{"id":253202,"date":"2021-08-25T11:00:27","date_gmt":"2021-08-25T05:30:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=253202"},"modified":"2021-08-25T10:04:46","modified_gmt":"2021-08-25T04:34:46","slug":"supplementary-charge-sheet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/25\/supplementary-charge-sheet\/","title":{"rendered":"Kar HC | \u201cSupplementary charge sheet is only an additional material collected against the accused persons\u201d; S. 167(2) CrPC not applicable on supplementary charge sheets filed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Karnataka High Court: <\/strong>Rajendra Badamikar, J., dismissed the petition being devoid of merits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The factual matrix of the instant case is that the petitioner being accused 1 was prosecuted for the offences punishable under Sections 380, 457, 458, 382, 201 of Penal Code 1860 i.e. IPC and Section 25(IA) of the Arms Act, 1959. The petitioner was arrested on 06-02-2021 and the supplementary charge sheet was filed on 17-05-2021 under Section 173(8) of Criminal Procedure Code i.e. CrPC. A petition for statutory bail Section 167(2) CrPC was sought on ground that the charge sheet was not submitted within 90 days from the date of his arrest which was thereby rejected and then revision petition was filed which was also rejected. Hence instant petition was filed under Section 439 of CrPC, for setting aside the impugned order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the petitioner Anand R. Kolli submitted that arrest took place on 06-02-2021 and supplementary charge sheet was submitted on 17-05-2021 and as the supplementary charge sheet was not filed within 90 days, as per the statute, he is entitled for statutory bail.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for respondents Ramesh B. Chigari contended that the charge sheet was submitted against the present petitioner prior to his arrest only. Hence, the provisions of Section 167(2) of CrPC cannot be applicable to him.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that the petition is not maintainable as the charge sheet was submitted on 04-01-2021 and the present petitioner was arrayed as accused 1 in the charge sheet. The charge sheet was submitted for the offences punishable under Sections 380, 457, 458, 382, 201 of IPC and Section 25(I-A) of the Arms Act, 1959 against the present petitioner. However, as some of the accused were absconding, the investigation officer in his charge sheet itself sought leave of the Court to submit supplementary charge sheet in due course. The supplementary charge sheet was submitted on 17-05-2021 by collecting some additional material.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that as per Section 167(2) Cr.PC the Magistrate can order for detention of the accused for maximum 90 days or 60 days as the case may be if the charge sheet is not filed and investigation is not concluded from the date of arrest. <strong>Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C., is applicable only when charge sheet is not laid down and it starts operative when accused is arrested during the course of investigation, but if charge sheet is filed against particular accused and supplementary charge sheet is submitted against other accused or for additional evidence, the provisions of Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C., cannot be applicable.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court thus held <em>\u201cthe petition is devoid of any merits and is misconceived and hence, it needs to be rejected both on maintainability and as well as on merits.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[Santosh v. State of Karnataka, Criminal Petition No. 101403 of 2021, decided on 03-08-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #003300;\">Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court: Rajendra Badamikar, J., dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The factual matrix of the instant case is that <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[28334,29785,46835],"class_list":["post-253202","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-karnataka-high-court","tag-law","tag-supplementary-charge-sheet"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Kar HC | \u201cSupplementary charge sheet is only an additional material collected against the accused persons\u201d; S. 167(2) CrPC not applicable on supplementary charge sheets filed | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"supplementary charge sheet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/25\/supplementary-charge-sheet\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kar HC | \u201cSupplementary charge sheet is only an additional material collected against the accused persons\u201d; S. 167(2) CrPC not applicable on supplementary charge sheets filed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"supplementary charge sheet\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/25\/supplementary-charge-sheet\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-08-25T05:30:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/25\/supplementary-charge-sheet\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/25\/supplementary-charge-sheet\/\",\"name\":\"Kar HC | \u201cSupplementary charge sheet is only an additional material collected against the accused persons\u201d; S. 167(2) CrPC not applicable on supplementary charge sheets filed | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-08-25T05:30:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"supplementary charge sheet\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/25\/supplementary-charge-sheet\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/25\/supplementary-charge-sheet\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/25\/supplementary-charge-sheet\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kar HC | \u201cSupplementary charge sheet is only an additional material collected against the accused persons\u201d; S. 167(2) CrPC not applicable on supplementary charge sheets filed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kar HC | \u201cSupplementary charge sheet is only an additional material collected against the accused persons\u201d; S. 167(2) CrPC not applicable on supplementary charge sheets filed | SCC Times","description":"supplementary charge sheet","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/25\/supplementary-charge-sheet\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kar HC | \u201cSupplementary charge sheet is only an additional