{"id":256725,"date":"2021-11-04T10:00:02","date_gmt":"2021-11-04T04:30:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=256725"},"modified":"2021-12-17T14:18:32","modified_gmt":"2021-12-17T08:48:32","slug":"whether-the-supplementary-invoices-relate-to-the-date-of-original-clearance-or-the-date-on-which-the-supplementary-invoice-was-raised","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/04\/whether-the-supplementary-invoices-relate-to-the-date-of-original-clearance-or-the-date-on-which-the-supplementary-invoice-was-raised\/","title":{"rendered":"CESTAT | Whether the supplementary invoices relate to the date of original clearance or the date on which the supplementary invoice was raised? Tribunal answers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT):<\/strong> The Coram of Dilip Gupta (President) and P.V. Subba Rao (Technical Member) partly allowed an appeal which was filed assailing order-in-original passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs &amp; Service Tax, Cochin.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The appellant manufactured electric cables\/ACSR conductors and supplies to M\/s Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) as per the contract which included a price variation clause. They paid duties at the time of the removal of goods subsequently prices were enhanced retrospectively in view of the increased in the cost of raw material. The differential duty in respect of such goods which were already cleared was paid by issuing supplementary invoices using Cenvat credit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A show cause notice was issued to the appellant alleging that the supplementary invoices were raised and, therefore, they are relatable to the clearances already made during the previous months.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As per the proviso to Rule 3 (4) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and proviso to Rule 3 (3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002, the appellant could not have used Cenvat credit, which was taken after the last day of month for payment of duty relating to that month. Therefore, the assessee\/ appellant was called upon to pay the differential central excise duty on the supplementary invoices in cash and not using Cenvat credit. The Commission had confirmed the demand of Rs. 89,95,674\/- plus interest along with penalty.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The appellant had contended that the supplementary invoices were relatable to the month in which the supplementary invoices were raised and not relatable to the month in which the goods were originally cleared because the duty became payable only when the price was enhanced and not before and that they had correctly availed and utilized Cenvat credit available at the time of raising supplementary invoices in its account and since the duty is relatable to the date of supplementary invoices, no interest was payable. Lastly, he concluded that no penalty was imposable under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Rule 15 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 as there was no violation of any Act or Rules and they had paid the duty on such supplementary invoices when they raised.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Tribunal opined that on the first question as to whether the supplementary invoices relate to the date of original clearance or the date on which the supplementary invoice was raised had been decided in <em>Steel Authority of India Ltd. v. CCE<\/em><strong>, <\/strong>2019 (366) E.L.T. 769 (S.C.) and thus interest under Section 11AB needs to be paid by the appellant on the differential amount of duty.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On the second question of whether Cenvat credit can be utilized for payment of duty in view of the proviso to Rule 3 (4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, the tribunal found that High Court of Gujarat in <em>Advance Surfactants India Ltd. v. Union of India<\/em><strong>, <\/strong>2017 (358) E.L.T. 53 (Guj.) had held that this proviso is ultravires therefore the appellant was correct in utilizing the Cenvat credit for payment of the excise duty.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On the third question of imposition of penalty the Tribunal found that from the facts of the case its clear that assessee has not violated any provision of the Act or the Rules to attract penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal and modified the order accordingly.[Traco Cable Co. Ltd. v. Commr. Of CE &amp; Customs, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5T8nFedD\"><b>2021 SCC OnLine CESTAT 2595<\/b><\/a>, decided on 01-11-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #993300;\">Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The Coram of Dilip Gupta (President) and P.V. Subba Rao (Technical Member) partly allowed <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":201689,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[34164,29538,39334,2627],"class_list":["post-256725","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-cenvat-credit","tag-customs","tag-excise","tag-Penalty"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>CESTAT | Whether the supplementary invoices relate to the date of original clearance or the date on which the supplementary invoice was raised? Tribunal answers | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Whether the supplementary invoices relate to the date of original clearance or the date on which the supplementary invoice was raised?\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/04\/whether-the-supplementary-invoices-relate-to-the-date-of-original-clearance-or-the-date-on-which-the-supplementary-invoice-was-raised\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"CESTAT | Whether the supplementary invoices relate to the date of original clearance or the date on which the supplementary invoice was raised? Tribunal answers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Whether the supplementary invoices relate to the date of original clearance or the date on which the supplementary invoice was raised?