{"id":257532,"date":"2021-11-22T16:00:57","date_gmt":"2021-11-22T10:30:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=257532"},"modified":"2021-11-26T13:26:22","modified_gmt":"2021-11-26T07:56:22","slug":"infringement-of-fundamental-right-to-life","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/22\/infringement-of-fundamental-right-to-life\/","title":{"rendered":"[MTP Act] Infringement of fundamental right to life of the victim heavily outweighs the right to life of the child in womb; Ori HC refuses to terminate 24+ week pregnancy of a rape victim"},"content":{"rendered":"

Orissa High Court: <\/strong>S. K. Panigrahi, J. disposed of the petition and refused to terminate 24+ week pregnancy of a rape victim.<\/p>\n

The facts of the case are such that the petitioner is a rape victim assailing the order dated 09-07-2021 passed by the Ld. S.D.J.M. under Section 3 of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as \u201cthe
\nMTP Act\u201d for brevity). Being aggrieved by the order, the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed in the instant court.<\/p>\n

Counsel for petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been pregnant for more than 4 months and feels morally insecure to step out of her house due to horrendous social stigma attached to such crime. The social relations between men and women in which violence against women is often taken for granted, especially in cases like these the judge do decide their fate in the decision to abort or not to abort the pregnancy.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that in the cases of this genre, the medical practice of abortion, \u00a0legal and illegal, has expanded but the Psycho-physiological and \u00a0social condition of the rape survivors form the essential aspects of \u00a0medical judgment especially in therapeutic abortion case.<\/em><\/p>\n

In the absence of any report by medical team ascertaining the actual \u00a0period of pregnancy, the Court directed the office of the Advocate General in \u00a0order to facilitate the petitioner for testing of the period of \u00a0pregnancy accurately by a team of doctors as prescribed under the \u00a0Act. Accordingly, the test was conducted and report submitted which suggests it may be unsafe for getting the termination done at this stage. In fact, allowing the termination at\u00a0 this stage could endanger the mother\u2019s life or even lead to\u00a0 substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function.<\/em><\/p>\n

The Court relied on judgment Suchitra Srivastava v. Chandigarh Administration <\/em>(2009) 9 SCC 1 wherein it was observed that perusal of the provisions of the MTP Act makes it clear \u00a0that ordinarily a pregnancy can be terminated only when a medical \u00a0practitioner is satisfied that a ‘continuance of the pregnancy would \u00a0involve a risk to the life of the pregnant woman or of grave injury \u00a0to her physical or mental health’ [as per Section 3(2)(i)] or when \u00a0‘there is a substantial risk that if the child were born, it would suffer \u00a0from such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped’ [as per Section 3(2) (ii)]. While the satisfaction of one medical practitioner is required for terminating a pregnancy within twelve weeks of the gestation period, two medical practitioners must be satisfied about either of these grounds in order to terminate a pregnancy between twelve to twenty weeks of the gestation period.<\/em><\/p>\n

The explanations to this provision have also contemplated \u00a0the termination of pregnancy when the same is the result of a rape \u00a0or a failure of birth-control methods since both of these \u00a0eventualities have been equated with a ‘grave injury to the mental \u00a0health’ of a woman. In all such circumstances, the consent of the pregnant woman is an essential requirement for proceeding with the termination of pregnancy. This position has been unambiguously stated in Section 3(4)(b) of the MTP Act, 1971. \u00a0The exceptions to this rule of consent have been laid down in Section 3(4)(a) of the Act. Section 3(4)(a) lays down that when the \u00a0pregnant woman is below eighteen years of age or is a ‘mentally ill’ \u00a0person, the pregnancy can be terminated if the guardian of the \u00a0pregnant woman gives consent for the same. The only other exception is found in Section 5(1) of the MTP Act which permits a registered medical practitioner to proceed with a termination of pregnancy when he\/she is of an opinion formed in good faith that the same is ‘immediately necessary to save the life of the pregnant woman.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that in the present case, there is no opinion of any registered medical practitioner regarding risk to life due to continuance of pregnancy of the petitioner or her physical and mental health. Further in the present case, the pregnancy exceeds 24 weeks and as per the requirement of the statute, the medical opinion of not less than two medical
\npractitioners was not obtained and no \u00a0medical opinion regarding termination of pregnancy, if, immediately \u00a0necessary to save the life of the petitioner as per Section 5 of MTP \u00a0Act. Therefore MTP Act does not permit the termination of pregnancy of the petitioner.<\/p>\n

