{"id":256861,"date":"2021-11-09T13:00:01","date_gmt":"2021-11-09T07:30:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=256861"},"modified":"2021-11-09T17:18:15","modified_gmt":"2021-11-09T11:48:15","slug":"trademark-infringement-suit-filed-by-bennett-coleman-disposed-of-by-tis-hazari-courts-after-defendants-pay-damages-of-re-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/09\/trademark-infringement-suit-filed-by-bennett-coleman-disposed-of-by-tis-hazari-courts-after-defendants-pay-damages-of-re-1\/","title":{"rendered":"Trademark Infringement suit filed by Bennett Coleman partly disposed of by Tis Hazari Courts after defendants pay damages of Re 1, reach settlement"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Tis Hazari Court: <\/strong>Man Mohan Sharma, District Judge, partly disposed of a trademark infringement suit filed by Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd., noting that the plaintiffs and the defendants reached a settlement agreement.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Factual Background<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Plaintiff was aggrieved by the actions of the Defendants who committed the trademark infringement and further illegally used and masthead which was exclusively owned by the plaintiff.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The statutory proprietary right of exclusive use of the trademarks wherein TIMES is used as distinguishing, key, essential and dominant feature is used was with the plaintiff.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Plaintiff is evidently recognized and distinguished as \u201cTimes Group\u201d and the trademark TIMES is identified vis-\u00e0-vis the goods, business and services originating or associated with the plaintiff and none else.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Trademark TIMES this constituted a valuable intellectual property owned by the plaintiff.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Proceedings<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was submitted that there are various unknown infringing portals operated by unknown entities which are engaged in unauthorized and illegal use of the trademarks and mastheads of the plaintiff and circulating\/broadcasting\/communicating the same to users\/customers and the general public.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The details of the above-stated websites are unknown and as such have been arrayed as \u201cJohn Doe\/Ashok Kumar\u201d defendants<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Adding to the above submissions it was stated that the trademarks, tradenames\/mastheads of the plaintiff company were being used by the defendant on their customized and personalized gifts, d\u00e9cor, accessories, etc, are identical and\/or similar in order to deceive the public at large to the effect that customized and personalized gifts, d\u00e9cor, accessories etc., are related to the plaintiff in some manner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was submitted in the present matter that defendants 1,2,7 and 11 had reached a settlement with the plaintiff and that the said defendants were prepared to suffer an injunction in terms of their respective settlement agreements and that nominal damages of Re 1 had been paid by each of the defendants to the plaintiff.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was added that the terms of settlement had been reduced into writing in the respective application under Order XXII Rule 3 CPC read with Section 151 CPC and the accompanying settlement agreements.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Analysis and Decision<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">District Court noted that the terms of respective applications and Settlement Agreements appeared to be within the four corners of law. Hence the said settlement agreement was accepted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above, a consent decree was passed and the suit was disposed of vis a vis the plaintiff and defendants 1, 2, 7 and 11.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Also, in view of the statement of plaintiff&#8217;s counsel, name of defendant 10 was directed to be removed from array of parties.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Matter to be listed for the appearance of the served defendants and further proceedings on 18-12-2021.[Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd. v. Giftcart Ecommerce Pvt. Ltd., CS (Comm) 1932 of 2021, decided on 1-11-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Advocates before the Court:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Rahul Malhotra, Counsel for the plaintiff.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Anushkaa Arora, Counsel for the defendant nos. 1, 2 and 10.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Defendant 7 on video conferencing<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Rahul Shukla, Counsel for the defendant 7.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Manish Kumar, Counsel for the defendant 14<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tis Hazari Court: Man Mohan Sharma, District Judge, partly disposed of a trademark infringement suit filed by Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd., <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":200734,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,4721],"tags":[31432,45316,29785,31697,47756,38202,18071],"class_list":["post-256861","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-district-court","tag-bennett-coleman","tag-consent-decree","tag-law","tag-settlement-agreement","tag-times","tag-tis-hazari-court","tag-trademark-infringement"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Trademark Infringement suit filed by Bennett Coleman partly disposed of by Tis Hazari Courts after defendants pay damages of Re 1, reach settlement | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Trademark Infringement suit filed by Bennett Coleman disposed of by Tis Hazari Courts after defendants pay damages of Re 