{"id":253400,"date":"2021-08-30T17:00:39","date_gmt":"2021-08-30T11:30:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=253400"},"modified":"2021-08-30T14:04:43","modified_gmt":"2021-08-30T08:34:43","slug":"guj-hc-distinction-between-the-law-and-order-and-the-public-order-needs-to-be-kept-in-mind-court-decides-in-matter-of-detention-under-gujarat-land-grabbing-proh","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/30\/guj-hc-distinction-between-the-law-and-order-and-the-public-order-needs-to-be-kept-in-mind-court-decides-in-matter-of-detention-under-gujarat-land-grabbing-proh\/","title":{"rendered":"Guj HC | Distinction between \u2018the law and order\u2019 and \u2018the public order\u2019 needs to be kept in mind; Court decides in matter of detention under Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Gujarat High Court:<\/strong> Paresh Upadhyay, J., allowed petitions which were filed against the order\u00a0 passed by the District Magistrate whereby the petitioners were treated as \u2018property grabbers\u2019 and were detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985. The execution of the impugned orders was suspended by this Court and the petitioners were directed to be released.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that t the justification put forward by the State Authorities to resort to PASA is that, had that not been done the petitioners would have taken help of advocates for continuing illegal activities.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>If any citizen faces action from the State and if he resorts to the legal remedy available to him, and if the citizen is protected, any attempt to obstruct it, may be viewed very seriously and even the option of initiating proceedings under the Contempt of Court Act, can also be explored. <\/em><\/strong>However, the matter here had not reached that far.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court found that the detaining authority had exercised the powers, treating the petitioners as \u2018property grabbers\u2019 within the meaning of Section 2(h) of the Act. The FIR, which was the basis to treat the petitioners as such persons as referred to in the impugned orders and further details in that regard were on record. After perusal of which the Court found that the detaining authority fell in error in treating the activities of the petitioner as prejudicial to the maintenance of the public order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court relying on the Supreme Court judgment in <em>Pushker Mukherjee v. State of West Bengal<\/em>, AIR 1970 SC 852 explained that distinction between \u2018the law and order\u2019 and \u2018the public order\u2019 needs to be kept in mind. The Court was of the opinion that the impugned order had failed this test. The Court further noted that the grounds of the detention, the detaining authority had recorded to the effect that, according to him, <em>the activities of the petitioner create a sense of alarm and feeling of insecurity in the minds of public at large, however on weighing this vis-a-vis the material on record, the citation of such words was more in the nature of rituals rather than with any significance to the alleged activities of the petitioner.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court allowing the petitions upheld the order of setting petitioners at liberty and further noted that on the basis of FIR <em>at least four detention orders are passed and two of them are ladies. The complainant resides at Mumbai. The enthusiasm on the part of the State Authorities to throw the weight of the State in favour of one of the contesting parties, in the matters of private property disputes, may lend the State in embarrassing position one day. Further, in the property disputes &#8211; the financial stakes from both the sides may be very high. This may also lead to temptation to one of the parties, for soliciting help from the revenue and the police officers, for the considerations less known to law. These are the dangers which need to be kept in view by the Higher Authorities of the State.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[Ramjibhai Nathubhai Charola v. State of Gujarat, R\/Special Civil Application No. 424 of 2021, decided on 25-08-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #003366;\">Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the Petitioners: Mr O I Pathan<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the Respondents: Mr Hardik Soni<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court: Paresh Upadhyay, J., allowed petitions which were filed against the order\u00a0 passed by the District Magistrate whereby the petitioners <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":206146,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-253400","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Guj HC | Distinction between \u2018the law and order\u2019 and \u2018the public order\u2019 needs to be kept in mind; Court decides in matter of detention under Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/30\/guj-hc-distinction-between-the-law-and-order-and-the-public-order-needs-to-be-kept-in-mind-court-decides-in-matter-of-detention-under-gujarat-land-grabbing-proh\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Guj HC | Distinction between \u2018the law and order\u2019 and \u2018the public order\u2019 needs to be kept in mind; Court decides in matter of detention under Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Gujarat High Court: Paresh Upadhyay, J., allowed petitions which were filed against the order\u00a0 