{"id":254223,"date":"2021-09-15T12:00:54","date_gmt":"2021-09-15T06:30:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=254223"},"modified":"2021-09-23T17:39:52","modified_gmt":"2021-09-23T12:09:52","slug":"tripura-plantation-labour-rules","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/15\/tripura-plantation-labour-rules\/","title":{"rendered":"Tri HC | Service of notice of meetings of the advisory board necessary specifying list of business to be transacted; Court allows appeal explaining Tripura Plantation Labour Rules, 1954"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Tripura High Court:<\/strong> The Division Bench of Akil Kureshi, CJ. and S.G. Chattopadhyay, J., allowed an appeal which was filed challenging the order of the Single Judge.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Appellant was a company incorporated under the Companies Act which was engaged in plantation, production and sale of tea. It ran a tea estate in Tripura in the name of Murticherra Tea Estate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Pursuant to the recommendation of the Advisory Board constituted by the State Government the respondent approved the standards and specifications of houses for the workers engaged in various tea estates across the State. The appellant in the original petition had challenged the formation of the Advisory Board and the standards and specifications of housing accommodation for tea plantation workers which was approved by the said Advisory Board on the ground that its composition did not conform to of the said rules. Petitioner had sought explanation as to why the notification should not be declared bad in law for not being issued following the requirements of Rule 54 of the Tripura Labour Plantation Rules 1954, and accordingly quashed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Respondent filed counter affidavit contending that Sri Anjan Kr. Das, President of Tea Association of India (TAI) in its Tripura chapter and its Secretary, Sri P.K. Sarkar were included in the Advisory Board constituted under Rule 54 of the said Rules as members with their consent because both of them were present in the tripartite meeting in which it was decided that the Advisory Board under Rule 54 of the said Rules would be constituted and said Anjan Kr. Das and P.K. Sarkar would be the employers\u2019 representative in the board. Consequently, the formation of the Advisory Board was notified by the State Government.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Single Judge had held that there was no defect in the formation of the Advisory Board which was duly notified by the State Government by notification and which was duly published in the Official Gazette.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The appellant had challenged the order of the single judge on the following grounds:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>(i) Formation of the board was defective because employers\u2019 representatives were never intimated about their inclusion in the said Advisory Board.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>(ii) Since the Advisory Board was not formed in conformity with the statutory provisions, the actions taken by the board were illegal.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>(iii) Learned Single Judge did not appreciate the fact that the respondent could not adduce any proof of delivery of the letter intimating the employers\u201f representatives about the schedule of the meeting held on 24.01.2012 in which the housing scheme was finalized.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court perused Rule 54, Rule 55(1) of the said Rules and noted that there is no conflict between Rule 55 and the notification dated 04-01-2012 of the State Government whereby the said Advisory Board was constituted. It would appear from the composition of the Board that the Advisory Board consisted of three representatives of the employers and three of the workers and as such the notification composing the Advisory Board cannot be faulted with. It was further observed that in so far as the challenge of the appellant to the validity of the recommendation of the Advisory Board in respect of the housing scheme was concerned, the appellant as it appears from the record, had challenged the validity of the meeting on the ground that no meeting notice was served on the employers\u2019 representatives intimating them about the schedule of the meeting and the <strong>finding of the Single Judge that notice was served on one of the representatives of the employers who refused to attend the meeting cannot stand because there is no proof of delivery of notice on any of the employers\u2019 representatives.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Procedure relating to the meetings of Advisory Board is laid down under Rule 60 to 66 in Chapter IV of the said Rules which was also perused by the Court and it was clarified that <strong><em>service of notice of meetings of the Advisory Board on every member at least 15 days before such meeting along with list of business is compulsory unless an emergent meeting is called by the Chairman in which case a notice giving such reasonable time as the Chairman may consider necessary shall be sufficient.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court was of the opinion that the challenge of the appellant with regard to validity of the recommendations made by Advisory Board as regards the standards and specifications of houses for tea garden labourers on the ground that no notice of the meeting of the said Advisory Board was served on any of the representatives of the employers appears to be genuine.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court allowing the appeal held that they are unable to accept the findings of the Single Judge with regard to the validity of the recommendations made by the Advisory Board.[Fortuna Agro Plantation Ltd. v. State of Tripura, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/2OXFdm5Y\"><b>2021 SCC OnLine Tri 46<\/b><\/a>, decided on 13-09-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #333300;\">Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Advocates before the Court:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For Appellant(s): Mr S.M. Chakraborty and Ms P. Sen<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For Respondent(s): Mr D. Sharma<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tripura High Court: The Division Bench of Akil Kureshi, CJ. and S.G. Chattopadhyay, J., allowed an appeal which was filed challenging the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[45489,29785,28244,47042,2525],"class_list":["post-254223","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-advisory-board","tag-law","tag-service-of-notice","tag-tea-estate","tag-Tripura_High_Court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Tri HC | Service of notice of meetings of the advisory board necessary specifying list of business to be transacted; Court allows appeal explaining Tripura Plantation Labour Rules, 1954 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Tripura Plantation Labour Rules\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/15\/tripura-plantation-labour-rules\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tri HC | Service of notice of meetings of the advisory board necessary specifying list of business to be transacted; Court allows appeal explaining Tripura Plantation Labour Rules, 1954\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tripura Plantation Labour Rules\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/15\/tripura-plantation-labour-rules\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-09-15T06:30:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-09-23T12:09:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Tripura-High-Court-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/15\/tripura-plantation-labour-rules\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/15\/tripura-plantation-labour-rules\/\",\"name\":\"Tri HC | Service of notice of meetings of the advisory board necessary specifying list of business to be transacted; Court allows appeal explaining Tripura Plantation Labour