{"id":257096,"date":"2021-11-15T11:00:41","date_gmt":"2021-11-15T05:30:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=257096"},"modified":"2021-11-19T18:26:52","modified_gmt":"2021-11-19T12:56:52","slug":"court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/15\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\/","title":{"rendered":"Cal HC | Court explains \u201dIntelligible testimony\u201d and \u201creverse burden of proof\u201d; dismisses appeal of accused charged for raping 3 year old girl under S. 6, POCSO Act"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Calcutta High Court:<\/strong> The Division Bench of Soumen Sen and Rabindranath Samanta, JJ., dismissed a criminal appeal which was filed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by Additional Sessions Judge\u2013cum-Special Judge under POCSO Act, 2012 whereby the appellant had been convicted for commission of offence punishable under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 read with Section 376 (2) (i), Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life without remission and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000,00.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On 15th December, 2017 victim minor girl was raped by the appellant\/accused as confessed by him to the mother of the victim at the time of confrontation and soon after that he fled away from his room. Thereafter, FIR was lodged under Section 6 of the POCSO Act. After completion of the investigation, the investigating officer submitted charge-sheet under Section 6 of the POCSO Act against the accused. Trial Judge found the accused guilty of committing the offence and charges framed against him being proved convicted and sentenced him as above. Feeling aggrieved by which the instant appeal was filed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the appellant argued that the prosecution had failed to establish the foundational facts and the charges levelled against the accused person, he further argued that the evidence of the prosecutrix cannot always be presumed to be gospel truth to record conviction of an accused. On the contrary, Counsel for the State submitted that the ocular evidence conjointly with the medical evidence clearly established without any shadow of doubt that the accused person sexually ravished the victim girl. He further submittd that the vital prosecution witnesses remain unshaken in cross-examination and their testimony before the Court was in consonance with the statements made by them before the Magistrate. In the judgment also the Trial Judge had held that the prosecution had been able to prove the foundational facts of the case and the legal presumption under Section 29 of the POCSO Act was available against the accused person. This implies that the onus was shifted upon the accused person to show why such presumption could not be available against him. But the accused person failed to discharge such onus either from the evidence led by the prosecution or by adducing independent evidence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The major issues were with regard to evidence of a child witness and the concept of reverse burden of proof in a criminal trial. The Court in this regard explained that,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>A witness is someone who provides astute evidence, which is proof that they have personally heard, seen, smelt, or felt. Competence is sometimes misconstrued with credibility or dependability. Determining competency is not a test of whether or not the witness is giving, or will give, accurate or truthful testimony. Credibility and reliability are factors that the trier of fact considers when deciding how much weight to give the evidence (judge or jury depending upon where the case is being heard). If the child is called as a witness by the prosecution, he or she must have the ability to understand the questions put to him by the defence as well as the prosecution and to provide answers to them which are understandable. <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court further elaborated the role of child witness in criminal trials according to the Indian Legal Jurisprudence and quoted that the basic test of competence is whether the person is able to understand questions put to him as a witness, and give answers to them which can be understood.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court mentioned catena of decisions that with respect to children, no precise age is fixed by law within which they are absolutely excluded from giving evidence on the presumption that they have not sufficient understanding including <em>Panchhi and National Commission for Women v. State of Uttar Pradesh<\/em>, 1998 CriLJ 3305, <em>Yogesh Singh v. Mahabeer Singh<\/em>, (2017) SCC 195, <em>The State of Maharashtra v. Bandu<\/em>, 2018 (11) SCC 163, <em>Sakshi v Union of India<\/em>, (2004) 5 SCC 518 etc.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court was finally of the view that the prosecution has provided and substantiated foundational evidence and has proved its case beyond all reasonable doubt. The appellant\/accused neither examined any independent witness nor produced any contra evidence to prove his defence. There has been no discrepancy between the place of occurrence, medical witness, report, and oral evidence of the alleged eye witness. The appeal was accordingly dismissed and order of conviction and sentence under appeal was confirmed.