{"id":255244,"date":"2021-10-06T17:00:39","date_gmt":"2021-10-06T11:30:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=255244"},"modified":"2021-10-07T09:34:50","modified_gmt":"2021-10-07T04:04:50","slug":"physical-presence-for-registration-of-marriage-under-delhi-compulsory-registration-of-marriage-order-2014-a-necessity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/06\/physical-presence-for-registration-of-marriage-under-delhi-compulsory-registration-of-marriage-order-2014-a-necessity\/","title":{"rendered":"Physical Presence v. Video Conference | Physical Presence for registration of marriage under Delhi (Compulsory Registration of Marriage) Order, 2014, a necessity? Delhi HC decides"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court: <\/strong>While addressing a request for registration of marriage without requiring the physical presence of the couple, Rekha Palli, J., expressed that,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008080;\">\u201cIn a little over half a decade, since the Registration Order was notified, the universe has undergone a sea change but the Registering Authority, while exercising its power and jurisdiction under the Registration Order is refusing to recognize the reality that with the technology as is available today, web portals and Video Conferencing have become almost the norm.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">An Indian Couple residing in the United States of America sought a direction to the concerned Sub-Divisional Magistrate, New Delhi to register their marriage in accordance with the provisions of the Delhi (Compulsory Registration of Marriage) Order, 2014 without insisting on their physical appearance before him.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench stated that the aforesaid Registration Order of 2014 was promulgated post the directions issued by the Supreme Court in <em>Seema v. Ashwani Kumar, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/V3rFT3Eo\">(2006) 2 SCC 578<\/a>. Pursuant to the said Order, the registration of marriages solemnized in Delhi was made compulsory under the Registration Order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petitioner submitted that due to being relocated to Singapore prior to 2014 they could not apply for registration of their marriage when the order came into effect.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Now the couple has relocated to USA and have applied for Green Card in the USA, for the grant of the same they require a marriage registration certificate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Due to the changed circumstances with the COVID-19 pandemic resulting in restrictions on travel, petitioners tried to make an online application in early June 2021but were unable to do so, as they do not possess an Aadhaar Card or a Voter ID Card, which are mandatory to apply through the portal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">When the petitioners tried to submit their application through the counsel, the same was not accepted stating that their physical presence was required.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above background, the present petition was filed.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Analysis, Law and Decision<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court stated that whether personal appearance for purposes of marriage would include appearance through Video Conferencing has already been considered and answered in the affirmative, as rightly urged by the Senior Counsel of the petitioner not only but this Court but by a number of other High Courts as well.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In <em>Charanjit Kaur Nagi<\/em> <span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\"><em>v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/LsWnYDvW\">2007 SCC OnLine Del 1393 <\/a><\/span><span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">when the use of Video Conferencing was still at a very nascent stage, this Court had permitted registration of marriage without insistence on the physical appearance of one of the parties to the marriage, while permitting appearance through video conferencing.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In another decision, <em>Upasana Bali <\/em><span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">v. <em>State of Jharkhand<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/EmYA891Z\">2012 SCC OnLine Jhar 1505<\/a>, <\/span><span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">Jharkhand High Court while allowing the petition of a similarly placed couple, who were residing in the UK, directed the Registering Authority under the Jharkhand Hindu Marriage Rules to accept their application for registration of marriage through their Power of Attorney holder, and to permit them to personally appear before the authority through Video Conferencing.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kerala High Court in <em>Pradeep Kodiveedu Cletus<\/em><span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">\u00a0<em>v. Local Registrar of Marriages<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/d17rEe1u\">2017 SCC OnLine Ker 23204<\/a>, <\/span><span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">observed that the provision for registration of marriage could certainly be interpreted as enabling the Local Registrar to obtain personal appearance through Video Conferencing as well.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Supreme Court\u2019s decision in <em>State of Maharashtra v. Praful B. Desai (Dr), <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/4gf8d4vP\">(2003) 4 SCC 601<\/a>, expounded the importance of Video Conferencing.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Therefore, in view of the above-stated precedents, High Court expressed that,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008080;\">\u201c\u2026in times such as these, when technology has proven to be in the bridge that ensured uninterrupted communication, widespread dissemination of information in public interest and the smooth functioning of the society, the Court cannot allow a rigid interpretation of the statute to prevent citizens from exercising their rights.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong>Further, the Court referred to the Supreme Court decision in <em>Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/h94Q5R0t\">(2020) 3 SCC 637<\/a> in which the Court emphasized the need to adapt technological advancements while dispensing justice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Physical Presence: Necessary or Not?<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court keeping in view the fact that the issuance of the registration order is to promote the registration of marriages, Clause 4 must be interpreted in such a manner that encourages parties to easily get their marriages registered.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008080;\">The insistence of physical appearance even when their personal appearance can be easily secured through video conferencing, will definitely make it more cumbersome for parties to come forward for registration of marriages. This will negate the very purpose of enactment of the Registration Order and cannot be permitted.