{"id":256910,"date":"2021-11-10T13:00:49","date_gmt":"2021-11-10T07:30:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=256910"},"modified":"2021-11-12T09:42:02","modified_gmt":"2021-11-12T04:12:02","slug":"recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/","title":{"rendered":"MP HC | Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department; Court partly allows appeal"},"content":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/strong> Subodh Abhyankar, J., partly allowed a petition which was filed aggrieved whereby respondent 3 had initiated the recovery of the amount paid in excess.<\/p>\n

The petitioner being a non-ministerial employee was given the benefit of increment and the Supreme Court had upheld that amount was wrongly paid to the non-ministerial staff after which State Government had initiated the recovery against all the employees who had been given the said benefit.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was not challenging the recovery of the principal amount, but he was aggrieved by the recovery of interest as there was no fault on the part of the petitioner to get the increment.<\/p>\n

The Court agreed that the Petitioner being the ministerial staff of the police department was not entitled to get the said ad-hoc increment, but the same was given to him along with others by the department itself, hence, recovery of the interest was not justified.<\/p>\n

The Court allowed the petition to the extent that recovery of the principal was justified but the recovery of the interest wasn\u2019t thus the part of the order was quashed and further directed that any amount already recovered as interest be returned to the petitioner.[Radheshyam Yadav v. State of M.P., 2021 SCC OnLine MP 2032<\/b><\/a>, decided on 27-10-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n

Counsel for the petitioner: Shri L. C. Patne<\/p>\n

Counsel for the respondents\/State: Shri Aditya Garg<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court: Subodh Abhyankar, J., partly allowed a petition which was filed aggrieved whereby respondent 3 had initiated the recovery <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30651,47766,2591,47765,38604],"class_list":["post-256910","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-employee","tag-excess","tag-Interest","tag-non-ministerial","tag-principal-amount"],"yoast_head":"\nMP HC | Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department; Court partly allows appeal | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP HC | Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department; Court partly allows appeal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-11-10T07:30:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-11-12T04:12:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/10\\\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/10\\\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"MP HC | Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department; Court partly allows appeal\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-11-10T07:30:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-11-12T04:12:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/10\\\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":266,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"employee\",\"excess\",\"Interest\",\"non-ministerial\",\"Principal Amount\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/10\\\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/10\\\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/10\\\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\\\/\",\"name\":\"MP HC | Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department; Court partly allows appeal | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-11-10T07:30:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-11-12T04:12:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/10\\\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/10\\\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/10\\\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP HC | Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department; Court partly allows appeal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP HC | Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department; Court partly allows appeal | SCC Times","description":"Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP HC | Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department; Court partly allows appeal","og_description":"Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-11-10T07:30:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-11-12T04:12:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"MP HC | Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department; Court partly allows appeal","datePublished":"2021-11-10T07:30:49+00:00","dateModified":"2021-11-12T04:12:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/"},"wordCount":266,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["employee","excess","Interest","non-ministerial","Principal Amount"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/","name":"MP HC | Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department; Court partly allows appeal | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-11-10T07:30:49+00:00","dateModified":"2021-11-12T04:12:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP HC | Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department; Court partly allows appeal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256910","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=256910"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256910\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=256910"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=256910"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=256910"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}