{"id":256625,"date":"2021-11-02T16:00:01","date_gmt":"2021-11-02T10:30:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=256625"},"modified":"2021-11-03T09:30:16","modified_gmt":"2021-11-03T04:00:16","slug":"tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-october-2021","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/02\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-october-2021\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup | October 2021"},"content":{"rendered":"

Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT)<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

AFT denies grant of any relief to the person invalidated from service due to Alcohol Dependence Syndrome<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cAll efforts are made by military doctors and the organization to help a soldier who has become a victim of \u2018Alcohol Dependence Syndrome\u2019 and only when all efforts fail the soldier is invalided out on ground of \u2018Alcohol Dependence Syndrome\u201d.<\/p>\n

Read more\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Is hypertension a disability attributable to or aggravated by Military Service? Will Invalidation make one entitled to disability pension? Tribunal decides<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Division Bench of Justice Umesh Chandra Srivastava and Vice Admiral Abhay Raghunath Karve, Member (A) granted disability pension to the person invalidated from service due to Hypertension.<\/p>\n

Read more\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Where lesser age is recorded in school certificate than the actual age; correct date of birth will be the one recorded by the parents in service records<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Resolving a date of birth related controversy, the Division Bench of Justice Umesh Chandra Srivastava and Vice Admiral Abhay Raghunath Karve, Member (A) stated,<\/p>\n

\u201cIf we take date of birth recorded in educational certificate of the applicant as correct i.e. 05-07-1992 and date of birth in respect of his younger brother being 20-02-1992 as per service records, one can imagine as to how it could be possible that an elder brother comes to this world later than his younger brother.\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Read more\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT)<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>When subjective satisfaction of dispensing with the inquiry is not supported by any independent material, dispensing with holding the inquiry would be illegal<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>\u201cIf a preliminary inquiry could be conducted, there may not be any reason as to why formal departmental inquiry could not have been initiated against the delinquent.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Read more\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

Competition Commission of India (CCI)<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

Competition Watchdog | Know why CCI imposed penalties on beer companies: Nation-wide Cartel? Read Full Report<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u201cNo distinction in the Act, for the purposes of assessment of anti-competitive conduct, is made between the end-consumers, and intermediaries falling in the supply chain.\u201d\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Read more\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI)<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

CBI | Does not find any fault in the coda but questions the agenda | Accepts CBI\u2019s closure report but questions the investigation<\/strong><\/p>\n

Shivank Singh, Special Judicial Magistrate (CBI), while accepting the closure report questioned the delayed investigation by the premier investigation agency of the country. While accepting closure report, the Court stated,<\/p>\n

\u201cIt may be noted that the collective and cogent evidence\/ material gathered by CBI is enough to settle the fact that the allegations of complainant against her father and 26 other accused could not be substantiated\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n

Read more\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Cremation of rights could not burn Justice on pyre | Lambasted UP Police for \u2018shoddy investigation\u2019, orders for further investigation<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>\u201c\u2026it may be noted that there are many lapses on the part of UP Police which has hauled this case with open ends. This court is in deep pain to note that due to such lapses, the parents and family of the deceased did not even get a chance to see the dead body of the deceased or to perform the last rites of their late son\u201d.<\/p>\n

Read more\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

When road construction is exempt; is every activity exempt relating to the road construction including consulting engineer services? Tribunal answers<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

This Tribunal has held in other disputed cases that even the barricade provided on the side of highway, maintaining greenery on the side or middle of highway, construction of any facility, refreshment centre for road users, is also part of the road construction and such activity is also exempt. Even the administrative building constructed by the concessionaire, for construction of the road or highway for administration and collection of toll etc. is part of road.<\/p>\n

Read more\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Recourse to revocation should be taken in extreme circumstances only and not in respect of violations for which there are other provisions to deal with them; Tribunal partly allows appeal<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Division Coram of Sulekha Beevi C.S. (Judicial Member) and P. Anjani Kumar (Technical Member) partly allowed an appeal which was filed assailing an impugned order by which the appellant customs broker\u2019s licence was revoked on the grounds of contravention of Regulations 10(b), 10(d) and (10)(n) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018; security deposit was forfeited and penalty was also imposed.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Read more\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Amount claimed as refund already debited in Returns, whether there would be entitlement for refund under Rule 5 of CCR, 2004? Tribunal answers<\/strong><\/p>\n

P Dinesha (Judicial Member) allowed an appeal in which the Tribunal had to decide whether the appellant was entitled to refund under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 (CCR).<\/p>\n

Read more\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

Whether the services provided by subsidiary company to its parent company in a foreign country could be treated as export of services? Tribunal answers<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Anil Choudhary (Judicial Member) allowed the appeals which were filed against the common Order-in-Appeal which dealt with the issue as to whether the services provided by the appellant to its parent company in Hong Kong, could be treated as export of services, and if the answer was in affirmative, whether the refund of amount paid under mistake of law by treating such export of services, as taxable service, could be denied by the revenue.<\/p>\n

