{"id":259221,"date":"2021-12-29T14:00:56","date_gmt":"2021-12-29T08:30:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=259221"},"modified":"2021-12-31T14:38:13","modified_gmt":"2021-12-31T09:08:13","slug":"divisional-commissioner-not-empowered-to-issue-orders-under-s-144-of-crpc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/29\/divisional-commissioner-not-empowered-to-issue-orders-under-s-144-of-crpc\/","title":{"rendered":"J&K and Ladakh HC | Divisional Commissioner not empowered to issue orders under S. 144 of CrPC; HC sets aside order declaring Unit dealing with Plastic Scrap a public nuisance"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court:<\/strong> Sanjeev Kumar, J., held that the Divisional Commissioner, Kashmir, or the Deputy Director (E&S), is not a District Magistrate or any other Executive Magistrate specially empowered by the State Government to exercise the powers under Section 144 CrPC.<\/p>\n

Aggrieved by the order of Deputy Director (E&S), with Divisional Commissioner, whereby the Unit of the petitioner, dealing with plastic scrap had been declared public nuisance in the area and cause of pollution, the petitioner had assailed the impugned order. The petitioner contended that the Divisional Commission had no competence or authority to pass such order and even if it was assumed that it had such authority or competence, the impugned order still could not be sustained having been passed in violation of principles of natural justice.<\/p>\n

The petitioner was engaged in the business of collecting, storing and segregation of plastic waste. He claimed that the respondent 6, who was having a property dispute with the petitioner, lodged a false and frivolous complaint with the Divisional Commissioner, who took cognizance of the same without providing an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and passed the impugned order, declaring the activity of the petitioner as public nuisance and a cause of pollution under Plastic Waste Management (Amendment Rules) 2018.<\/p>\n

The Bench observed that neither the Divisional Commissioner, Kashmir, nor the Deputy Director (E&S), working in his office, was a District Magistrate, a Sub Divisional Magistrate or any other Executive Magistrate, specially empowered by the State Government to exercise the powers u\/s 144 CrPC. Further, section 144 Cr.PC lays down an elaborate procedure to be followed and any order made u\/s 144 Cr.PC is to remain in force only for a period of two months and if it is to be extended beyond that period, the competence lies only with the Government, that too, when it deems it necessary so to do for preventing danger to human life, health or safety or preventing a fight or any affray and this can be done by the Government only by issuance of notification.<\/p>\n

Even under the Prevention of Water Pollution Act 1974 and Air Pollution Act 1981, the Divisional Commissioner or any other officer working with him, has not been given the jurisdiction to seal any Unit, which as per his or her information, may be a source of pollution as the Pollution Control Board is established for that purpose.<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. That the impugned order was without jurisdiction and was, accordingly, quashed.<\/li>\n
  2. That notwithstanding quashing of the impugned order, it would be competent for the District Magistrate, Sub Divisional Magistrate or any other Executive Magistrate, specially empowered in this behalf by the Government, to proceed u\/s 144 CrPC, provided the activity, the petitioner is engaged in amounts to public nuisance or otherwise falls within the ambit of section 144 CrPC.<\/li>\n
  3. In case the authority specially empowered by the Government, decide to proceed against the petitioner, in that eventuality, not only the petitioner shall be given opportunity of being heard but the entire procedure, laid down in section 144 CrPC, shall be strictly adhered to.<\/li>\n
  4. It was left to the State Pollution Control Board or any other competent authority to look into the grievance of the private respondents and take a decision as to whether the activity, the petitioner is engaged in, falls within the ambit of the Prevention of Water Pollution Act 1974, Air Pollution Act 1981 or the Rules framed thereunder or any other applicable provision of Anti Pollution Law and, therefore, requires permission to establish\/operate a Unit.<\/li>\n
  5. That the request of the petitioner for permission made earlier, having been rejected once by the Pollution Control Board, on the ground that the activity does not fall within its purview, shall not come in the way of the respondents, who may reconsider and take appropriate action under rules only if the activity of the petitioner falls under the ambit of such rules.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    [Abdul Salam Guroo v. UT of J&K, 2021 SCC OnLine J&K 1045<\/b><\/a>, 24-12-2021]<\/p>\n

