{"id":255488,"date":"2021-10-12T13:00:11","date_gmt":"2021-10-12T07:30:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=255488"},"modified":"2021-12-28T10:02:33","modified_gmt":"2021-12-28T04:32:33","slug":"decree-of-divorce-under-section-28-of-special-marriage-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/decree-of-divorce-under-section-28-of-special-marriage-act\/","title":{"rendered":"Husband and Wife separated for more than 1 year. Will 6 months period be waived, if divorce is sought mutually under S. 28 of Special Marriage Act? Pune Family Court decides"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Family Court No. 3, Pune: <\/strong>M.R. Kale, J., addressed a petition for divorce by mutual consent under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 and granted the same noting the difference of opinion and incompatibility of petitioner\u2019s temperament.<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Instant petition was filed by the petitioners for dissolving their marriage by a divorce decree by mutual consent under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Factual Background<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Marriage between the two petitioners was solemnized before the Marriage Officer at Pune as per the provisions of the Special Marriage Act. Due to differences of opinion and incompatibility of temperament, both the petitioners have not been able to live together.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petitioners with mutual consent filed for divorce.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Question for Consideration<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Whether the present matter is a fit case for granting a decree of divorce by mutual consent under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954?<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Analysis, Law and Decision<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petitioners filed an application for waiving of a statutory period of 6 months.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was noted that the petitioners were separated since 26-4-2019. Thus, the parties had already undergone a period of separation for more than 18 months, therefore it was not necessary to keep them further waiting for 6 months.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above, Bench waived off the 6 months period contemplated under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the affidavits submitted by the petitioners, they mentioned that petitioner 2 has waived her right of maintenance from petitioner 1. Petitioners won\u2019t have any claim on each other movable or immovable property along with this no dispute regarding the stridhan and articles.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Adding to the above, both the petitioners mentioned in their affidavits that they cannot live together and their consent for divorce was voluntary.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Court allowed the petition and the petitioners marriage was dissolved by a decree of divorce under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 in view of the difference of opinion and incompatibility of the petitioner\u2019s temperament due to which they would not be able to live together and a happy married life together. [X v. Y, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/2sZlL4Tp\">Petition No. F 1468 of 2021<\/a>, decided on 29-9-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Advocates before the Court:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #008000;\">For petitioners 1 and 2:<\/span><\/strong> Mayur and Ajinkya P. Salunke<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Family Court No. 3, Pune: M.R. Kale, J., addressed a petition for divorce by mutual consent under Section 28 of the Special <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":255499,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,4721],"tags":[31376,31588,2846,47478,29785,32376,3590,45155,29789,4071],"class_list":["post-255488","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-district-court","tag-cooling-off-period","tag-decree-of-divorce","tag-divorce","tag-family-court-pune","tag-law","tag-mutual-consent","tag-property","tag-section-28-of-special-marriage-act","tag-special-marriage-act","tag-stridhan"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Husband and Wife separated for more than 1 year. Will 6 months period be waived, if divorce is sought mutually under S. 28 of Special Marriage Act? Pune Family Court decides | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"M.R. Kale, J., addressed a petition for divorce by mutual consent under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 and granted the same noting the difference of opinion and incompatibility of petitioner\u2019s temperament.\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/decree-of-divorce-under-section-28-of-special-marriage-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Husband and Wife separated for more than 1 year. Will 6 months period be waived, if divorce is sought mutually under S. 28 of Special Marriage Act? Pune Family Court decides\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"M.R. Kale, J., addressed a petition for divorce by mutual consent under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 and granted the same noting the difference of opinion and incompatibility of petitioner\u2019s temperament.\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/decree-of-divorce-under-section-28-of-special-marriage-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-10-12T07:30:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-12-28T04:32:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1707\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/decree-of-divorce-under-section-28-of-special-marriage-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/decree-of-divorce-under-section-28-of-special-marriage-act\/\",\"name\":\"Husband and Wife separated for more than 1 year. Will 6 months period be waived, if divorce is sought mutually under S. 28 of Special Marriage Act? Pune Family Court decides | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/decree-of-divorce-under-section-28-of-special-marriage-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/decree-of-divorce-under-section-28-of-special-marriage-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-scaled.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-10-12T07:30:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-12-28T04:32:33+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"M.R. Kale, J., addressed a petition for divorce by mutual consent under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 and granted the same noting the difference of opinion and incompatibility of petitioner\u2019s temperament.\u00a0\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/decree-of-divorce-under-section-28-of-special-marriage-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/decree-of-divorce-under-section-28-of-special-marriage-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/decree-of-divorce-under-section-28-of-special-marriage-act\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-scaled.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-scaled.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1707},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/decree-of-divorce-under-section-28-of-special-marriage-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Husband and Wife separated for more than 1 year. Will 6 months period be waived, if divorce is sought mutually under S. 28 of Special Marriage Act? Pune Family Court decides\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Husband and Wife separated for more than 1 year. Will 6 months period be waived, if divorce is sought mutually under S. 28 of Special Marriage Act? Pune Family Court decides | SCC Times","description":"M.R. Kale, J., addressed a petition for divorce by mutual consent under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 and granted the same noting the difference of opinion and incompatibility of petitioner\u2019s temperament.\u00a0","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/decree-of-divorce-under-section-28-of-special-marriage-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Husband and Wife separated for more than 1 year. Will 6 months period be waived, if divorce is sought mutually under S. 28 of Special Marriage Act? Pune Family Court decides","og_description":"M.R. Kale, J., addressed a petition for divorce by mutual consent under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 and granted the same noting the difference of opinion and incompatibility of petitioner\u2019s temperament.