{"id":258611,"date":"2021-12-16T17:00:13","date_gmt":"2021-12-16T11:30:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=258611"},"modified":"2021-12-17T13:22:07","modified_gmt":"2021-12-17T07:52:07","slug":"scope-of-interference-by-hc-under-art-227-of-constitution-of-india","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/16\/scope-of-interference-by-hc-under-art-227-of-constitution-of-india\/","title":{"rendered":"Scope of interference by HC under Art. 227 of Constitution of India: Can an interlocutory order of a Commercial Court be challenged in High Court? Del HC explains"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: <\/strong>Amit Bansal, J., decided under whether the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India can interfere in the decision of the Commercial Court or not.<\/p>\n

Instant petition was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugning the order passed by the Commercial Court in Arbitration Petition whereby the application for condonation of delay in refiling the Section 34 petition on behalf of the respondents had been allowed subject to costs.<\/p>\n

Why did petitioners approach this Court?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Sole Arbitrator had passed an award while partly allowing the claims of the petitioner and dismissed the counterclaims of the respondents. After a year, respondents filed a petition under Section 34 of the A&C Act against the said award and refiled the petition on various dates.<\/p>\n

Further, on each filing, certain defects cropped up.<\/p>\n

Thereafter, the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Courts below was increased, and the respondents filed a Section 34 petition before the Court of District Judge, and the Commercial Court allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing the Section 34 petition and imposed costs.<\/p>\n

On being aggrieved by the findings of the Commercial Court, petitioners approached this Court.<\/p>\n

Analysis, Law and Decision<\/span><\/h4>\n

High Court referred to Section 8 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 on which the respondents counsel placed reliance.<\/p>\n

\u201c8. Bar against revision application or petition against an interlocutory order.\u2014Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, no civil revision application or petition shall be entertained against any interlocutory order of a Commercial Court, including an order on the issue of jurisdiction, and any such challenge, subject to the provisions of section 13, shall be raised only in an appeal against the decree of the Commercial Court.\u201d<\/em>\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

Bench stated that the observations of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in Black Diamond Track Parts (P) Ltd. v. Black Diamond Motors (P) Ltd.,<\/em>2021 SCC OnLine Del 3946<\/a> are fully applicable in the facts and circumstances of the present matter.<\/p>\n

High Court noted that the scope of interference by this Court in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India were extremely narrow and limited only in respect of orders that were patently lacking inherent jurisdiction. Present case was not the one where the impugned order was passed by the Commercial Court without inherent jurisdiction.<\/p>\n

Court stated that even though there may be some merit in the contentions raised by the petitioners with regard to the non est<\/em> filing, that cannot be a ground for this Court to exercise jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and interfere with the decision of the Commercial Court.<\/p>\n

If the above would be done, it would completely frustrate the objective behind the Commercial Courts Act, that commercial matters should be decided expeditiously and parties may not challenge interlocutory orders passed in the proceedings, except those which were specifically appealable.<\/p>\n

Hence, no ground for interference by this Court was made out. [Ashok Kumar Puri v. S. Suncon Realtors (P) Ltd., 2021 SCC OnLine Del 5220<\/b><\/a>, decided on 10-12-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Advocates before the Court:<\/strong><\/p>\n

For the Petitioners:<\/span><\/p>\n

Mr Ajay Kapur, Sr. Advocate with Mr Harshbir Singh Kohli and Ms Mahima Dang, Advocates<\/p>\n

