{"id":255329,"date":"2021-10-08T13:00:43","date_gmt":"2021-10-08T07:30:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=255329"},"modified":"2021-10-07T18:37:52","modified_gmt":"2021-10-07T13:07:52","slug":"birth-and-death-register-are-public-documents-and-admissible-under-s-35-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/birth-and-death-register-are-public-documents-and-admissible-under-s-35-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872\/","title":{"rendered":"[RTI] HP HC | Birth and Death Register are public documents and admissible under S. 35 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872; To be given even if asked on a simple paper"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Himachal Pradesh High Court: <\/strong>Tarlok Singh Chauhan J. directed all the Panchayat Secretaries in the State of Himachal Pradesh to provide death certificate as demanded by any person or authority under the Right to Information Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The instant application was filed seeking direction to the Panchayat Secretary, Shingla, Development Block, Rampur, District Shimla, H.P. to provide the death certificate, Legal Heir Certificate and BPL Certificate in respect of Baldev resident of Village Dakolar, Post Office Shingla. As per the provisions contained in Section 8(1) J and Section 11 of Right to Information Act, 2005 as the aforesaid officer refused it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was brought to the notice of the Court that the Death Certificate, Birth and Death Register is maintained by the Panchayat Secretary of concerned Gram Panchayat as a local Registrar Birth and Death. Death Certificate is provided by the Panchayat Secretary to the family members of the deceased person only. It was further noted that the copy of Death certificate of late Sh. Baldev was requested to be provided under the RTI Act, 2005 and accordingly as per provision 11 (1) of the RTI Act, 2005 for providing Third Party information wife of deceased was inquired who refused to provide certificate of her deceased husband and accordingly as per Rule 8(1)(j) and 11 of the RTI Act, the applicant\/Advocate was intimated accordingly by the concerned Public Information Officer-cum-Panchayat Secretary Shingla.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that once a party has died, his death certificate cannot be termed a &#8216;<em>Third Party Information<\/em>&#8216;, as that information relates\/related only to the deceased. It was further observed that entries in Birth and Death Register are public documents and admissible under Section 35 of the Indian Evidence Act and it is not necessary to prove, who made the entries and what was the source of information.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court directed that <em>\u201chenceforth whenever a copy of death certificate is demanded by any person or authority under Right to Information Act, or even on simple paper, the same shall be given by all the Panchayat Secretaries in the State of Himachal Pradesh, subject to of course on usual charges.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[OIC Ltd. v. Hira Devi, FAO (WCA) 417 of 2012, decided on 27-08-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #333300;\">Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong>Appearances<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For Appellants: Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma and Mr. Mayank Sharma<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For Respondents 1 and 2: Mr. Sarthak Mehta<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For respondent State: Mr. Ashok Sharma, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Mr. Kewal Sharma, Additional Director (Panchayati Raj) in person.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Himachal Pradesh High Court: Tarlok Singh Chauhan J. directed all the Panchayat Secretaries in the State of Himachal Pradesh to provide death <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[24174,31004,47437,46396,6252,47436,35477,2606,37558,47439,47440,47438,15041],"class_list":["post-255329","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-24174","tag-birth-certificate","tag-bpl-certificate","tag-death-certificate","tag-evidence-act","tag-legal-heir-certificate","tag-public-information-officer","tag-right_to_information","tag-rti-act-2005","tag-section-11-of-right-to-information-act","tag-section-35-of-evidence-act","tag-section-81j-of-right-to-information-act","tag-third-party-information"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>[RTI] HP HC | Birth and Death Register are public documents and admissible under S. 35 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872; To be given even if asked on a simple paper | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Birth and Death Register are public documents and admissible under S. 35 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/birth-and-death-register-are-public-documents-and-admissible-under-s-35-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[RTI] HP HC | Birth and Death Register are public documents and admissible under S. 35 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872; To be given even if asked on a simple paper\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Birth and Death Register are public documents and admissible under S. 35 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/birth-and-death-register-are-public-documents-and-admissible-under-s-35-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-10-08T07:30:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_2.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/birth-and-death-register-are-public-documents-and-admissible-under-s-35-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/birth-and-death-register-are-public-documents-and-admissible-under-s-35-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872\/\",\"name\":\"[RTI] HP HC | Birth and Death Register are public documents and admissible under S. 35 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872; To be given even if asked on a simple paper | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-10-08T07:30:43+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Birth and Death Register are public documents and admissible under S. 35 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/birth-and-death-register-are-public-documents-and-admissible-under-s-35-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/birth-and-death-register-are-public-documents-and-admissible-under-s-35-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/birth-and-death-register-are-public-documents-and-admissible-under-s-35-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[RTI] HP HC | Birth and Death Register are public documents and admissible under S. 35 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872; To be given even if asked on a simple paper\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[RTI] HP HC | Birth and Death Register are public documents and admissible under S. 35 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872; To be given even if asked on a simple paper | SCC Times","description":"Birth and Death Register are public documents and admissible under S. 35 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/birth-and-death-register-are-public-documents-and-admissible-under-s-35-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[RTI] HP HC | Birth and Death Register are public documents and admissible under S. 35 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872; To be given even if asked on a simple paper","og_description":"Birth and Death Register are public documents and admissible under S. 35 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/birth-and-death-register-are-public-documents-and-admissible-under-s-35-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-10-08T07:30:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_2.