passed by the District Magistrate whereby the petitioners\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/30\/guj-hc-distinction-between-the-law-and-order-and-the-public-order-needs-to-be-kept-in-mind-court-decides-in-matter-of-detention-under-gujarat-land-grabbing-proh\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-08-30T11:30:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/30\/guj-hc-distinction-between-the-law-and-order-and-the-public-order-needs-to-be-kept-in-mind-court-decides-in-matter-of-detention-under-gujarat-land-grabbing-proh\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/30\/guj-hc-distinction-between-the-law-and-order-and-the-public-order-needs-to-be-kept-in-mind-court-decides-in-matter-of-detention-under-gujarat-land-grabbing-proh\/\",\"name\":\"Guj HC | Distinction between \u2018the law and order\u2019 and \u2018the public order\u2019 needs to be kept in mind; Court decides in matter of detention under Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/30\/guj-hc-distinction-between-the-law-and-order-and-the-public-order-needs-to-be-kept-in-mind-court-decides-in-matter-of-detention-under-gujarat-land-grabbing-proh\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/30\/guj-hc-distinction-between-the-law-and-order-and-the-public-order-needs-to-be-kept-in-mind-court-decides-in-matter-of-detention-under-gujarat-land-grabbing-proh\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-08-30T11:30:39+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/30\/guj-hc-distinction-between-the-law-and-order-and-the-public-order-needs-to-be-kept-in-mind-court-decides-in-matter-of-detention-under-gujarat-land-grabbing-proh\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/30\/guj-hc-distinction-between-the-law-and-order-and-the-public-order-needs-to-be-kept-in-mind-court-decides-in-matter-of-detention-under-gujarat-land-grabbing-proh\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/30\/guj-hc-distinction-between-the-law-and-order-and-the-public-order-needs-to-be-kept-in-mind-court-decides-in-matter-of-detention-under-gujarat-land-grabbing-proh\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/30\/guj-hc-distinction-between-the-law-and-order-and-the-public-order-needs-to-be-kept-in-mind-court-decides-in-matter-of-detention-under-gujarat-land-grabbing-proh\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Guj HC | Distinction between \u2018the law and order\u2019 and \u2018the public order\u2019 needs to be kept in mind; Court decides in matter of detention under Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Guj HC | Distinction between \u2018the law and order\u2019 and \u2018the public order\u2019 needs to be kept in mind; Court decides in matter of detention under Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/30\/guj-hc-distinction-between-the-law-and-order-and-the-public-order-needs-to-be-kept-in-mind-court-decides-in-matter-of-detention-under-gujarat-land-grabbing-proh\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Guj HC | Distinction between \u2018the law and order\u2019 and \u2018the public order\u2019 needs to be kept in mind; Court decides in matter of detention under Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020","og_description":"Gujarat High Court: Paresh Upadhyay, J., allowed petitions which were filed against the order\u00a0 passed by the District Magistrate whereby the petitioners","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/30\/guj-hc-distinction-between-the-law-and-order-and-the-public-order-needs-to-be-kept-in-mind-court-decides-in-matter-of-detention-under-gujarat-land-grabbing-proh\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-08-30T11:30:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/30\/guj-hc-distinction-between-the-law-and-order-and-the-public-order-needs-to-be-kept-in-mind-court-decides-in-matter-of-detention-under-gujarat-land-grabbing-proh\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/30\/guj-hc-distinction-between-the-law-and-order-and-the-public-order-needs-to-be-kept-in-mind-court-decides-in-matter-of-detention-under-gujarat-land-grabbing-proh\/","name":"Guj HC | Distinction between \u2018the law and order\u2019 and \u2018the public order\u2019 needs to be kept in mind; Court decides in matter of detention under Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/30\/guj-hc-distinction-between-the-law-and-order-and-the-public-order-needs-to-be-kept-in-mind-court-decides-in-matter-of-detention-under-gujarat-land-grabbing-proh\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/30\/guj-hc-distinction-between-the-law-and-order-and-the-public-order-needs-to-be-kept-in-mind-court-decides-in-matter-of-detention-under-gujarat-land-grabbing-proh\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg","datePublished":"2021-08-30T11:30:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/30\/guj-hc-distinction-between-the-law-and-order-and-the-public-order-needs-to-be-kept-in-mind-court-decides-in-matter-of-detention-under-gujarat-land-grabbing-proh\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/30\/guj-hc-distinction-between-the-law-and-order-and-the-public-order-needs-to-be-kept-in-mind-court-decides-in-matter-of-detention-under-gujarat-land-grabbing-proh\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/30\/guj-hc-distinction-between-the-law-and-order-and-the-public-order-needs-to-be-kept-in-mind-court-decides-in-matter-of-detention-under-gujarat-land-grabbing-proh\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/30\/guj-hc-distinction-between-the-law-and-order-and-the-public-order-needs-to-be-kept-in-mind-court-decides-in-matter-of-detention-under-gujarat-land-grabbing-proh\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Guj