Rules, 1954 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-09-15T06:30:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-09-23T12:09:52+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Tripura Plantation Labour Rules\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/15\/tripura-plantation-labour-rules\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/15\/tripura-plantation-labour-rules\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/15\/tripura-plantation-labour-rules\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tri HC | Service of notice of meetings of the advisory board necessary specifying list of business to be transacted; Court allows appeal explaining Tripura Plantation Labour Rules, 1954\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tri HC | Service of notice of meetings of the advisory board necessary specifying list of business to be transacted; Court allows appeal explaining Tripura Plantation Labour Rules, 1954 | SCC Times","description":"Tripura Plantation Labour Rules","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/15\/tripura-plantation-labour-rules\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tri HC | Service of notice of meetings of the advisory board necessary specifying list of business to be transacted; Court allows appeal explaining Tripura Plantation Labour Rules, 1954","og_description":"Tripura Plantation Labour Rules","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/15\/tripura-plantation-labour-rules\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-09-15T06:30:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-09-23T12:09:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Tripura-High-Court-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/15\/tripura-plantation-labour-rules\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/15\/tripura-plantation-labour-rules\/","name":"Tri HC | Service of notice of meetings of the advisory board necessary specifying list of business to be transacted; Court allows appeal explaining Tripura Plantation Labour Rules, 1954 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-09-15T06:30:54+00:00","dateModified":"2021-09-23T12:09:52+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Tripura Plantation Labour Rules","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/15\/tripura-plantation-labour-rules\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/15\/tripura-plantation-labour-rules\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/15\/tripura-plantation-labour-rules\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tri HC | Service of notice of meetings of the advisory board necessary specifying list of business to be transacted; Court allows appeal explaining Tripura Plantation Labour Rules, 1954"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":325397,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/no-appeal-lies-u-s-54-land-acquisition-act-1894-against-order-of-executing-court-trihc\/","url_meta":{"origin":254223,"position":0},"title":"No appeal lies u\/s 54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 against orders of Executing Court: Tripura High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"July 1, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The appellant filed an objection before the Executing Court to delete their name from the execution proceeding and to insert the name of Executive Engineer PWD, NH Division as Judgment debtor but the Executing Court disposed of objection on the ground that matter was already decided.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tripura High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":197555,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/26\/mere-filing-of-an-appeal-does-not-stay-the-order-appealed-against\/","url_meta":{"origin":254223,"position":1},"title":"Mere filing of an appeal does not stay the order appealed against","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Ajay Rastogi, CJ and Arindam Lodh, JJ. dismissed an intra court appeal filed against the order of learned Single Judge directing the appellant-Corporation to consider the appointment of Respondent 1 in accordance with the \u2018die-in-harness\u2019 scheme. Husband of Respondent 1 was in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":327401,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/26\/trihc-dismisses-appeal-filed-u-s-100-cpc-as-there-was-no-material-to-formulate-any-substantial-question-of-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":254223,"position":2},"title":"\u2018No material to formulate any substantial question of law\u2019; Tripura HC dismisses appeal filed u\/S 100 of CPC","author":"Simranjeet","date":"July 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u2018The contention that the appeal is not maintainable under Section 100 of CPC cannot be accepted, rather the appeal filed by appellant is maintainable before the Court as the order of Additional District Judge is a decree.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tripura High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Tripura-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313458,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/trihc-upholds-discharge-order-of-judicial-officer-who-approached-minister-for-transfer-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":254223,"position":3},"title":"Tripura HC upholds discharge order of Judicial Officer, who approached Minister of State for Social Justice and Empowerment for his transfer","author":"Simranjeet","date":"February 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe service rule of petitioner being a Judicial Officer is covered by Tripura Judicial Service Rules, 2003 and the ambit of Article 311 of the Constitution pertains to permanent employees and not probationer Judicial Officer.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"tripura high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/tripura-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/tripura-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/tripura-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/tripura-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":318942,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/31\/karta-cannot-start-business-with-risks-charge-joint-family-property-with-payment-of-monies-borrowed-for-business-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":254223,"position":4},"title":"Never Reported Judgment | Karta cannot start a business attendant with risks and charge joint family property with payment of monies borrowed for business [(1953) 1 SCC 241]","author":"Simranjeet","date":"March 31, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"This report covers the Supreme Court's Never Reported Judgment dating back to the year 1953 on rights\/powers\/duties of a Karta in relation to joint family property.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"duties of a Karta","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/duties-of-a-Karta.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/duties-of-a-Karta.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/duties-of-a-Karta.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/duties-of-a-Karta.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298805,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/07\/calcutta-hc-rejected-plea-challenging-minimum-wage-advisory-for-tea-plantations\/","url_meta":{"origin":254223,"position":5},"title":"Calcutta High Court rejects plea challenging Minimum Wage Advisory for Tea plantations in West Bengal","author":"Ritu","date":"August 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that tea plantation owners cannot challenge Government's Wage Enhancements after willingly accepting them for so long.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254223","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=254223"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/254223\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=254223"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=254223"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=254223"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}