{"id":254928,"date":"2021-09-30T15:00:12","date_gmt":"2021-09-30T09:30:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=254928"},"modified":"2021-09-30T09:54:29","modified_gmt":"2021-09-30T04:24:29","slug":"nominee-director-reminded-of-the-not-so-nominal-duties","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/30\/nominee-director-reminded-of-the-not-so-nominal-duties\/","title":{"rendered":"NCLAT | \u2018Unhesitatingly\u2019 decides the \u2018unsustainability\u2019| Nominee Director reminded of the not so nominal duties| Held: \u2018Controlling by votes\u2019 is \u2018Controlling interest\u2019 \u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>National Company Law Appellate Tribunal-<\/strong>The Coram of Justice M. Venugopal, Acting Chairperson and Kanthi Narahari, Technical Member while concurring with the adjudicating authority\u2019s order and dismissing the appeal, held,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u201cin the light of the detailed upshot, and considering the facts and circumstances of the instant case in a conspectus fashion and keeping in mind the ingredients of the \u2018Articles of Association\u2019 to the effect that the nominee Directors have a vital influence in regard to the working of the \u2018Corporate Debtor\u2019, this Tribunal unhesitatingly comes to a consequent conclusion that the Appellant is a \u2018related party\u2019 and the view arrived at by the \u2018Resolution Professional\u2019 to include the Appellant\/TSTPCL as member of the \u2018Committee of Creditors\u2019 is clearly unsustainable in the eye of law\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the pertinent matter impugned order of the NCLT, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad was challenged where it refuted the submission of the Resolution Professional that they are only the <em>nominated members with no say in the functioning of the company and the Corporate Debtor. The appellants contended that <\/em>the adjudicating authority had failed to appreciate the term \u2018related party\u2019 as construed under Section 24(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 in consideration of the Memorandum of Understanding, Articles of Association, Loan Agreement, Shareholding Agreement and Share Transfer Agreement.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>The adjudicating authority was of the opinion that the Resolution Professional squarely fits into the definition of \u2018related party\u2019 under Section 5(24) (a), (h), (j), (l) and (m) of the Code. It even stated that, \u201c the role and responsibility of the Directors is to protect the interests of the Corporate Debtor and not to merely sit in the Board meetings of the corporation\u201d.<\/em><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Tribunal while concurring with the adjudicating authority, opined,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u201cthe expression \u2018control\u2019 in Section 29A(c) of the \u2018I&amp;B\u2019 Code symbolizes only the positive control i.e. that the mere power to block special resolutions of a Company cannot amount to control. In reality, the word \u2018control\u2019 juxtaposed with the term \u2018management\u2019 means \u2018De facto control of actual management or policy decisions that may be or are in reality taken\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It further stated that,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u201cTo put it precisely, the part played by the two nominee Directors clearly point out that the first Respondent \/ Company acts on the advice, direction and instructions of the Appellant in its normal business affairs relating to the first Respondent. As such, this Tribunal is of the earnest opinion that the Appellant \u2018squarely comes within the ambit of related party as per clause (f) of Sub Section 24 of section 5 of the Code\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Tribunal, therefore, considering the circumstantial matrix, summed up by stating,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u201cas perceived from the \u2018Articles of Association\u2019 and the requisite majority needed for taking important business decisions, the conduct of the business of the First Respondent, the establishment of First Respondent Company, all considered in an integral and cumulative manner will exhibit the noteworthy influence of the Appellant in issues concerning the First Respondent. In this manner also, the First Respondent is treating the Appellant as \u2018Related Party\u2019\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[Telangana State Trade Promotion Corporation v. A.P. Gema &amp; Jewellery Park Private Limited, Company Appeal (AT)(CH) (Ins.) No.54 of 2021, decided on 21-09-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #333300;\">Agatha Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Counsel for the Parties:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the Appellant:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mr. Ravi, Senior Counsel For R.S. Associates, M.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Naga Deepak, B. Lokeshwar Reddy, Rohan Aloor<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">and Himangini Sanghi, Advocates.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the Respondents:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mr. Y. Suryanarayana, Respondent No. 1<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mr. Satish Parasaran, Senior Advocate for M\/s.