{"id":259555,"date":"2022-01-05T15:00:09","date_gmt":"2022-01-05T09:30:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=259555"},"modified":"2022-01-07T11:08:07","modified_gmt":"2022-01-07T05:38:07","slug":"mp-hc-dismissal-of-application-under-s-34-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-of-1996-on-ground-of-limitation-will-come-within-the-purview-of-refusing-to-set-aside-an-arbitration-award","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/05\/mp-hc-dismissal-of-application-under-s-34-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-of-1996-on-ground-of-limitation-will-come-within-the-purview-of-refusing-to-set-aside-an-arbitration-award\/","title":{"rendered":"MP HC | Dismissal of application under S. 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 on ground of limitation will come within the purview of refusing to set aside an arbitration award"},"content":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/strong> Vishal Dhagat, J. allowed an arbitration appeal against an impugned order passed by the First ADJ of Balaghat (MP).<\/p>\n

The facts of the case were that the Court held that limitation for filing application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “Act, 1996”) shall be counted from date of passing of award dated 22-06-2017. Application filed for modification of award under Section 33 of Act of 1996 will not have any bearing as said application was filed on merits of award and not on grounds under Section 33(1) (a) (b).<\/p>\n

In the present matter the counsel for appellant contended that they should have been given the benefit of Section 33 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. Running of limitation should have been considered from the date of the rejection of the application instead of the date of passing of the order. On the other hand the respondent’s counsel contended that the application was dismissed and the award given therein was not modified hence the dismissal stands justified.<\/p>\n

The Court was of the view that Dismissal of application under Section 34 of Act of 1996 on ground of limitation will come within the purview of refusing to set aside an arbitration award, therefore, appeal under Section 37 will be maintainable if application under Section 34 is dismissed on ground of limitation. The court eventually ‘set aside’ the impugned order which dismissed the application of the appellant filled under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.[Sar Parivahan v. Hindustan Copper Ltd., 2021 SCC OnLine MP 2477<\/b><\/a>, decided on 04-12-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n

