{"id":258261,"date":"2021-12-09T09:00:03","date_gmt":"2021-12-09T03:30:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=258261"},"modified":"2022-03-18T22:14:38","modified_gmt":"2022-03-18T16:44:38","slug":"army-issuing-look-out-notice-declaring-person-a-deserter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/09\/army-issuing-look-out-notice-declaring-person-a-deserter\/","title":{"rendered":"AFT | Army issuing look out notice declaring person a deserter; Will the notice remain in affect even post resignation? Tribunal answers"},"content":{"rendered":"

Armed Forces Tribunal (Lucknow Bench):<\/strong> The Division Bench of Umesh Chandra Srivastava, J., and Vice Admiral Abhay Raghunath Karve, Member (A) slammed the government for failing to call back the apprehension roll of the applicant even after accepting her resignation. The applicant had been declared a deserter for not resuming her duty even though her resignation application was accepted by the authorities concerned.<\/p>\n

Brief facts of the case were that after serving ten days in the Army Medical Corps, the applicant submitted an application for resignation on the ground that she was detailed for MOBC course at Lucknow. As per the applicant she was assured by the DGAFMS during selection interview that she would be allowed to live with her parents for some time in Delhi. The applicant also wrote a letter\u00a0 for\u00a0 cancellation\u00a0 of\u00a0 Part-II\u00a0 Order\u00a0 with\u00a0 respect\u00a0 to\u00a0 commissioning\u00a0 in\u00a0 AMC.<\/p>\n

According to the applicant, her resignation was\u00a0 accepted\u00a0 vide\u00a0 letter\u00a0 dated\u00a0 02-09-2008\u00a0 and\u00a0 the\u00a0 same\u00a0 was\u00a0 conveyed\u00a0 to\u00a0 her.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Applicant\u00a0 got\u00a0 married\u00a0 on\u00a0 01-07-2017\u00a0 and\u00a0 while proceeding to Zurich for honeymoon trip she was stopped\u00a0 at Airport by immigration department on the pretext of look out\u00a0 notice (apprehension roll) sent by Base Hospital, Delhi Cantt in\u00a0 the\u00a0 year\u00a0 2008,\u00a0 which\u00a0 according\u00a0 to\u00a0 applicant\u00a0 gave\u00a0 her\u00a0 mental\u00a0 pain\u00a0 and\u00a0 agony. The applicant contended that her \u00a0detention\u00a0 at\u00a0 the\u00a0 Delhi\u00a0 Airport\u00a0 in\u00a0 2017\u00a0 caused\u00a0 irreparable damage to her and her parents\u201f reputation, in eyes\u00a0 of\u00a0 her\u00a0 husband\u00a0 and\u00a0 her\u00a0 in-laws, therefore, she pleaded for revocation\u00a0 of\u00a0 all\u00a0 actions\u00a0 against\u00a0 her\u00a0 issued\u00a0 after submission of her resignation from Army service and acceptance by the authorities concerned.<\/p>\n

On the other hand, the respondents submitted that the applicant was initially granted 11 days leave which was extended to 60 days leave and the applicant ought to have rejoined from leave on 13-07-2008 which she failed to do. Thereafter, apprehension roll was issued and same being in force, her resignation was accepted vide order dated 02-09-2008. The respondent contended that since the applicant did not report in spite of being duly informed by the unit on multiple occasions, her documentation with regard to final acceptance of resignation could not be completed and the letter dated 02-09-2008 conveying provisional acceptance of her resignation became infructuous and void.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal noticed that though vide order dated 02-09-2008 her resignation was approved but presumably the apprehension roll was left uncancelled due to oversight on the part of the respondents which resulted in her detention on 04-07-2017 at Airport when she was to leave for Zurich with her husband, but later on she was released from custody. On scrutiny, the Bench came to know that vide order dated 20-07-2017 applicant was allowed to leave India subject to her filing of an undertaking that she will return within a period of two months.<\/p>\n

Noticing that although the apprehension roll was issued on 26-07-2008 and she visited and met the Commandant, Base Hospital, Delhi Cantt along with her father on 22-09-2008, nearly two months after issue of the apprehension roll, no steps were taken by the Hospital authorities to apprehend the applicant, the Bench opined that the such actions indicated that they had no intention of apprehending the applicant, presumably as her resignation had already been accepted on 02-09-2008. The Bench stated,<\/p>\n