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/birth-and-death-register-are-public-documents-and-admissible-under-s-35-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/birth-and-death-register-are-public-documents-and-admissible-under-s-35-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872\/","name":"[RTI] HP HC | Birth and Death Register are public documents and admissible under S. 35 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872; To be given even if asked on a simple paper | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-10-08T07:30:43+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Birth and Death Register are public documents and admissible under S. 35 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/birth-and-death-register-are-public-documents-and-admissible-under-s-35-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/birth-and-death-register-are-public-documents-and-admissible-under-s-35-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/birth-and-death-register-are-public-documents-and-admissible-under-s-35-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[RTI] HP HC | Birth and Death Register are public documents and admissible under S. 35 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872; To be given even if asked on a simple paper"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":68141,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/09\/council-for-the-india-school-certificate-examinations-does-not-come-under-the-purview-of-the-rti-act-2005\/","url_meta":{"origin":255329,"position":0},"title":"Council for the India School Certificate Examinations does not come under the purview of the RTI Act, 2005","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 9, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: While deciding the question that whether Council for the India School Certificate Examinations (hereinafter 'Council') is a State or a State Instrumentality under Article 12 of the Constitution, thus a \u2018public authority\u2019 for the purposes of Right to Information Act, 2005, the Bench of Shivakant Prasad, J.,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":363296,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/bom-hc-no-proof-of-first-marriage-wife-gets-maintenance\/","url_meta":{"origin":255329,"position":1},"title":"No proof of subsisting first marriage; Bombay HC upholds maintenance for wife under S. 125 CrPC","author":"Editor","date":"October 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cHowever, even presuming that for the sake of discussion the marriage between the husband and wife is void, still the wife is entitled to claim maintenance under Section 125 of the CrPC.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"subsisting first marriage maintenance claim","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/subsisting-first-marriage-maintenance-claim.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/subsisting-first-marriage-maintenance-claim.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/subsisting-first-marriage-maintenance-claim.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/subsisting-first-marriage-maintenance-claim.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":235857,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/16\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82-nepali-citizen-living-in-shimla-since-1997-refused-bonafide-himachali-certificate-s-31-b-of-indian-citizenship-act-1955-applied\/","url_meta":{"origin":255329,"position":2},"title":"HP HC | Nepali citizen living in Shimla since 1997 refused Bonafide Himachali Certificate; S. 3(1) (b) of Indian Citizenship Act, 1955 applied","author":"Editor","date":"September 16, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Ajay Mohan Goel J., dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are such that the petitioner is a woman residing in Shimla since the year 1997 and in terms of the provisions in Hand Book on Personnel Matters (Vol-I) issued by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":232214,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/14\/sc-clarifies-law-on-admissibility-of-electronic-evidence-without-certificate-under-section-65b-of-evidence-act-1872\/","url_meta":{"origin":255329,"position":3},"title":"SC clarifies law on admissibility of electronic evidence without certificate under Section 65B of Evidence Act, 1872","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"July 14, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a reference dealing with the interpretation of Section 65B of the Evidence Act, 1872 that deals with admissibility of electronic records, the 3-judge bench of RF Nariman, S. Ravindra Bhat and V. Ramasubramanian, JJ has held that the certificate required under Section 65B(4) is a condition precedent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215622,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/12\/mp-hc-son-not-entitled-to-fathers-pension-account-if-not-made-a-nominee-rejection-of-rti-application-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":255329,"position":4},"title":"MP HC | Son not entitled to father\u2019s pension account if not made a nominee; rejection of RTI application upheld","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 12, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of Sanjay Yadav and Vivek Agarwal, JJ. entertained a writ appeal which challenged the impugned order by the Authorities under the Right to Information Act, 2005. The main contention raised in the appeal was related to the order which declined to divulge the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":297286,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/20\/school-transfer-certificate-not-document-age-determination-victim-pocso-act-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":255329,"position":5},"title":"School Transfer Certificate not acceptable for age determination of victim in POCSO Act: Supreme Court","author":"Ridhi","date":"July 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court regarded the result of ossification or bone test in the instant matter, as the most authentic evidence for being corroborated by the examining doctor as well.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"age determination of victim in pocso act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/age-determination-of-victim-in-pocso-act.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/age-determination-of-victim-in-pocso-act.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/age-determination-of-victim-in-pocso-act.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/age-determination-of-victim-in-pocso-act.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255329","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=255329"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255329\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=255329"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=255329"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=255329"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}