{"id":256908,"date":"2021-11-10T15:00:10","date_gmt":"2021-11-10T09:30:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=256908"},"modified":"2021-11-12T09:39:42","modified_gmt":"2021-11-12T04:09:42","slug":"even-bare-consumption-of-electricity-energy-by-a-person-who-generates-the-same-is-permissible-to-be-taxed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/even-bare-consumption-of-electricity-energy-by-a-person-who-generates-the-same-is-permissible-to-be-taxed\/","title":{"rendered":"Megh HC | Even bare consumption of electricity energy by a person who generates the same is permissible to be taxed; Court upholds constitutionality of the Act"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Meghalaya High Court:<\/strong> The Division Bench of Ranjit More, CJ. and H.S.Thangkhiew, J., dismissed a petition which was filed challenging the constitutional validity of Section 3(1)(c) of the Meghalaya Electricity Duty (Assam Act XXX of 1964 as adapted by Meghalaya) as amended vide amendment Act dated 15th October, 2019 (\u201cthe Act\u201d).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Before the 2019 amendment, Section 3(1)(c) of the Assam Electricity Duty Act, 1964 (Assam Act XXX of 1964) reads as follows:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u201c3. (1) There shall be levied and paid to the State Government a duty, to be called the \u201celectricity duty\u201d, at the rate of five paise per unit of energy.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>(c) generated by a person or a company or a firm or any organisation for own use or consumption\u201d.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Division Bench of the Gauhati High Court held and declared that the State is not legally competent to levy duty from the cellular phone companies on self-produced and self-consumed electricity. The Division Bench further held that taxable event is generate and that cannot be read as consumption and hence Entry 53 of the State List of the Seventh Schedule does not support the State action. Consequently, Section 3(1)(c) of the Assam Electricity Duty Act, 1964 is declared ultra vires. Sub Section 3 (1) (c), thereafter was subsequently substituted by the State of Assam. Similar action was taken by the State of Meghalaya and Sub Section 3(1) (c) of the Meghalaya Electricity Duty (Assam Act XXX of 1964 as adapted by Meghalaya) was amended. Sub-Section (c) was substituted as follows:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u201c(c) Consumed by any person or any organization generating energy\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mr A.Kumar, AG and Mr K.Khan, Sr. GA appearing for the respondents submitted that the 2019 amendment of the said Act was in consonance with Entry 53 of the State List. Learned AG further submitted that the 2019 amendment to the said Act has made it abundantly clear that taxable event in respect of captive consumption of electricity was when the electricity was \u201cconsumed\u201d by the person generating it. Consequently, the duty is not imposed under Section 3 (1) (c) of the said Act on the mere act of \u201cgeneration\u201d of electricity. He further submitted that levy of electricity duty under the amended Sub Section 3(1) on consumption of electricity was perfectly admissible.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court opined that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by the two Supreme Court judgments in <em>Jiyageerao Cotton Mills Ltd. v. State of Madhya Pradesh<\/em>, AIR 1963 SC 414 and <em>State of Andhra Pradesh v. National Thermal Power Corpn. Ltd<\/em>. (NTPC), AIR 2002 SC 1895 and held that <strong><em>even bare consumption of electricity energy by a person who generates the same is permissible to be taxed by reference to Entry 53 of the State List, <\/em><\/strong>thus the petition was declared devoid of merits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[ATC Telecom Infrastructure (P) Ltd. v. State of Meghalaya, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/R79K348C\"><b>2021 SCC OnLine Megh 216<\/b><\/a>, decided on 21-10-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\">Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Meghalaya High Court: The Division Bench of Ranjit More, CJ. and H.S.Thangkhiew, J., dismissed a petition which was filed challenging the constitutional <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3274,30594,47764,44383],"class_list":["post-256908","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-constitutionality","tag-electricity","tag-entry-53","tag-state-list"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Megh HC | Even bare consumption of electricity energy by a person who generates the same is permissible to be taxed; Court upholds constitutionality of the Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Even bare consumption of electricity energy by a person who generates the same is permissible to be taxed\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/even-bare-consumption-of-electricity-energy-by-a-person-who-generates-the-same-is-permissible-to-be-taxed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Megh HC | Even bare consumption of electricity energy by a person who generates the same is permissible to be taxed; Court upholds constitutionality of the Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Even bare consumption of electricity energy by a person who generates the same is permissible to be taxed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/even-bare-consumption-of-electricity-energy-by-a-person-who-generates-the-same-is-permissible-to-be-taxed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-11-10T09:30:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-11-12T04:09:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Meghalaya-High-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/even-bare-consumption-of-electricity-energy-by-a-person-who-generates-the-same-is-permissible-to-be-taxed\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/even-bare-consumption-of-electricity-energy-by-a-person-who-generates-the-same-is-permissible-to-be-taxed\/\",\"name\":\"Megh HC | Even bare consumption of electricity energy by a person who generates the same is permissible to be taxed; Court upholds constitutionality of the Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-11-10T09:30:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-11-12T04:09:42+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Even bare consumption of electricity energy by a person who generates the same is permissible to be taxed\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/even-bare-consumption-of-electricity-energy-by-a-person-who-generates-the-same-is-permissible-to-be-taxed\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/even-bare-consumption-of-electricity-energy-by-a-person-who-generates-the-same-is-permissible-to-be-taxed\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/even-bare-consumption-of-electricity-energy-by-a-person-who-generates-the-same-is-permissible-to-be-taxed\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Megh HC | Even bare consumption of electricity energy by a person who generates the same is permissible to be taxed; Court upholds constitutionality of the Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Megh HC | Even bare consumption of electricity energy by a person who generates the same is permissible to be taxed; Court upholds constitutionality of the Act | SCC Times","description":"Even bare consumption of electricity energy by a person who generates the same is permissible to be taxed","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/even-bare-consumption-of-electricity-energy-by-a-person-who-generates-the-same-is-permissible-to-be-taxed\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Megh HC | Even bare consumption of electricity energy by a person who generates the same is permissible to be taxed; Court upholds constitutionality of the Act","og_description":"Even bare consumption of electricity energy