\u201cPrima facie it appears to be a case of non application of mind by the respondents while dealing with the present matter as after acceptance of her resignation in the month of September, 2008, respondents ought to have cancelled their apprehension roll which caused great distress and hardship to applicant throughout and particularly while proceeding abroad on honeymoon in the year 2017.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Consequently, the Bench opined that since the respondents had accepted her resignation in September, 2008 after following due process and thereafter, no proceedings were required to be held in applicant\u2019s case, being not subject to Army Act. In view of the above, respondents were directed to cancel all proceedings against the applicant carried out after 02-09-2008. Impugned orders with respect to applicant were hereby quashed. [Parul Jain v. Union of India, 2021 SCC OnLine AFT 7429<\/b><\/a>, decided on 02-12-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Kamini Sharma, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n

Appearance by: <\/strong><\/p>\n

For the Applicant: SS Pandey, Advocate and SS Rajawat, Advocate.<\/p>\n

For Union of India: Sunil Sharma, Central Govt. Standing Counsel<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Armed Forces Tribunal (Lucknow Bench): The Division Bench of Umesh Chandra Srivastava, J., and Vice Admiral Abhay Raghunath Karve, Member (A) slammed <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":198586,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[47984,12331,44752,21124,47985],"class_list":["post-258261","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-amc","tag-armed-forces","tag-deserter","tag-resignation","tag-short-service-commission"],"yoast_head":"\nAFT | Army issuing look out notice declaring person a deserter; Will the notice remain in affect even post resignation? Tribunal answers | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Army issuing look out notice declaring person a deserter\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/09\/army-issuing-look-out-notice-declaring-person-a-deserter\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"AFT | Army issuing look out notice declaring person a deserter; Will the notice remain in affect even post resignation? Tribunal answers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Army issuing look out notice declaring person a deserter\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/09\/army-issuing-look-out-notice-declaring-person-a-deserter\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-12-09T03:30:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-03-18T16:44:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/09\/army-issuing-look-out-notice-declaring-person-a-deserter\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/09\/army-issuing-look-out-notice-declaring-person-a-deserter\/\",\"name\":\"AFT | Army issuing look out notice declaring person a deserter; Will the notice remain in affect even post resignation? Tribunal answers | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/09\/army-issuing-look-out-notice-declaring-person-a-deserter\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/09\/army-issuing-look-out-notice-declaring-person-a-deserter\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-12-09T03:30:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-03-18T16:44:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Army issuing look out notice declaring person a deserter\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/09\/army-issuing-look-out-notice-declaring-person-a-deserter\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/09\/army-issuing-look-out-notice-declaring-person-a-deserter\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/09\/army-issuing-look-out-notice-declaring-person-a-deserter\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887,\"caption\":\"Armed Forces Tribunal\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/09\/army-issuing-look-out-notice-declaring-person-a-deserter\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"AFT | Army issuing look out notice declaring person a deserter; Will the notice remain in affect even post resignation? Tribunal answers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"AFT | Army issuing look out notice declaring person a deserter; Will the notice remain in affect even post resignation? Tribunal answers | SCC Times","description":"Army issuing look out notice declaring person a deserter","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/09\/army-issuing-look-out-notice-declaring-person-a-deserter\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"AFT | Army issuing look out notice declaring person a deserter; Will the notice remain in affect even post resignation? Tribunal answers","og_description":"Army issuing look out notice declaring person a deserter","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/09\/army-issuing-look-out-notice-declaring-person-a-deserter\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-12-09T03:30:03+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-03-18T16:44:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/09\/army-issuing-look-out-notice-declaring-person-a-deserter\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/09\/army-issuing-look-out-notice-declaring-person-a-deserter\/","name":"AFT | Army issuing look out notice declaring person a deserter; Will the notice remain in affect even post resignation? Tribunal answers | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/09\/army-issuing-look-out-notice-declaring-person-a-deserter\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/09\/army-issuing-look-out-notice-declaring-person-a-deserter\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg","datePublished":"2021-12-09T03:30:03+00:00","dateModified":"2022-03-18T16:44:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Army issuing look out notice declaring person a deserter","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/09\/army-issuing-look-out-notice-declaring-person-a-deserter\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/09\/army-issuing-look-out-notice-declaring-person-a-deserter\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/09\/army-issuing-look-out-notice-declaring-person-a-deserter\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg","width":1330,"height":887,"caption":"Armed