The Court further stated that the victim is being forced to bear and care for the unwanted child is bound to severely impact her personality and womanhood. Thus the court observed that her request should have been acceded to over and above the right to life of the child yet to be born. Though this issue has, time and again, knocks at the judicial threshold it is still crying for an unperplexed solution by way of suitable amendment in the statute governing the field.<\/p>\n

The Court feels that the Police officers could have acted more sensibly and, at the very least, guided them to approach District Legal Service Authority or Legal Services Units at Taluk Level or to any para legal volunteers. This would have, perhaps, helped the victim to get timely legal advice and may have saved her from suffering the forced delivery, imposed on her due to medico- legal compulsions.<\/em><\/p>\n

The Court issued following directions keeping in mind rape victims and their unborn child:<\/p>\n

1).The District Collector, Cuttack shall ensure that arrangements are made to provide proper diet, medical supervision and medicines as may be necessary, to the \u00a0victim throughout the remaining part of her journey of \u00a0pregnancy. When the time for delivery arrives, proper medical facilities be made available for a safe delivery of \u00a0the child.<\/p>\n

2).The State Legal Services Authority shall ensure that the State Government shall pay an amount of Rs.10, 00,000\/- (rupees ten lakhs only) as compensation to the victim. This amount shall be over and above the compensation amount, if any, the learned Trial Court may direct to be paid to the victim and\/or her child at conclusion of the trial in the underlying proceedings.<\/p>\n

The Court held that it does feel that her welfare is of, paramount consideration for this court. \u201cHowever, as regards the legal position, the above discussion and the mandate of Section 3 of the MTP Act, in particular, lead only to one conclusion i.e., since the length of the pregnancy of the victim is over twenty-six weeks, this Court cannot permit its termination.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

[X v. State of Odisha, 2021 SCC OnLine Ori 1964<\/b><\/a>, decided on 16-11-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Arunima bose, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n

