{"id":255907,"date":"2021-10-21T17:00:55","date_gmt":"2021-10-21T11:30:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=255907"},"modified":"2021-10-22T13:23:23","modified_gmt":"2021-10-22T07:53:23","slug":"whether-the-firm-was-a-partnership-or-proprietorship-would-be-answered-by-way-of-a-declaration-in-a-proper-constituted-suit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/21\/whether-the-firm-was-a-partnership-or-proprietorship-would-be-answered-by-way-of-a-declaration-in-a-proper-constituted-suit\/","title":{"rendered":"Pat HC | \u201cWhether the firm was a partnership or proprietorship would be answered by way of a declaration in a proper constituted suit\u201d; HC dismisses appeal seeking misguided relief"},"content":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court: <\/strong>The Division Bench of Sanjay Karol, CJ., and S. Kumar, J., denied to entertain an intra-court appeal against the order of a Single Judge.<\/p>\n

Briefly stated the facts of the case was that M\/s. Sunit Saw Mill in the District of Madhubani became operational in the year 1994 after getting licence under Section 7 of Bihar Saw Mills (Regulation) Act, 1990 in the name of its proprietor Suresh Thakur. The appellant claimed to have entered into an agreement with the said proprietor by which the ownership of the mill was transferred in his name on 24-12-2001 for the amount of rupees two lakhs.<\/p>\n

The appellant had earlier challenged seniority of saw mill published by the Divisional Forest Officer, stating that he was holding valid licence for saw mill but his name had not been included before the licensing authority cum Divisional Forest Officer which was dismissed holding that the owner of Sunit Saw Mill was Suresh Thakur who had been granted licence and said saw mill was operational at specified location. The appellant had established a separate saw mill in the name of Sunit Saw Mill and was operating it without any valid licence which was illegal.<\/p>\n

Challenging the order of the licensing authority the appellant had approached the Single Judge of the High Court. The counter affidavit filed by the State stated that appellant was not registered as saw mill owner of Sunit Saw mill rather Suresh Thakur was real owner of the Mill. The original Mill was running at Bhatsimer Rajnagar and appellant had illegally established another mill at Kaluahi in the name of Sunit Saw Mill, and was operating it without any valid licence which was illegal and for which direction has been issued to the concerned authority to take appropriate action against appellant.<\/p>\n

The Single judge had dismissed the petition observing that whether the firm was a partnership or proprietorship was a disputed question which the petitioner would avail by way of a declaration in a proper constituted suit in consonance with declaration with regard to Sunit Saw Mill and then and only would be entitled to ask for any kind of licence at the end of the respondents.<\/p>\n

Addressing the appeal against the order of the Single Judge, the Bench opined that there was no error or infirmity in the order. Accordingly, the Bench denied interfering with the same, hence, the appeal was dismissed. [Sunit Saw Mill v. State of Bihar, 2021 SCC OnLine Pat 2287<\/b><\/a>, decided on 19-08-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Kamini Sharma, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Appearance by: <\/strong><\/p>\n

