal filed by the Commissioner of GST against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai. Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd. (assessee) was registered with the Central Excise Department. In 2009, the assessee entered into\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":281820,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/17\/service-tax-to-be-refunded-for-cancelled-flat-bookings-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":260047,"position":2},"title":"Cancelled Flat Bookings amount to non-performance of service; CESTAT directs Authorities to refund service tax to Builder","author":"Editor","date":"January 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"CESTAT states that cancelled flat bookings amount to non-performance of service,Held that Service tax is not applicable if no service is rendered.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"CESTAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-106.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":252472,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/10\/service-tax-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":260047,"position":3},"title":"CESTAT | Is Service Tax chargeable on the services rendered by the foreman in the chit fund business? Tribunal answers","author":"Editor","date":"August 10, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): P. Dinesha (Judicial Member) allowed an appeal which was filed after being rejected by the Adjudicating Authority and First Appellate Authority in relation to refund claim in the chit fund business. The appellant engaged in the chit fund business and after the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238280,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/30\/cestat-demand-of-interest-to-be-calculated-from-the-date-of-determination-of-due-amount-till-actual-date-of-payment-of-duty-tribunal-allows-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":260047,"position":4},"title":"CESTAT | Demand of interest to be calculated from the date of determination of due amount till actual date of payment of duty; Tribunal allows appeal","author":"Editor","date":"October 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): Anil Choudhary (Judicial Member), allowed an appeal which was filed aggrieved by the judgment and order given by Commissioner (Appeals). The issue before the Tribunal was whether the demand of interest was to be calculated from the date of clearance of goods\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237739,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/20\/cestat-interest-on-delayed-refund-is-payable-under-s-11bb-of-central-excise-act-1944-tribunal-allows-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":260047,"position":5},"title":"CESTAT | Interest on delayed refund is payable under S. 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944; Tribunal allows appeal","author":"Editor","date":"October 20, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): S.S. Garg (Judicial Member) allowed appeals directed against the common impugned order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) whereby the Commissioner had rejected appeals of the appellant and upheld the order passed by the original authority. Both appeals were taken together since the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260047","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=260047"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/260047\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/201689"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=260047"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=260047"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=260047"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}