{"id":256679,"date":"2021-11-03T09:00:08","date_gmt":"2021-11-03T03:30:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=256679"},"modified":"2021-11-04T13:35:00","modified_gmt":"2021-11-04T08:05:00","slug":"can-service-rendered-in-central-and-state-government-be-considered-a-single-block-of-pensionable-service-by-condoning-the-break-period-between-two-services-sc-answers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/03\/can-service-rendered-in-central-and-state-government-be-considered-a-single-block-of-pensionable-service-by-condoning-the-break-period-between-two-services-sc-answers\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00adCan service rendered in Central and State government be considered a single block of pensionable service by condoning the break period between two services? SC answers"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: <\/strong>The Division Bench of M.R. Shah and A.S. Bopanna*, JJ., condoned the non pensionable sandwiched period between pensionable services rendered in Central and State government for the purpose of providing a single bock of pensionable service.<\/p>\n

The appellant worked as a Technician in the Telecom Department during the period 05-02-1974 to 31-05-1984. Later on, the appellant joined the Technical Education Department on 31-05-1987, where he served till 30-06-2006 and got retired on attaining the age of superannuation. During the period between those services the appellant had worked in Steel Industries Limited, Kerala (SILK), a Public Sector Undertaking.<\/p>\n

The appellant had requested the State to condone the period served by him in PSU and consider the services rendered by him under the Telecom Department and Education Department as one for granting pension which was rejected by the State. On application the Kerala Administrative Tribunal allowed benefit of pension to the appellant by condoning the period of break in service, as being permissible in the circumstance. However, the same was set aside by the High Court by the impugned judgment.<\/p>\n

Admittedly, the service rendered by the appellant in \u2018SILK\u2019 which was a PSU was not pensionable service. Therefore, the said period of service acted as a disconnect between the two different pensionable service and the same needed to be condoned to provide a single block of pensionable service.<\/p>\n

\n

\u201c<\/strong>The case of the appellant was not that the non\u00ad pensionable service be reckoned and the entire service from 05-02-1974 to 30-06-2006 be admitted for computing the pensionary benefits as assumed by the High Court.<\/strong>\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Rather what the appellant sought was to exclude the service rendered in \u2018SILK\u2019 and condone that period from being treated as a disjoint or break between the two pensionable services.<\/p>\n

The appellant had relied on a Government Order dated 12-11-2002 by which the government had declared that the employees of the State Government Departments who had left the former service in Central Government\/ Central Public Sector Undertakings on their own volition for taking up appointment in State government Departments will be allowed to reckon their prior service for all pensionary benefits along with the service in the State Government Department.<\/p>\n

Similarly, the Government Order dated 24-09-2014 the government had provided for condonation of the non\u00adqualifying sandwiched period to reckon the qualifying service.<\/p>\n

After perusing the referred Government Orders, the Bench opined that the benefit sought for by the appellant was provided and the sandwiched non qualifying service as break in the two services was condonable and the prior public service should be reckoned as qualifying service for pension.<\/p>\n

Rejecting the State\u2019s contention that the appellant had retired on 30-06-2006, while the Government Order was dated 24-09-2014 and as such could not be made applicable retrospectively, the Bench stated the issue had not been settled and not reached finality in the case of the appellant since his review petition dated 17-09-2014 was still pending when the Government Order was issued. Moreover, the said Government Order in para 2 had taken note of the several requests received to reckon the prior qualifying service.<\/p>\n

In the backdrop of above, the Bench was of the opinion that the Tribunal was justified in its conclusion and the High Court had erred in setting aside the same. Accordingly, the impugned order was set aside and the order of the Tribunal was restored for its implementation.<\/p>\n

[Valsan P. v. State of Kerala, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 953<\/b><\/a>, decided on 21-10-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Kamini Sharma, Editorial Assistant has put this report together\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Appearance by: <\/strong><\/p>\n