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong>Hence, Clause 4 of the Registration Order has to be read to include presence secured through Video Conferencing.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above discussion, petition was allowed resulting in parties seeking marriage registration being entitled to submit a physical copy of their application through their attorney and also enter a personal appearance as and when required, through Video Conferencing.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Directions<\/span><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">a) The petitioners are permitted to submit their application for registration of marriage, through their counsel\/Power of Attorney Holder in physical form before the SDM Kishan Ganj, Delhi, alongwith copies of all supporting documents duly notarized, either by the notary public in US, where they are presently residing, or by the notary public in Delhi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">b)The respondent will allow the \u201cpersonal appearance\u201d of the Petitioners for the purpose of Clause 4 (d) and (e) &amp; Form A of The Delhi (Compulsory Registration of Marriage), 2014 through Video Conferencing.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">c) The two witnesses, as required under the Registration Order will appear physically before the Registering Authority alongwith their original ID proofs, on the date as notified by the authority.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">d) The respondent will, thereafter, expeditiously register the petitioners&#8217; marriage, and issue the Marriage Registration Certificate within a period of two weeks&#8217; from the date of receipt of the application made by the petitioners.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[Reena Chadha v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/DC90Ykj3\">2021 SCC OnLine Del 4336<\/a>, decided on 9-9-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Advocates before the Court:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Praveen Gaur, Adv.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ms. Shobhana Takiar, ASC, GNCTD.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court: While addressing a request for registration of marriage without requiring the physical presence of the couple, Rekha Palli, J., <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[47418,2543,47419,47417,29785,47416],"class_list":["post-255244","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-delhi-compulsory-registration-of-marriage-order-2014","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-green-card","tag-indian-couple","tag-law","tag-marriage-registration"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Physical Presence v. Video Conference | Physical Presence for registration of marriage under Delhi (Compulsory Registration of Marriage) Order, 2014, a necessity? Delhi HC decides | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Physical Presence for registration of marriage under Delhi (Compulsory Registration of Marriage) Order, 2014, a necessity\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/06\/physical-presence-for-registration-of-marriage-under-delhi-compulsory-registration-of-marriage-order-2014-a-necessity\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Physical Presence v. Video Conference | Physical Presence for registration of marriage under Delhi (Compulsory Registration of Marriage) Order, 2014, a necessity? Delhi HC decides\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Physical Presence for registration of marriage under Delhi (Compulsory Registration of Marriage) Order, 2014, a necessity\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/06\/physical-presence-for-registration-of-marriage-under-delhi-compulsory-registration-of-marriage-order-2014-a-necessity\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-10-06T11:30:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-10-07T04:04:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/06\/physical-presence-for-registration-of-marriage-under-delhi-compulsory-registration-of-marriage-order-2014-a-necessity\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/06\/physical-presence-for-registration-of-marriage-under-delhi-compulsory-registration-of-marriage-order-2014-a-necessity\/\",\"name\":\"Physical Presence v. Video Conference | Physical Presence for registration of marriage under Delhi (Compulsory Registration of Marriage) Order, 2014, a necessity? Delhi HC decides | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-10-06T11:30:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-10-07T04:04:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Physical Presence for registration of marriage under Delhi (Compulsory Registration of Marriage) Order, 2014, a necessity\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/06\/physical-presence-for-registration-of-marriage-under-delhi-compulsory-registration-of-marriage-order-2014-a-necessity\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/06\/physical-presence-for-registration-of-marriage-under-delhi-compulsory-registration-of-marriage-order-2014-a-necessity\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/06\/physical-presence-for-registration-of-marriage-under-delhi-compulsory-registration-of-marriage-order-2014-a-necessity\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Physical Presence v. Video Conference | Physical Presence for registration of marriage under Delhi (Compulsory Registration of Marriage) Order, 2014, a necessity? Delhi HC decides\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Physical Presence v. Video Conference | Physical Presence for registration of marriage under Delhi (Compulsory Registration of Marriage) Order, 2014, a necessity? Delhi HC decides | SCC Times","description":"Physical Presence for registration of marriage under Delhi (Compulsory Registration of Marriage) Order, 2014, a necessity","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/06\/physical-presence-for-registration-of-marriage-under-delhi-compulsory-registration-of-marriage-order-2014-a-necessity\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Physical Presence v. Video Conference | Physical Presence for registration of marriage under Delhi (Compulsory Registration of Marriage) Order, 2014, a necessity? Delhi HC decides","og_description":"Physical Presence for registration of marriage under Delhi (Compulsory Registration of Marriage) Order, 2014, a necessity","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/06\/physical-presence-for-registration-of-marriage-under-delhi-compulsory-registration-of-marriage-order-2014-a-necessity\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-10-06T11:30:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-10-07T04:04:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/06\/physical-presence-for-registration-of-marriage-under-delhi-compulsory-registration-of-marriage-order-2014-a-necessity\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/06\/physical-presence-for-registration-of-marriage-under-delhi-compulsory-registration-of-marriage-order-2014-a-necessity\/","name":"Physical