HC | Distinction between \u2018the law and order\u2019 and \u2018the public order\u2019 needs to be kept in mind; Court decides in matter of detention under Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":322595,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/21\/gujarat-hc-orders-reinstatement-for-wrongful-termination-forest-department-workers-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":253400,"position":0},"title":"&#8216;The forest department workers were thrown out of service to deprive them of benefits of regular services\u2019; Gujarat HC orders reinstatement for wrongful termination","author":"Editor","date":"May 21, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe act of terminating services of the petitioners, so as to deprive them of the benefits of Government Resolution was illegal and contrary to the principles of natural justice.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Gujarat High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":149954,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/16\/gujarat-hc-issues-directions-for-common-counselling-by-state-for-management-quota-seats-in-ayurveda-colleges\/","url_meta":{"origin":253400,"position":1},"title":"Gujarat HC issues directions for common counselling by State for management quota seats in Ayurveda Colleges","author":"Saba","date":"August 16, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: The High Court recently quashed the Rules framed under the Gujarat Professional Medical Educational Colleges or Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fees) Act, 2007 permitting common counselling for admissions to management quota seats in the courses of Bachelor of Ayurveda, Medicine & Surgery (BAMS), Bachelor\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":342470,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/27\/gujarat-hc-allows-law-graduates-from-allegedly-unrecognized-institute-to-participate-in-civil-judge-recruitment-process\/","url_meta":{"origin":253400,"position":2},"title":"Gujarat HC allows two law graduates from allegedly unrecognized institute to participate in Civil Judge recruitment process","author":"Editor","date":"February 27, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioners had completed their LL.B., but disputes had arisen as to the recognition of their college as a recognized institute.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Gujarat High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":184624,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/30\/period-service-completed-prior-regularisation-counted-towards-pensionary-benefits\/","url_meta":{"origin":253400,"position":3},"title":"Period of service completed prior to regularisation, would be counted towards pensionary benefits","author":"Saba","date":"January 30, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: A petition filed by the aggrieved under Articles 14, 16 and 226 of the Constitution, for denial of pensionary benefits was heard by the Bench of Mohinder Pal, J. The petitioners were unskilled labourers on daily wage contract under Deesa Irrigation Division in the year 1972. According\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/GujHC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324365,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/14\/gujarat-hc-stays-release-movie-maharaj-on-netflix-featuring-amir-khan-son-junaid-khan\/","url_meta":{"origin":253400,"position":4},"title":"Gujarat HC stays release of the movie &#8216;Maharaj&#8217; on Netflix, featuring Amir Khan\u2019s son, Junaid Khan","author":"Editor","date":"June 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The film is based on the Maharaj Libel Case of 1862 rendered by English Judges and allegedly contains scandalous and defamatory language, which affects the Pustimargi sect as a whole.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Gujarat High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Gujarat-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":354148,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/gujarat-hc-adoption-of-child-before-15-years-of-age\/","url_meta":{"origin":253400,"position":5},"title":"Gujarat HC: In absence of adoption\u2019s registered document, adoptive parents must establish that child is adopted before 15 years of age with wife\u2019s consent","author":"Nikita","date":"July 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cNo case is made out by the petitioners that a custom or usage is applicable to them which permitted adoption of a person who has attained the age of 15 years.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"adoption before 15 years","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/adoption-before-15-years.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/adoption-before-15-years.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/adoption-before-15-years.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/adoption-before-15-years.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253400","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=253400"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253400\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/206146"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=253400"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=253400"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=253400"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}