    \n

    Kamini Sharma, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n
    \n

    Appearance by:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    For the Petitioner: P.S.Ahmad, Advocate<\/p>\n

    For the UT of J&K: M.A.Chashoo, AAG<\/p>\n

    For the Respondent: Jahangir Iqbal Ganai, Sr. Advocate with Humaira Shafi, Advocate<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court: Sanjeev Kumar, J., held that the Divisional Commissioner, Kashmir, or the Deputy Director (E&S), is <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[48194,47152,3264,32525,48193,32657],"class_list":["post-259221","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-environment-pollution","tag-plastic-waste","tag-Pollution","tag-public-nuisance","tag-section-144","tag-waste"],"yoast_head":"\nJ&K and Ladakh HC | Divisional Commissioner not empowered to issue orders under S. 144 of CrPC; HC sets aside order declaring Unit dealing with Plastic Scrap a public nuisance | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Divisional Commissioner not empowered to issue orders under S. 144 of CrPC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/29\/divisional-commissioner-not-empowered-to-issue-orders-under-s-144-of-crpc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"J&K and Ladakh HC | Divisional Commissioner not empowered to issue orders under S. 144 of CrPC; HC sets aside order declaring Unit dealing with Plastic Scrap a public nuisance\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Divisional Commissioner not empowered to issue orders under S. 144 of CrPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/29\/divisional-commissioner-not-empowered-to-issue-orders-under-s-144-of-crpc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-12-29T08:30:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-12-31T09:08:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/29\/divisional-commissioner-not-empowered-to-issue-orders-under-s-144-of-crpc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/29\/divisional-commissioner-not-empowered-to-issue-orders-under-s-144-of-crpc\/\",\"name\":\"J&K and Ladakh HC | Divisional Commissioner not empowered to issue orders under S. 144 of CrPC; HC sets aside order declaring Unit dealing with Plastic Scrap a public nuisance | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-12-29T08:30:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-12-31T09:08:13+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Divisional Commissioner not empowered to issue orders under S. 144 of CrPC\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/29\/divisional-commissioner-not-empowered-to-issue-orders-under-s-144-of-crpc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/29\/divisional-commissioner-not-empowered-to-issue-orders-under-s-144-of-crpc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/29\/divisional-commissioner-not-empowered-to-issue-orders-under-s-144-of-crpc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"J&K and Ladakh HC | Divisional Commissioner not empowered to issue orders under S. 144 of CrPC; HC sets aside order declaring Unit dealing with Plastic Scrap a public nuisance\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"J&K and Ladakh HC | Divisional Commissioner not empowered to issue orders under S. 144 of CrPC; HC sets aside order declaring Unit dealing with Plastic Scrap a public nuisance | SCC Times","description":"Divisional Commissioner not empowered to issue orders under S. 144 of CrPC","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/29\/divisional-commissioner-not-empowered-to-issue-orders-under-s-144-of-crpc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"J&K and Ladakh HC | Divisional Commissioner not empowered to issue orders under S. 144 of CrPC; HC sets aside order declaring Unit dealing with Plastic Scrap a public nuisance","og_description":"Divisional Commissioner not empowered to issue orders under S. 144 of CrPC","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/29\/divisional-commissioner-not-empowered-to-issue-orders-under-s-144-of-crpc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-12-29T08:30:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-12-31T09:08:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/29\/divisional-commissioner-not-empowered-to-issue-orders-under-s-144-of-crpc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/29\/divisional-commissioner-not-empowered-to-issue-orders-under-s-144-of-crpc\/","name":"J&K and Ladakh HC | Divisional Commissioner not empowered to issue orders under S. 144 of CrPC; HC sets aside order declaring Unit dealing with Plastic Scrap a public nuisance | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-12-29T08:30:56+00:00","dateModified":"2021-12-31T09:08:13+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Divisional Commissioner not empowered to issue orders under S. 144 of CrPC","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/29\/divisional-commissioner-not-empowered-to-issue-orders-under-s-144-of-crpc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/29\/divisional-commissioner-not-empowered-to-issue-orders-under-s-144-of-crpc\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/29\/divisional-commissioner-not-empowered-to-issue-orders-under-s-144-of-crpc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"J&K and Ladakh HC | Divisional Commissioner not empowered to issue orders under S. 144 of CrPC; HC sets aside order declaring Unit dealing with Plastic Scrap a public