[Raju Roy v. State of West Bengal, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/9WY4Y1x1\"><b>2021 SCC OnLine Cal 2911<\/b><\/a>, decided on 29-09-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h4><span style=\"color: #993300;\">Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the Appellant : Md. Zohaib Rauf, Mr Rameez Alam<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the State of West Bengal : Mr Saibal Bapuli, Mr. Bibaswan Bhattacharya<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Calcutta High Court: The Division Bench of Soumen Sen and Rabindranath Samanta, JJ., dismissed a criminal appeal which was filed against the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":52131,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3228,2573,47792,23204,2572,41738],"class_list":["post-257096","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-burden_of_proof","tag-child_witness","tag-intelligible-testimony","tag-pocso","tag-Rape","tag-reverse-burden-of-proof"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cal HC | Court explains \u201dIntelligible testimony\u201d and \u201creverse burden of proof\u201d; dismisses appeal of accused charged for raping 3 year old girl under S. 6, POCSO Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Court explains \u201dIntelligible testimony\u201d and \u201creverse burden of proof\u201d\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/15\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cal HC | Court explains \u201dIntelligible testimony\u201d and \u201creverse burden of proof\u201d; dismisses appeal of accused charged for raping 3 year old girl under S. 6, POCSO Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Court explains \u201dIntelligible testimony\u201d and \u201creverse burden of proof\u201d\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/15\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-11-15T05:30:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-11-19T12:56:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/15\\\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/15\\\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"Cal HC | Court explains \u201dIntelligible testimony\u201d and \u201creverse burden of proof\u201d; dismisses appeal of accused charged for raping 3 year old girl under S. 6, POCSO Act\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-11-15T05:30:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-11-19T12:56:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/15\\\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":793,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/15\\\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/06\\\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"burden of proof\",\"child witness\",\"intelligible testimony\",\"POCSO\",\"Rape\",\"Reverse Burden of Proof\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/15\\\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/15\\\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/15\\\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cal HC | Court explains \u201dIntelligible testimony\u201d and \u201creverse burden of proof\u201d; dismisses appeal of accused charged for raping 3 year old girl under S. 6, POCSO Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/15\\\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/15\\\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/06\\\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-11-15T05:30:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-11-19T12:56:52+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Court explains \u201dIntelligible testimony\u201d and \u201creverse burden of proof\u201d\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/15\\\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/15\\\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/15\\\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/06\\\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/06\\\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/15\\\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cal HC | Court explains \u201dIntelligible testimony\u201d and \u201creverse burden of proof\u201d; dismisses appeal of accused charged for raping 3 year old girl under S. 6, POCSO Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cal HC | Court explains \u201dIntelligible testimony\u201d and \u201creverse burden of proof\u201d; dismisses appeal of accused charged for raping 3 year old girl under S. 6, POCSO Act | SCC Times","description":"Court explains \u201dIntelligible testimony\u201d and \u201creverse burden of proof\u201d","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/15\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cal HC | Court explains \u201dIntelligible testimony\u201d and \u201creverse burden of proof\u201d; dismisses appeal of accused charged for raping 3 year old girl under S. 6, POCSO Act","og_description":"Court explains \u201dIntelligible testimony\u201d and \u201creverse burden of proof\u201d","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/15\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-11-15T05:30:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-11-19T12:56:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/15\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/15\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"Cal HC | Court explains \u201dIntelligible testimony\u201d and \u201creverse burden of proof\u201d; dismisses appeal of accused charged for raping 3 year old girl under S. 6, POCSO Act","datePublished":"2021-11-15T05:30:41+00:00","dateModified":"2021-11-19T12:56:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/15\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\/"},"wordCount":793,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/15\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","keywords":["burden of proof","child witness","intelligible testimony","POCSO","Rape","Reverse Burden of Proof"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/15\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/15\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/15\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\/","name":"Cal HC | Court explains \u201dIntelligible testimony\u201d and \u201creverse burden of proof\u201d; dismisses appeal of accused charged for raping 3 year old girl under S. 6, POCSO Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/15\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/15\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","datePublished":"2021-11-15T05:30:41+00:00","dateModified":"2021-11-19T12:56:52+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Court explains \u201dIntelligible testimony\u201d and \u201creverse burden of