{"id":256186,"date":"2021-10-29T09:03:37","date_gmt":"2021-10-29T03:33:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=256186"},"modified":"2021-10-29T09:22:04","modified_gmt":"2021-10-29T03:52:04","slug":"the-cinematograph-act-is-coming-full-circle","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/29\/the-cinematograph-act-is-coming-full-circle\/","title":{"rendered":"The Cinematograph Act is Coming Full Circle"},"content":{"rendered":"

In 1968, Khwaja Ahmad Abbas, an\u00a0Indian film director and screenwriter made a documentary film titled \u201cChar Shaher Ek Kahani\u201d, aimed at exposing the disparity in the lives of the haves and have-nots in India\u2019s metropolises, including highlighting the plight of commercial sex workers in Mumbai. When he sought certification for this film for unrestricted viewership, the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) certified it only for adult viewing. He appealed to the Central Government, but they would agree to give him a \u201cU\u201d certificate only on the condition that he delete certain scenes, particularly those shot in the red-light district. He chose to challenge this decision in a writ petition before the Supreme Court. At the Supreme Court hearing, the then Attorney General informed the court that the Government no longer sought the cuts it had previously insisted on. Mr Abbas nonetheless pursued his petition by amending it to challenge the constitutionality of the very concept of pre-censorship, apart from specific provisions of the Cinematograph Act, 19521<\/a> \u00a0(the \u201cAct\u201d), as being violative of the freedom of speech and expression. More precisely, he questioned Section 62<\/a>, which was the provision under which the Central Government could revise decisions of the CBFC, and the absence of an appeal against the decision of the CBFC to a court or an independent tribunal.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court, in K.A. Abbas <\/em>v. Union of India<\/em>3<\/a>, repelled all but one of Mr Abbas\u2019s contentions, namely, that the Central Government could not be the final arbiter on the certification or otherwise of a film. The then Solicitor General in fact conceded to this position, and the Supreme Court speaking through Chief Justice Hidayatullah noted:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \u2026 We express our satisfaction that the Central Government will cease to perform curial functions through one of its secretaries in this sensitive field involving the fundamental right of speech and expression. Experts sitting as a tribunal and deciding matters quasi-judicially inspire more confidence than a secretary and therefore it is better that the appeal should lie to a court or tribunal.4<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    True to its word, the Government amended the Act with effect from 1983 by, amongst other things, introducing a provision for an appeal and creating the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal (FCAT). The Tribunal was to be headed by a retired High Court Judge or an equally qualified person. However, the revisional power of the Central Government under Section 6 was retained, permitting it to revise the decision on certification already taken or pending before the CBFC. Additionally, this amendment, in fact, widened the Central Government\u2019s revisional power to include those cases whose appeals were pending before the FCAT, or had been decided by it.<\/p>\n

    This amended Section 6 was challenged before the Karnataka High Court (High Court) in K.M. Shankarappa <\/em>v. Union of India<\/em>5<\/a>. The High Court unequivocally held that the revisional power of the Central Government exercised against a decision rendered either by the CBFC or by the FCAT, would be equally unconstitutional. This, because it would amount to the executive sitting in judgment over a quasi-judicial body, thus breaching the separation of powers under the Constitution, which is a part of its basic structure. It observed:<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. \u2026 Therefore, we are of the view that<\/em>Section 6(1)<\/em>of the Act insofar it enables the Central Government to exercise the power of revision against the decisions of the Board of Film Certification and also the Appellate Tribunal is violative of the basic structures (sic) of the Constitution. The decision of the Board of Film Certification refusing to grant a certificate; or granting only an \u201cA\u201d Certificate; or granting only a \u201cS\u201d Certificate; or granting only a \u201cUA\u201d Certificate; or directing the applicant to carry out any excisions or modifications, is appealable under<\/em>\u00a0<\/em>Section 5-C<\/em>\u00a0<\/em>of the Act<\/em>6<\/em><\/a>. The appeal lies to the Appellate Tribunal. Therefore, the power of revision conferred upon the Central Government against the order of the Board of Film Certification falling under<\/em>\u00a0<\/em>Section 5-C<\/em>\u00a0<\/em>of the Act interferes with the exercise of judicial power.<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      This reasoning was echoed by the SC in the appeal to it, in Union of India <\/em>v. K.M. Shankarappa<\/em>7<\/a>, while observing that to permit this \u201cwould amount to interference with the exercise of judicial functions by a quasi-judicial Board<\/em>\u201d8<\/a> i.e., the CBFC. <\/em>It reiterated that this was a travesty of the rule of law, one of the basic features of the Constitution. Clearly, what the Supreme Court and the High Court held to be impermissible was the scrutiny by the executive of decisions not only of the FCAT, but also those of the CBFC.<\/p>\n