by a person who generates the same is permissible to be taxed","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/even-bare-consumption-of-electricity-energy-by-a-person-who-generates-the-same-is-permissible-to-be-taxed\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-11-10T09:30:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-11-12T04:09:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/Meghalaya-High-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/even-bare-consumption-of-electricity-energy-by-a-person-who-generates-the-same-is-permissible-to-be-taxed\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/even-bare-consumption-of-electricity-energy-by-a-person-who-generates-the-same-is-permissible-to-be-taxed\/","name":"Megh HC | Even bare consumption of electricity energy by a person who generates the same is permissible to be taxed; Court upholds constitutionality of the Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-11-10T09:30:10+00:00","dateModified":"2021-11-12T04:09:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Even bare consumption of electricity energy by a person who generates the same is permissible to be taxed","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/even-bare-consumption-of-electricity-energy-by-a-person-who-generates-the-same-is-permissible-to-be-taxed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/even-bare-consumption-of-electricity-energy-by-a-person-who-generates-the-same-is-permissible-to-be-taxed\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/10\/even-bare-consumption-of-electricity-energy-by-a-person-who-generates-the-same-is-permissible-to-be-taxed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Megh HC | Even bare consumption of electricity energy by a person who generates the same is permissible to be taxed; Court upholds constitutionality of the Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":372250,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/10\/jhar-hc-quashes-electricity-duty-on-net-charges\/","url_meta":{"origin":256908,"position":0},"title":"Jharkhand High Court quashes electricity duty on &#8220;net charges&#8221; for breaching constitutional limits and excessive delegation","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"January 10, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIf electricity duty is charged on per cent of \u2018net charges\u2019 for energy consumed or sold, then similarly situated persons pay different duty depending on the distribution licensee, since the tariff fixed by the JSERC varies, which would amount to violation of Article 14 of the Constitution.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"electricity duty on net charges","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/electricity-duty-on-net-charges.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/electricity-duty-on-net-charges.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/electricity-duty-on-net-charges.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/electricity-duty-on-net-charges.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":326090,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/08\/meghalaya-hc-dismisses-assam-rifleman-reinstatement-plea\/","url_meta":{"origin":256908,"position":1},"title":"[Reinstating employee of unsound mind] Meghalaya HC dismisses Assam rifleman\u2019s reinstatement plea who shot co-employee","author":"Editor","date":"July 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Rifleman was accused of missing from his service with his weapon and firing three rounds on his co-employee, injuring his right knee, right side of neck and lower abdomen.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Meghalaya High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":128751,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/03\/essar-to-pay-electricity-duty-of-rs-1038-27-crores-to-the-state-of-gujarat\/","url_meta":{"origin":256908,"position":2},"title":"Essar to pay electricity duty of Rs. 1038.27 Crores to the State of Gujarat","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 3, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Refusing to interfere with the decision of the Gujarat High Court directing Essar Steel India Ltd. (ESL) to pay electricity duty amounting to Rs. 562 Crores together\u00a0with\u00a0interest\u00a0totaling\u00a0Rs. 1038.27 Crores to the State of Gujarat, the bench of Dr. A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan, JJ said that the statutory\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":381035,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/15\/cam-represents-jsw-steel-electricity-duty-refund-bombay-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":256908,"position":3},"title":"Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas successfully represented JSW Steel Limited in electricity duty dispute before Bombay High Court; \u20b947.47 crore refund secured","author":"Editor","date":"April 15, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that exemption benefits under the Package Scheme of Incentives continued during the eligibility period and were not extinguished by subsequent legislation.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Law Firms News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Law Firms News","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/law-firms-news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"CAM Represents JSW Steel Dispute","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/CAM-Represents-JSW-Steel-Dispute.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/CAM-Represents-JSW-Steel-Dispute.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/CAM-Represents-JSW-Steel-Dispute.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/CAM-Represents-JSW-Steel-Dispute.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":249082,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/01\/consumer-dispute\/","url_meta":{"origin":256908,"position":4},"title":"Consumer Forum | Can complainant raise consumer dispute where excess electricity duty is charged? Is he overriding statutory remedy if he already approached the Collector? Read on","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 1, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Gujarat State, Ahmedabad: Justice V.P. Patel, President and U.P. Jani, Member, addressed an appeal which was raised in light of a complaint raised due to excess of electricity duty being charged. Appellants filed the instant appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Consumer.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Consumer.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Consumer.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Consumer.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/Consumer.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":329075,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/21\/meghalaya-hc-upholds-assam-rifleman-dismissal-from-service-for-engaging-in-polygamy\/","url_meta":{"origin":256908,"position":5},"title":"Meghalaya High Court upholds Assam rifleman\u2019s dismissal from service for engaging in polygamy","author":"Editor","date":"August 21, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Rule 10(2) of the Assam Rifles Rules, 2010 provides that \u201cany person subject to the Act, who contracts or enters into a second marriage during the lifetime of his first spouse, shall render himself ineligible for retention in service and may be dismissed, removed or retired from service on ground\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Meghalaya High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256908","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=256908"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256908\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=256908"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=256908"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=256908"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}