{"id":253585,"date":"2021-09-02T18:00:00","date_gmt":"2021-09-02T12:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=253585"},"modified":"2021-09-02T17:41:54","modified_gmt":"2021-09-02T12:11:54","slug":"national-flag-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/02\/national-flag-2\/","title":{"rendered":"MP HC | Flag Code is not \u201claw\u201d under Art. 13 of Constitution, but mere compendium of executive instructions; flying of National Flag between sunset and sunrise not contemptuous"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/strong> S.A. Dharmadhikari, J., allowed a petition which was filed invoking inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quashment of FIR registered alleging offence punishable under Section 2 of the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971 (1971 Act).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A complaint was lodged by Sweety Rajawat, Sub Inspector that she found that in the compound of Balaji ITI College, Gurudwara Road, Sabalgarh, the national flag continued to remain hoisted till 8.30 PM and, as such, intentional insult to National Flag was being caused. Counsel for the petitioners submitted that even if the allegations contained in the FIR are treated to be true, then too they do not constitute any offence as alleged.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court perused Section 2 of 1971 Act and derived that it attracts punishment of imprisonment for a term of three years or with fine or both when a person is found in public place within public view burning mutilating, defacing, defiling, disfiguring, destroying, trampling upon or bringing or otherwise bringing into contempt by words spoken or written or by act begin the Indian National Flag. It was further noted that allegation against petitioners is of leaving National Flag at hoisted position at about 8.30 PM i.e. between sunset and sunrise and that <strong><em>act of petitioners does not squarely fall within Section\u00a0 2 of 1971 Act. Thus, the act of leaving the National Flag in hoisted position even after sunset may be an act of advertent or inadvertent forgetfulness and subject matter of misconduct but not contemptuous unless it is shown that hoisting and flying the National Flag between sunset and sunrise is expressly prescribed as an offence in specific terms.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>The fundamental rule of interpretation of penal provision requires that every penal provision is to be interpreted strictly. If an act does not fall within the four corners of the offence described by the statute, then the said act cannot suffer rigors of penal provision.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Reliance was placed on the Supreme Court judgment in <em>R. Kalyani v. Janak C. Mehta<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Rl31LT8d\">(2009) 1 SCC 516<\/a> and it was evident that the act of leaving the National Flag at hoisted position between sunset and sunrise does not satisfy the ingredients which constitute the offence punishable under Section 2 of 1971 Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for respondents submitted that Clause of Section 2 (2.2)(xi) of the Indian Flag Code, 2002 states that allowing National Flag to remain hoisted between sunset and sunrise was prohibited.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court perused the abovementioned section and was of the view that the said Flag Code is not \u201claw\u201d as defined in Article 13 of Constitution of India and is a mere compendium of executive instructions as held by the Supreme Court in <em>Union of India v. Naveen Jindal<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/M2Ih73Aj\">(2004) 2 SCC 510<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court finally held <em>that since the Flag Code does not have any statutory force it cannot attract any offence. <\/em>The Court allowed the petition and quashed all the consequential proceedings explaining that, the Flag Code laid down that as far as possible National Flag should be flown between sunrise and sunset which meant that it should not be flown between sunset and sunrise. Use of expression &#8220;as far as possible&#8221; in the said clause of Flag Code, which was a mere instruction, was sufficient for this Court to conclude that flying of National Flag between sunset and sunrise was not prohibited by law.[Gaurishankar Garg v. State of M.P., M.Cr.C. No.18186 of 2021, decided on 24-08-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #003300;\">Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><strong>Advocates before the Court:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the petitioners: Mr Vivek Khedkar<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the respondent\/State: Mr Manish Nayak<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madhya Pradesh High Court: S.A. Dharmadhikari, J., allowed a petition which was filed invoking inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[35491,29785,7201,11581,45629],"class_list":["post-253585","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-flag-code","tag-law","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-national-flag","tag-public-place"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>MP HC | Flag Code is not \u201claw\u201d under Art. 13 of Constitution, but mere compendium of executive instructions; flying of National Flag between sunset and sunrise not contemptuous | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"National Flag\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/02\/national-flag-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP HC | Flag Code is not \u201claw\u201d under Art. 13 of Constitution, but mere compendium of executive instructions; flying of National Flag between sunset and sunrise not contemptuous\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"National Flag\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/02\/national-flag-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-09-02T12:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/02\/national-flag-2\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/02\/national-flag-2\/\",\"name\":\"MP HC | Flag Code is not \u201claw\u201d under Art. 13 of Constitution, but mere compendium of executive instructions; flying of National Flag between sunset and sunrise not contemptuous | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-09-02T12:30:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"National Flag\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/02\/national-flag-2\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/02\/national-flag-2\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/02\/national-flag-2\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP HC | Flag Code is not \u201claw\u201d under Art. 13 of Constitution, but mere compendium of executive instructions; flying of National Flag between sunset and sunrise not contemptuous\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP HC | Flag Code is not \u201claw\u201d under Art. 13 of Constitution, but mere compendium of executive instructions; flying of National Flag between sunset and sunrise not contemptuous | SCC Times","description":"National