{"id":253653,"date":"2021-09-03T18:00:08","date_gmt":"2021-09-03T12:30:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=253653"},"modified":"2021-09-04T12:27:38","modified_gmt":"2021-09-04T06:57:38","slug":"representation-by-advocates-before-labour-courts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/03\/representation-by-advocates-before-labour-courts\/","title":{"rendered":"Representation by Advocates before Labour Courts: Del HC reiterates there is no absolute bar"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: <\/strong>Prathiba M. Singh, J.,\u00a0while reiterating that there is no absolute bar on legal practitioners representing Management before Labour Courts, observed that:<\/p>\n

\n

Judicial decisions on the question of consent, including implied consent, have primarily turned on the facts of each case.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Instant petition challenged the order by which Counsel for the Petitioner-Management was not permitted to represent his client before the Industrial Tribunal.<\/p>\n

Counsel for Petitioner-Management submitted that the impugned order was completely contrary to the prevailing law on the issue inasmuch as Advocates are permitted to represent the management, so long as there was no objection by the workman or the litigation expenses were paid.<\/p>\n

Further, the Counsel submitted that the authorized representative of the Management was appearing at the time when pleadings were being exchanged and other procedural formalities were being completed. However, when the matter reached the stage of trial, the Management thought it fit to engage the services of an Advocate for tendering evidence and conducting cross-examination. Accordingly, Counsel Sabharwal had been engaged in the matter.<\/p>\n

Adding to the above, Counsel submitted that it is the usual practice before Labour Courts that Advocates appear and represent the management as well as the workmen.<\/p>\n

In the present case, Rajesh Khanna was an authorized representative for the Workmen and one such representative of the trade union, regularly appearing for workmen before the Labour Courts. He submits that the Management would be enormously prejudiced if the Workmen are permitted to be represented by an expert and the Management is not allowed to engage an Advocate.<\/p>\n

Analysis, Law and Decision<\/span><\/h3>\n

Question for consideration is in respect of the representation of Advocates before the Labour Courts.<\/p>\n

As per Section 36(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, both parties i.e., the workmen and the management, are permitted to be represented by a legal practitioner with the consent of the other party and with the leave of the Court<\/p>\n

From the judgement in Paradip Port Trust, Paradip v. Workmen,<\/em> (1977) 2 SCC 339<\/a>, <\/span>it is clear that there is no absolute bar and if consent is given by the workmen, a lawyer can appear before the Labour Court.<\/p>\n

Whether there was consent \u2013 implied or expressed, and whether leave ought to be granted by the Adjudicator concerned.<\/p>\n

In the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Thyssen Krupp Industries India Private Limited v. Suresh Maruti Chougule<\/em> [Civil Appeal No. 6586\/2019]<\/span>, the clear conclusion would be that a legal practitioner can represent the management before the Labour Court, if the litigation expenses for the workman to engage the advocate are paid by the management.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026as the matter reaches trial, it would be inapt to say that the management or the workmen would not be entitled to engage Advocates or legal practitioners to represent them, in accordance with law. If the Management wishes to be represented by a legal practitioner, the Court can consider the question of whether the workman has given consent or not, whether impliedly or otherwise. \u201c<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Court directed that the parties shall appear before the Labour Court on 20-09-2021.[A&B Fashions (P) Ltd. v. Ramesh Kumar, WP (C) 8929 of 2021, decided on 24-08-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Advocates before the Court:<\/strong><\/p>\n