1\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/09\/trademark-infringement-suit-filed-by-bennett-coleman-disposed-of-by-tis-hazari-courts-after-defendants-pay-damages-of-re-1\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Trademark Infringement suit filed by Bennett Coleman partly disposed of by Tis Hazari Courts after defendants pay damages of Re 1, reach settlement\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Trademark Infringement suit filed by Bennett Coleman disposed of by Tis Hazari Courts after defendants pay damages of Re 1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/09\/trademark-infringement-suit-filed-by-bennett-coleman-disposed-of-by-tis-hazari-courts-after-defendants-pay-damages-of-re-1\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-11-09T07:30:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-11-09T11:48:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/09\/trademark-infringement-suit-filed-by-bennett-coleman-disposed-of-by-tis-hazari-courts-after-defendants-pay-damages-of-re-1\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/09\/trademark-infringement-suit-filed-by-bennett-coleman-disposed-of-by-tis-hazari-courts-after-defendants-pay-damages-of-re-1\/\",\"name\":\"Trademark Infringement suit filed by Bennett Coleman partly disposed of by Tis Hazari Courts after defendants pay damages of Re 1, reach settlement | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/09\/trademark-infringement-suit-filed-by-bennett-coleman-disposed-of-by-tis-hazari-courts-after-defendants-pay-damages-of-re-1\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/09\/trademark-infringement-suit-filed-by-bennett-coleman-disposed-of-by-tis-hazari-courts-after-defendants-pay-damages-of-re-1\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-11-09T07:30:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-11-09T11:48:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Trademark Infringement suit filed by Bennett Coleman disposed of by Tis Hazari Courts after defendants pay damages of Re 1\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/09\/trademark-infringement-suit-filed-by-bennett-coleman-disposed-of-by-tis-hazari-courts-after-defendants-pay-damages-of-re-1\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/09\/trademark-infringement-suit-filed-by-bennett-coleman-disposed-of-by-tis-hazari-courts-after-defendants-pay-damages-of-re-1\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/09\/trademark-infringement-suit-filed-by-bennett-coleman-disposed-of-by-tis-hazari-courts-after-defendants-pay-damages-of-re-1\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887,\"caption\":\"Tis-hazari\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/09\/trademark-infringement-suit-filed-by-bennett-coleman-disposed-of-by-tis-hazari-courts-after-defendants-pay-damages-of-re-1\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Trademark Infringement suit filed by Bennett Coleman partly disposed of by Tis Hazari Courts after defendants pay damages of Re 1, reach settlement\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Trademark Infringement suit filed by Bennett Coleman partly disposed of by Tis Hazari Courts after defendants pay damages of Re 1, reach settlement | SCC Times","description":"Trademark Infringement suit filed by Bennett Coleman disposed of by Tis Hazari Courts after defendants pay damages of Re 1","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/09\/trademark-infringement-suit-filed-by-bennett-coleman-disposed-of-by-tis-hazari-courts-after-defendants-pay-damages-of-re-1\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Trademark Infringement suit filed by Bennett Coleman partly disposed of by Tis Hazari Courts after defendants pay damages of Re 1, reach settlement","og_description":"Trademark Infringement suit filed by Bennett Coleman disposed of by Tis Hazari Courts after defendants pay damages of Re 1","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/09\/trademark-infringement-suit-filed-by-bennett-coleman-disposed-of-by-tis-hazari-courts-after-defendants-pay-damages-of-re-1\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-11-09T07:30:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-11-09T11:48:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/09\/trademark-infringement-suit-filed-by-bennett-coleman-disposed-of-by-tis-hazari-courts-after-defendants-pay-damages-of-re-1\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/09\/trademark-infringement-suit-filed-by-bennett-coleman-disposed-of-by-tis-hazari-courts-after-defendants-pay-damages-of-re-1\/","name":"Trademark Infringement suit filed by Bennett Coleman partly disposed of by Tis Hazari Courts after defendants pay damages of Re 1, reach settlement | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/09\/trademark-infringement-suit-filed-by-bennett-coleman-disposed-of-by-tis-hazari-courts-after-defendants-pay-damages-of-re-1\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/09\/trademark-infringement-suit-filed-by-bennett-coleman-disposed-of-by-tis-hazari-courts-after-defendants-pay-damages-of-re-1\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg","datePublished":"2021-11-09T07:30:01+00:00","dateModified":"2021-11-09T11:48:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Trademark Infringement suit filed by Bennett Coleman disposed of by Tis Hazari Courts after defendants pay damages of Re 1","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/09\/trademark-infringement-suit-filed-by-bennett-coleman-disposed-of-by-tis-hazari-courts-after-defendants-pay-damages-of-re-1\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/09\/trademark-infringement-suit-filed-by-bennett-coleman-disposed-of-by-tis-hazari-courts-after-defendants-pay-damages-of-re-1\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/09\/trademark-infringement-suit-filed-by-bennett-coleman-disposed-of-by-tis-hazari-courts-after-defendants-pay-damages-of-re-1\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg","width":1330,"height":887,"caption":"Tis-hazari"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/09\/trademark-infringement-suit-filed-by-bennett-coleman-disposed-of-by-tis-hazari-courts-after-defendants-pay-damages-of-re-1\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Trademark