{"id":255322,"date":"2021-10-08T10:00:04","date_gmt":"2021-10-08T04:30:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=255322"},"modified":"2021-10-29T11:40:44","modified_gmt":"2021-10-29T06:10:44","slug":"when-can-court-invoke-its-power-to-effect-an-attachment-under-or-38-r-5-of-civil-procedure-code","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/when-can-court-invoke-its-power-to-effect-an-attachment-under-or-38-r-5-of-civil-procedure-code\/","title":{"rendered":"When can Court invoke its Power to effect an attachment under Or. 38 R. 5 of Civil Procedure Code? Madras HC decides"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Madras High Court: <\/strong>G. Jayachandran, J., with the lens of this decision addressed the Power under Order XXXVIII, Rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Code.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the present matter, the plaintiff a Non-banking Finance Company (NBFC) and the First defendant a Micro Level Finance Company were the parties, and the first defendant borrowed a loan from the plaintiff. Other defendants i.e. 2 and 3 were the Director\/Chief Executive Officer and Director-cum-Chairman of the first defendant\u2019s company.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was stated that the defendants failed to repay the loan and it was alleged that the second defendant fraudulently diverted the funds of the first defendant and had misappropriated the first defendant\u2019s fund which led to the default in repayment after September 2020.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, it was alleged that the second defendant committed gross fraud by inflating the assets under management by showing fictitious disbursement, withdrawal and deposits as collections.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #003366;\">Liability of Defendants<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Due to complete and abject failure of the corporate governance and financial collapse, the corporate veil is to be lifted and defendants 2 and 3 are to be held personally liable for the default of the first defendant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Defendants had admitted the liability on several occasions and admitted the findings of fraud by the Forensic Auditors. The chance of the defendants fleeing away from the country was imminent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above background, present application was filed to furnish security or bank guarantee equal to the suit claim.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was noted that the 3<sup>rd<\/sup> defendant father of second defendant died, and the defendant company was under liquidation. The administrator was appointed to take over the assets and liabilities.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #003366;\">Analysis, Law and Decision<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court expressed that,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008080;\">\u201cPower under Order XXXVIII, Rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Code has to be sparingly used and only when, there is sufficient reason to believe that the defendant is about to dispose his property, Attachment or Order to furnish security shall be ordered.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Madras High Court\u2019s decision in <em>W. Pappammal v. I Chidambaram, <\/em>1984 Mad 70, was referred, wherein the Court held that,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201c6.<em> The essential requirements for invoking the power of court to effect an attachment under 0. 38, R. 5 (1), C.P.C., are that the Court must be satisfied that the defendant is about to dispose of the whole or any part of his or her property, or the defendant is about to remove the whole or any part of his or her property from the local limits of the jurisdiction of the court and the defendant is intending so to do with a view to cause obstruction or delay the execution of any decree that may be pawed against him or her. it is incumbent that the plaintiff should state precisely the grounds on which the belief or apprehension is entertained that the defendant is likely to dispose of or remove the property. It may even be necessary in some cases to give the source of information and belief. A mere mechanical repetition of the provisions in the Code or the language therein without any basic strata of truth underlying the allegation or vague and general allegations that the defendant is about to dispose of the property or remove it beyond the jurisdiction of the court totally unsupported by particulars would not be sufficient compliance with the first part of 0. 38, R. 5 (1), C.P.C.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above, High Court held that the second defendant, who stood as guarantor for the term loan availed in the name of the first defendant, cannot be segregated or delinked from the defendant company, which is now under restructuring.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As far as the question of whether the second defendant mismanaged the company and appropriated the funds, the same would be proved through the investigation which was under progress and through trial.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Coming to the issue regarding Order Attachment before Judgment or to furnish security equal to the suit claim, the second defendant though found in a bad light and unacceptable antecedents were all not reasons to allow application under Order XXXVIII, Rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Code.