{"id":258053,"date":"2021-12-03T13:00:47","date_gmt":"2021-12-03T07:30:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=258053"},"modified":"2021-12-03T10:23:33","modified_gmt":"2021-12-03T04:53:33","slug":"model-code-of-conduct","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/03\/model-code-of-conduct\/","title":{"rendered":"[Model Code of Conduct] Kar HC | Mere display of any stickers and flags on vehicles of any particular party will not attract\/invoke S. 171 H IPC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Karnataka High Court<\/strong>: H P Sandesh J. allowed the petition and quashed the proceedings initiated against the petitioners.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code i.e. Cr.P.C., praying this Court to quash the order of the Civil Judge and JMFC, Muddebihal, dated 13.07.2018 passed in C.C.No.167\/2018 (Crime No.107\/2018 of Muddebihal Police Station) taking cognizance against the petitioners \u00a0\u00a0for the offences punishable under Section 171H of Penal Code, 1860 i.e. IPC and Section 3 of the Karnataka Open Places (Prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1981.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the petitioner Mr. Rajesh G Doddamani submitted that the Act invoked i.e., the Karnataka Open Places (Prevention \u00a0of Disfigurement) Act, 1981 is not applicable to \u00a0Muddebihal and the said Act is applicable only in respect \u00a0of particular places. Unless the same is notified in respect of particular place of Muddebihal, the police ought not to have initiated proceedings against the petitioners under Section 3 of the Act. It was also submitted that the respondents have also invoked Section 171H of IPC. The complaint is not filed under Section 195 of Cr.P.C., but the case has been registered against the petitioners and based on the police report, cognizance was taken. Therefore, when non-cognizable offence is invoked, it requires permission from the Magistrate under Section 155(2) of Cr.P.C., and hence, it requires interference of this Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for respondents Mr. Gururaj V Hasilkar submitted that the election was declared in respect of Muddebihal assembly constituency in 2018. When the election notification was issued by the State, the order was passed by the District Election Officer and District Magistrate, Vijayapura dated 31.03.2018 appointing flying squads and the same includes Muddebihal \u00a0Constituency. The learned counsel also relied upon the \u00a0order of the State Government dated 10.04.2018 and so also the revised order dated 31.03.2018 appointing officers consisting of flying squads. The learned counsel also relied upon the Notification of Election Commission of India dated 02.05.2018 wherein it is clarified that as per Section 126(1)(b) of the Representative of People Act, 1951, there shall not be displaying of any stickers and flags of any particularly party and the said act is in \u00a0violation of the same and there is no specific notification \u00a0for applying the above Act but election notification is \u00a0issued. It is not in dispute that the petitioners herein came to the Tahsildar\u2019s office in vehicles displaying stickers and flags of a particular party. Hence, the proceedings initiated against the petitioners cannot be quashed.Issue: Whether Karnataka Open Places (Prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1991 is applicable to Muddebihal or not?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that on perusal of Section 1(2)(i) of the Act makes it clear that the Act is applicable for the cities viz., Bangalore, \u00a0Mysore, Hubli-Dharwar, Mangalore and Belgaum constituted or continued under the Karnataka Municipal \u00a0Corporation Act, 1976 or under any other law, on the fifth day of May, 1981 and Section (1)(2)(ii) of the Act says that the same come into force in the municipalities, notified areas, sanitary boards, constituted or continued under the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 or under any other law, or in any other local area, on such date, as the State Government may by notification appoint and different dates may be appointed in respect of different areas.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\nBut, no such Notification was issued in respect of Muddebihal. Hence, unless the Act is applicable to particular city and municipal area, the initiation of proceedings under the said Act is unsustainable under law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\nThe Court further observed that Section 171H of IPC deals with illegal payments in connection with an election<em>. But, in the \u00a0case on hand, the allegation against the petitioners is \u00a0that they came in vehicles with flag of political party and no allegations with regard to illegal payments in \u00a0connection with election are found in the complaint. \u00a0Under the circumstances, very initiation of proceedings against the petitioners is nothing but an abuse of process of law. Hence, it is appropriate to exercise power under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., or otherwise it leads to miscarriage of justice<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>The Court having considered the allegation made in the complaint as well as in the charge sheet observed that it does not attract offence under Section 171H of IPC and so also Section 3 of the Act as there is no notification. <em>\u201c\u2026.complaint averments and charge sheet averments do not attract the offences invoked and apart from that, the above Act is not applicable to Muddebihal and without any notification for application of the Act, proceedings have been initiated.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court held <em>\u201c\u2026.very initiation of \u00a0proceedings against the petitioners is not sustainable in the eye of law, as there was no notification for applicability of the above Act to Muddebihal and also no ingredients of offence under Section 171H of IPC.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[Hanmagouda v. State of Karnataka, Criminal petition No. 200377 of 2019, decided on 26-11-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\">Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court: H P Sandesh J. allowed the petition and quashed the proceedings initiated against the petitioners. This petition is filed <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[13671,11941,4931,47946,13961,47945,34879,14261,47944,30941,13021],"class_list":["post-258053","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-criminal-procedure-code","tag-crpc","tag-election","tag-flag-display","tag-ipc","tag-karnataka-open-places-prevention-of-disfigurement-act-1991","tag-model-code-of-conduct","tag-penal-code","tag-section-171-h-ipc","tag-section-482","tag-section-482-crpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>[Model Code of Conduct] Kar HC | Mere display of any stickers and flags on vehicles of any particular party will not attract\/invoke S. 171 H IPC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Model Code of Conduct\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/03\/model-code-of-conduct\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[Model Code of Conduct] Kar HC | Mere display of any stickers and flags on vehicles of any particular party will not attract\/invoke S. 171 H IPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Model Code of