{"id":257666,"date":"2021-11-25T11:00:55","date_gmt":"2021-11-25T05:30:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=257666"},"modified":"2021-11-26T12:55:37","modified_gmt":"2021-11-26T07:25:37","slug":"judicial-order","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/25\/judicial-order\/","title":{"rendered":"Utt HC | Judicial order necessarily has to be a reasoned one; Court finds reasoning by the Single Judge cryptic, remands the case back"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Uttaranchal High Court:<\/strong> The Division Bench of Raghvendra Singh Chauhan, CJ. and Narayan Singh Dhanik, J. decided on a petition which was filed challenging the validity of the order passed by the Single Judge whereby the respondent-writ petitioner, M\/s Kohli Enterprises, was not only blacklisted, but even its registration was cancelled by the appellants.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the appellants, submitted that the impugned order passed by the Single Judge was a non-speaking order, as it does not spell out the three factors, which were required for grant of a stay order. Therefore, the impugned order passed deserved to be set aside by this Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the respondent-writ petitioner, submitted that since the petitioner had challenged the jurisdiction of the Regional Manager to pass the impugned order dated 21-10-2021, and since no power of canceling a registration was granted either to the Regional Manager, or to the Managing Director, both the blacklisting, and the cancellation of the registration is patently illegal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court after perusal of the impugned order noted that the Single Judge had merely observed that <em>\u201chaving regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and also the reasons indicated in the impugned order, this Court is prima facie satisfied that petitioner has made out a case of grant of interim order\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court found the reasoning given by the Single Judge cryptic as he neither discussed the existence of a prima facie case in favour of the respondent-writ petitioner, nor discussed the balance of convenience, nor discussed the irreparable loss that would be caused to the respondent-writ petitioner in case the stay were not granted by the Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>The need for passing a reasoned order need not be emphasized. For, it is well known that a judicial order necessarily has to be a reasoned one, where the mind of the learned Court needs to be revealed, and cogent and convincing reasons need to be stated even while granting a stay order.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the case back to Single Judge requesting to decide the Interim Stay Application within a period of two weeks.[Uttarakhand State Warehousing Corporation v. Kohli Enterprises, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/661csTj5\"><b>2021 SCC OnLine Utt 1313<\/b><\/a>, decided on 22-11-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h4><span style=\"color: #993300;\">Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the appellants. : Mr D.S. Patni, Senior Counsel assisted by Mr Parikshit Saini<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the respondent. : Mr Anil Kumar Joshi<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Uttaranchal High Court: The Division Bench of Raghvendra Singh Chauhan, CJ. and Narayan Singh Dhanik, J. decided on a petition which was <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31083,30327,29540,20511,10851],"class_list":["post-257666","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-blacklist","tag-cancellation","tag-non-speaking-order","tag-reasoned-order","tag-registration"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Utt HC | Judicial order necessarily has to be a reasoned one; Court finds reasoning by the Single Judge cryptic, remands the case back | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Judicial Order\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/25\/judicial-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Utt HC | Judicial order necessarily has to be a reasoned one; Court finds reasoning by the Single Judge cryptic, remands the case back\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Judicial Order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/25\/judicial-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-11-25T05:30:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-11-26T07:25:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/25\/judicial-order\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/25\/judicial-order\/\",\"name\":\"Utt HC | Judicial order necessarily has to be a reasoned one; Court finds reasoning by the Single Judge cryptic, remands the case back | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-11-25T05:30:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-11-26T07:25:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Judicial Order\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/25\/judicial-order\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/25\/judicial-order\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/25\/judicial-order\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Utt HC | Judicial order necessarily has to be a reasoned one; Court finds reasoning by the Single Judge cryptic, remands the case back\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Utt HC | Judicial order necessarily has to be a reasoned one; Court finds reasoning by the Single Judge cryptic, remands the case back | SCC Times","description":"Judicial Order","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/25\/judicial-order\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Utt HC | Judicial order necessarily has to be a reasoned one; Court finds reasoning by the Single Judge cryptic, remands the case