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Lastly, the bench concluded by expressing that,<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #008080;\">\u201c\u2026affidavit filed along with the application does not disclose adequate reasons for ordering furnish security that the property available now with the defendant will be disposed or removed from the local limits to cause obstruction or delay the execution of the decree.\u201d<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above application was dismissed. [Northern ARC Capital Ltd. v. Sambandh Finserve Pvt. Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/I4G95i4E\"><b>2021 SCC OnLine Mad 5511<\/b><\/a>, decided on 6-10-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Advocates before the Court:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For Applicant: Mr Anirudh Krishnan<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For Respondents :Mr Supriyo Ranjan Mahaptra for R1<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mr Prashant Rajagopal for R2<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court: G. Jayachandran, J., with the lens of this decision addressed the Power under Order XXXVIII, Rule 5 of the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[11991,29785,2567,47434,47435,3590],"class_list":["post-255322","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-execution-of-decree","tag-law","tag-Madras_High_Court","tag-order-to-furnish-security","tag-order-xxxviii-rule-5-of-the-civil-procedure-code","tag-property"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>When can Court invoke its Power to effect an attachment under Or. 38 R. 5 of Civil Procedure Code? Madras HC decides | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"When can Court invoke it&#039;s Power to effect an attachment under Or. 38 R. 5 of Civil Procedure Code?\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/when-can-court-invoke-its-power-to-effect-an-attachment-under-or-38-r-5-of-civil-procedure-code\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"When can Court invoke its Power to effect an attachment under Or. 38 R. 5 of Civil Procedure Code? Madras HC decides\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"When can Court invoke it&#039;s Power to effect an attachment under Or. 38 R. 5 of Civil Procedure Code?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/when-can-court-invoke-its-power-to-effect-an-attachment-under-or-38-r-5-of-civil-procedure-code\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-10-08T04:30:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-10-29T06:10:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/madras-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/when-can-court-invoke-its-power-to-effect-an-attachment-under-or-38-r-5-of-civil-procedure-code\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/when-can-court-invoke-its-power-to-effect-an-attachment-under-or-38-r-5-of-civil-procedure-code\/\",\"name\":\"When can Court invoke its Power to effect an attachment under Or. 38 R. 5 of Civil Procedure Code? Madras HC decides | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-10-08T04:30:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-10-29T06:10:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"When can Court invoke it's Power to effect an attachment under Or. 38 R. 5 of Civil Procedure Code?\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/when-can-court-invoke-its-power-to-effect-an-attachment-under-or-38-r-5-of-civil-procedure-code\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/when-can-court-invoke-its-power-to-effect-an-attachment-under-or-38-r-5-of-civil-procedure-code\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/when-can-court-invoke-its-power-to-effect-an-attachment-under-or-38-r-5-of-civil-procedure-code\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"When can Court invoke its Power to effect an attachment under Or. 38 R. 5 of Civil Procedure Code? Madras HC decides\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"When can Court invoke its Power to effect an attachment under Or. 38 R. 5 of Civil Procedure Code? Madras HC decides | SCC Times","description":"When can Court invoke it's Power to effect an attachment under Or. 38 R. 5 of Civil Procedure Code?","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/when-can-court-invoke-its-power-to-effect-an-attachment-under-or-38-r-5-of-civil-procedure-code\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"When can Court invoke its Power to effect an attachment under Or. 38 R. 5 of Civil Procedure Code? Madras HC decides","og_description":"When can Court invoke it's Power to effect an attachment under Or. 38 R. 5 of Civil Procedure Code?","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/when-can-court-invoke-its-power-to-effect-an-attachment-under-or-38-r-5-of-civil-procedure-code\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-10-08T04:30:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-10-29T06:10:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/madras-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/when-can-court-invoke-its-power-to-effect-an-attachment-under-or-38-r-5-of-civil-procedure-code\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/when-can-court-invoke-its-power-to-effect-an-attachment-under-or-38-r-5-of-civil-procedure-code\/","name":"When can Court invoke its Power to effect an attachment under Or. 38 R. 5 of Civil Procedure Code? Madras HC decides | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-10-08T04:30:04+00:00","dateModified":"2021-10-29T06:10:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"When can Court invoke it's Power to effect an attachment under Or. 38 R. 5 of Civil Procedure