Infringement suit filed by Bennett Coleman partly disposed of by Tis Hazari Courts after defendants pay damages of Re 1, reach settlement"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":253563,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/02\/trademark-infringement\/","url_meta":{"origin":256861,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | Will the rights of a prior user override those of subsequent user even though it had been accorded registration of its trademark? All-Inclusive Report on Trademark Infringement of \u2018Rajdhani\u2019","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Jayant Nath, J., did a comprehensive analysis of the matter involving trademark infringement. Legacy of Rajdhani Plaintiff had originally conceived and adopted the trademark\/label \u2018Rajdhani\u2019 for several products. Plaintiff company was formed in 1983 and carried forward the said business under the trademark\/label\u2019 Rajdhani\u2019. Trademarks\/Labels are owned\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":266738,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/11\/trademark-infringement-of-starbucks-trademark-frappuccino\/","url_meta":{"origin":256861,"position":1},"title":"Infringement of Starbucks trademark FRAPPUCCINO | Del HC awards Rs 2 lakh in damages and 9 lakh costs","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 11, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a matter wherein Starbucks trademark \u2018frappuccino\u2019 was being infringed, Jyoti Singh, J., while observing that, FRAPPUCCINO trademarks have acquired formidable reputation and goodwill in India, awarded Starbuck Rupees 2 lakhs damages and 9 lakh costs. Instant suit had been filed to seek a decree of permanent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278667,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/21\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-american-eagle-against-ektarfa-garments-in-a-trademark-and-copyright-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":256861,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to American Eagle against Ektarfa Garments in a trademark and copyright infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"November 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case where application was filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 51 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (Code) in a trademark and copyright infringement suit, the Single Judge Bench of Jyoti Singh, J. Passed an Order granting ex-parte\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297748,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/26\/tis-hazari-court-vacates-interim-injunction-against-home-needs-use-of-mark-polo-lifetime\/","url_meta":{"origin":256861,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Polo\/Ralph Lauren Co. failed to establish prima facie infringement\u2019; Tis Hazari Court vacates interim injunction against Home Needs for use of mark \u2018POLO Lifetime\u2019","author":"Simranjeet","date":"July 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cMarks of plaintiff and defendant appear quite distinctive as except the word mark POLO there is no similarity. The defendant's mark uses suffix \u2018LIFETIME\u2019 which is predominant whereas plaintiff's mark uses suffix \u2018Ralph Lauren\u2019 and \u2018picture of polo player\u2019.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"tis hazari court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tis-hazari-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tis-hazari-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tis-hazari-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/tis-hazari-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268319,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/13\/tis-hazari-territorial-jurisdiction-contract-only-exclusively-district-court-legal-updates-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":256861,"position":4},"title":"Tis Hazari Court| Contract between parties determines Territorial jurisdiction; Non-mentioning of words \u201conly\u201d or \u201cexclusively\u201d before name of place of jurisdiction immaterial","author":"Editor","date":"June 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Tis Hazari Court, Delhi : Vinod Kumar Gautam, Additional District Judge, while addressing the matter regarding the question of territorial jurisdiction, has held that the territorial jurisdiction in a matter is determined based on the contract entered between the parties. In the case at hand where the plaintiff had sought\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tis-hazari","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282693,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/30\/trademark-v-domain-name-bombay-hc-holds-trademark-infringement-suit-is-an-action-in-personam-court-cannot-impose-a-blanket-ban-on-swiggy-mark-in-future\/","url_meta":{"origin":256861,"position":5},"title":"[Trademark v. Domain Name] Bombay HC holds trademark infringement suit is an action in personam; Court cannot impose a blanket ban on \u201cSwiggy\u201d mark in future","author":"Editor","date":"January 30, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Court held that in every case of trademark infringement, the plaintiff claiming infringement of its registered mark is required to claim relief in the context of specific instances of infringement, relatable to individuals against whom orders can be passed by the Court.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Bombay-High-Court-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256861","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=256861"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256861\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/200734"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=256861"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=256861"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=256861"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}