{"id":256910,"date":"2021-11-10T13:00:49","date_gmt":"2021-11-10T07:30:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=256910"},"modified":"2021-11-12T09:42:02","modified_gmt":"2021-11-12T04:12:02","slug":"recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/","title":{"rendered":"MP HC | Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department; Court partly allows appeal"},"content":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/strong> Subodh Abhyankar, J., partly allowed a petition which was filed aggrieved whereby respondent 3 had initiated the recovery of the amount paid in excess.<\/p>\n

The petitioner being a non-ministerial employee was given the benefit of increment and the Supreme Court had upheld that amount was wrongly paid to the non-ministerial staff after which State Government had initiated the recovery against all the employees who had been given the said benefit.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was not challenging the recovery of the principal amount, but he was aggrieved by the recovery of interest as there was no fault on the part of the petitioner to get the increment.<\/p>\n

The Court agreed that the Petitioner being the ministerial staff of the police department was not entitled to get the said ad-hoc increment, but the same was given to him along with others by the department itself, hence, recovery of the interest was not justified.<\/p>\n

The Court allowed the petition to the extent that recovery of the principal was justified but the recovery of the interest wasn\u2019t thus the part of the order was quashed and further directed that any amount already recovered as interest be returned to the petitioner.[Radheshyam Yadav v. State of M.P., 2021 SCC OnLine MP 2032<\/b><\/a>, decided on 27-10-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n
\n

Counsel for the petitioner: Shri L. C. Patne<\/p>\n

Counsel for the respondents\/State: Shri Aditya Garg<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court: Subodh Abhyankar, J., partly allowed a petition which was filed aggrieved whereby respondent 3 had initiated the recovery <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30651,47766,2591,47765,38604],"class_list":["post-256910","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-employee","tag-excess","tag-Interest","tag-non-ministerial","tag-principal-amount"],"yoast_head":"\nMP HC | Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department; Court partly allows appeal | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP HC | Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department; Court partly allows appeal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-11-10T07:30:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-11-12T04:12:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/10\\\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/10\\\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"MP HC | Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department; Court partly allows appeal\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-11-10T07:30:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-11-12T04:12:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/10\\\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":266,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"employee\",\"excess\",\"Interest\",\"non-ministerial\",\"Principal Amount\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/10\\\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/10\\\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/10\\\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\\\/\",\"name\":\"MP HC | Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department; Court partly allows appeal | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-11-10T07:30:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-11-12T04:12:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/10\\\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/10\\\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/11\\\/10\\\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP HC | Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department; Court partly allows appeal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP HC | Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department; Court partly allows appeal | SCC Times","description":"Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP HC | Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department; Court partly allows appeal","og_description":"Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-11-10T07:30:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-11-12T04:12:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"MP HC | Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department; Court partly allows appeal","datePublished":"2021-11-10T07:30:49+00:00","dateModified":"2021-11-12T04:12:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/"},"wordCount":266,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["employee","excess","Interest","non-ministerial","Principal Amount"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/","name":"MP HC | Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department; Court partly allows appeal | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-11-10T07:30:49+00:00","dateModified":"2021-11-12T04:12:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/recovery-of-interest-not-justified-as-benefit-of-increment-was-faulty-at-the-part-of-the-department\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP HC | Recovery of interest not justified as benefit of increment was faulty at the part of the department; Court partly allows appeal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":196402,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/24\/recovery-of-excess-payment-from-a-retired-employee-held-impermissible\/","url_meta":{"origin":256910,"position":0},"title":"Recovery of excess payment from a retired employee held impermissible","author":"Saba","date":"May 24, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: A writ petition filed by a retired employee against the order of recovery of certain amount, was allowed by a Single Judge Bench comprising of Sudhir Agarwal, J. The petitioner was a retired employee of Nagar Palika. He assailed the order passed by the respondent whereunder the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":315146,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/23\/no-recovery-of-excess-payment-from-employee-leave-encashment-benefit-orissa-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":256910,"position":1},"title":"No recovery of excess payment from employee\u2019s leave encashment benefit after retirement in case payment was made due to employer\u2019s fault: Orissa HC","author":"Editor","date":"February 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe employer authority erred in deducting the excess payment made to the Government employee from his leave encashment benefits and thus, the action was not acceptable and the same was invalidated\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":308445,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-upholds-banks-right-to-recover-excess-amount-of-pension-legal-news-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":256910,"position":2},"title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court upholds bank\u2019s right to recover excess payment in pension recovery dispute","author":"Ritu","date":"December 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court noted that the petitioner did not dispute her liability to refund the commuted portion in instalments, as per her undertaking.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295818,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/03\/excess-payment-employee-cannot-recovered-kerala-high-court-reiterates\/","url_meta":{"origin":256910,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Employee had no role in drawing excess amount in increment\u2019; Kerala High Court upholds KAT order restricting any recovery of excess pay","author":"Ridhi","date":"July 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Kerala High Court clarified that the authorities erroneously granted the said increment in terms of Government Order while being careless and negligent, and that the respondent could not be faulted at all for their negligence.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"kerala high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":104871,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/09\/an-employers-right-to-recover-excess-payment-from-pensionary-benefits-of-employee-who-has-committed-no-fraud-or-misrepresentation-whatsoever-must-be-strictly-construed\/","url_meta":{"origin":256910,"position":4},"title":"An employer\u2019s right to recover excess payment from pensionary benefits of employee who has committed no fraud or misrepresentation whatsoever, must be strictly construed","author":"Saba","date":"February 9, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: In the present case, where the petitioner was aggrieved due to the impugned Pension Payment Order, 1999 by which the respondent authorities had deducted an amount of Rs. 29,447 on account of alleged overdrawal, the Bench of Arijit Banerjee, J., held that pensionary benefits are paid to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":314731,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/20\/delhi-high-court-denies-increment-to-teacher-alleged-sexual-harassment-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":256910,"position":5},"title":"[Sexual Harassment by Teacher] Delhi High Court holds recovery of overpaid salary invalid and denies increments","author":"Arunima","date":"February 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court bars the recovery of overpaid salary in a case involving teacher misconduct, citing unapproved suspension. However, increments are denied amidst allegations of serious nature.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256910","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=256910"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256910\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=256910"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=256910"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=256910"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}