Read more\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

Whether refund claim under R. 5 of CCR can be rejected on the ground that appellant did not debit amount of refund claimed at the time of filing refund claim, but have debited such amount subsequent to the filing of refund claim but before adjudication?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Anil Choudhary (Judicial Member) allowed an appeal which was filed bearing the issue as to whether the refund claim under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules read with Notification No.27\/2012-CE (NT) can be rejected on the ground that the appellant did not debit the amount of refund claimed at the time of fling the refund claim, but have debited such amount subsequent to the filing of the refund claim but before adjudication.<\/p>\n

Read more\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

If two reasonable constructions of a taxing provision are possible, that construction which favours the assessee must be adopted; Appeal allowed<\/strong><\/p>\n

When there is a reasonable interpretation of a legal and factual situation, which is favourable to the assessee, such an interpretation is to be adopted.<\/p>\n

Read more\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

Deducing from the acts and the tactics of the corporate debtor failing the test of legality, initiates CIRP<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Coram of Ashok Kumar Borah, Judicial Member, and Shyam Babu Gautam, Technical Member while allowing the company petition, ordered for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The Bench stated that,<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Operational Creditor has successfully demonstrated and proved the debt and default in this case and has also proved that there is absolutely no reason for the Corporate Debtor to hold on to the payment of the invoices\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n

Read more\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Debit acknowledged in emails, CIRP initiated resultantly-Appoints IRPM and declares moratorium<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Coram of P.S.N Prasad, Judicial Member and Narender Kumar Bhola,\u00a0 Technical Member were inclined to allow the process of CIRP, considering the debt acknowledged by the corporate debtor.<\/p>\n

Read more\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

National Company Law and Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

NCLAT| Finds raising a late \u2018pre-existing dispute\u2019, spurious and to avoid action under IBC| Denies to stay CIRP<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Coram of Justice Jarat Kumar Jain and Alok Srivastava, Technical Member while deciding an appeal denied to put a stay on the CIRP proceedings. The Tribunal was of the opinion that the alleged \u2018pre-existing-dispute\u2019 was raised at such a late stage even though it was a spurious dispute, only with an intention to avoid action under IBC. The Tribunal further made it clear that the order will not have any effect on the final outcome.<\/p>\n

Read more\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI)<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

SEBI | Monotonous modus operandi, modulated endgame |Issue of GDR, artificial arrangement, supported by the subscribing Company itself-Restrained and to disgorge<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cIt appears that the whole series of GDR issues by several listed companies in India was an act orchestrated by Arun Panchariya to reap benefits by sitting on the other side of the issuance and subscribing to the GDRs through an arrangement with Vintage. The respective Indian companies have also apparently participated in such schemes. Accordingly, as brought in the foregoing paragraphs, in view of the repetitive nature of such acts along with the gravity of the offences that have been perpetrated by Arun Panchariya, I am of the considered opinion that stern measures need to be taken against him and his connected entities\u201d.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Read more \u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cPandya ka Sauda\u201d turns out to be the \u201cAakhri Sauda\u201d for anchor and 5 other entities for the fraudulent trade activity-Ex parte interim order<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>The balance of convenience is to impose suitable directions against the aforesaid entities so as to maintain a level playing field in the market for the general investors. If an ex-parte order is passed, what is at stake is right of the current entities herein vis-a-vis multitude of investors in the market. It may be noted that one of the underlying differences between the ex-parte orders in the case of private suits and ex-parte public enforcement actions, is the identification of the injured party. In private damage suits, the injured individual, as \u201cwhole\u201d, is identifiable whereas ex-parte public enforcement actions, seek to protect the floating multitude of investing public by preventing, continuous and imminent violations of the securities laws.<\/p>\n

Read more\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

GDR| Catches the principal architect in activation & orchestration of the fraudulent scheme \u2013Leaves one being \u2018under liquidation\u2019, rest restrained from accessing the market<\/strong><\/p>\n

G Mahalingam, Whole Time Member, restricted the entities from the securities market, involved in the fraudulent issuance of GDRs without appropriate disclosures.<\/p>\n

Read more\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Calibrated efforts cancelling out the chance of coincidence of matching trades in illiquid scrip does not go scot free-Restricted from the market for manipulation<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Madhabi Puri Buch, Whole Time Member, while exercising powers under Section 19 read with Sections 11(1), 11(4) and 11B (1) and 11B(2) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 restricted the Noticees involved in manipulation of the scrip.<\/p>\n