For the Appellant\/s: Kripa Nand Jha, Advocate<\/p>\n

For the Respondent\/s: Awanish Nandan Sinha, GP 21<\/p>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court: The Division Bench of Sanjay Karol, CJ., and S. Kumar, J., denied to entertain an intra-court appeal against the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8651,47576,7551,47577,2769],"class_list":["post-255907","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-declaration","tag-nature-of-entity","tag-partnership","tag-proprietorship","tag-relief"],"yoast_head":"\nPat HC | \u201cWhether the firm was a partnership or proprietorship would be answered by way of a declaration in a proper constituted suit\u201d; HC dismisses appeal seeking misguided relief | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Whether the firm was a partnership or proprietorship would be answered by way of a declaration in a proper constituted suit\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/21\/whether-the-firm-was-a-partnership-or-proprietorship-would-be-answered-by-way-of-a-declaration-in-a-proper-constituted-suit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pat HC | \u201cWhether the firm was a partnership or proprietorship would be answered by way of a declaration in a proper constituted suit\u201d; HC dismisses appeal seeking misguided relief\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Whether the firm was a partnership or proprietorship would be answered by way of a declaration in a proper constituted suit\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/21\/whether-the-firm-was-a-partnership-or-proprietorship-would-be-answered-by-way-of-a-declaration-in-a-proper-constituted-suit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-10-21T11:30:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-10-22T07:53:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/21\/whether-the-firm-was-a-partnership-or-proprietorship-would-be-answered-by-way-of-a-declaration-in-a-proper-constituted-suit\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/21\/whether-the-firm-was-a-partnership-or-proprietorship-would-be-answered-by-way-of-a-declaration-in-a-proper-constituted-suit\/\",\"name\":\"Pat HC | \u201cWhether the firm was a partnership or proprietorship would be answered by way of a declaration in a proper constituted suit\u201d; HC dismisses appeal seeking misguided relief | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-10-21T11:30:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-10-22T07:53:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Whether the firm was a partnership or proprietorship would be answered by way of a declaration in a proper constituted suit\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/21\/whether-the-firm-was-a-partnership-or-proprietorship-would-be-answered-by-way-of-a-declaration-in-a-proper-constituted-suit\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/21\/whether-the-firm-was-a-partnership-or-proprietorship-would-be-answered-by-way-of-a-declaration-in-a-proper-constituted-suit\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/21\/whether-the-firm-was-a-partnership-or-proprietorship-would-be-answered-by-way-of-a-declaration-in-a-proper-constituted-suit\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pat HC | \u201cWhether the firm was a partnership or proprietorship would be answered by way of a declaration in a proper constituted suit\u201d; HC dismisses appeal seeking misguided relief\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pat HC | \u201cWhether the firm was a partnership or proprietorship would be answered by way of a declaration in a proper constituted suit\u201d; HC dismisses appeal seeking misguided relief | SCC Times","description":"Whether the firm was a partnership or proprietorship would be answered by way of a declaration in a proper constituted suit","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/21\/whether-the-firm-was-a-partnership-or-proprietorship-would-be-answered-by-way-of-a-declaration-in-a-proper-constituted-suit\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pat HC | \u201cWhether the firm was a partnership or proprietorship would be answered by way of a declaration in a proper constituted suit\u201d; HC dismisses appeal seeking misguided relief","og_description":"Whether the firm was a partnership or proprietorship would be answered by way of a declaration in a proper constituted suit","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/21\/whether-the-firm-was-a-partnership-or-proprietorship-would-be-answered-by-way-of-a-declaration-in-a-proper-constituted-suit\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-10-21T11:30:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-10-22T07:53:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/21\/whether-the-firm-was-a-partnership-or-proprietorship-would-be-answered-by-way-of-a-declaration-in-a-proper-constituted-suit\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/21\/whether-the-firm-was-a-partnership-or-proprietorship-would-be-answered-by-way-of-a-declaration-in-a-proper-constituted-suit\/","name":"Pat HC | \u201cWhether the firm was a partnership or proprietorship would be answered by way of a declaration in a proper constituted suit\u201d; HC dismisses appeal seeking misguided relief | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-10-21T11:30:55+00:00","dateModified":"2021-10-22T07:53:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Whether the firm was a partnership or proprietorship would be answered by way of a declaration in a proper constituted suit","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/21\/whether-the-firm-was-a-partnership-or-proprietorship-would-be-answered-by-way-of-a-declaration-in-a-proper-constituted-suit\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/21\/whether-the-firm-was-a-partnership-or-proprietorship-would-be-answered-by-way-of-a-declaration-in-a-proper-constituted-suit\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/21\/whether-the-firm-was-a-partnership-or-proprietorship-would-be-answered-by-way-of-a-declaration-in-a-proper-constituted-suit\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pat