For the Petitioner: Vinay Sabharwal, Advocate<\/p>\n

Mr Raj Birbal, Ms Raavi Birbal and Mr Gunjan Singh, Advocates assisting the Court<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: Prathiba M. Singh, J.,\u00a0while reiterating that there is no absolute bar on legal practitioners representing Management before Labour Courts, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[7141,2543,9931,29785,3392],"class_list":["post-253653","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-advocates","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-labour-court","tag-law","tag-Workmen"],"yoast_head":"\nRepresentation by Advocates before Labour Courts: Del HC reiterates there is no absolute bar | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/03\/representation-by-advocates-before-labour-courts\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Representation by Advocates before Labour Courts: Del HC reiterates there is no absolute bar\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: Prathiba M. Singh, J.,\u00a0while reiterating that there is no absolute bar on legal practitioners representing Management before Labour Courts,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/03\/representation-by-advocates-before-labour-courts\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-09-03T12:30:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-09-04T06:57:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/03\/representation-by-advocates-before-labour-courts\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/03\/representation-by-advocates-before-labour-courts\/\",\"name\":\"Representation by Advocates before Labour Courts: Del HC reiterates there is no absolute bar | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-09-03T12:30:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-09-04T06:57:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/03\/representation-by-advocates-before-labour-courts\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/03\/representation-by-advocates-before-labour-courts\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/03\/representation-by-advocates-before-labour-courts\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Representation by Advocates before Labour Courts: Del HC reiterates there is no absolute bar\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Representation by Advocates before Labour Courts: Del HC reiterates there is no absolute bar | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/03\/representation-by-advocates-before-labour-courts\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Representation by Advocates before Labour Courts: Del HC reiterates there is no absolute bar","og_description":"Delhi High Court: Prathiba M. Singh, J.,\u00a0while reiterating that there is no absolute bar on legal practitioners representing Management before Labour Courts,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/03\/representation-by-advocates-before-labour-courts\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-09-03T12:30:08+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-09-04T06:57:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/03\/representation-by-advocates-before-labour-courts\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/03\/representation-by-advocates-before-labour-courts\/","name":"Representation by Advocates before Labour Courts: Del HC reiterates there is no absolute bar | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-09-03T12:30:08+00:00","dateModified":"2021-09-04T06:57:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/03\/representation-by-advocates-before-labour-courts\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/03\/representation-by-advocates-before-labour-courts\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/03\/representation-by-advocates-before-labour-courts\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Representation by Advocates before Labour Courts: Del HC reiterates there is no absolute bar"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":217473,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/30\/mp-hc-in-absence-of-consent-or-in-case-of-opposition-by-a-party-before-labour-court-the-other-party-cannot-be-permitted-to-be-represented-through-advocate\/","url_meta":{"origin":253653,"position":0},"title":"MP HC | In absence of consent or in case of opposition by a party before Labour Court, other party cannot be permitted to be represented through advocate","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court:\u00a0Prakash Shrivastava, J. allowed the petition of the petitioner and held that in the absence of consent or in case of opposition by a party before the Labour Court, the other party cannot be permitted to be represented through an advocate as per Section 36(3) and (4)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":366762,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/15\/jhar-hc-workman-appearing-through-advocate-deemed-consent-employes-legal-representation\/","url_meta":{"origin":253653,"position":1},"title":"Workman appearing through advocate constitutes deemed consent for employer’s legal representation: Jharkhand High Court","author":"Editor","date":"November 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe complete embargo on the appearance of Advocates in Industrial adjudication is confined to conciliation proceedings alone.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Workman appearing through advocate deemed consent","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Workman-appearing-through-advocate-deemed-consent.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Workman-appearing-through-advocate-deemed-consent.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Workman-appearing-through-advocate-deemed-consent.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Workman-appearing-through-advocate-deemed-consent.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296257,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/07\/delhi-hc-dismiss-pil-challenging-method-of-empanelment-gov-advocates-representing-uoi\/","url_meta":{"origin":253653,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court dismisses PIL challenging method of empanelment of Government Advocates by calling it a ‘Publicity Interest Litigation’","author":"Arunima","date":"July 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court observed that it seems that the petitioner, who is an Advocate, filed the present petition after being a beneficiary of the very same process only because he has been denied extension or reappointment.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279379,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/09\/first-year-law-student-appears-as-proxy-counsel-before-trial-court-delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-cautions-law-students-from-appearing-before-court-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":253653,"position":3},"title":"First-year law student appears as proxy counsel before Trial Court; Delhi High Court quashes FIR but after cautioning law students from indulging in such acts","author":"Editor","date":"December 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court observed that a law student shall not represent a party or provide legal counsel in any legal proceeding before a court of law before being properly enrolled by a bar council and being admitted to the bar.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":294406,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/12\/delhi-high-court-enhances-compensation-illegal-termination-workman-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":253653,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court enhances compensation from Rs 50,000 to Rs. 1,50,000 for illegal termination of \u2018workman\u2019","author":"Arunima","date":"June 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court observed that Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. R. Rajappa, 1978 (3) SCR 207 acts as a North star for the courts to reach the conclusion regarding the applicability of the Industrial Dispute Act to an organization by laying down elaborate guidelines with respect to the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282453,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/25\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-registered-against-law-intern-who-projected-himself-as-proxy-counsel-on-instructions-of-his-advocate\/","url_meta":{"origin":253653,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court quashes FIR registered against the law intern who projected himself as a proxy counsel on the instructions of his Advocate","author":"Editor","date":"January 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR registered against the law intern who projected himself as a proxy counsel on the instructions of his Advocate and the Court observed that the law interns who were merely students should be counselled, properly informed, and instructed instead of registering FIRs against them.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253653","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=253653"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253653\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=253653"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=253653"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=253653"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}