{"id":254616,"date":"2021-09-23T15:00:01","date_gmt":"2021-09-23T09:30:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=254616"},"modified":"2021-11-20T09:41:22","modified_gmt":"2021-11-20T04:11:22","slug":"consumer-claiming-refund-of-mobile-phone-purchased-from-amazon-sellers-due-to-some-defect","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/23\/consumer-claiming-refund-of-mobile-phone-purchased-from-amazon-sellers-due-to-some-defect\/","title":{"rendered":"NCDRC refuses refund, punitive damages to consumer for defective phone purchased from Amazon Sellers: Read why"},"content":{"rendered":"

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): Discussing a matter wherein allegedly a defective mobile phone was received From Amazon sellers, <\/strong>Bench of Dr Justice R.K. Agarwal (President) and Dr S.M. Kantikar (Member) emphasized the concept of punitive damages.<\/p>\n

Present Consumer complaint under Section 2(1)(d)(i) read with Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act had been filed against Amazon Seller Service Private Limited seeking refund of the amount of Rs 9,119 paid towards purchase of Mobile Phone along with litigation and transportation cost of Rs 1 lakh and Punitive Damages to the tune of Rs 7,43,00,00,000 for causing legal injury and financial loss to the complainant and other innumerable consumers.<\/p>\n

Complainant purchased a mobile phone from OP. It was contended that after using the Mobile Phone for a couple of days, it started heating up which compelled him to return the same as per the Easy Return Policy of the OP advertised on T.V. Serial, Media and Print Media.<\/p>\n

Since, the Complainant was not able to click the option of Return\/Exchange on their website, he called the Customer Support of the Opposite Party and was informed that they had changed its Return Policy on the items purchased.<\/p>\n

Complainant sent an email to the OP stating that they had always advertised about Easy Returns and that at the time of purchase, it had not been mentioned that the Refund\/Return Policy of the Opposite Party has been changed which amounted to Unfair Trade Practice on their part. Vide an email the OP apprised to the Complainant that if he had received a defective\/damaged Phone, he would be eligible only for free replacement and not for a refund.<\/p>\n

Further, in the invoice bill of the phone along with the order list, the option of returning the phone was given.<\/p>\n

Hence, he stated that the action\/inaction of the OP was in violation of the Right of Consumers to be informed about the product and to decide as to whether to purchase the same or not.<\/p>\n

Complainant alleged that the OP was involved in Unfair Trade Practice by making a false promise and running misleading advertisement about Easy Refund of the Product. The OP was bound to disclose all the necessary information about its Product enabling the Consumers to take a decision as to whether buy the said product or not.<\/p>\n

Analysis, Law and Decision<\/span><\/h3>\n

Commission while referring to the decision of Supreme Court in Magma Fincorp Ltd. v. Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, <\/em>(2020) 10 SCC 399<\/a>, answered the question as to whether the punitive damages claimed by the complainant can be treated as part of the compensation for determining the pecuniary jurisdiction of the commission.<\/p>\n

In the said decision it was held that the Punitive damages cannot be treated as a form of compensation.<\/p>\n

\n

Punitive damages under Section 14(1)(d) of the Act cannot be granted by the Consumer Fora in cases of breach of contract unless the act is so reprehensible that it calls for punishment of the party in breach, by imposition of punitive or exemplary damages.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

In the instant matter, <\/strong>Bench stated that some of the purchasers are purchasing the products on the online website and after using the said product for a few days, seek a refund of the amount paid by them.<\/p>\n

The above was the reason why OP changed its policy of Easy Return.<\/p>\n

Commission added that, in case the Complainant had received the defective mobile phone, the remedy was still available with him to get it replaced despite the change in Return\/Refund Policy\u201d.<\/p>\n

OP had published in the newspaper, namely the Indian Express about the change in its Return Policy with the Heading \u201cAmazon no longer has a return and get refund policy for mobiles\u201d along with this, the said information was also published in NDTV Gadget 360 with the heading that \u201cMobile Purchased from Amazon India No longer Eligible for Return\u201d<\/p>\n

In so far as the option appearing in the Invoice Bill of the Mobile Phone regarding the refund, was concerned, Commission opined that since there was a gap of only 16 days from the date of change of policy, i.e. 07-02-2017 and purchasing of mobile phone, i.e. 23-02-2017, it was not possible to rectify the said mistake or reprint the Invoice Bill.<\/p>\n