nuisance"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":205503,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/19\/object-of-section-133-of-crpc-is-to-protect-public-from-public-nuisance-should-not-be-used-to-settle-private-disputes-jk-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":259221,"position":0},"title":"Object of Section 133 of CrPC is to protect public from public nuisance; should not be used to settle private disputes: J&K HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 19, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Sanjay Kumar Gupta J., allowed the petition filed under Section 435 read with Section 439 of the CrPC, and set aside the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate. It also ruled that an order could be passed provided that the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":359114,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/05\/hp-hc-authority-cannot-rehear-remanded-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":259221,"position":1},"title":"Once appeal is remanded, Authority becomes functus officio, lacks jurisdiction to rehear it: Himachal Pradesh HC","author":"Editor","date":"September 5, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThere was no provision to hear and decide the objections after the appeal was decided by the Divisional Commissioner because Rule 10 of the 1994 Rules laid down that the orders passed in appeal by the Divisional Commissioner would be final.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"remanded appeal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/remanded-appeal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/remanded-appeal.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/remanded-appeal.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/remanded-appeal.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217594,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/01\/jk-hc-magistrate-is-empowered-to-issue-a-search-warrant-on-reason-to-believe-illegal-confinement-constituting-offence\/","url_meta":{"origin":259221,"position":2},"title":"J&K HC | Magistrate is empowered to issue a search warrant on \u2018reason to believe\u2019 illegal confinement constituting offence","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: Ali Mohammad Magrey, J. allowed a petition under Section 561-A of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner married the respondent in 2002 and gave birth to a child in 2005 out of the wedlock. The couple got divorced in 2009, and the petitioner re-married another\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":321035,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/30\/lawyer-detained-compensation-5lakhs-preventive-detention-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":259221,"position":3},"title":"J&K Administration must pay compensation of 5 lakhs to a lawyer detained in preventive custody for more than 1080 days: J&K and Ladakh HC","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court noted that petitioner had been made to suffer loss of his liberty for a cumulative period of more than 1080 days of preventive custody covered under the span of four detention orders in row from 2019 to March 2024.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245911,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/22\/delhi-maintenance-and-welfare-of-parents-and-senior-citizens-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":259221,"position":4},"title":"Del HC | Which is the proper forum for filing appeals from the eviction order passed by DM under Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act? Court answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 22, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Prathiba M. Singh, J., held that: The senior citizen can approach the Deputy Commissioner\/DM for eviction from any property over which he\/she enjoys rights and such order will be appealable to the Divisional Commissioner. Petitioner who is the wife of respondent 4 and daughter-in-law of respondent 3\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":365166,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/30\/jk-hc-quashes-detention-order-executed-after-45-days-delay\/","url_meta":{"origin":259221,"position":5},"title":"Know why J&K and Ladakh HC quashed preventive detention order executed after 45-days delay","author":"Editor","date":"October 30, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIf a detenue satisfied the Court that there was an unexplained delay in execution of the detention order, then such an order would be interpreted as breaking the live-proximity link in between the event of detention and passing of the detention order.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Detention order executed after 45-days delay","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Detention-order-executed-after-45-days-delay.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Detention-order-executed-after-45-days-delay.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Detention-order-executed-after-45-days-delay.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Detention-order-executed-after-45-days-delay.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259221","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=259221"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259221\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=259221"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=259221"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=259221"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}