proof\u201d","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/15\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/15\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/15\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/15\/court-explains-intelligible-testimony-and-reverse-burden-of-proof\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cal HC | Court explains \u201dIntelligible testimony\u201d and \u201creverse burden of proof\u201d; dismisses appeal of accused charged for raping 3 year old girl under S. 6, POCSO Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":217136,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/22\/sikk-hc-lack-of-injury-on-genitals-of-victim-not-conclusive-proof-of-non-commission-of-rape-ocular-testimony-of-victim-has-greater-evidentiary-value-vis-a-vis-medical-evidence\/","url_meta":{"origin":257096,"position":0},"title":"Sikk HC | Lack of injury on genitals of victim not conclusive proof of non-commission of rape \u2013 ocular testimony of victim has greater evidentiary value vis-a-vis medical evidence","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 22, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Sikkim High Court: Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J. hearing a criminal appeal filed by a person convicted of rape and sexual assault under Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter 'IPC') and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter 'POCSO'), partly allowed the appeal and set aside conviction under POCSO Act on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":254263,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/16\/child-victims-testimony-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":257096,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | Can testimony of child victim be trustworthy? HC reiterates law on finding child witness competent","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Emphasising the reliability on the child victim\u2019s testimony, Manoj Kumar Ohri, J., dismissed the appeal filed and the conviction and sentence awarded under Section 10 of POCSO At was maintained. The present appeal was filed under Section 374(2) CrPC. Subject matter of the appeal was that the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":297087,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/18\/bombay-high-court-upholds-conviction-of-46-year-old-for-raping-6-year-old-medical-evidence\/","url_meta":{"origin":257096,"position":2},"title":"[POCSO] Bombay High Court upholds conviction of accused of raping a 6-year-old based on medical evidence","author":"Arunima","date":"July 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court observed that the appellant was aged 46 when the offence was committed and it has come in the evidence that he was residing with his wife and children. Still, he has ravished a small child aged six years and, therefore, no leniency can be shown against him.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"bombay high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":381977,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/23\/unchallenged-oral-testimony-sufficient-to-prove-age-under-pocso-act-ker-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":257096,"position":3},"title":"Unchallenged oral testimony of victim and her mother is sufficient to prove age; Kerala HC upholds POCSO conviction","author":"Sunaina","date":"April 23, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court holds when the accused contends that the victim is not a child as defined in the POCSO Act, it is the prosecution\u2019s duty to prove the victim\u2019s age.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"unchallenged oral testimony","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/unchallenged-oral-testimony.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/unchallenged-oral-testimony.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/unchallenged-oral-testimony.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/unchallenged-oral-testimony.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":262914,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/02\/touching-bum-of-a-minor-girl-will-be-sexual-assault\/","url_meta":{"origin":257096,"position":4},"title":"Touching \u2018bum\u2019 of a minor girl will be sexual assault punished under S. 10 of POCSO Act? POCSO Court explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Special Court for Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Fort, Greater Bombay: Expressing that, the sexual intention is the state of mind, may not necessarily to be proved by direct evidence, such intention is to be inferred from attending circumstances of the case, M.A. Baraliya, Designated Judge under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/POCSO.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/POCSO.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/POCSO.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/POCSO.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/POCSO.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297984,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/29\/no-independent-evidentiary-value-of-school-leave-certificate-of-rape-victim-orissa-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":257096,"position":5},"title":"\u2018School Leaving Certificate has no independent evidentiary value in proving DOB of Rape victim\u2019: Orissa HC","author":"Editor","date":"July 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court found that there was absence of concrete proof of age of the minor victim, therefore, the charge under Section 6 of the POCSO Act was not proved, instead the appellant was convicted under Section 376(1) of the IPC.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"orissa high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257096","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=257096"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257096\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/52131"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=257096"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=257096"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=257096"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}