For the Respondents:<\/span><\/p>\n

Mr Amit Khemka, Mr Rishi Sehgal and Mr Midhun Aggarwal, Advocates<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: Amit Bansal, J., decided under whether the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India can interfere <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3226,33933,47046,2543,31954,29785,42834],"class_list":["post-258611","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-arbitration","tag-article-227-of-constitution-of-india","tag-commercial-court","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-interlocutory-order","tag-law","tag-legal-news"],"yoast_head":"\nScope of interference by HC under Art. 227 of Constitution of India: Can an interlocutory order of a Commercial Court be challenged in High Court? Del HC explains | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Scope of interference by HC under Art. 227 of Constitution of India\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/16\/scope-of-interference-by-hc-under-art-227-of-constitution-of-india\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Scope of interference by HC under Art. 227 of Constitution of India: Can an interlocutory order of a Commercial Court be challenged in High Court? Del HC explains\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Scope of interference by HC under Art. 227 of Constitution of India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/16\/scope-of-interference-by-hc-under-art-227-of-constitution-of-india\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-12-16T11:30:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-12-17T07:52:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/16\/scope-of-interference-by-hc-under-art-227-of-constitution-of-india\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/16\/scope-of-interference-by-hc-under-art-227-of-constitution-of-india\/\",\"name\":\"Scope of interference by HC under Art. 227 of Constitution of India: Can an interlocutory order of a Commercial Court be challenged in High Court? Del HC explains | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-12-16T11:30:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-12-17T07:52:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Scope of interference by HC under Art. 227 of Constitution of India\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/16\/scope-of-interference-by-hc-under-art-227-of-constitution-of-india\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/16\/scope-of-interference-by-hc-under-art-227-of-constitution-of-india\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/16\/scope-of-interference-by-hc-under-art-227-of-constitution-of-india\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Scope of interference by HC under Art. 227 of Constitution of India: Can an interlocutory order of a Commercial Court be challenged in High Court? Del HC explains\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Scope of interference by HC under Art. 227 of Constitution of India: Can an interlocutory order of a Commercial Court be challenged in High Court? Del HC explains | SCC Times","description":"Scope of interference by HC under Art. 227 of Constitution of India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/16\/scope-of-interference-by-hc-under-art-227-of-constitution-of-india\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Scope of interference by HC under Art. 227 of Constitution of India: Can an interlocutory order of a Commercial Court be challenged in High Court? Del HC explains","og_description":"Scope of interference by HC under Art. 227 of Constitution of India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/16\/scope-of-interference-by-hc-under-art-227-of-constitution-of-india\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-12-16T11:30:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-12-17T07:52:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/16\/scope-of-interference-by-hc-under-art-227-of-constitution-of-india\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/16\/scope-of-interference-by-hc-under-art-227-of-constitution-of-india\/","name":"Scope of interference by HC under Art. 227 of Constitution of India: Can an interlocutory order of a Commercial Court be challenged in High Court? Del HC explains | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-12-16T11:30:13+00:00","dateModified":"2021-12-17T07:52:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Scope of interference by HC under Art. 227 of Constitution of India","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/16\/scope-of-interference-by-hc-under-art-227-of-constitution-of-india\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/16\/scope-of-interference-by-hc-under-art-227-of-constitution-of-india\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/16\/scope-of-interference-by-hc-under-art-227-of-constitution-of-india\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Scope of interference by HC under Art. 227 of Constitution of India: Can an interlocutory order of a Commercial Court be challenged in High Court? Del HC explains"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":319306,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/03\/delhi-hc-dismisses-petition-challenging-order-passed-by-arbitrator-scctimes\/","url_meta":{"origin":258611,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Order not so perverse to shock the conscience of Court\u2019; Delhi HC dismisses petition challenging award passed by arbitrator","author":"Arushi","date":"April 3, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA perusal of the impugned order shows that the arbitrator has yet not fully closed the issue and has decided to adjudicate on the issue after evidence is led on the same issue.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343167,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/07\/letters-patent-appeal-will-not-lie-against-judgment-passed-by-single-judge-in-appellate-jurisdiction-dhc\/","url_meta":{"origin":258611,"position":1},"title":"Letters Patent Appeal will not lie against judgment passed by Single Judge in appellate jurisdiction or against order by Court subject to superintendence of this Court: Delhi HC","author":"Arushi","date":"March 7, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The jurisdiction available to this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution is primarily in the nature of superintendence and accordingly the Letters Patent Appeal will not lie in the instant matter.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":318586,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/28\/orders-passed-by-tribunals-under-senior-citizens-act-2007-also-amenable-to-challenge-under-article-227-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":258611,"position":2},"title":"Orders passed by tribunals under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 also amenable to challenge under Article 227: Delhi High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"March 28, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The orders passed by the tribunals and the judicial acts by administrative bodies or authorities or persons exercising quasi-judicial functions are all amenable to challenge under Article 226 of the Constitution.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":341729,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/18\/merely-because-arbitrator-was-appointed-by-orissa-hc-is-no-ground-for-ranchi-court-to-not-have-jurisdiction-jhc\/","url_meta":{"origin":258611,"position":3},"title":"Merely because arbitrator was appointed by Orissa HC is no ground for Ranchi Court to not have jurisdiction: Jharkhand HC sets aside order dismissing S.34 arbitration application","author":"Arushi","date":"February 18, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The intention of both the parties where to go for arbitration, is at Ranchi and the proceeding after permission of the High Court was also conducted at Ranchi and in the agreement, the seat is also said to be at Ranchi. Thus, Ranchi court is having jurisdiction.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":314810,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/21\/cal-hc-affirms-drats-order-on-finding-no-illegality-or-material-irregularity-under-article-227-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":258611,"position":4},"title":"Calcutta High Court finds no illegality or material irregularity in DRAT\u2019s order; reiterates High Court\u2019s jurisdictional limits under Article 227","author":"Ritu","date":"February 21, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court reasoned that the High Court\u2019s jurisdiction under Article 227 is not appellate in nature and cannot be exercised to correct mere errors of fact.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":110821,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/02\/article-227-to-be-used-only-when-there-is-flagrant-abuse-of-process-of-law-and-not-otherwise\/","url_meta":{"origin":258611,"position":5},"title":"Article 227 to be used only when there is flagrant abuse of process of law and not otherwise","author":"Saba","date":"March 2, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court:\u00a0 The Court had to decide on a petition \u00a0under Article 227 of the Constitution, challenging the order passed by Family Court, Jabalpur in 2014 where the trial court dismissed the application preferred by the petitioner under Order 16 Rule 1 CPC that mandates the filing of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/258611","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=258611"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/258611\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=258611"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=258611"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=258611"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}