{"id":259796,"date":"2022-01-10T13:00:19","date_gmt":"2022-01-10T07:30:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=259796"},"modified":"2022-01-14T11:56:25","modified_gmt":"2022-01-14T06:26:25","slug":"aggrieved-with-the-categorisation-as-unsecured-creditor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/10\/aggrieved-with-the-categorisation-as-unsecured-creditor\/","title":{"rendered":"NCLAT | Aggrieved with the categorisation as \u2018unsecured creditor\u2019, Tribunal secures \u2018secured creditor\u2019, having relinquished the security interest"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi:<\/strong> The Coram of Ashok Bhushan J, (Chairperson), and Dr Alok Srivastava (Technical Member) while accepting the appeal and rejecting the claim of the respondent, the Tribunal was of the opinion that the Adjudicating Authority committed an error in rejecting the claim of the appellant to be &#8216;secured creditor&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the instant case, the appellant challenged the impugned order of the National Company Law Tribunal, Ahemdabad Bench (Adjudicating Authority), where it has rejected the application. The Appellant had provided a loan which the debtor was unable to pay back, therefore the Financial Creditor of the Debtor filed an Application demanding proof of claim before the IRP. List of stakeholders and Financial Creditors was prepared by the Liquidator, regarding relinquishment of security interest in accordance with Section 52(1)(a) of the IB code in which the claim of the Appellant was put under the head of \u201camount unsecured\u201d. The Appellant filed an application against it. The Adjudicating Authority rejected the application.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Appellant submitted that the Adjudicating Authority committed an error in rejecting the application of the Appellant filed under Section 60 sub-section (5) of the IB Code and not under Section 42; hence limitation provided for filing an Appeal was not applicable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The respondent contented that the Appellant&#8217;s claim claiming an amount was accepted, but the Appellant was classified as \u2018unsecured creditor\u2019 under Section 77 subsection(3) of the Companies Act, 2013.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Tribunal concluded that the Adjudicating Authority had erred in rejecting the claim of the Appellant. The Tribunal while accepting the appeal directed the Respondent to correct the classification of claim of the Appellant as \u2018secured\u2019. It was of the opinion, \u201cBy virtue of judgment and order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal, the Appellants were entitled to recover their dues from the secured assets and they having<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">relinquished the security interest according to Section 52 of the IB Code, as was requested by the Liquidator, in the liquidation proceedings, they have to be treated as \u2018secured creditor\u2019.[SICOM Ltd. v Sundaresh\u00a0 Bhat, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/jv61c86L\"><b>2022 SCC OnLine NCLAT 5<\/b><\/a>, decided on 06-01-2022]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h4><span style=\"color: #993300;\">Agatha Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Counsel for the Parties:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong>For Appellant: <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Arun Kathpalia, Sr. Advocate,<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Pranaya Goyal, Dharav Shah,<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Diksha Gupta, Advocates<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>For Respondent: <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Nakul Dewan, Sr. Advocate with<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Abhishek Sharma, Ashly Cherian,<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Kamlendra Singh, Adv<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi: The Coram of Ashok Bhushan J, (Chairperson), and Dr Alok Srivastava (Technical Member) while accepting <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":153604,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-259796","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>NCLAT | Aggrieved with the categorisation as \u2018unsecured creditor\u2019, Tribunal secures \u2018secured creditor\u2019, having relinquished the security interest | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/10\/aggrieved-with-the-categorisation-as-unsecured-creditor\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"NCLAT | Aggrieved with the categorisation as \u2018unsecured creditor\u2019, Tribunal secures \u2018secured creditor\u2019, having relinquished the security interest\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi: The Coram of Ashok Bhushan J, (Chairperson), and Dr Alok Srivastava (Technical Member) while accepting\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/10\/aggrieved-with-the-categorisation-as-unsecured-creditor\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-01-10T07:30:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-01-14T06:26:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"844\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/10\/aggrieved-with-the-categorisation-as-unsecured-creditor\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/10\/aggrieved-with-the-categorisation-as-unsecured-creditor\/\",\"name\":\"NCLAT | Aggrieved with the categorisation as \u2018unsecured creditor\u2019, Tribunal secures \u2018secured creditor\u2019, having relinquished the security interest | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/10\/aggrieved-with-the-categorisation-as-unsecured-creditor\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/10\/aggrieved-with-the-categorisation-as-unsecured-creditor\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-01-10T07:30:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-01-14T06:26:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/10\/aggrieved-with-the-categorisation-as-unsecured-creditor\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/10\/aggrieved-with-the-categorisation-as-unsecured-creditor\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/10\/aggrieved-with-the-categorisation-as-unsecured-creditor\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":844},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/10\/aggrieved-with-the-categorisation-as-unsecured-creditor\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"NCLAT | Aggrieved with the categorisation as \u2018unsecured creditor\u2019, Tribunal secures \u2018secured creditor\u2019, having relinquished the security interest\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NCLAT | Aggrieved with the categorisation as \u2018unsecured creditor\u2019, Tribunal secures \u2018secured creditor\u2019, having relinquished the security interest | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/10\/aggrieved-with-the-categorisation-as-unsecured-creditor\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"NCLAT | Aggrieved with the categorisation as \u2018unsecured creditor\u2019, Tribunal secures \u2018secured creditor\u2019, having relinquished the security interest","og_description":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi: The Coram of Ashok Bhushan J, (Chairperson), and Dr Alok Srivastava (Technical Member) while accepting","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/10\/aggrieved-with-the-categorisation-as-unsecured-creditor\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-01-10T07:30:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-01-14T06:26:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":844,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/10\/aggrieved-with-the-categorisation-as-unsecured-creditor\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/10\/aggrieved-with-the-categorisation-as-unsecured-creditor\/","name":"NCLAT | Aggrieved with the categorisation as \u2018unsecured creditor\u2019, Tribunal secures \u2018secured creditor\u2019, having relinquished the security interest | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/10\/aggrieved-with-the-categorisation-as-unsecured-creditor\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/10\/aggrieved-with-the-categorisation-as-unsecured-creditor\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","datePublished":"2022-01-10T07:30:19+00:00","dateModified":"2022-01-14T06:26:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/10\/aggrieved-with-the-categorisation-as-unsecured-creditor\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/10\/aggrieved-with-the-categorisation-as-unsecured-creditor\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/10\/aggrieved-with-the-categorisation-as-unsecured-creditor\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","width":1330,"height":844},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/10\/aggrieved-with-the-categorisation-as-unsecured-creditor\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"NCLAT | Aggrieved with the categorisation as \u2018unsecured creditor\u2019, Tribunal secures \u2018secured creditor\u2019, having relinquished the security interest"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":296343,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/08\/corporate-debtor-cannot-constitute-committee-of-creditors-with-a-single-operational-creditor-under-ibc-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":259796,"position":0},"title":"Corporate Debtor cannot constitute Committee of Creditors with a single Operational Creditor under IBC: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"July 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NCLAT held that CIRP be closed with respect to the Corporate Debtor since not a single \u2018Claim' was received by the IRP even after the public announcement.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":289975,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/18\/nclt-admitted-section-9-ibc-application-nclat-objection-pre-existing-dispute-appeal-dismissed-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":259796,"position":1},"title":"To reject application under Sec. 9 IBC, a genuine pre-existing dispute must exist: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"April 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal held that no pre-existing dispute regarding quality of supplied goods exist as the same was not raised before consumption of the goods.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":304400,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/nclat-rejects-claim-to-be-financial-creditor-on-mere-reflection-of-name-in-balance-sheet-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":259796,"position":2},"title":"Reflection of name in balance sheet alone does not override rejection of claim to be Financial Creditor in Liquidation Proceedings: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"October 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In the instant matter, the appellant claimed to be a Financial Creditor as their name was included in the balance sheet of the Corporate Debtor.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215461,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/07\/nclat-claim-to-be-a-financial-creditor-valid-when-the-amount-disbursed-has-been-made-for-consideration-of-time-value-of-money-in-favour-of-borrower\/","url_meta":{"origin":259796,"position":3},"title":"NCLAT | Claim to be a &#8216;financial creditor&#8217; valid when amount disbursed has been made for consideration of time value of money in favour of borrower","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 7, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A Coram of Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J. (Chairperson), A.I.S. Cheema, J. (Judicial Member) and Kanthi Narhari (Technical Member) dismissed the appeal of Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited claiming to be a financial creditor of Rudra Buildwell Projects Private Limited. The appellant, Indiabulls, had sanctioned a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283118,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/04\/financial-creditor-application-section-7-ibc-nclt-cirp-corporate-debtor-consent-terms-breach-subsequent-application-allowed-appeal-nclat-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":259796,"position":4},"title":"Nature of Financial Debt does not change on account of breach of consent terms | NCLAT","author":"Editor","date":"February 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While upholding the NCLT's order of admission of fresh application and initiation of CIRP against the Corporate Debtor, the Tribunal held that the nature of financial debt would not change on account of breach of the consent terms.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":293529,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/31\/nclat-upheld-nclt-order-debt-remains-unpaid-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":259796,"position":5},"title":"No benefit to Corporate Debtor, if Criminal Proceedings were initiated after receipt of Demand Notice: NCLAT upholds NCLT&#8217;s order","author":"Ritu","date":"May 31, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While upholding NCLT's order the NCLAT held that in the present case there is a debt which remained unpaid by the Operational Creditor.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259796","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=259796"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259796\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/153604"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=259796"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=259796"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=259796"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}