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/04\/whether-the-supplementary-invoices-relate-to-the-date-of-original-clearance-or-the-date-on-which-the-supplementary-invoice-was-raised\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-11-04T04:30:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-12-17T08:48:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/04\/whether-the-supplementary-invoices-relate-to-the-date-of-original-clearance-or-the-date-on-which-the-supplementary-invoice-was-raised\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/04\/whether-the-supplementary-invoices-relate-to-the-date-of-original-clearance-or-the-date-on-which-the-supplementary-invoice-was-raised\/\",\"name\":\"CESTAT | Whether the supplementary invoices relate to the date of original clearance or the date on which the supplementary invoice was raised? Tribunal answers | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/04\/whether-the-supplementary-invoices-relate-to-the-date-of-original-clearance-or-the-date-on-which-the-supplementary-invoice-was-raised\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/04\/whether-the-supplementary-invoices-relate-to-the-date-of-original-clearance-or-the-date-on-which-the-supplementary-invoice-was-raised\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-11-04T04:30:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-12-17T08:48:32+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Whether the supplementary invoices relate to the date of original clearance or the date on which the supplementary invoice was raised?\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/04\/whether-the-supplementary-invoices-relate-to-the-date-of-original-clearance-or-the-date-on-which-the-supplementary-invoice-was-raised\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/04\/whether-the-supplementary-invoices-relate-to-the-date-of-original-clearance-or-the-date-on-which-the-supplementary-invoice-was-raised\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/04\/whether-the-supplementary-invoices-relate-to-the-date-of-original-clearance-or-the-date-on-which-the-supplementary-invoice-was-raised\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/04\/whether-the-supplementary-invoices-relate-to-the-date-of-original-clearance-or-the-date-on-which-the-supplementary-invoice-was-raised\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"CESTAT | Whether the supplementary invoices relate to the date of original clearance or the date on which the supplementary invoice was raised? Tribunal answers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"CESTAT | Whether the supplementary invoices relate to the date of original clearance or the date on which the supplementary invoice was raised? Tribunal answers | SCC Times","description":"Whether the supplementary invoices relate to the date of original clearance or the date on which the supplementary invoice was raised?","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/04\/whether-the-supplementary-invoices-relate-to-the-date-of-original-clearance-or-the-date-on-which-the-supplementary-invoice-was-raised\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"CESTAT | Whether the supplementary invoices relate to the date of original clearance or the date on which the supplementary invoice was raised? Tribunal answers","og_description":"Whether the supplementary invoices relate to the date of original clearance or the date on which the supplementary invoice was raised?","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/04\/whether-the-supplementary-invoices-relate-to-the-date-of-original-clearance-or-the-date-on-which-the-supplementary-invoice-was-raised\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-11-04T04:30:02+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-12-17T08:48:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/04\/whether-the-supplementary-invoices-relate-to-the-date-of-original-clearance-or-the-date-on-which-the-supplementary-invoice-was-raised\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/04\/whether-the-supplementary-invoices-relate-to-the-date-of-original-clearance-or-the-date-on-which-the-supplementary-invoice-was-raised\/","name":"CESTAT | Whether the supplementary invoices relate to the date of original clearance or the date on which the supplementary invoice was raised? Tribunal answers | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/04\/whether-the-supplementary-invoices-relate-to-the-date-of-original-clearance-or-the-date-on-which-the-supplementary-invoice-was-raised\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/04\/whether-the-supplementary-invoices-relate-to-the-date-of-original-clearance-or-the-date-on-which-the-supplementary-invoice-was-raised\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","datePublished":"2021-11-04T04:30:02+00:00","dateModified":"2021-12-17T08:48:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Whether the supplementary invoices relate to the date of original clearance or the date on which the supplementary invoice was raised?","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/04\/whether-the-supplementary-invoices-relate-to-the-date-of-original-clearance-or-the-date-on-which-the-supplementary-invoice-was-raised\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/04\/whether-the-supplementary-invoices-relate-to-the-date-of-original-clearance-or-the-date-on-which-the-supplementary-invoice-was-raised\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/04\/whether-the-supplementary-invoices-relate-to-the-date-of-original-clearance-or-the-date-on-which-the-supplementary-invoice-was-raised\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/04\/whether-the-supplementary-invoices-relate-to-the-date-of-original-clearance-or-the-date-on-which-the-supplementary-invoice-was-raised\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"CESTAT | Whether the supplementary invoices relate to the date of original clearance or the date on which the supplementary invoice was raised? Tribunal