HC | \u201cWhether the firm was a partnership or proprietorship would be answered by way of a declaration in a proper constituted suit\u201d; HC dismisses appeal seeking misguided relief"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":261806,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/16\/dishonour-of-cheque-8\/","url_meta":{"origin":255907,"position":0},"title":"Can only a sole proprietor be held liable under S. 138 NI Act for dishonour of cheque drawn on account of sole proprietorship concern? Tis Hazari Court decodes","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 16, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Tis Hazari Courts, New Delhi: While deciding a matter under Section 138 of the negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Devanshu Sajlan, MM-05 (NI Act) reiterated the settled position of law that there is no concept of vicarious liability in case of a sole proprietorship concern since a sole proprietorship concern does\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tis-hazari","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":203947,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/18\/arbitration-clause-non-assignable-held-does-not-devolve-on-company-being-separate-entity-from-proprietorship-firm-delhi-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":255907,"position":1},"title":"Arbitration clause non-assignable; held, does not devolve on company being separate entity from proprietorship firm: Delhi HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Pratibha M. Singh, J. allowed an appeal filed by the Government of NCT of Delhi which challenged the award passed by a sole arbitrator. The brief facts were that the Government called a tender for providing sanitation and scavenger services inside\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":270599,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/bombay-high-court-%e2%94%82-registrar-entitled-to-determine-the-registered-proprietor-of-the-trademark-iskcon-v-iskcon\/","url_meta":{"origin":255907,"position":2},"title":"Bombay High Court \u2502 Registrar entitled to determine the registered proprietor of the Trademark [ISKCON v. ISKCON]","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"July 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of G.S. Patel and Gauri Godse, JJ. disposed of an appeal which was preferred by ISKCON (International Society for Krishna Consciousness) Bengaluru aggrieved by the observations that this well-known trademark (ISKCON) is exclusively associated with the original Plaintiff (\u201cMumbai ISKCON\u201d) and, by necessary implication,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245450,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/12\/where-one-party-habitually-resides-in-a-foreign-country-arbitration-becomes-an-international-commercial-arbitration-even-when-the-business-is-being-carried-through-an-office-in-india-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":255907,"position":3},"title":"Where one party habitually resides in a foreign country, arbitration becomes an international commercial arbitration even when the business is being carried through an office in India: SC","author":"Editor","date":"March 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench of R.F. Nariman* and B.R. Gavai, JJ., addressed an important case regarding nature of arbitration under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Bench ruled, \"If at least one of the parties was either a foreign national, or habitually resident in any country other than India;\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255421,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/11\/goa-goods-and-services-tax-eighth-amendment-rules-2021\/","url_meta":{"origin":255907,"position":4},"title":"Goa Goods and Services Tax (Eighth Amendment) Rules, 2021","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 11, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"On October 06, 2021, the Department of Finance, Goa has issued the Goa Goods and Services Tax (Eighth Amendment) Rules, 2021 to further amend the Goa Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. Key amendments: In Rule 10A which specifies \u201cComposition levy\u201d, the following proviso has been inserted, namely: - \u201cProvided\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"AAR","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/image-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237721,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/19\/all-hc-principle-contained-in-s-141-of-ni-act-is-not-applicable-to-a-sole-proprietary-concern-firm-need-not-be-arraigned-as-an-accused-while-making-a-claim-for-recovery-under-s-138-of-the-ni-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":255907,"position":5},"title":"All HC | Principle contained in S. 141 of NI Act is not applicable to a sole-proprietary concern, firm need not be arraigned as an accused while making a claim for recovery under S. 138 of the NI Act","author":"Editor","date":"October 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: While deciding a petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Suresh Kumar Gupta, J., dismissed the same and declined to interfere in the judgment delivered by Sessions Court. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner to set aside the impugned orders dated\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255907","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=255907"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255907\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=255907"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=255907"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=255907"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}