Presence v. Video Conference | Physical Presence for registration of marriage under Delhi (Compulsory Registration of Marriage) Order, 2014, a necessity? Delhi HC decides | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-10-06T11:30:39+00:00","dateModified":"2021-10-07T04:04:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Physical Presence for registration of marriage under Delhi (Compulsory Registration of Marriage) Order, 2014, a necessity","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/06\/physical-presence-for-registration-of-marriage-under-delhi-compulsory-registration-of-marriage-order-2014-a-necessity\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/06\/physical-presence-for-registration-of-marriage-under-delhi-compulsory-registration-of-marriage-order-2014-a-necessity\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/06\/physical-presence-for-registration-of-marriage-under-delhi-compulsory-registration-of-marriage-order-2014-a-necessity\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Physical Presence v. Video Conference | Physical Presence for registration of marriage under Delhi (Compulsory Registration of Marriage) Order, 2014, a necessity? Delhi HC decides"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":335040,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/13\/delhi-high-court-annuls-special-marriage-act-registration-muslim-couple-conflict-islamic-law-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":255244,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court annuls Special Marriage Act registration for Muslim couple due to conflict with Islamic Law","author":"Arunima","date":"November 13, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court directed that the Chief Secretary of the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) personally intervene to ensure the timely and effective compliance of the judgment dated 04-07-2024 which required the implementation of an online registration mechanism for marriages solemnized under Muslim personal law.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":109791,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/27\/aadhar-not-compulsory-for-registration-of-marriage-govt-authorities-must-spread-awareness-says-cic\/","url_meta":{"origin":255244,"position":1},"title":"Aadhar not compulsory for registration of marriage, govt. authorities must spread awareness, says CIC","author":"Saba","date":"February 27, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Central Information Commission:\u00a0The appellant filed the RTI application seeking information about action taken on Delhi (Compulsory Registration of Marriage) Executive Order No. F. 1(12)\/DC\/MC\/2014 dated 21.4.2014 regarding appointment of additional marriage officers in compliance with directions given by in Seema v. Ashwani Kumar,\u00a0 (2005) 4 SCC 443. For this, CPIO\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/central_information_commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298458,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/03\/ai-increased-possibility-impersonation-delhi-hc-sma-act-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":255244,"position":2},"title":"[Special Marriage Act] \u2018AI increased the possibility of impersonation\u2019; Delhi High Court directs Indian National to appear before Indian High Commission in Canada and join video conferencing","author":"Arunima","date":"August 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Marriage Registration Authority submitted that in view of the advancement in the technology in Artificial Intelligence, the possibility of somebody impersonating Petitioner cannot be ruled out.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":194965,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/04\/06\/certificate-of-marriage-under-the-special-marriage-act-1954-is-conclusive-proof-of-solemnization-of-marriage-under-the-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":255244,"position":3},"title":"Certificate of Marriage under the Special Marriage Act, 1954 is conclusive proof of solemnization of marriage under the Act","author":"Saba","date":"April 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: An important question of law relating to the Special Marriage Act, 1954 (hereinafter \u2018Act\u2019) has arisen before a Single Judge Bench comprising of JR Midha, J, for adjudication. The issue is whether the parties married under the Act can be permitted to challenge the jurisdiction of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":140701,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/05\/law-commission-of-india-submits-report-no-270-recommending-compulsory-registration-of-marriages\/","url_meta":{"origin":255244,"position":4},"title":"Law Commission of India submits Report No. 270, recommending Compulsory Registration of Marriages","author":"Saba","date":"July 5, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"The Department of Legal Affairs forwarded a request received from the Legislative Department, asking the Law Commission to examine and submit a report with regard to various issues relating to compulsory registration of marriages. This Report proposes to amend the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 to include compulsory\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Law-Commission-of-India.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Law-Commission-of-India.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Law-Commission-of-India.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Law-Commission-of-India.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Law-Commission-of-India.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":208497,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/21\/delhi-hc-registrar-of-marriage-directed-to-issue-marriage-certificate-to-foreign-citizens-as-required-under-s-13-of-special-marriage-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":255244,"position":5},"title":"Del HC | Registrar of Marriage directed to issue marriage certificate to foreign citizens as required under S.13 of Special Marriage Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0The Bench of Vibhu Bhakru, J.allowed petition filed by foreign citizens and directed the Registrar of Marriage to issue Certificate of Marriage to them. Petitioners, in this case, were working in the British High Commission, New Delhi. One of them was a Canadian citizen while other was a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255244","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=255244"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255244\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=255244"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=255244"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=255244"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}