{"id":258755,"date":"2021-12-20T09:00:11","date_gmt":"2021-12-20T03:30:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=258755"},"modified":"2021-12-24T10:19:24","modified_gmt":"2021-12-24T04:49:24","slug":"can-pendency-of-matrimonial-cases-be-a-ground-to-deny-a-passport","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/20\/can-pendency-of-matrimonial-cases-be-a-ground-to-deny-a-passport\/","title":{"rendered":"Can someone’s passport be impounded merely because a case under S. 498-A IPC is pending or a red corner notice issued? MP HC unravels"},"content":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court: <\/strong>Sujoy Paul, J., held that the pendency of matrimonial cases alone cannot be a ground to decline the renewal of the passport.<\/p>\n

In the present matter, the petitioner was a travel blogger and consultant who approached the Court a second time against the action of Regional Passport Authority, Bhopal in not issuing a regular passport for a period of ten years and on the contrary impounding his passport in utter violation of principles of natural justice.<\/p>\n

What was the case of travel blogger?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Petitioner submitted that being a travel blogger by profession he was required to travel around the globe. Initially, he was issued the passport on 5-9-1997, got it renewed for a period of ten years on 2-6-2014 and a new passport valid till 1-6-2021 was issued.<\/p>\n

The petitioner had matrimonial discord with his wife and due to which his wife took away the old passport of the petitioner with her. Later due to several disputes, a petition for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act was filed and the same is still sub judice<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Petitioner\u2019s wife had filed a crime against the petitioner and his family members alleging demand of dowry, for which the petitioner got bail with no bail conditions imposed upon him regarding his travel abroad.<\/p>\n

Later in the year 2017, the petitioner made an application for re-issuance of his earlier passport that was taken away by the wife and also filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for which Allahabad High Court protected the petitioner and referred the matter to mediation.<\/p>\n

Analysis, Law and Decision<\/span><\/h4>\n

High Court referred to the decision of Navin Kumar Sonkar v. Union of India<\/em>, ILR 2018 MP 677, wherein it was opined that mere pendency of criminal case cannot be a ground to initiate action by the passport officer. The pendency alone can also not be a ground for impounding the passport.<\/p>\n

There is a need of application of mind by passport officer regarding the nature of the criminal case.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In Manish Kumar Mittal v. Chief Passport Officer<\/em>, 2013 SCC OnLine Del 3007<\/a>, the same principle was followed and it is expected that passport officer will apply mind while taking decision regarding impounding\/revocation of passport.<\/p>\n

Further, the Bombay High Court\u2019s decision in Roshan Lawrence Menezes v. Union of India, WP (Lodging) No. 699 of 2020, <\/em>makes it clear that various Division Benches of Bombay High Court have taken a consistent view that Gazette Notification dated 25.09.1993 is not an impediment for renewing the passport for a period of 10 years.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that the petitioner was not afforded any pre or post decisional hearing before impounding his passport. Hence the impugned order cannot sustain judicial scrutiny.<\/p>\n

\n

The pendency of matrimonial cases alone cannot be a ground to decline renewal of passport. The gazette notification aforesaid cannot be a ground for not renewing the passport for a period of ten years or for impounding it or restricting it for a period of one year only.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Therefore, the action of respondents certainly affected the rights of livelihood of a travel blogger who keeps body and soul together by travelling abroad and earning his livelihood.<\/p>\n

Concluding the matter, Court set aside the impugned action of respondents impounding\/cancelling the passport and hence respondents were directed to issue a regular passport for a period of 10 years to the petitioner. [Hardik Shah v. Union of India,\u00a0 2021 SCC OnLine MP 2326<\/b><\/a>, decided on 7-12-2021]<\/p>\n

Know the Law:<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n

The passport cannot be impounded merely because a case involving offence under Section 498-A etc. is pending or a red corner notice was issued. Impounding can take place if Investigating Officer has shown his satisfaction that accused may abscond which may disturb the routine legal proceedings. In absence thereof, as a routine, passport cannot be impounded.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

Advocates before the Court:<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Shri Prateek Maheshwari, learned counsel for the petitioner.<\/p>\n