Appearances:<\/strong><\/p>\n

For Petitioner: Mr Sarathi Jyoti Mohanty
\nFor Opp. Parties: Mr L. Samantaray<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Orissa High Court: S. K. Panigrahi, J. disposed of the petition and refused to terminate 24+ week pregnancy of a rape victim. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[47126,13201,43653,2644,40331,2572,47841,17371],"class_list":["post-257532","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-medical-termination","tag-medical-termination-of-pregnancy-act","tag-mtp-act","tag-pregnancy","tag-pregnant-women","tag-Rape","tag-rape-pregnancy","tag-rape-victim"],"yoast_head":"\n[MTP Act] Infringement of fundamental right to life of the victim heavily outweighs the right to life of the child in womb; Ori HC refuses to terminate 24+ week pregnancy of a rape victim | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Infringement of fundamental right to life\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/22\/infringement-of-fundamental-right-to-life\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[MTP Act] Infringement of fundamental right to life of the victim heavily outweighs the right to life of the child in womb; Ori HC refuses to terminate 24+ week pregnancy of a rape victim\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Infringement of fundamental right to life\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/22\/infringement-of-fundamental-right-to-life\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-11-22T10:30:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-11-26T07:56:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/22\/infringement-of-fundamental-right-to-life\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/22\/infringement-of-fundamental-right-to-life\/\",\"name\":\"[MTP Act] Infringement of fundamental right to life of the victim heavily outweighs the right to life of the child in womb; Ori HC refuses to terminate 24+ week pregnancy of a rape victim | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-11-22T10:30:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-11-26T07:56:22+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Infringement of fundamental right to life\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/22\/infringement-of-fundamental-right-to-life\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/22\/infringement-of-fundamental-right-to-life\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/22\/infringement-of-fundamental-right-to-life\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[MTP Act] Infringement of fundamental right to life of the victim heavily outweighs the right to life of the child in womb; Ori HC refuses to terminate 24+ week pregnancy of a rape victim\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[MTP Act] Infringement of fundamental right to life of the victim heavily outweighs the right to life of the child in womb; Ori HC refuses to terminate 24+ week pregnancy of a rape victim | SCC Times","description":"Infringement of fundamental right to life","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/22\/infringement-of-fundamental-right-to-life\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[MTP Act] Infringement of fundamental right to life of the victim heavily outweighs the right to life of the child in womb; Ori HC refuses to terminate 24+ week pregnancy of a rape victim","og_description":"Infringement of fundamental right to life","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/22\/infringement-of-fundamental-right-to-life\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-11-22T10:30:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-11-26T07:56:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/22\/infringement-of-fundamental-right-to-life\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/22\/infringement-of-fundamental-right-to-life\/","name":"[MTP Act] Infringement of fundamental right to life of the victim heavily outweighs the right to life of the child in womb; Ori HC refuses to terminate 24+ week pregnancy of a rape victim | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-11-22T10:30:57+00:00","dateModified":"2021-11-26T07:56:22+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Infringement of fundamental right to life","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/22\/infringement-of-fundamental-right-to-life\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/22\/infringement-of-fundamental-right-to-life\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/22\/infringement-of-fundamental-right-to-life\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[MTP Act] Infringement of fundamental right to life of the victim heavily outweighs the right to life of the child in womb; Ori HC refuses to terminate 24+ week pregnancy of a rape victim"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":278845,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/30\/legal-update-legal-news-medcal-termination-of-pregnancy-more-than-24-weeks-old-pegnancy\/","url_meta":{"origin":257532,"position":0},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court directs Medical Termination of Pregnancy of minor rape victim","author":"Editor","date":"November 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: While deciding the writ petition, a bench of Vinod S. Bhardwaj, J., directed the Medical Board to terminate more than 24 weeks old pregnancy of minor rape victim. Background In the case at hand, the petitioner was subjected to rape as a result of which\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image42.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":358313,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/29\/rajasthan-hc-denies-32-weeks-preganant-minor-rape-survivor-terminate-pregnancy\/","url_meta":{"origin":257532,"position":1},"title":"Rajasthan High Court denies Abortion for 32-weeks Pregnant minor deaf and mute rape survivor; Outlines Pre and Post-delivery care plans","author":"Editor","date":"August 29, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhere any pregnancy is alleged by the pregnant woman to have been caused by rape, the anguish caused by the pregnancy is presumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the woman.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"32-week pregnant minor rape survivor","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/32-week-pregnant-minor-rape-survivor.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/32-week-pregnant-minor-rape-survivor.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/32-week-pregnant-minor-rape-survivor.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/32-week-pregnant-minor-rape-survivor.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":321728,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/09\/sacrosanct-right-of-woman-bodily-integrity-article-21-kerala-high-court-allows-minor-rape-victim-terminate-pregnancy-28-weeks\/","url_meta":{"origin":257532,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Sacrosanct right of woman to bodily integrity under Art. 21\u2019: Kerala HC allows minor rape victim to terminate pregnancy of 28 weeks","author":"Editor","date":"May 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe right of a woman or a girl to make autonomous decisions about her own body and reproductive functions is at the very core of her fundamental right to equality and privacy\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/27\/delhi-high-court-issues-guidelines-for-medical-examination-of-pregnant-rape-victims-exceeding-24-weeks-allows-termination-of-pregnancy-of-around-25-weeks-of-a-minor-child-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":257532,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court issues guidelines for medical examination of pregnant rape victims exceeding 24 weeks; allows termination of pregnancy of around 25 weeks of a minor child","author":"Editor","date":"January 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court allowed termination of pregnancy of around 25 weeks of a minor child and further directed the SHO concerned to ensure that after the medical termination and the period of rest, the minor child was admitted to a Government school, so she could continue studying further.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":164764,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/23\/bombay-hc-dismisses-petition-filed-rape-victim-termination-27-weeks-pregnancy\/","url_meta":{"origin":257532,"position":4},"title":"Bombay HC dismisses petition filed by rape victim for termination of 27 weeks\u2019 pregnancy","author":"Saba","date":"October 23, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Ranjit More and Prakash D. Naik, JJ. heard a petition requesting termination of pregnancy of the petitioner\u2019s daughter who was a victim of rape and was running into 27 weeks of pregnancy on the grounds that continuation of pregnancy would cause grave\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267571,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/30\/victim-of-rape-allowed-to-terminate-13-week-pregnancy\/","url_meta":{"origin":257532,"position":5},"title":"MP HC | Victim of rape allowed to terminate 13 week pregnancy; Direction issued to District Hospital for immediate action","author":"Editor","date":"May 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Vivek Rusia, J. allowed an appeal which was filed seeking permission\/ direction for termination of pregnancy. The petitioner born in 2005 lodged an FIR alleging her kidnapping and sexual assault and because of the unfortunate incident, she had become pregnant and at present, she is carrying\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257532","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=257532"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257532\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=257532"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=257532"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=257532"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}