Therefore, present matter was not a fit case for awarding exemplary punitive damages and action\/inaction of the OP did not warrant any punishment. [Paras Jain v. Amazon Seller Services (P) Ltd., 2021 SCC OnLine NCDRC 312<\/b><\/a>, decided on 22-09-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Advocates before the Commission:<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

For the Complainant: Mr Paras Jain, In-person<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

For the Opposite Party: Mr Joy Basu, Sr. Advocate with Mr Amit Kr. Mishra, Mr. Mohit Singh, Mr. Turab Ali Kazmi, Ms. Samridhi Hota and Mr. Kank B, Advocates<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): Discussing a matter wherein allegedly a defective mobile phone was received From Amazon sellers, Bench of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":199533,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[47163,2728,14601,29785,47164,47161,3095,39908,47162],"class_list":["post-254616","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-amazon-sellers","tag-compensation","tag-consumer","tag-law","tag-misleading-advertisement","tag-mobile-phone","tag-NCDRC","tag-punitive-damages","tag-return-policy"],"yoast_head":"\nNCDRC refuses refund, punitive damages to consumer for defective phone purchased from Amazon Sellers: Read why | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Consumer claiming refund of mobile phone purchased from Amazon Sellers due to some defect\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/23\/consumer-claiming-refund-of-mobile-phone-purchased-from-amazon-sellers-due-to-some-defect\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"NCDRC refuses refund, punitive damages to consumer for defective phone purchased from Amazon Sellers: Read why\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Consumer claiming refund of mobile phone purchased from Amazon Sellers due to some defect\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/23\/consumer-claiming-refund-of-mobile-phone-purchased-from-amazon-sellers-due-to-some-defect\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-09-23T09:30:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-11-20T04:11:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/23\/consumer-claiming-refund-of-mobile-phone-purchased-from-amazon-sellers-due-to-some-defect\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/23\/consumer-claiming-refund-of-mobile-phone-purchased-from-amazon-sellers-due-to-some-defect\/\",\"name\":\"NCDRC refuses refund, punitive damages to consumer for defective phone purchased from Amazon Sellers: Read why | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/23\/consumer-claiming-refund-of-mobile-phone-purchased-from-amazon-sellers-due-to-some-defect\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/23\/consumer-claiming-refund-of-mobile-phone-purchased-from-amazon-sellers-due-to-some-defect\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-09-23T09:30:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-11-20T04:11:22+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Consumer claiming refund of mobile phone purchased from Amazon Sellers due to some defect\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/23\/consumer-claiming-refund-of-mobile-phone-purchased-from-amazon-sellers-due-to-some-defect\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/23\/consumer-claiming-refund-of-mobile-phone-purchased-from-amazon-sellers-due-to-some-defect\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/23\/consumer-claiming-refund-of-mobile-phone-purchased-from-amazon-sellers-due-to-some-defect\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887,\"caption\":\"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/23\/consumer-claiming-refund-of-mobile-phone-purchased-from-amazon-sellers-due-to-some-defect\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"NCDRC refuses refund, punitive damages to consumer for defective phone purchased from Amazon Sellers: Read why\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NCDRC refuses refund, punitive damages to consumer for defective phone purchased from Amazon Sellers: Read why | SCC Times","description":"Consumer claiming refund of mobile phone purchased from Amazon Sellers due to some defect","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/23\/consumer-claiming-refund-of-mobile-phone-purchased-from-amazon-sellers-due-to-some-defect\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"NCDRC refuses refund, punitive damages to consumer for defective phone purchased from Amazon Sellers: Read why","og_description":"Consumer claiming refund of mobile phone purchased from Amazon Sellers due to some defect","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/23\/consumer-claiming-refund-of-mobile-phone-purchased-from-amazon-sellers-due-to-some-defect\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-09-23T09:30:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-11-20T04:11:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/23\/consumer-claiming-refund-of-mobile-phone-purchased-from-amazon-sellers-due-to-some-defect\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/23\/consumer-claiming-refund-of-mobile-phone-purchased-from-amazon-sellers-due-to-some-defect\/","name":"NCDRC refuses refund, punitive damages to consumer for defective phone purchased from Amazon Sellers: Read why | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/23\/consumer-claiming-refund-of-mobile-phone-purchased-from-amazon-sellers-due-to-some-defect\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/23\/consumer-claiming-refund-of-mobile-phone-purchased-from-amazon-sellers-due-to-some-defect\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","datePublished":"2021-09-23T09:30:01+00:00","dateModified":"2021-11-20T04:11:22+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Consumer claiming refund of mobile phone purchased from Amazon Sellers due to some