      The Tribunals Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions of Service) Ordinance, 20219<\/a>, promulgated on 44-2021, abolished the FCAT and designated the High Court in its place, to hear appeals from the CBFC. This Ordinance was eventually passed by Parliament and thus enacted as the Tribunals Reforms Act, 202110<\/a> (the \u201c2021 Act\u201d) on 13-8-2021. In the meantime, in June this year, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting had sought public comments on a further proposed amendment which broadens the revisional power in Sections 6 (by introducing a proviso) to allow the Central Government to remand a film for \u201cre-examination\u201d to the CBFC, based on the broad heads enumerated in Art. 19(2) of the Constitution11<\/a> to justify reasonable restrictions on the freedom of speech and expression.<\/p>\n

      The film industry today, is bracing for the practical impact of these amendments on filmmakers\u2019 freedom to produce and release critical content. The anxiety has hinged, as it always does, on whether the amendments will, in fact, have the chilling effect that critics of the law apprehend.<\/p>\n

      A cursory glance at this Bill reveals that it is avowedly a validating amendment enacted to overcome the legal position obtaining from the judgments of the High Court and Supreme Court in Shankarappa<\/em>12<\/a>. <\/em>That this validating amendment is of significance, because, to be tenable, it must satisfy the well-settled tests of legislative competence, constitutionality (including consistency with fundamental rights) and above all, that of the legislature having removed the defect which the court had found in the previous law.13<\/a><\/p>\n

      The 2021 Bill seeks to confer revisional powers on the Central Government, to the extent that it can direct a \u201cre-examination\u201d of a film even after it has been certified for public exhibition by the CBFC. This has been done to get over the law laid down in the Shankarappa<\/em> judgments14<\/a> (1990 and 2001) which held that once a film is certified, the power of revision would no longer be exercisable by the Government in respect of such a film. The basis of the judgments of the Supreme Court and the High Court15<\/a>, for censuring such revisional powers was that to allow it would amount to review of a decision of a quasi-judicial body by the executive.<\/p>\n

      Succinctly, the legislature has sought to nullify the law obtaining from the Shankarappa<\/em> judgments16<\/a> in two steps: (i<\/em>) remove the FCAT by way of the 2021 Act; and (ii<\/em>) restore post-certification revisional powers to the Central Government, through the proposed proviso to Section 6(1) of the Act.<\/p>\n

      This appears to be premised on the legislature\u2019s interpretation that the ratio of the Shankarappa<\/em> judgments17<\/a> is restricted only to holding that a decision of the FCAT alone is unamenable to review by the Central Government. By abolishing the FCAT, the legislature appears to have assumed that the exercise of revisional powers by the Central Government, post film certification by the CBFC, would no longer amount to an impermissible review by the executive.<\/p>\n

      The tenability of this two-step validating amendment is rather doubtful since: firstly, it ignores that the Shankarappa<\/em> judgments18<\/a> hold that even decisions of the CBFC cannot be the subject-matter of revision by the Central Government; secondly, it fails to account for the legislative history and scheme of the Cinematograph Act (insofar as certification and the review process is concerned), which is actually an implementation of the undertaking given by the Government to the Supreme Court in K.A. Abbas<\/em>19<\/a>.<\/p>\n

      Thus, to the extent that the 2021 Act and Bill overlook an important aspect of the holding in the Shankarappa<\/em> judgments20<\/a>, and completely ignore what was held in K.A. Abbas<\/em>21<\/a>, it quite clearly fails to remove the basis of these judgments. Consequently, it falls foul of one of the cardinal tests for a validating amendment to be legally tenable i.e., curing the defect noticed by the Court in the previous law.<\/p>\n

      Furthermore, it is of utmost significance that the basis of the Shankarappa <\/em>judgments22<\/a> is that a scrutiny by the executive of a decision of a quasi-judicial body i.e., the CBFC, would be antithetical to the doctrine of separation of powers and thus the rule of law. In this context, the Supreme Court has recently, in Madras Bar Assn. <\/em>v. Union of India<\/em>23<\/a>, held that:<\/p>\n