Advocate for petitioner<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n

Adv. C. Veda Rao<\/p>\n

Advocate for Respondent <\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n

Shri R.K Sanghi<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court: Vishal Dhagat, J. allowed an arbitration appeal against an impugned order passed by the First ADJ of Balaghat <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3226,34829,3655],"class_list":["post-259555","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-arbitration","tag-conciliation","tag-limitation"],"yoast_head":"\nMP HC | Dismissal of application under S. 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 on ground of limitation will come within the purview of refusing to set aside an arbitration award | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/05\/mp-hc-dismissal-of-application-under-s-34-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-of-1996-on-ground-of-limitation-will-come-within-the-purview-of-refusing-to-set-aside-an-arbitration-award\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP HC | Dismissal of application under S. 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 on ground of limitation will come within the purview of refusing to set aside an arbitration award\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Vishal Dhagat, J. allowed an arbitration appeal against an impugned order passed by the First ADJ of Balaghat\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/05\/mp-hc-dismissal-of-application-under-s-34-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-of-1996-on-ground-of-limitation-will-come-within-the-purview-of-refusing-to-set-aside-an-arbitration-award\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-01-05T09:30:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-01-07T05:38:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/05\/mp-hc-dismissal-of-application-under-s-34-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-of-1996-on-ground-of-limitation-will-come-within-the-purview-of-refusing-to-set-aside-an-arbitration-award\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/05\/mp-hc-dismissal-of-application-under-s-34-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-of-1996-on-ground-of-limitation-will-come-within-the-purview-of-refusing-to-set-aside-an-arbitration-award\/\",\"name\":\"MP HC | Dismissal of application under S. 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 on ground of limitation will come within the purview of refusing to set aside an arbitration award | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-01-05T09:30:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-01-07T05:38:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/05\/mp-hc-dismissal-of-application-under-s-34-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-of-1996-on-ground-of-limitation-will-come-within-the-purview-of-refusing-to-set-aside-an-arbitration-award\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/05\/mp-hc-dismissal-of-application-under-s-34-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-of-1996-on-ground-of-limitation-will-come-within-the-purview-of-refusing-to-set-aside-an-arbitration-award\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/05\/mp-hc-dismissal-of-application-under-s-34-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-of-1996-on-ground-of-limitation-will-come-within-the-purview-of-refusing-to-set-aside-an-arbitration-award\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP HC | Dismissal of application under S. 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 on ground of limitation will come within the purview of refusing to set aside an arbitration award\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP HC | Dismissal of application under S. 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 on ground of limitation will come within the purview of refusing to set aside an arbitration award | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/05\/mp-hc-dismissal-of-application-under-s-34-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-of-1996-on-ground-of-limitation-will-come-within-the-purview-of-refusing-to-set-aside-an-arbitration-award\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP HC | Dismissal of application under S. 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 on ground of limitation will come within the purview of refusing to set aside an arbitration award","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Vishal Dhagat, J. allowed an arbitration appeal against an impugned order passed by the First ADJ of Balaghat","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/05\/mp-hc-dismissal-of-application-under-s-34-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-of-1996-on-ground-of-limitation-will-come-within-the-purview-of-refusing-to-set-aside-an-arbitration-award\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2022-01-05T09:30:09+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-01-07T05:38:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/05\/mp-hc-dismissal-of-application-under-s-34-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-of-1996-on-ground-of-limitation-will-come-within-the-purview-of-refusing-to-set-aside-an-arbitration-award\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/05\/mp-hc-dismissal-of-application-under-s-34-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-of-1996-on-ground-of-limitation-will-come-within-the-purview-of-refusing-to-set-aside-an-arbitration-award\/","name":"MP HC | Dismissal of application under S. 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 on ground of limitation will come within the purview of refusing to set aside an arbitration award | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-01-05T09:30:09+00:00","dateModified":"2022-01-07T05:38:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/05\/mp-hc-dismissal-of-application-under-s-34-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-of-1996-on-ground-of-limitation-will-come-within-the-purview-of-refusing-to-set-aside-an-arbitration-award\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/05\/mp-hc-dismissal-of-application-under-s-34-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-of-1996-on-ground-of-limitation-will-come-within-the-purview-of-refusing-to-set-aside-an-arbitration-award\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/05\/mp-hc-dismissal-of-application-under-s-34-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-of-1996-on-ground-of-limitation-will-come-within-the-purview-of-refusing-to-set-aside-an-arbitration-award\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP HC | Dismissal of application under S. 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 on ground of limitation will come within the purview of refusing to set aside an arbitration award"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":363311,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/interplay-between-sections-33-34-arbitration-act-experts-corner\/","url_meta":{"origin":259555,"position":0},"title":"When Does the Clock Start Ticking? The Interplay Between Sections 33 and 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996","author":"Editor","date":"October 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Arush Khanna* and Gurdev Singh Tung**","rel":"","context":"In "Experts Corner"","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sections 33 and 34 Arbitration Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Sections-33-and-34-Arbitration-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Sections-33-and-34-Arbitration-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Sections-33-and-34-Arbitration-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Sections-33-and-34-Arbitration-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":358948,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/04\/pat-hc-refers-to-larger-bench-on-limitation-act-applicability-to-arbitration-bihar-public-works-contract\/","url_meta":{"origin":259555,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Condonation of delay under Bihar Public Works Contracts Disputes Arbitration Act governed by Limitation Act or Arbitration and Conciliation Act?\u2019: Patna HC refers matter to larger bench","author":"Editor","date":"September 4, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAs there is conflicting view upon the same by co-ordinate benches, in such circumstances this Court is of the view that the issue should be examined by a larger bench.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Limitation Act applicability to Arbitration","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Limitation-Act-applicability-to-Arbitration.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Limitation-Act-applicability-to-Arbitration.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Limitation-Act-applicability-to-Arbitration.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Limitation-Act-applicability-to-Arbitration.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298671,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/madhya-pradesh-hc-allows-fresh-adjudication-on-limitation-issue-in-arbitration-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":259555,"position":2},"title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court allows fresh adjudication on limitation issue in Arbitration appeal","author":"Ritu","date":"August 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the Trial Court failed to properly adjudicate the issue related to calculation of limitation period.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":341995,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/21\/novel-plea-non-receipt-signed-award-copy-cannot-be-raised-appeal-gujarat-hc-rejects-nhai-appeals\/","url_meta":{"origin":259555,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Novel plea of non-receipt of signed award copy cannot be raised in appeal\u2019; Gujarat HC rejects NHAI\u2019s appeals against dismissal of S. 34 applications due to delay","author":"Editor","date":"February 21, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA novel plea has been taken for the first time without any substantial basis on the factual aspects about the non-delivery of the copy of the award by the Arbitrator to the NHAI, in the present appeal, which cannot be appreciated within the limited scope of Section 37.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Gujarat High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":362407,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/03\/rajasthan-high-court-appellate-power-under-section-37-arbitration-appeal-no-arbitration-clause-limitation\/","url_meta":{"origin":259555,"position":4},"title":"Rajasthan High Court: Appellate power under Section 37 confined to domain of Section 34 of Arbitration Act","author":"Editor","date":"October 3, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe scope of the intervention of the court in arbitral matters is virtually prohibited, if not absolutely barred.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Appellate power under Section 37","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Appellate-power-under-Section-37.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Appellate-power-under-Section-37.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Appellate-power-under-Section-37.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Appellate-power-under-Section-37.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":319130,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/enforcement-of-arbitral-awards-india-analysis-potential-issues-strategies-for-success\/","url_meta":{"origin":259555,"position":5},"title":"Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in India: An Analysis of Potential Issues and Strategies for Success","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 2, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Vasant Rajasekaran* and Harshvardhan Korada** Cite as: 2024 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 26","rel":"","context":"In "Experts Corner"","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"enforcement of arbitral awards","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/enforcement-of-arbitral-awards.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/enforcement-of-arbitral-awards.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/enforcement-of-arbitral-awards.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/enforcement-of-arbitral-awards.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259555","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=259555"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259555\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=259555"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=259555"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=259555"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}