back","og_description":"Judicial Order","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/25\/judicial-order\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-11-25T05:30:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-11-26T07:25:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/25\/judicial-order\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/25\/judicial-order\/","name":"Utt HC | Judicial order necessarily has to be a reasoned one; Court finds reasoning by the Single Judge cryptic, remands the case back | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-11-25T05:30:55+00:00","dateModified":"2021-11-26T07:25:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Judicial Order","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/25\/judicial-order\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/25\/judicial-order\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/25\/judicial-order\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Utt HC | Judicial order necessarily has to be a reasoned one; Court finds reasoning by the Single Judge cryptic, remands the case back"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":267569,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/30\/adequate-opportunity-of-filing-counter-affidavit-should-be-afforded-to-state\/","url_meta":{"origin":257666,"position":0},"title":"Utt HC | Adequate opportunity of filing counter-affidavit should be afforded to State; intra-Court appeal allowed","author":"Editor","date":"May 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: The Division Bench of S.K. Mishra, ACJ and A.K. Verma, J. allowed an intra-Court appeal wherein the State has assailed the order passed by the Single Judge whereby the Writ Petition of the writ petitioners-respondents herein was allowed supposedly on the concession made by the government pleader.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222322,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/20\/raj-hc-court-can-exercise-its-power-of-judicial-review-if-the-quantum-of-penalty-is-disproportionate\/","url_meta":{"origin":257666,"position":1},"title":"Raj HC | Court can exercise its power of judicial review if the quantum of penalty is disproportionate","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 20, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Narendra Singh Dhaddha and Mohammad Rafiq, JJ. dismissed the appeal filed by Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (RSRTC) challenging a judgment passed by the single judge of the present court. In the instant case, the respondent-writ petitioner was appointed in the service of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":271172,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/04\/uttaranchal-high-court-non-communication-of-all-the-service-rules-does-not-indicate-that-there-are-no-rules\/","url_meta":{"origin":257666,"position":2},"title":"Uttaranchal High Court | Non-communication of all the Service Rules does not indicate that there are no Rules","author":"Editor","date":"August 4, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Uttaranchal High Court: The Division bench of Vipin Sanghi, C.J., and R.C. Khulbe, J., had held that merely because the communication sanctioning a post does not indicate the promotion rules, does not mean that there are no Rules framed or applicable for promotion, requiring minimum service in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":180614,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/11\/order-director-industries-quashed-not-speaking-reasoned-order\/","url_meta":{"origin":257666,"position":3},"title":"Order of Director of Industries quashed for not being a speaking and reasoned order","author":"Saba","date":"January 11, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Himachal Pradesh: A civil writ petition was heard and decided by a Single Judge Bench comprising of Ajay Mohan Goel, J., wherein it was held that an order passed by the Director of Industries, to the detriment of the petitioner firm, was liable to be quashed for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217250,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/24\/raj-hc-division-bench-set-aside-order-of-single-judge-restraining-nri-students-for-admission-in-medical-colleges\/","url_meta":{"origin":257666,"position":4},"title":"Raj HC | Division Bench set aside order of Single Judge restraining NRI students for admission in Medical Colleges","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 24, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Mohammad Rafiq and Narendra Singh Dhaddha, JJ., set aside an impugned order passed by the Single Judge of the High Court, and requested to revisit and decide the main matter in question. In this instant case, the present appeal is directed against an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216540,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/05\/ori-hc-quasi-judicial-body-ought-to-provide-grounds-of-dismissal-of-employee-from-services\/","url_meta":{"origin":257666,"position":5},"title":"Ori HC | Quasi-Judicial body ought to provide grounds of dismissal of employee from services","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 5, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: A Division Bench of S.K. Mishra and Dr A.K. Mishra, JJ., dismissed a writ appeal and provided the impugned judgment does not suffer from any infirmity as the respondent-individual was denied the right of being heard and dismissed without any reason by a quasi-judicial authority. In the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257666","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=257666"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257666\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=257666"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=257666"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=257666"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}