        \n
      1. \u2026 a legislation can be invalidated on the basis of breach of the separation of powers since such breach is negation of equality under Article 14 of the Constitution24<\/a>.\u00a0Equality, rule of law, judicial review and separation of powers form parts of the basic structure of the Constitution. Each of these concepts are intimately connected. There can be no rule of law, if there is no equality before the law.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        It is thus apparent that any amendment seeking to subject the decision of a quasi-judicial body to executive whim would be in violation of the basic structure of the Constitution, and to the extent the 2021 Act and Bill seek to create such a position, they are unsustainable.<\/p>\n

        More importantly, it is arguable that a defect which has been held to impinge on the basic structure itself is incurable by validation and must be eschewed only by its deletion. In other words, Parliament does not possess the power to validate anything that violates the basic structure, since it is entrenched and inviolable.<\/p>\n

        The scheme of the Cinematograph Act, post the 2021 Act and the amendments proposed by the 2021 Bill, seeks to create a scenario where although those aggrieved by a CBFC decision would have a statutory right to appeal to the High Court, it would be the Central Government\u2019s exclusive prerogative to parallelly direct a reconsideration of a certification already granted\/refused by the CBFC. The revisional power contemplated is unbridled, especially since the stage at which it can be exercised has not been specified. This implies that it could effectively be invoked even when an appeal is pending before the High Court.<\/p>\n

        The provision for an appeal to the High Court creates an illusion that necessary safeguards against executive whim are in place, when in fact, the parallel revisional power has the ability to negate such safeguards. In other words, the appeal provision, is a decoy in a manner of speaking, to detract from the reintroduction of the revisional provision, twice censured by the Supreme Court i.e., in K.A. Abbas<\/em>25<\/a> and Shankarappa<\/em>26<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        It is plainly obvious that the proposed scheme once again purports to subject decisions regarding film certification to executive whim. <\/em>Thus, the breach of the separation of powers and in turn the rule of law, which was the basis of both the Supreme Court decisions27<\/a>, persists.<\/p>\n

        The precise apprehension with regard to such a statutory scheme is already playing out in reality, as news reports suggest that last month, a movie titled \u201cAadhaar\u201d which had already been certified by the CBFC, has been subsequently subjected to 28 cuts at the instance of the UIDAI, a part of the Central Government28<\/a>.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

        Above all, these amendments have effectively turned the clock back to how the law stood before the decision in K.A. Abbas29<\/a><\/em>, where Chief Justice Hidayatullah had, on the assurance of the then Solicitor General, expressed satisfaction on behalf of the court that \u201cthe Central Government will cease to perform curial functions through one of its secretaries in this sensitive field involving the fundamental right of speech and expression\u201d. Alas, that it seems is not to be.<\/p>\n

        \n

        *<\/a> The authors are practicing lawyers at the Supreme Court.<\/span><\/p>\n

        1<\/a> http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/cU28r6a4<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        2<\/a> http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Z1H2M060<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        3<\/a> (1970) 2 SCC 780<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        4<\/a> (1970) 2 SCC 780, 785.<\/a><\/p>\n