Code?","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/when-can-court-invoke-its-power-to-effect-an-attachment-under-or-38-r-5-of-civil-procedure-code\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/when-can-court-invoke-its-power-to-effect-an-attachment-under-or-38-r-5-of-civil-procedure-code\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/when-can-court-invoke-its-power-to-effect-an-attachment-under-or-38-r-5-of-civil-procedure-code\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"When can Court invoke its Power to effect an attachment under Or. 38 R. 5 of Civil Procedure Code? Madras HC decides"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":251213,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/judgment-and-decree\/","url_meta":{"origin":255322,"position":0},"title":"When can decree on admission be passed? Madras HC explains how general admission of facts v. admission of claim, makes difference","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 13, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: Dr G. Jayachandran, J., refused to pass a decree in favour of the plaintiff who relied on general admission of facts made by the defendant. In the instant matter, it was stated that the plaintiff was engaged in the business of providing and arranging finance to various\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":268455,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/15\/a-suit-cannot-be-summarily-decreed-until-the-claim-stands-duly-proved-mad-hc-analyses-rules-of-evidence-vis-a-vis-order-xiii-a-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":255322,"position":1},"title":"A suit cannot be summarily decreed until the claim stands duly proved; Mad HC analyses Rules of Evidence Vis a Vis Order XIII A CPC","author":"Editor","date":"June 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: Senthil Kumar Ramamoorthy, J. remarked that a suit cannot be summarily decreed at the instance of a plaintiff unless such plaintiff satisfies the court that the suit claim stands duly proved.\u00a0 The facts of the case are such that the first defendant borrowed money from the Plaintiff\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279810,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/does-civil-court-have-jurisdiction-to-determine-title-of-shares-issued-fraudulently-calcutta-high-court-examines\/","url_meta":{"origin":255322,"position":2},"title":"Does Civil Court have jurisdiction to determine title of shares issued \u2018fraudulently\u2019? Calcutta High Court examines","author":"Editor","date":"December 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Calcutta High Court | Krishna Rao, J., held that under Companies Act, 2013, Civil Courts have jurisdiction to enquire into allegations of fraud pertaining to the title of issued shares, but they would not have jurisdiction to adjudicate the allegation of fraud under S. 447 of the Companies\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image95.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":296369,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/10\/exception-bonafide-use-of-name-as-trademark-u-s35-will-not-extend-to-name-of-spouse-madras-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":255322,"position":3},"title":"[SANGEETHA v NEW SANGEETHA] Exception of bona fide use of name as trade mark does not extend to the name of spouse: Madras High Court grants permanent injunction","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court has also granted the plaintiff a decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from committing passing off of its restaurant business by using deceptively similar trade mark.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283833,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/14\/in-camera-proceedings-can-be-held-under-section-151-of-civil-procedure-code-1908-if-warranted-by-the-facts-and-circumstances-of-the-case-delhi-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":255322,"position":4},"title":"In Camera proceedings can be held under Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 if warranted by the facts and circumstances of the case: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"February 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court observed that merely because there was no express provision in the Code of Civil Procedure, it does not mean that in-camera proceedings cannot be allowed. Therefore, the Court held that in appropriate cases, the Court may under Section 151 of the Code pass any order for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":268043,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/07\/faces-cosmetics-restrained-from-selling-products-under-the-trademark-velvet-matte\/","url_meta":{"origin":255322,"position":5},"title":"Del HC | Faces cosmetics restrained from selling products under the trademark &#8220;Velvet Matte&#8221;","author":"Editor","date":"June 7, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Prathiba M. Singh, J. granted an ad interim ex parte injunction in favour of Colorbar cosmetics Private Limited by restraining the Canada based company, Faces Cosmetics India Private Limited from manufacturing, selling and offering for sale cosmetics and other products under the trademark \"Velvet matte\" or any\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255322","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=255322"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255322\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=255322"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=255322"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=255322"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}