\u00a0","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/decree-of-divorce-under-section-28-of-special-marriage-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-10-12T07:30:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-12-28T04:32:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":1707,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-scaled.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/decree-of-divorce-under-section-28-of-special-marriage-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/decree-of-divorce-under-section-28-of-special-marriage-act\/","name":"Husband and Wife separated for more than 1 year. Will 6 months period be waived, if divorce is sought mutually under S. 28 of Special Marriage Act? Pune Family Court decides | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/decree-of-divorce-under-section-28-of-special-marriage-act\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/decree-of-divorce-under-section-28-of-special-marriage-act\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-scaled.jpg","datePublished":"2021-10-12T07:30:11+00:00","dateModified":"2021-12-28T04:32:33+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"M.R. Kale, J., addressed a petition for divorce by mutual consent under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 and granted the same noting the difference of opinion and incompatibility of petitioner\u2019s temperament.\u00a0","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/decree-of-divorce-under-section-28-of-special-marriage-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/decree-of-divorce-under-section-28-of-special-marriage-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/decree-of-divorce-under-section-28-of-special-marriage-act\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-scaled.jpg","width":2560,"height":1707},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/decree-of-divorce-under-section-28-of-special-marriage-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Husband and Wife separated for more than 1 year. Will 6 months period be waived, if divorce is sought mutually under S. 28 of Special Marriage Act? Pune Family Court decides"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-scaled.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":255790,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/18\/divorce-by-mutual-consent\/","url_meta":{"origin":255488,"position":0},"title":"Divorce by Mutual Consent: Family Court dissolves marriage where husband and wife had difference of opinions and incompatible temperament","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 18, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Family Court Pune: M.R. Kale, J., granted a decree of divorce by mutual consent to a couple who due to difference of opinion and incompatibility of their temperament could not live together. Instant petition was filed for dissolving the marriage by a decree of divorce by mutual consent under Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/divorce1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/divorce1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/divorce1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/divorce1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/divorce1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":243732,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/12\/hp-hc-whether-minimum-period-of-six-months-stipulated-under-s-13b2-of-the-hindu-marriage-act-for-a-motion-of-passing-decree-of-divorce-on-the-basis-of-mutual-consent-can-be-relaxed-court-expla\/","url_meta":{"origin":255488,"position":1},"title":"HP HC | Whether minimum period of six months stipulated under S. 13(B)(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act for a motion of passing decree of divorce on the basis of mutual consent can be relaxed? Court explains","author":"Editor","date":"February 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J., disposed of a petition while granting liberty to the parties to move an appropriate application seeking relaxation of the period prescribed under Section 28(2) of the Special Marriage Act 1954. The parties were husband and wife and their marriage was solemnized as\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259172,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/28\/family-court-grants-divorce-by-mutual-consent-under-s-13-b-where-parties-refuse-to-cohabit-and-resolve-disputes\/","url_meta":{"origin":255488,"position":2},"title":"Family Court grants divorce by mutual consent under S. 13-B where parties refuse to cohabit and resolve disputes","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 28, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Family Court, Ahmednagar: Netra A Kank, J., allowed a petition granting a decree of divorce by mutual consent to the petitioners. The instant petition was filed by the petitioners for mutual divorce as per Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act. Factual Matrix Marriage of the petitioners took place on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-scaled.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-scaled.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-5-scaled.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":262233,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/23\/if-husband-and-wife-register-their-marriage-under-special-marriage-act-and-later-get-registered-their-marriage-under-parsi-marriage-and-divorce-act-1936-as-well-would-this-require-them-to-get-nullit\/","url_meta":{"origin":255488,"position":3},"title":"If husband and wife get their marriage registered under Special Marriage Act &#038; under Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 as well, would this require them to get nullity of marriage under both Acts or one? Court decides","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Parsi Chief Matrimonial Court, Bombay: G.S. Kulkarni, J., expressed that, there is no provision under legislations, that if a marriage between the same couple is annulled under a competent law as enacted by the Parliament, it can as well be of a legal effect in the corresponding enactment. The present\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/New-Image.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/New-Image.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/New-Image.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/New-Image.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/New-Image.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":241382,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/28\/flashback-ker-hc-if-a-husband-imputes-infidelity-and-immorality-on-the-part-of-his-wife-would-that-amount-to-cruelty-read-how-hc-discusses-applicability-of-s-27-of-special-marriage-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":255488,"position":4},"title":"[Flashback] Ker HC | If a husband imputes infidelity and immorality on the part of his wife, would that amount to cruelty? Read How HC discusses applicability of S. 27 of Special Marriage Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 28, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"To marry or not to marry and if so whom, may well be a private affair. But, the freedom to break a matrimonial tie is not. (N.G. Dastane v. S. Dastane: (1975) 2 SCC 326). Kerala High Court:\u00a0The Division Bench of C.K. Abdul Rehim and R. Narayana Pisharadi, JJ., while\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":204932,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/08\/decree-for-dissolution-of-marriage-by-mutual-consent-procedurally-unsound-if-not-based-on-satisfaction-of-grounds-stated-in-section-10a-of-the-divorce-act-1869\/","url_meta":{"origin":255488,"position":5},"title":"Decree for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent procedurally unsound if not based on satisfaction of grounds stated in Section 10A of the Divorce Act, 1869","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 8, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A Division bench comprising of C.K. Abdul Rehim and R. Narayana Pisharadi, JJ. allowed an appeal against the judgment of Family Court for the said court\u2019s failure in conducting a proper enquiry and for failure in recording satisfaction based on such an enquiry conducted. The appellant and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255488","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=255488"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255488\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/255499"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=255488"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=255488"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=255488"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}