        5<\/a> 1990 SCC OnLine Kar 149<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        6<\/a> http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/xQJjVsQu<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        7<\/a> (2001) 1 SCC 582<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        8<\/a> (2001) 1 SCC 582, 585<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        9<\/a> http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/f98Y656o<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        10<\/a> http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/PEvv9yWB<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        11<\/a> http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/74roly04<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        12<\/a> K.M. Shankarappa <\/em>v. Union of India<\/em>, 1990 SCC OnLine Kar 149<\/a>; Union of India <\/em>v. K.M. Shankarappa<\/em>, (2000) 1 SCC 582<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        13<\/a> C.f. Indian Aluminium Co. v. State of Kerala, (<\/strong>1996) 7 SCC 637<\/a> following Shri Prithvi Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Broach Borough Municipality, (1969) 2 SCC 283<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        14<\/a> K.M. Shankarappa <\/em>v. Union of India<\/em>, 1990 SCC OnLine Kar 149<\/a>; Union of India <\/em>v. K.M. Shankarappa<\/em>, (2000) 1 SCC 582<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        15<\/a> K.M. Shankarappa <\/em>v. Union of India<\/em>, 1990 SCC OnLine Kar 149<\/a>; Union of India <\/em>v. K.M. Shankarappa<\/em>, (2000) 1 SCC 582<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        16<\/a> K.M. Shankarappa <\/em>v. Union of India<\/em>, 1990 SCC OnLine Kar 149<\/a>; Union of India <\/em>v. K.M. Shankarappa<\/em>, (2000) 1 SCC 582<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        17<\/a> K.M. Shankarappa <\/em>v. Union of India<\/em>, 1990 SCC OnLine Kar 149<\/a>; Union of India <\/em>v. K.M. Shankarappa<\/em>, (2000) 1 SCC 582<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        18<\/a> K.M. Shankarappa <\/em>v. Union of India<\/em>, 1990 SCC OnLine Kar 149<\/a>; Union of India <\/em>v. K.M. Shankarappa<\/em>, (2000) 1 SCC 582<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        19<\/a> (1970) 2 SCC 780<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        20<\/a> K.M. Shankarappa <\/em>v. Union of India<\/em>, 1990 SCC OnLine Kar 149<\/a>; Union of India <\/em>v. K.M. Shankarappa<\/em>, (2000) 1 SCC 582<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        21<\/a> (1970) 2 SCC 780<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        22<\/a> K.M. Shankarappa <\/em>v. Union of India<\/em>, 1990 SCC OnLine Kar 149<\/a>; Union of India <\/em>v. K.M. Shankarappa<\/em>, (2000) 1 SCC 582<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        23<\/a> 2021 SCC OnLine SC 463<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        24<\/a> http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/h7G5KbD4<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        25<\/a> (1970) 2 SCC 780<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        26<\/a> (2001) 1 SCC 582<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        27<\/a> K.A. Abbas<\/em> v. Union of India<\/em>, (1970) 2 SCC 780<\/a> and Union of India <\/em>v. K.M. Shankarappa<\/em>, (2000) 1 SCC 582<\/a>.<\/p>\n

        28<\/a> UIDAI has Suggested 28 Cuts for \u201cAadhaar\u201d Film Already Cleared by CBFC: Director, The Hindu<\/em>, 25-7-2021 available at <<\/em>https:\/\/www.thehindu.com\/entertainment\/movies\/uidai-has-suggested-28-cuts-for-aadhaar-film-already-cleared-by-cbfc-director\/article35524736.ece<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