<\/p>\n<p>Ravindra Bose &amp; R. Saravanan, Respondent No.2<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>National Company Law Appellate Tribunal-The Coram of Justice M. Venugopal, Acting Chairperson and Kanthi Narahari, Technical Member while concurring with the adjudicating <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":153604,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[47313,22014,12521,47311,47312],"class_list":["post-254928","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-controlling-interest","tag-nclat","tag-nclt","tag-nominee-director","tag-resoltuina-professional"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>NCLAT | \u2018Unhesitatingly\u2019 decides the \u2018unsustainability\u2019| Nominee Director reminded of the not so nominal duties| Held: \u2018Controlling by votes\u2019 is \u2018Controlling interest\u2019 \u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Nominee Director reminded of the not so nominal duties\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/30\/nominee-director-reminded-of-the-not-so-nominal-duties\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"NCLAT | \u2018Unhesitatingly\u2019 decides the \u2018unsustainability\u2019| Nominee Director reminded of the not so nominal duties| Held: \u2018Controlling by votes\u2019 is \u2018Controlling interest\u2019 \u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Nominee Director reminded of the not so nominal duties\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/30\/nominee-director-reminded-of-the-not-so-nominal-duties\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-09-30T09:30:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"844\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/30\/nominee-director-reminded-of-the-not-so-nominal-duties\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/30\/nominee-director-reminded-of-the-not-so-nominal-duties\/\",\"name\":\"NCLAT | \u2018Unhesitatingly\u2019 decides the \u2018unsustainability\u2019| Nominee Director reminded of the not so nominal duties| Held: \u2018Controlling by votes\u2019 is \u2018Controlling interest\u2019 \u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/30\/nominee-director-reminded-of-the-not-so-nominal-duties\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/30\/nominee-director-reminded-of-the-not-so-nominal-duties\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-09-30T09:30:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Nominee Director reminded of the not so nominal duties\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/30\/nominee-director-reminded-of-the-not-so-nominal-duties\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/30\/nominee-director-reminded-of-the-not-so-nominal-duties\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/30\/nominee-director-reminded-of-the-not-so-nominal-duties\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":844},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/30\/nominee-director-reminded-of-the-not-so-nominal-duties\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"NCLAT | \u2018Unhesitatingly\u2019 decides the \u2018unsustainability\u2019| Nominee Director reminded of the not so nominal duties| Held: \u2018Controlling by votes\u2019 is \u2018Controlling interest\u2019 \u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NCLAT | \u2018Unhesitatingly\u2019 decides the \u2018unsustainability\u2019| Nominee Director reminded of the not so nominal duties| Held: \u2018Controlling by votes\u2019 is \u2018Controlling interest\u2019 \u00a0 | SCC Times","description":"Nominee Director reminded of the not so nominal duties","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/30\/nominee-director-reminded-of-the-not-so-nominal-duties\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"NCLAT | \u2018Unhesitatingly\u2019 decides the \u2018unsustainability\u2019| Nominee Director reminded of the not so nominal duties| Held: \u2018Controlling by votes\u2019 is \u2018Controlling interest\u2019 \u00a0","og_description":"Nominee Director reminded of the not so nominal duties","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/30\/nominee-director-reminded-of-the-not-so-nominal-duties\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-09-30T09:30:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":844,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/30\/nominee-director-reminded-of-the-not-so-nominal-duties\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/30\/nominee-director-reminded-of-the-not-so-nominal-duties\/","name":"NCLAT | \u2018Unhesitatingly\u2019 decides the \u2018unsustainability\u2019| Nominee Director reminded of the not so nominal duties| Held: \u2018Controlling by votes\u2019 is \u2018Controlling interest\u2019 \u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/30\/nominee-director-reminded-of-the-not-so-nominal-duties\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/30\/nominee-director-reminded-of-the-not-so-nominal-duties\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","datePublished":"2021-09-30T09:30:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Nominee Director reminded of the not so nominal duties","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/30\/nominee-director-reminded-of-the-not-so-nominal-duties\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/30\/nominee-director-reminded-of-the-not-so-nominal-duties\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/30\/nominee-director-reminded-of-the-not-so-nominal-duties\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","width":1330,"height":844},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/30\/nominee-director-reminded-of-the-not-so-nominal-duties\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"NCLAT | \u2018Unhesitatingly\u2019 decides the \u2018unsustainability\u2019| Nominee Director reminded of the not so nominal duties| Held: \u2018Controlling by votes\u2019 is \u2018Controlling interest\u2019 \u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":246198,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/26\/reinstatement-by-nclat-too-big-a-pill-for-perhaps-even-cyrus-mistry-to-swallow-heres-why-supreme-court-upheld-cyrus-mistrys-removal-as-chairman-by-the-tata-sons\/","url_meta":{"origin":254928,"position":0},"title":"&#8216;Reinstatement by NCLAT &#8220;too big a pill&#8221; for perhaps even Cyrus Mistry to swallow&#8217;; Here&#8217;s why Supreme Court upheld Cyrus Mistry&#8217;s removal as Chairman by the Tata Sons","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 26, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\"NCLAT appears to have granted the relief of reinstatement gratis without any foundation in pleadings, without any prayer and without any basis in law, thereby forcing upon the appellant an Executive Chairman, who now is unable to support his own reinstatement.\u00a0\"","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270901,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/30\/entertainment-city-ltd-an-affiliate-of-united-group-nclat-grants-moratorium-benefits\/","url_meta":{"origin":254928,"position":1},"title":"Entertainment City Ltd an &#8216;affiliate&#8217; of United Group; NCLAT grants Moratorium Benefits","author":"Editor","date":"July 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi: The Bench of Ashok Kumar Bhushan, J., Chairperson, M. Satyanarayana Murthy, J., Judicial Member, and Barun Mitra, Technical Member set aside an order given by the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi (NCLT, New Delhi) and held that the Appellant, Entertainment\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292549,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/nclat-threshold-limit-under-ibc-includes-principal-amount-interest-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":254928,"position":2},"title":"Threshold limit includes both principal amount and interest under IBC; NCLAT set aside NCLT&#8217;s order","author":"Ritu","date":"May 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NCLAT held that the Adjudicating Authority committed error in rejecting the S. 7 application for not fulfilling \u2018threshold\u2019 when Deed of Guarantee mentions about the interest on default.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252965,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/20\/nclat-acknowledgment-is-based-on-neighboring-circumstances-and-has-nothing-to-do-with-the-form-rejects-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":254928,"position":3},"title":"NCLAT | \u2018Acknowledgment\u2019 is based on neighboring circumstances and has nothing to do with the form-Rejects Appeal","author":"Editor","date":"August 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal\u00a0 (NCLAT): The Coram of Justice Venugopal M (Judicial Member) and V.P. Singh (Technical Member) while setting aside an appeal opined that \u201c\u2026this Tribunal an irresistible, inevitable and inescapable conclusion that in respect of the loan account of the \u2018Corporate Debtor\u2019, there was an \u2018Acknowledgement of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200019,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/10\/induction-of-the-assignee-in-committee-of-creditors-quashed-holding-him-to-be-a-related-party-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":254928,"position":4},"title":"Induction of the \u2018assignee\u2019 in committee of creditors quashed holding him to be a \u2018related party\u2019: NCLAT","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 10, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) dismissed an appeal filed against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai. The directors of Fortune Pharma (P) Ltd., Corporate Debtor, had executed a\u00a0 personal guarantee\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267819,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/02\/to-nominate-or-not-the-effects-of-aruna-oswal\/","url_meta":{"origin":254928,"position":5},"title":"To Nominate or Not : The Effects of Aruna Oswal","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Shyam Kapadia\u2020 and Spenta Havewala\u2021","rel":"","context":"In &quot;OP. ED.&quot;","block_context":{"text":"OP. ED.","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-138.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-138.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-138.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-138.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-138.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254928","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=254928"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254928\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/153604"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=254928"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=254928"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=254928"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}