For the Appellant: P.V. Surendranath, Senior Counsel<\/p>\n

For the Respondent: C.K. Sasi<\/p>\n

\n

*Judgment by: Justice A.S. Bopanna<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: The Division Bench of M.R. Shah and A.S. Bopanna*, JJ., condoned the non pensionable sandwiched period between pensionable services rendered <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":251197,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[20201,47706,30115,5271,47705,5941],"class_list":["post-256679","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-central-government","tag-condonation-of-break","tag-government-servant","tag-pension","tag-psu","tag-service-law"],"yoast_head":"\n\u00adCan service rendered in Central and State government be considered a single block of pensionable service by condoning the break period between two services? SC answers | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/03\/can-service-rendered-in-central-and-state-government-be-considered-a-single-block-of-pensionable-service-by-condoning-the-break-period-between-two-services-sc-answers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u00adCan service rendered in Central and State government be considered a single block of pensionable service by condoning the break period between two services? SC answers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: The Division Bench of M.R. Shah and A.S. Bopanna*, JJ., condoned the non pensionable sandwiched period between pensionable services rendered\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/03\/can-service-rendered-in-central-and-state-government-be-considered-a-single-block-of-pensionable-service-by-condoning-the-break-period-between-two-services-sc-answers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-11-03T03:30:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-11-04T08:05:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/03\/can-service-rendered-in-central-and-state-government-be-considered-a-single-block-of-pensionable-service-by-condoning-the-break-period-between-two-services-sc-answers\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/03\/can-service-rendered-in-central-and-state-government-be-considered-a-single-block-of-pensionable-service-by-condoning-the-break-period-between-two-services-sc-answers\/\",\"name\":\"\u00adCan service rendered in Central and State government be considered a single block of pensionable service by condoning the break period between two services? SC answers | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/03\/can-service-rendered-in-central-and-state-government-be-considered-a-single-block-of-pensionable-service-by-condoning-the-break-period-between-two-services-sc-answers\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/03\/can-service-rendered-in-central-and-state-government-be-considered-a-single-block-of-pensionable-service-by-condoning-the-break-period-between-two-services-sc-answers\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-11-03T03:30:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-11-04T08:05:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/03\/can-service-rendered-in-central-and-state-government-be-considered-a-single-block-of-pensionable-service-by-condoning-the-break-period-between-two-services-sc-answers\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/03\/can-service-rendered-in-central-and-state-government-be-considered-a-single-block-of-pensionable-service-by-condoning-the-break-period-between-two-services-sc-answers\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/03\/can-service-rendered-in-central-and-state-government-be-considered-a-single-block-of-pensionable-service-by-condoning-the-break-period-between-two-services-sc-answers\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/03\/can-service-rendered-in-central-and-state-government-be-considered-a-single-block-of-pensionable-service-by-condoning-the-break-period-between-two-services-sc-answers\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u00adCan service rendered in Central and State government be considered a single block of pensionable service by condoning the break period between two services? SC answers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u00adCan service rendered in Central and State government be considered a single block of pensionable service by condoning the break period between two services? SC answers | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/03\/can-service-rendered-in-central-and-state-government-be-considered-a-single-block-of-pensionable-service-by-condoning-the-break-period-between-two-services-sc-answers\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u00adCan service rendered in Central and State government be considered a single block of pensionable service by condoning the break period between two services? SC answers","og_description":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench of M.R. Shah and A.S. Bopanna*, JJ., condoned the non pensionable sandwiched period between pensionable services rendered","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/03\/can-service-rendered-in-central-and-state-government-be-considered-a-single-block-of-pensionable-service-by-condoning-the-break-period-between-two-services-sc-answers\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-11-03T03:30:08+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-11-04T08:05:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/03\/can-service-rendered-in-central-and-state-government-be-considered-a-single-block-of-pensionable-service-by-condoning-the-break-period-between-two-services-sc-answers\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/03\/can-service-rendered-in-central-and-state-government-be-considered-a-single-block-of-pensionable-service-by-condoning-the-break-period-between-two-services-sc-answers\/","name":"\u00adCan service rendered in Central and State government be considered a single block of pensionable service by condoning the break period between two services? SC answers | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/03\/can-service-rendered-in-central-and-state-government-be-considered-a-single-block-of-pensionable-service-by-condoning-the-break-period-between-two-services-sc-answers\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/03\/can-service-rendered-in-central-and-state-government-be-considered-a-single-block-of-pensionable-service-by-condoning-the-break-period-between-two-services-sc-answers\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png","datePublished":"2021-11-03T03:30:08+00:00","dateModified":"2021-11-04T08:05:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/03\/can-service-rendered-in-central-and-state-government-be-considered-a-single-block-of-pensionable-service-by-condoning-the-break-period-between-two-services-sc-answers\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/03\/can-service-rendered-in-central-and-state-government-be-considered-a-single-block-of-pensionable-service-by-condoning-the-break-period-between-two-services-sc-answers\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/03\/can-service-rendered-in-central-and-state-government-be-considered-a-single-block-of-pensionable-service-by-condoning-the-break-period-between-two-services-sc-answers\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png","width":1331,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/03\/can-service-rendered-in-central-and-state-government-be-considered-a-single-block-of-pensionable-service-by-condoning-the-break-period-between-two-services-sc-answers\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u00adCan