        29<\/a> (1970) 2 SCC 780<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

        by Ninad Laud and Ananyaa Mazumdar*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":256220,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[42503,1191],"tags":[47651,29785],"class_list":["post-256186","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-legal-analysis","category-op-ed","tag-cinematograph-act","tag-law"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Cinematograph Act is Coming Full Circle | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Cinematograph Act is Coming Full Circle\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/29\/the-cinematograph-act-is-coming-full-circle\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Cinematograph Act is Coming Full Circle\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Cinematograph Act is Coming Full Circle\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/29\/the-cinematograph-act-is-coming-full-circle\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-10-29T03:33:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-10-29T03:52:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/cinematogharphy-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/29\/the-cinematograph-act-is-coming-full-circle\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/29\/the-cinematograph-act-is-coming-full-circle\/\",\"name\":\"The Cinematograph Act is Coming Full Circle | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/29\/the-cinematograph-act-is-coming-full-circle\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/29\/the-cinematograph-act-is-coming-full-circle\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/cinematogharphy-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-10-29T03:33:37+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-10-29T03:52:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"The Cinematograph Act is Coming Full Circle\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/29\/the-cinematograph-act-is-coming-full-circle\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/29\/the-cinematograph-act-is-coming-full-circle\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/29\/the-cinematograph-act-is-coming-full-circle\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/cinematogharphy-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/cinematogharphy-1.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/29\/the-cinematograph-act-is-coming-full-circle\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Cinematograph Act is Coming Full Circle\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Cinematograph Act is Coming Full Circle | SCC Times","description":"The Cinematograph Act is Coming Full Circle","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/29\/the-cinematograph-act-is-coming-full-circle\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Cinematograph Act is Coming Full Circle","og_description":"The Cinematograph Act is Coming Full Circle","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/29\/the-cinematograph-act-is-coming-full-circle\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-10-29T03:33:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-10-29T03:52:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/cinematogharphy-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/29\/the-cinematograph-act-is-coming-full-circle\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/29\/the-cinematograph-act-is-coming-full-circle\/","name":"The Cinematograph Act is Coming Full Circle | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/29\/the-cinematograph-act-is-coming-full-circle\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/29\/the-cinematograph-act-is-coming-full-circle\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/cinematogharphy-1.jpg","datePublished":"2021-10-29T03:33:37+00:00","dateModified":"2021-10-29T03:52:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"The Cinematograph Act is Coming Full Circle","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/29\/the-cinematograph-act-is-coming-full-circle\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/29\/the-cinematograph-act-is-coming-full-circle\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/29\/the-cinematograph-act-is-coming-full-circle\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/cinematogharphy-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/cinematogharphy-1.jpg","width":1331,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/29\/the-cinematograph-act-is-coming-full-circle\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Cinematograph Act is Coming Full Circle"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/cinematogharphy-1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":295526,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/28\/adipurush-controversy-allahabad-hc-asks-union-if-mib-will-take-steps-by-invoking-revisional-power\/","url_meta":{"origin":256186,"position":0},"title":"[Adipurush Controversy]: Will I&B Ministry take steps in public interest by invoking revisional power under Cinematograph Act; Allahabad High Court asks Centre","author":"Apoorva","date":"June 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court has also allowed an application requesting the inclusion of Manoj Muntashir Shukla, the dialogue writer of \u2018Adipurush\u2019, as a party in the case and issued notice to him.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":7062,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/28\/members-of-the-central-board-of-film-certification-cbfc-appointed\/","url_meta":{"origin":256186,"position":1},"title":"Members of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) appointed","author":"Sucheta","date":"January 28, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"On 19-01-2015, the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 (1); of the Cinematograph Act, 1952 (37 of 1952) read with Rule 3 of the Cinematograph (Certification) Rules, 1983, appointed Pahlaj Nihalani as the Chairman of the Central Board of Film Certification, as well as following\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":353940,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/20\/censorship-and-films-silencing-cinematic-voice\/","url_meta":{"origin":256186,"position":2},"title":"Censorship and Films: Silencing the Cinematic Voice","author":"Editor","date":"July 20, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by C. George Thomas* and Ansh Mittal**","rel":"","context":"In "Experts Corner"","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Film censorship in India","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Film-censorship-in-India.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Film-censorship-in-India.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Film-censorship-in-India.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Film-censorship-in-India.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295812,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/02\/adipurush-controversy-allahabad-hc-directs-ib-ministry-revisit-issue-forming-an-expert-committee\/","url_meta":{"origin":256186,"position":3},"title":"[Adipurush Controversy] Allahabad HC directs IB Ministry to revisit issue by forming an expert committee; Seeks personal presence of Film Director and Dialogue writer","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court said that the Gods have been shown in a film by the film makers including the dialogue writers without taking care of holiness and sanctity of those characters.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324283,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/13\/supreme-court-suspends-release-film-hamare-baarah-until-disposal-case-pending-before-bombay-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":256186,"position":4},"title":"Supreme Court suspends screening of film \u2018Hamare Baarah\u2019 until disposal of case pending over its release before Bombay HC","author":"Apoorva","date":"June 13, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court gave the petitioner liberty to raise the objection regarding constitution of the committee by the CBFC before the High Court","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Release of Hamare Baarah","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Release-of-Hamare-Baarah.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Release-of-Hamare-Baarah.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Release-of-Hamare-Baarah.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Release-of-Hamare-Baarah.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":317071,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/15\/sc-seeks-centres-reply-centres-response-on-certification-of-films-involving-differently-abled-persons-scctimes\/","url_meta":{"origin":256186,"position":5},"title":"Deprecatory portrayal of disability in film \u2018Aankh Micholi\u2019: Supreme Court seeks Centre\u2019s response on Certification of films involving Differently Abled Persons","author":"Arushi","date":"March 15, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioner has contended that there is a distinction between making a comedy of a situation (which is permissible) and making a comedy of a condition of disability.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"deprecatory reference to persons with disability in Aankh Micholi movie","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/deprecatory-reference-to-persons-with-disability-in-Aankh-Micholi-movie.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/deprecatory-reference-to-persons-with-disability-in-Aankh-Micholi-movie.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/deprecatory-reference-to-persons-with-disability-in-Aankh-Micholi-movie.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/deprecatory-reference-to-persons-with-disability-in-Aankh-Micholi-movie.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256186","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=256186"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256186\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/256220"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=256186"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=256186"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=256186"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}