material collected against the accused persons\u201d; S. 167(2) CrPC not applicable on supplementary charge sheets filed","og_description":"supplementary charge sheet","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/25\/supplementary-charge-sheet\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-08-25T05:30:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/25\/supplementary-charge-sheet\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/25\/supplementary-charge-sheet\/","name":"Kar HC | \u201cSupplementary charge sheet is only an additional material collected against the accused persons\u201d; S. 167(2) CrPC not applicable on supplementary charge sheets filed | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-08-25T05:30:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"supplementary charge sheet","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/25\/supplementary-charge-sheet\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/25\/supplementary-charge-sheet\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/25\/supplementary-charge-sheet\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kar HC | \u201cSupplementary charge sheet is only an additional material collected against the accused persons\u201d; S. 167(2) CrPC not applicable on supplementary charge sheets filed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":105001,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/10\/proceedings-under-section-174-a-ipc-cant-be-initiated-unless-accused-is-declared-as-proclaimed-offender-by-competent-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":253202,"position":0},"title":"Proceedings under Section 174-A IPC can\u2019t be initiated unless accused is declared as proclaimed offender by competent court","author":"Saba","date":"February 10, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: The Court dealt with an important question of law in criminal proceedings in a case, where the process under Sections 82 and 83 CrPC was issued against the accused. While the statement of process server under Section 82 CrPC was recorded by the CMM, the process couldn\u2019t\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":251555,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/21\/right-of-default-bail\/","url_meta":{"origin":253202,"position":1},"title":"Chh HC | Right of default bail under S. 167(2) CrPC cannot be defeated by subsequent filing of charge-sheet on same day","author":"Editor","date":"July 21, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Narendra Kumar Vyas J. allowed the petition and set aside the impugned order. The facts of the case are such that the petitioner was found in possession of 145 strips of Spasmo Proxyvon Plus total of 1160 capsules and 90 strips total 720 capsules of Spasmo Proxyvon\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":362908,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/08\/bom-hc-orders-single-trial-in-case-with-multiple-charge-sheets\/","url_meta":{"origin":253202,"position":2},"title":"Bombay HC orders single trial in a case with multiple charge-sheets; first charge-sheet to be treated as principal and others as supplementary","author":"Editor","date":"October 8, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The accused had challenged the maintainability of five different charge-sheets which were the offshoots of a single Charge-sheet and were registered as five different cases before the Sessions Court.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"single trial in case with multiple charge-sheets","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/single-trial-in-case-with-multiple-charge-sheets.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/single-trial-in-case-with-multiple-charge-sheets.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/single-trial-in-case-with-multiple-charge-sheets.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/single-trial-in-case-with-multiple-charge-sheets.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323954,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/10\/del-hc-directs-investigation-officer-prompt-provide-digitised-hard-copies-supplementary-charge-sheet-accused-del-excise-policy-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":253202,"position":3},"title":"[Delhi Excise Policy] Delhi High Court directs IO to provide prompt hard and digitized copies of Supplementary Charge Sheet to accused upon filing","author":"Arunima","date":"June 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Keeping in view the rules of natural justice, fair trial and criminal jurisprudence, the accused will be entitled to supply of those additional documents which may be filed against the co-accused with whom he has been alleged to have conspired with and as stated above, to additionally address arguments on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":333630,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/23\/calcutta-hc-grants-bail-accused-under-ndps-act-failure-in-filing-fls-report-within-180-days-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":253202,"position":4},"title":"Calcutta HC grants bail to accused under NDPS Act due to failure in filing FLS Report within 180 days","author":"Editor","date":"October 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u2018In an NDPS case, if charge sheet is filed within 180 days from the date of arrest of the accused, no right of statutory bail accrues.\u2019","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":249735,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/14\/common-charge-sheet\/","url_meta":{"origin":253202,"position":5},"title":"Kar HC | IO filed common charge-sheet for various crimes registered in different Police Stations; Amalgamation of final reports in respect of different FIRs held to be impermissible","author":"Editor","date":"June 14, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: K. Natarajan, J., allowed the petition and quashed the impugned order. The facts of the case are such that accused 1 i.e. Greenbuds Agro Farms Limited Company and accused 2 to 5 are the Managing Directors and Directors of the said Company who are alleged to have\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253202","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=253202"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253202\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=253202"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=253202"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=253202"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}