answers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":269968,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/12\/does-empty-packaging-drums-of-cenvatable-input-attract-payment-of-excise-duty-or-cenvat-credit-cestat-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":256725,"position":0},"title":"Does empty packaging drums of cenvatable input attract payment of excise duty or cenvat credit? CESTAT answers","author":"Editor","date":"July 12, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): While dealing with an issue relating to payment of 6% on empty packaging drums of cenvatable input considering the same as non-excisable goods, Ramesh Nair (Judicial Member) held that the empty packaging material of cenvatable input is not liable for payment.CA appearing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/CESTATNew-Logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/CESTATNew-Logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/CESTATNew-Logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/CESTATNew-Logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/CESTATNew-Logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268452,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/15\/whether-the-credit-availed-by-bank-on-service-tax-paid-for-insuring-deposits-eligible-for-cenvat-credit-or-not-cestat-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":256725,"position":1},"title":"Whether the credit availed by bank on service tax paid for insuring deposits, eligible for CENVAT Credit or not? CESTAT answers","author":"Editor","date":"June 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The coram of Sulekha Beevi C.S. (Judicial Member) and P. Anjani Kumar (Technical Member) allowed an appeal which was filed aggrieved by the order of the original authority confirming the demand interest and imposed penalty, including a separate penalty on the Former\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/CESTATNew-Logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/CESTATNew-Logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/CESTATNew-Logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/CESTATNew-Logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/CESTATNew-Logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":281820,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/17\/service-tax-to-be-refunded-for-cancelled-flat-bookings-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":256725,"position":2},"title":"Cancelled Flat Bookings amount to non-performance of service; CESTAT directs Authorities to refund service tax to Builder","author":"Editor","date":"January 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"CESTAT states that cancelled flat bookings amount to non-performance of service,Held that Service tax is not applicable if no service is rendered.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"CESTAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-106.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":245851,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/20\/bill-of-entry\/","url_meta":{"origin":256725,"position":3},"title":"CESTAT | Penal charges for late filing of Bill-of-Entry waived; Tribunal allows appeal","author":"Editor","date":"March 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): P. Dinesha (Judicial Member) allowed an appeal which was filed against the Order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner of G.S.T. and Central Excise (Appeals). The vessel carrying 38,000 kgs of \u201cLaird Lentils\u201d in the name of Moorthy Traders, Virudhunagar, and they did not\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":269164,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/05\/can-tcs-collected-from-sale-of-scrap-be-included-in-the-assessable-value-for-charging-excise-duty-cestat-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":256725,"position":4},"title":"Can TCS collected from sale of scrap be included in the assessable value for charging Excise Duty? CESTAT answers","author":"Editor","date":"July 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The coram of Ramesh Nair (Judicial Member) and Raju (Technical Member) allowed an appeal holding that TCS collected from sale of scrap cannot be included in the assessable value for charging excise duty which was filed by the aggrieved on the dismissal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/CESTATNew-Logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/CESTATNew-Logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/CESTATNew-Logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/CESTATNew-Logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/CESTATNew-Logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252898,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/19\/cestat-tribunal-discusses-distinction-between-mere-provision-of-table-space-and-actual-rendering-of-service-non-discharge-of-tax-liability-as-provider-of-business-auxilia\/","url_meta":{"origin":256725,"position":5},"title":"CESTAT | Tribunal discusses distinction between mere provision of \u2018table space\u2019 and actual rendering of service; Non discharge of tax liability as provider of \u201cbusiness auxiliary service\u201d partly allowed","author":"Editor","date":"August 19, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The Coram of CJ Mathew (Technical Member) and Ajay Sharma (Judicial Member) partly allowed an appeal which was filed with the issue of non-discharge of tax liability of Rs.17,46,066\/-, as provider of \u2018business auxiliary service\u2019, for the period between April 2007 and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256725","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=256725"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256725\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/201689"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=256725"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=256725"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=256725"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}