Read more\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Here\u2019s a run-through of all the significant decisions covered in the month of October 2021 under the Section of Tribunals\/Commission\/Regulatory Bodies.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":256652,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[45673,46957],"tags":[46392,29785,42834,42768,46393,20611],"class_list":["post-256625","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-columns-for-roundup","category-tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup","tag-commissions","tag-law","tag-legal-news","tag-legal-updates","tag-regulatory-bodies","tag-tribunals"],"yoast_head":"\nTribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup | October 2021 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup | October 2021\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/02\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-october-2021\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup | October 2021\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup | October 2021\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/02\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-october-2021\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-11-02T10:30:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-11-03T04:00:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-113.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/02\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-october-2021\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/02\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-october-2021\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup | October 2021 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/02\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-october-2021\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/02\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-october-2021\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-113.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-11-02T10:30:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-11-03T04:00:16+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup | October 2021\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/02\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-october-2021\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/02\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-october-2021\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/02\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-october-2021\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-113.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-113.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/02\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-october-2021\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup | October 2021\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup | October 2021 | SCC Times","description":"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup | October 2021","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/02\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-october-2021\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup | October 2021","og_description":"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup | October 2021","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/02\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-october-2021\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-11-02T10:30:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-11-03T04:00:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-113.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/02\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-october-2021\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/02\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-october-2021\/","name":"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup | October 2021 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/02\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-october-2021\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/02\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-october-2021\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-113.jpg","datePublished":"2021-11-02T10:30:01+00:00","dateModified":"2021-11-03T04:00:16+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup | October 2021","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/02\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-october-2021\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/02\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-october-2021\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/02\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-october-2021\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-113.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-113.jpg","width":1331,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/02\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-october-2021\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup | October 2021"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-113.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":219059,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/03\/aft-for-calculating-disability-pension-alcohol-dependence-syndrome-can-neither-be-attributable-to-nor-aggravated-by-military-service-since-it-is-a-matter-personal-choice\/","url_meta":{"origin":256625,"position":0},"title":"AFT | For calculating disability pension, \u2018Alcohol Dependence Syndrome\u2019 can neither be attributable to nor aggravated by military service","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 3, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Armed Force Tribunal (AFT): A Division Bench of Justice Virender Singh (Chairperson) and Air Marshal B.B.P Sinha (Member) dismissed an application by the applicant under Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007. The applicant was enrolled in Army in 2003 as a Signalman and was invalided out from\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Armed Forces Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255109,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/04\/aft-denies-grant-of-any-relief-to-the-person-invalidated-from-service-due-to-alcohol-dependence-syndrome\/","url_meta":{"origin":256625,"position":1},"title":"AFT denies grant of any relief to the person invalidated from service due to Alcohol Dependence Syndrome","author":"Editor","date":"October 4, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAll efforts are made by military doctors and the organization to help a soldier who has become a victim of \u2018Alcohol Dependence Syndrome\u2019 and only when all efforts fail the soldier is invalided out on ground of \u2018Alcohol Dependence Syndrome\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Armed Forces Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":213838,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/22\/aft-bench-frowns-at-practice-of-alcohol-dependence-syndrome-ads-cases-being-invalided-for-pension-directs-grant-of-pension-to-ex-sepoy-diagnosed-with-ads\/","url_meta":{"origin":256625,"position":2},"title":"AFT | Bench frowns at practice of Alcohol Dependence Syndrome cases being invalided for pension","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 22, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Armed Forces Tribunal: The Coram of Justice SVS Rathore (Judicial Member) and Air Marshal BBP Sinha (Administrative Member) allowed an application filed under Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 for grant of disability pension. Applicant herein, who joined the Indian Army in 2003, was admitted to the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Armed Forces Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":243836,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/13\/aft-we-dont-agree-that-there-is-no-stress-and-strain-of-service-in-military-stations-located-in-peace-areas-tribunal-grants-disability-pension-for-hypertension\/","url_meta":{"origin":256625,"position":3},"title":"AFT | \u201cWe don\u2019t agree that there is no stress and strain of service in military stations located in peace areas\u201d Tribunal grants disability pension for hypertension","author":"Editor","date":"February 13, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT): The Division Bench of Justice Umesh Chandra Srivastava (Chairperson) and Vice Admiral Abhay Raghunath Karve (Member) A, heard the instant application seeking for grant of disability pension. The facts of the case were such that the applicant was enrolled in Army on 29-07-2003 and was invalided\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Armed Forces Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":198585,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/16\/claim-for-disability-pension-denied-on-grounds-of-minimal-exposure-to-military-training\/","url_meta":{"origin":256625,"position":4},"title":"Claim for \u2018disability pension\u2019 denied on grounds of minimal exposure to military training","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 16, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Armed Forces Tribunal, Lucknow Bench: The Bench comprising of S.V.S Rathore J. and Air Marshal BBP Sinha, Member dismissed an original application filed under Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal, 2007. In the present application, the applicant was enrolled in the Army Medical Corps and was invalidated from service\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Armed Forces Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250530,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup-june-2021\/","url_meta":{"origin":256625,"position":5},"title":"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup | June 2021","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 30, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Here's a run-through of all the significant decisions covered in the month of June, 2021 under the Section of Tribunals\/Commission\/Regulatory Bodies. Armed Forces Tribunal \u2666 AFT | Pension cannot be denied for disability being less than 20% where the disability is assessed at 15-19%\u201c The assessment of disability to the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup"","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Regulatory Bodies\/Commissions Monthly Roundup","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/tribunals-regulatory-bodies-commissions-monthly-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-5.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-5.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-5.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-5.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-5.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256625","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=256625"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256625\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/256652"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=256625"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=256625"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=256625"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}