service rendered in Central and State government be considered a single block of pensionable service by condoning the break period between two services? SC answers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":210998,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/26\/sc-only-the-leave-for-salary-is-payable-would-be-taken-into-account-for-determining-the-pensionable-service\/","url_meta":{"origin":256679,"position":0},"title":"SC| Only the leave for salary is payable would be taken into account for determining the pensionable service","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: On the question as to exclusion of unauthorised leaves for determination of pensionary benefits, the 3-judge bench of SA Bobde, Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Deepak Gupta, JJ has held that \u201cthe period of leave for which salary is payable would be taken into account for determining the pensionable\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":130071,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/05\/10\/benefit-of-2-years-weightage-of-service-under-employees-pension-scheme\/","url_meta":{"origin":256679,"position":1},"title":"Benefit of 2 years weightage of service under Employees Pension Scheme","author":"Saba","date":"May 10, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"[Letter No: Pension-Pen-I\/3\/4\/2016\/MOL&E\/2 ;\u00a0Dated: 08.05.2017] Subject: Benefit of 2 Years weightage of Service to the members with 20 or more years of pensionable service under Para 10(2) of Employees Pension Scheme, 1995 \u2014reg. Attention is drawn to Head Office letter No. Pension-I\/3(4)16\/7915 dated 25.07.2016 and letter No. Pension-I\/3(4)16\/2\/15850 dated 20.05.2016\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "News"","block_context":{"text":"News","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/EPFO_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/EPFO_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/EPFO_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/EPFO_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/EPFO_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":369661,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/12\/karnataka-high-court-pension-ruling-kcsrs-media-academytemperance-board-employees-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":256679,"position":2},"title":"Media Academy & Temperance Board employees not entitled to Pension under Karnataka Civil Services Rules: Karnataka High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"December 12, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In the absence of any Government order, \u201cthe employees of Institutions like the Temperance Board and the Media Academy cannot claim that they are entitled to pension as a matter of right.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court pension ruling","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Karnataka-High-Court-pension-ruling.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Karnataka-High-Court-pension-ruling.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Karnataka-High-Court-pension-ruling.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Karnataka-High-Court-pension-ruling.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":46421,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/09\/employees-pension-scheme-2016\/","url_meta":{"origin":256679,"position":3},"title":"Employee’s Pension Scheme, 2016","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 9, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"The Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by\u00a0 6A read with section 7(1) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, makes Employees' Pension (Second Amendment) Scheme, 2016 in order to amend the Employees\u2019 Pension Scheme, 1995. The said Rules will come into force on the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Foreign Legislation"","block_context":{"text":"Foreign Legislation","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/foreign\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Pension.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Pension.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Pension.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Pension.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Pension.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":276822,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/05\/amended-employees-pension-scheme-valid-provisions-read-down-applicability-explained-1-6-contribution-illegal-supreme-court-legal-research-service-law-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":256679,"position":4},"title":"Supreme Court upholds validity of amended Employees\u2019 Pension Scheme but reads down certain provisions; Explains applicability of pre & post amendment Scheme","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The requirement of the members to contribute at the rate of 1.16 per cent of their salary to the extent such salary exceeds Rs.15000\/- per month as an additional contribution under the amended scheme has, however, been held to be ultra vires the provisions of the 1952 Act. The Court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-8-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-8-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-8-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-8-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-8-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255289,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/07\/voluntary-retirement-v-s-resignation-supreme-court-cogitates-technicalities-of-legal-terms-and-their-implication-in-armed-forces\/","url_meta":{"origin":256679,"position":5},"title":"\u00a0\u201cVoluntary retirement v\/s Resignation\u201d; Supreme Court cogitates technicalities of legal terms and their implication in Armed Forces","author":"Editor","date":"October 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cHaving tendered \u2018resignation\u2019, the respondent had to suffer the consequences and could not be permitted to take \u2018U\u2019 turn and say that what the respondent wanted was \u2018premature retirement\u2019 and not \u2018resignation\u2019.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256679","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=256679"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256679\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/251197"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=256679"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=256679"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=256679"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}