defect","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/23\/consumer-claiming-refund-of-mobile-phone-purchased-from-amazon-sellers-due-to-some-defect\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/23\/consumer-claiming-refund-of-mobile-phone-purchased-from-amazon-sellers-due-to-some-defect\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/23\/consumer-claiming-refund-of-mobile-phone-purchased-from-amazon-sellers-due-to-some-defect\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","width":1330,"height":887,"caption":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/23\/consumer-claiming-refund-of-mobile-phone-purchased-from-amazon-sellers-due-to-some-defect\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"NCDRC refuses refund, punitive damages to consumer for defective phone purchased from Amazon Sellers: Read why"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":6464,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/11\/26\/punitive-damages-of-fifty-thousand-imposed-upon-complainant-for-false-and-contradictory-assertions-in-its-complaint\/","url_meta":{"origin":254616,"position":0},"title":"Punitive Damages of Fifty Thousand imposed upon complainant for false and contradictory assertions in its complaint","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 26, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC):\u00a0While reiterating that if any litigant approaches any Judicial Fora by making false assertions in its complaint and tries to mislead the Judicial Fora, then such litigant is not entitled to any relief in equity and such petition should be thrown away at the threshold\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies"","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":320306,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/18\/non-deployment-airbags-scdrc-compensation-order-set-aside-ncdrc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":254616,"position":1},"title":"NCDRC sets aside SCDRC\u2019s Rs 1 Lakh compensation order against Honda Cars due to lack of expert opinion on non-deployment of the airbags","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"NCDRC pointed out that the State Commission\u2019s finding that non-deployment of the airbags when the respondent\u2019s car crashed, warranted punitive damages, was not based on any finding of fact or legal precedent.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":95211,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/28\/direction-to-pay-85-of-current-value-of-property-along-with-18-interest-for-misplacing-sale-deed-not-proper\/","url_meta":{"origin":254616,"position":2},"title":"Direction to pay 85% of current value of property along with 18% interest for misplacing sale deed, not proper","author":"Saba","date":"December 28, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC):\u00a0While rendering relief to Life Insurance Corporation Housing Finance company, NCDRC set aside the order of U.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, vide which LIC Housing Finance was directed to pay 85% of the current value of a property along with interest and punitive damages\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242489,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/20\/amazon-to-pay-rs-45000-for-rowing-back-on-confirmed-order-for-laptop-by-law-student-cant-evade-responsibility-when-it-allowed-rockery-marketing\/","url_meta":{"origin":254616,"position":3},"title":"Amazon to pay Rs 45000 for rowing back on confirmed order for laptop by Law student, can’t evade responsibility when it allowed ‘Rockery Marketing’","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Odisha (SCDRC):\u00a0Dr D.P. Choudhury (President) modified the compensation amount awarded to a Law Student in light of being subjected to 'Deficiency of Service' and 'Unfair Trade by 'Amazon'. The instant appeal was filed under Section 15 of the erstwhile Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Factual Matrix\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/Consumer-Protection.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/Consumer-Protection.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/Consumer-Protection.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/Consumer-Protection.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/Consumer-Protection.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296886,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/mumbai-floods-2005-ncdrc-dismisses-leela-hotel-insurance-claim-rs-6-crores\/","url_meta":{"origin":254616,"position":4},"title":"[Mumbai Floods 2005] NCDRC dismisses Leela Hotel insurance claim of Rs 6 Crores","author":"Ridhi","date":"July 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe report of the surveyor can be contested by the insured for valid reasons. The insurer is required to consider the report of the surveyor appointed by it although he is not bound to accept the report in entirety.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national consumer disputes redressal commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":226688,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/07\/ncdrc-tata-motors-resorted-to-deceptive-trade-practice-by-alluring-customers-and-promoting-sale-of-their-cars-decision-of-below-fora-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":254616,"position":5},"title":"NCDRC | Tata Motors resorted to deceptive trade practice by alluring customers and promoting sale of their cars; Decision of below fora — upheld","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Redressal Commission (NCDRC):\u00a0C. Vishwanath (Presiding Member) dismissed the revision petition filed by Tata Motors Limited against the West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolkata. Case of the complainant was that he was allured by advertisement issued by petitioner to purchase a model of Tata Indigo-CS Car. In\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254616","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=254616"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254616\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/199533"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=254616"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=254616"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=254616"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}