Shri Himanshu Joshi, learned Assistant Solicitor General for the respondent \/ Union of India<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court: Sujoy Paul, J., held that the pendency of matrimonial cases alone cannot be a ground to decline the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[29785,42834,7201,36178,2724,38301,31299,48087],"class_list":["post-258755","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-law","tag-legal-news","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-matrimonial-case","tag-passport","tag-passport-authority","tag-section-498-a-ipc","tag-travel-blogger"],"yoast_head":"\nCan someone's passport be impounded merely because a case under S. 498-A IPC is pending or a red corner notice issued? MP HC unravels | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Can pendency of matrimonial cases be a ground to deny a passport?\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/20\/can-pendency-of-matrimonial-cases-be-a-ground-to-deny-a-passport\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Can someone's passport be impounded merely because a case under S. 498-A IPC is pending or a red corner notice issued? MP HC unravels\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Can pendency of matrimonial cases be a ground to deny a passport?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/20\/can-pendency-of-matrimonial-cases-be-a-ground-to-deny-a-passport\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-12-20T03:30:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-12-24T04:49:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/20\/can-pendency-of-matrimonial-cases-be-a-ground-to-deny-a-passport\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/20\/can-pendency-of-matrimonial-cases-be-a-ground-to-deny-a-passport\/\",\"name\":\"Can someone's passport be impounded merely because a case under S. 498-A IPC is pending or a red corner notice issued? MP HC unravels | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-12-20T03:30:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-12-24T04:49:24+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Can pendency of matrimonial cases be a ground to deny a passport?\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/20\/can-pendency-of-matrimonial-cases-be-a-ground-to-deny-a-passport\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/20\/can-pendency-of-matrimonial-cases-be-a-ground-to-deny-a-passport\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/20\/can-pendency-of-matrimonial-cases-be-a-ground-to-deny-a-passport\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Can someone’s passport be impounded merely because a case under S. 498-A IPC is pending or a red corner notice issued? MP HC unravels\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Can someone's passport be impounded merely because a case under S. 498-A IPC is pending or a red corner notice issued? MP HC unravels | SCC Times","description":"Can pendency of matrimonial cases be a ground to deny a passport?","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/20\/can-pendency-of-matrimonial-cases-be-a-ground-to-deny-a-passport\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Can someone's passport be impounded merely because a case under S. 498-A IPC is pending or a red corner notice issued? MP HC unravels","og_description":"Can pendency of matrimonial cases be a ground to deny a passport?","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/20\/can-pendency-of-matrimonial-cases-be-a-ground-to-deny-a-passport\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-12-20T03:30:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-12-24T04:49:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/20\/can-pendency-of-matrimonial-cases-be-a-ground-to-deny-a-passport\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/20\/can-pendency-of-matrimonial-cases-be-a-ground-to-deny-a-passport\/","name":"Can someone's passport be impounded merely because a case under S. 498-A IPC is pending or a red corner notice issued? MP HC unravels | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-12-20T03:30:11+00:00","dateModified":"2021-12-24T04:49:24+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Can pendency of matrimonial cases be a ground to deny a passport?","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/20\/can-pendency-of-matrimonial-cases-be-a-ground-to-deny-a-passport\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/20\/can-pendency-of-matrimonial-cases-be-a-ground-to-deny-a-passport\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/20\/can-pendency-of-matrimonial-cases-be-a-ground-to-deny-a-passport\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Can someone’s passport be impounded merely because a case under S. 498-A IPC is pending or a red corner notice issued? MP HC unravels"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":213867,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/23\/del-hc-impounding-of-passport-held-not-warranted-where-aggrieved-already-called-upon-to-deposit-the-same-with-the-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":258755,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | Impounding of passport held not warranted where aggrieved already called upon to deposit the same with the Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 23, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Vibhu Bhakru, J., set aside an order whereby the petitioner's passport was impounded and gave him liberty to travel abroad subject to compliance with the conditions imposed. The petitioner was facing criminal charges under Section 120-B read with Section 420 IPC along with Section 13(2) and 13(1)(d)\u00a0of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":297385,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/21\/legal-implications-on-impounding-and-revocation-of-passport-and-travel-documents\/","url_meta":{"origin":258755,"position":1},"title":"Legal Implications on Impounding and Revocation of Passport and Travel documents","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"by Kapil Madan\u2020 and Sahil Madaan\u2020\u2020 Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 62","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"revocation of passport and travel documents","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/revocation-of-passport-and-travel-documents.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/revocation-of-passport-and-travel-documents.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/revocation-of-passport-and-travel-documents.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/revocation-of-passport-and-travel-documents.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273275,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/08\/karnataka-high-court-consent-of-father-not-a-prerequisite-for-grant-of-passport-of-minor-child-in-exclusive-custody-of-mother-visitation-rights-not-affected\/","url_meta":{"origin":258755,"position":2},"title":"Karnataka High Court | Consent of father not a prerequisite for grant of passport of minor child in exclusive custody of mother; Visitation rights not affected","author":"Editor","date":"September 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Karnataka High Court: In a case filed by the petitioner-mother (\u2018petitioner 2') seeking acceptance on her pending passport application for her minor ward (\u2018petitioner 1') without any compulsion on her to mention the name of the father of the ward or his presence or signature in any form,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/karnataka_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/karnataka_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/karnataka_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/karnataka_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/karnataka_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237488,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/15\/kar-hc-elaborating-upon-s-6-of-passport-act-court-directs-for-renewal-of-passport-to-authorities-concerned-irrespective-of-a-pending-criminal-case-against-petitioner\/","url_meta":{"origin":258755,"position":3},"title":"Kar HC | Elaborating upon S.6 of Passport Act, Court directs for renewal of passport to authorities concerned irrespective of a pending criminal case against petitioner","author":"Editor","date":"October 15, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Hemant Chandangoudar J., while allowing the Writ Petition against the Passport Authority, elaborated upon the relevant provisions of the Passport Act and the Right to unhindered movement as a facet to Article 21. Brief Facts This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the constitution praying\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":255165,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/05\/no-final-report-and-no-cognizance-signify-there-is-no-pending-criminal-proceeding\/","url_meta":{"origin":258755,"position":4},"title":"Ker HC | No final report and no cognizance signify there is no pending criminal proceeding; HC lays down parameters governing issuance of passport in a criminal case","author":"Editor","date":"October 5, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Bechu Kurian Thomas, J., held that if the final report had not been filed and no cognizance had been taken it would mean that there is no criminal proceeding pending and the Passport Authority are free to decide the grant of passport. The petitioner had challenged communication\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":211414,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/06\/ker-hc-pendency-of-criminal-case-concealed-in-passport-application-applicant-liable-to-pay-compounding-fee-and-give-reasons-for-such-suppression\/","url_meta":{"origin":258755,"position":5},"title":"Ker HC | Pendency of criminal case concealed in passport application \u2013 applicant liable to pay compounding fee and give reasons for such suppression","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 6, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: The Bench of Devan Ramachandran, J. allowed a petition for consideration of passport application a person entangled in a criminal proceeding. Petitioner\u2019s case was that the 2nd respondent (Regional Passport Officer) was refusing to issue passport to him in spite of his valid application, for no tenable\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/258755","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=258755"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/258755\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=258755"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=258755"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=258755"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}