Forces Tribunal"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/09\/army-issuing-look-out-notice-declaring-person-a-deserter\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"AFT | Army issuing look out notice declaring person a deserter; Will the notice remain in affect even post resignation? Tribunal answers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":210175,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/18\/aft-claim-for-pension-not-admissible-when-a-person-is-dismissed-under-the-provisions-of-army-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":258261,"position":0},"title":"AFT | Claim for pension not admissible when a person is dismissed under the provisions of Army Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT): The Bench of S.V.S. Rathore, J. and Air Marshal BBP Sinha (Member) dismissed a Lance Naik\u2019s claim for pension on the ground that he had been declared as a deserter and dismissed from service. Petitioner herein joined the Indian Army on 31-10-1985 and was sanctioned casual\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Armed Forces Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":244019,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/18\/aft-civil-medical-professionals-are-unaware-of-the-demands-of-duties-in-forces-tribunal-holds-demand-for-medical-check-up-by-civil-doctors-unsustainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":258261,"position":1},"title":"AFT | \u201cCivil medical professionals are unaware of the demands of duties in forces.\u201d Tribunal holds demand for medical check-up by civil doctors unsustainable \u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"February 18, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT): The Division Bench of Justice Umesh Chandra Srivastava (Chairperson) and Vice Admiral Abhay Raghunath Karve (Member) A, heard the instant application alleging harassment by military hospitals (MH). Background The applicant was commissioned in the Indian Army on 15-12-1989. Due to disturbed married life, the applicant became\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Armed Forces Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255289,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/07\/voluntary-retirement-v-s-resignation-supreme-court-cogitates-technicalities-of-legal-terms-and-their-implication-in-armed-forces\/","url_meta":{"origin":258261,"position":2},"title":"\u00a0\u201cVoluntary retirement v\/s Resignation\u201d; Supreme Court cogitates technicalities of legal terms and their implication in Armed Forces","author":"Editor","date":"October 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cHaving tendered \u2018resignation\u2019, the respondent had to suffer the consequences and could not be permitted to take \u2018U\u2019 turn and say that what the respondent wanted was \u2018premature retirement\u2019 and not \u2018resignation\u2019.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":198585,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/16\/claim-for-disability-pension-denied-on-grounds-of-minimal-exposure-to-military-training\/","url_meta":{"origin":258261,"position":3},"title":"Claim for \u2018disability pension\u2019 denied on grounds of minimal exposure to military training","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 16, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Armed Forces Tribunal, Lucknow Bench: The Bench comprising of S.V.S Rathore J. and Air Marshal BBP Sinha, Member dismissed an original application filed under Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal, 2007. In the present application, the applicant was enrolled in the Army Medical Corps and was invalidated from service\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Armed Forces Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":181994,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/17\/armed-forces-tribunal-rules-favour-applicant-aggrieved-refusal-grant-disability-pension\/","url_meta":{"origin":258261,"position":4},"title":"Armed Forces Tribunal rules in favour of applicant aggrieved by refusal to grant disability pension","author":"Saba","date":"January 17, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Lucknow: Hon\u2019ble Justice DP Singh and Hon\u2019ble Air Marshal BBP Sinha, pronounced an order in respect to an application being filed in regard to refusal to grant disability pension under Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007. The applicant was commissioned in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/appoointment.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/appoointment.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/appoointment.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/appoointment.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/appoointment.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273529,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/12\/aft-armed-forces-antedated-dismissal-whether-justified-anti-national-activities-espionage-show-cause-notice-legal-news-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":258261,"position":5},"title":"Whether dismissal order served without show cause notice justified when there’s suspicion of involvement in espionage & anti-national activities? Armed Forces Tribunal decides","author":"Editor","date":"September 12, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Armed Forces Tribunal (Lucknow Bench): The Division Bench of Justice Umesh Chandra Srivastava, Member (J) and Vice Admiral Abhay Raghunath Karve, Member (A) upheld the antedated dismissal of the applicant which was served without any show cause notice on the ground of his involvement in espionage and anti-national activities. Background\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Armed Forces Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/258261","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=258261"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/258261\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/198586"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=258261"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=258261"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=258261"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}