Conduct\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/03\/model-code-of-conduct\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-12-03T07:30:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/03\/model-code-of-conduct\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/03\/model-code-of-conduct\/\",\"name\":\"[Model Code of Conduct] Kar HC | Mere display of any stickers and flags on vehicles of any particular party will not attract\/invoke S. 171 H IPC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-12-03T07:30:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Model Code of Conduct\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/03\/model-code-of-conduct\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/03\/model-code-of-conduct\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/03\/model-code-of-conduct\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[Model Code of Conduct] Kar HC | Mere display of any stickers and flags on vehicles of any particular party will not attract\/invoke S. 171 H IPC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[Model Code of Conduct] Kar HC | Mere display of any stickers and flags on vehicles of any particular party will not attract\/invoke S. 171 H IPC | SCC Times","description":"Model Code of Conduct","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/03\/model-code-of-conduct\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[Model Code of Conduct] Kar HC | Mere display of any stickers and flags on vehicles of any particular party will not attract\/invoke S. 171 H IPC","og_description":"Model Code of Conduct","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/03\/model-code-of-conduct\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-12-03T07:30:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/03\/model-code-of-conduct\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/03\/model-code-of-conduct\/","name":"[Model Code of Conduct] Kar HC | Mere display of any stickers and flags on vehicles of any particular party will not attract\/invoke S. 171 H IPC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-12-03T07:30:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Model Code of Conduct","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/03\/model-code-of-conduct\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/03\/model-code-of-conduct\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/03\/model-code-of-conduct\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[Model Code of Conduct] Kar HC | Mere display of any stickers and flags on vehicles of any particular party will not attract\/invoke S. 171 H IPC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":259938,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/13\/kar-hc-while-deciding-the-petition-under-s-482-of-crpc-evidence-cannot-be-appreciated-as-it-lies-within-the-domain-of-trial-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":258053,"position":0},"title":"Kar HC |\u00a0 While deciding the petition under S. 482 of CrPC evidence cannot be appreciated as it lies within the domain of Trial Court","author":"Editor","date":"January 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Sreenivas Harish Kumar J. dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are such that the 1st petitioner is the husband of 2nd respondent. On certain allegations that the petitioners subjected the 2nd respondent to harassment in connection with demand for dowry, FIR\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":224927,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/01\/kar-hc-criminal-proceedings-cannot-be-initiated-against-other-suspects-in-the-absence-of-main-culprit\/","url_meta":{"origin":258053,"position":1},"title":"Kar HC | Criminal proceedings cannot be initiated against other suspects, in the absence of main culprit","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 1, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: P.G.M. Patil, J. heard a Criminal Petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 appealing to quash Judicial Magistrate First Court\u2019s (JMFC), Hubballi order which resulted in registering of cases under Sections 307, 120 (B), 114 of Penal Code (IPC), 1860 and under Section 25\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":297899,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/28\/misuse-section-498a-ipc-increasing-implicating-relatives-husband-jharkhand-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":258053,"position":2},"title":"Misuse of Section 498-A, IPC by implicating husband&#8217;s relatives in matrimonial disputes; Jharkhand High Court quashes criminal complaint","author":"Ridhi","date":"July 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Jharkhand High Court reiterated the object of Section 498-A of IPC to punish cruelty by husband and his relatives.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"jharkhand high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/jharkhand-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325333,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/29\/paramour-accused-498a-ipc-criminal-proceedingspetition-allowed-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":258053,"position":3},"title":"Paramour of an accused cannot be dragged into proceedings under Section 498A of IPC; Karnataka HC reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"June 29, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court pointed out that a paramour of an accused cannot be dragged into proceedings under Section 498A of IPC as the said accused would not become a relative or a member of the family as is necessary under Section 498A of IPC.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259250,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/29\/can-fir-complaint-in-non-compoundable-offences-pertaining-to-matrimonial-disputes-be-quashed-hp-hc-lays-down-under-what-circumstances\/","url_meta":{"origin":258053,"position":4},"title":"Can FIR\/ complaint in non compoundable offences pertaining to matrimonial disputes be quashed? HP HC lays down under what circumstances","author":"Editor","date":"December 29, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Chander Bhusan Barowalia J. disposed of the petition and quashed the FIR\/complaint. The facts of the case are such that marriage between Mukesh Sharma (son of petitioners 1 and 2 and brother of petitioner 3) and respondent No. 2\/wife was solemnized on according to the Hindu\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":250539,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/bigamy\/","url_meta":{"origin":258053,"position":5},"title":"Telangana HC | In what conditions a complaint of bigamy filed by wife is maintainable when another complaint under S. 498-A IPC is already pending? Court discusses","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 30, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Telangana High Court: K. Lakshman, J., refused to quash a subsequent complaint filed by the wife against her husband (and others), where a prior complaint alleging offence under Section 498-A Penal Code, 1860 was already pending. Instant criminal petition was filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Petitioners\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/258053","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=258053"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/258053\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=258053"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=258053"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=258053"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}