Flag","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/02\/national-flag-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP HC | Flag Code is not \u201claw\u201d under Art. 13 of Constitution, but mere compendium of executive instructions; flying of National Flag between sunset and sunrise not contemptuous","og_description":"National Flag","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/02\/national-flag-2\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-09-02T12:30:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/02\/national-flag-2\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/02\/national-flag-2\/","name":"MP HC | Flag Code is not \u201claw\u201d under Art. 13 of Constitution, but mere compendium of executive instructions; flying of National Flag between sunset and sunrise not contemptuous | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-09-02T12:30:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"National Flag","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/02\/national-flag-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/02\/national-flag-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/02\/national-flag-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP HC | Flag Code is not \u201claw\u201d under Art. 13 of Constitution, but mere compendium of executive instructions; flying of National Flag between sunset and sunrise not contemptuous"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":355745,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/05\/not-lowering-national-flag-after-sunset-kerala-hc-criminal-case-quashed\/","url_meta":{"origin":253585,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Mere lapse in not lowering National Flag after sunset not gross affront or insult\u2019; Kerala HC quashes criminal case dating back to 2015","author":"Apoorva","date":"August 5, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cTo attract the offence under Section 2 of the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971, a person should burn, mutilate, deface, defile, disfigure, destroy, trample upon or otherwise show disrespect to or bring into contempt, the Indian National Flag or the Constitution of India or any part thereof,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"not lowering National Flag after sunset","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/not-lowering-National-Flag-after-sunset.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/not-lowering-National-Flag-after-sunset.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/not-lowering-National-Flag-after-sunset.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/not-lowering-National-Flag-after-sunset.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":376886,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/26\/bombay-hc-intention-to-insult-essential-under-national-honour-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":253585,"position":1},"title":"&#8220;Intention to insult is essential under the National Honour Act&#8221;: Bombay HC quashes FIR against 85-year-old over alleged inverted display of the National Flag","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"February 26, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cNeither the statement of the watchman nor any material collected by the prosecution on record indicated that the applicant hoisted or displayed the Indian National Flag, or was involved in its display, on 26 January 2017.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Honour Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/National-Honour-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/National-Honour-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/National-Honour-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/National-Honour-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":355675,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/05\/ph-hc-denies-pre-arrest-bail-for-hoisting-saffron-flag-on-mosque\/","url_meta":{"origin":253585,"position":2},"title":"Punjab &amp; Haryana High Court denies anticipatory bail to person accused of hoisting saffron flag on Mosque","author":"Editor","date":"August 5, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The accused had hoisted a saffron flag on a Mosque, replacing the National Flag already in place with an intent to hurt religious feelings of the members of Muslim community.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"saffron flag on Mosque","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/saffron-flag-on-Mosque.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/saffron-flag-on-Mosque.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/saffron-flag-on-Mosque.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/saffron-flag-on-Mosque.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214826,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/17\/mp-hc-no-mandate-in-flag-code-that-national-flag-should-be-hoisted-on-all-days-on-public-buildings\/","url_meta":{"origin":253585,"position":3},"title":"MP HC | No mandate in Flag Code that National Flag should be hoisted on all days on public buildings","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of S.K. Seth, CJ and Vijay Kumar Shukla, J. dismissed a petition seeking orders for compulsory hoisting of National Flags on every public building every day. The petition was filed suggesting a change in the Flag Code of India, 2002 (FCOI). The present\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":333277,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/17\/salute-tricolour-21-times-while-saying-bharat-mata-ki-jai-mp-hc-grants-bail-to-accused-for-shouting-pakistan-zindabad-hindustan-murdabad-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":253585,"position":4},"title":"\u201cSay \u2018Bharat Mata ki Jai\u2019, Salute tricolour 21 times\u201d; MP HC grants bail to accused for shouting \u201cPakistan Zindabad, Hindustan Murdabad\u201d","author":"Ritu","date":"October 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court opined that applicant may be released on bail by imposing some conditions which may enthuse in him the sense of responsibility and a pride for the country in which he is born and living.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250745,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/05\/national-flag\/","url_meta":{"origin":253585,"position":5},"title":"Gau HC | Is using of National Flag as a table cloth Sedition? HC grants bail to the woman accused of willfully dishonouring the National Flag","author":"Editor","date":"July 5, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court: Manish Choudhury, J., granted bail to the woman charged with sedition for using National Flag as a table cloth. The petitioner, Ms Rajina Parbin Sultana was booked under Sections 120B\/124A IPC and Section 2 of the Prevention of Insult to National Honour Act, 1971 and had been\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253585","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=253585"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253585\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=253585"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=253585"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=253585"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}