{"id":252857,"date":"2021-08-18T15:00:31","date_gmt":"2021-08-18T09:30:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=252857"},"modified":"2021-08-20T09:50:51","modified_gmt":"2021-08-20T04:20:51","slug":"rent-act-would-not-come-to-the-aid-of-a-tenant-in-sufferance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/18\/rent-act-would-not-come-to-the-aid-of-a-tenant-in-sufferance\/","title":{"rendered":"Rent Act would not come to the aid of a \u201ctenant-\u00adin-\u00adsufferance\u201d vis-\u00ad\u00e0-\u00advis SARFAESI Act due to operation of S. 13(2) read with S. 13(13) of SARFAESI Act: SC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court: <\/strong>The Division Bench of S. Abdul Nazeer and Krishna Murari, JJ., addressed a pertinent issue of whether the rent act would come to the aid of a <em><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u201ctenant in sufferance\u201d<\/span>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Instant appeals were directed against the Orders passed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Esplanade, Mumbai rejecting the application filed by the appellant for restraining HDFC Bank, the first respondent from taking possession of the property in the appellant\u2019s possession.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Financial Facility of Rs 5,50,00,000 was granted by HDFC Bank Limited to respondents 2 and 3 (the borrowers). Borrowers had mortgaged a property (Secured Asset) in favour of the Bank with an intention to secure the said credit facility.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Later, the Borrowers accounts were declared at non-performing assets, the Bank issued a notice under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 to the Borrowers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Appellant submitted that he is the tenant of the Secured Asset and has been paying rent regularly to his landlord since inception of his tenancy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Appellant approached the Magistrate seeking protection of his possession of the Secured Asset as the Magistrate was ceased with the petition under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act filed by the respondent 1 \u2013 Bank. Though the magistrate had dismissed the registered tenancy placed on record by the appellant.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Analysis, Law and Decision<\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench noted that the appellant\u2019s case was that he is a tenant of the Secured Asset and has paid the rent in advance.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">However, in the detailed representation sent in response to the notice issued under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, the Borrowers did not claim that any tenant was staying at the Secured Asset.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The appellant provided a rent receipt claiming tenancy after the date of creation of mortgage.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Procedural mechanism for taking possession of the Secured Asset was provided under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act provides for the right of appeal to any person including the borrower to approach Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT). Section 17 has been amended by Act No. 44 of 2016 providing for challenging the measures to recover secured debts. Under the Amendment, possession can be restored to the borrower or such other aggrieved person.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">In the Supreme Court decision of <\/span><em style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\">Harshad Govardhan Sondagar v. International Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd., <\/em><span style=\"font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen-Sans, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/w534Xwu2\">(2014) 6 SCC 1<\/a>, it was held that the right of appeal is available to the tenant claiming under the borrower.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In <em>Kanaiyalal Lalchand Sachdev v. State of Maharashtra, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/m9xRRa7u\">(2011) 2 SCC 782<\/a>, this Court has held that DRT can not only set aside the action of the secured creditor but even restore the status quo ante.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Court stated that in view of the appeal being in pendency from 2016, this Court proposes to examine the case on merits without directing the appellant to avail the alternative remedy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A Three\u00ad Judge Bench of this Court in <em>Bajarang Shyamsunder Agarwal v. Central Bank of India, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/633d94od\">(2019) 9 SCC 94<\/a>, after considering almost all decisions of this Court, in relation to the right of a tenant in possession of the secured asset, has held that <em>if a valid tenancy under law is in existence even prior to the creation of the mortgage, such tenant\u2019s possession cannot be disturbed by the secured creditor by taking possession of the property. If a tenancy under law comes into existence after the creation of a mortgage but prior to issuance of a notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, it has to satisfy the conditions of Section 65\u00adA of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. If a tenant claims that he is entitled to possession of a Secured Asset for a term of more than a year, it has to be supported by the execution of a registered instrument. In the said decision of this Court, it was clarified that in the absence of a registered instrument, if the tenant only relies upon an unregistered instrument or an oral agreement accompanied by delivery of possession, the tenant is not entitled to possession of the secured asset for more than the period prescribed under the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">While noting the above discussion, Bench held that,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">\u201c\u2026Rent Act would not come to the aid of a \u201c<em>tenant\u00ad-in-\u00adsufferance\u201d<\/em> vis\u00ad\u00e0\u00advis SARFAESI Act due to the operation of Section 13(2) read with Section 13(13) of the SARFAESI Act.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the present matter, there was doubt as to the <em>bona fide<\/em> of the tenant, as there was no good or sufficient evidence to establish the tenancy of the appellant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The pleading of tenancy was not supported by any registered document, and adding to this, the appellant himself stated that he was a <em>\u201ctenant-in-sufferance\u201d, <\/em>therefore, he is not entitled to any protection of the Rent Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Another point expressed by the Court, was that even if the tenancy had been claimed to be renewed in terms of Section 13(13) of the SARFAESI Act, the Borrower would be required to seek the consent of the secured creditor for transfer of the Secured Asset by way of sale, lease or otherwise, after issuance of the notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act and, admittedly, no such consent has been sought by the Borrower.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above, appeal were dismissed. [Hemraj Ratnakar Salian v. HDFC Bank Limited, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/fP5LxH60\"><b>2021 SCC OnLine SC 611<\/b><\/a>, decided on 17-08-2021]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: The Division Bench of S. Abdul Nazeer and Krishna Murari, JJ., addressed a pertinent issue of whether the rent act <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":251173,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[3090,28984,29785,11641,31457,11421,43986,5363],"class_list":["post-252857","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-bank","tag-drt","tag-law","tag-mortgage","tag-rent-act","tag-sarfaesi-act","tag-secured-asset","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Rent Act would not come to the aid of a \u201ctenant-\u00adin-\u00adsufferance\u201d vis-\u00ad\u00e0-\u00advis SARFAESI Act due to operation of S. 13(2) read with S. 13(13) of SARFAESI Act: SC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rent Act would not come to the aid of a \u201ctenant-\u00adin-\u00adsufferance\u201d\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/18\/rent-act-would-not-come-to-the-aid-of-a-tenant-in-sufferance\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rent Act would not come to the aid of a \u201ctenant-\u00adin-\u00adsufferance\u201d vis-\u00ad\u00e0-\u00advis SARFAESI Act due to operation of S. 13(2) read with S. 13(13) of SARFAESI Act: SC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rent Act would not come to the aid of a \u201ctenant-\u00adin-\u00adsufferance\u201d\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/18\/rent-act-would-not-come-to-the-aid-of-a-tenant-in-sufferance\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-08-18T09:30:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-08-20T04:20:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/18\/rent-act-would-not-come-to-the-aid-of-a-tenant-in-sufferance\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/18\/rent-act-would-not-come-to-the-aid-of-a-tenant-in-sufferance\/\",\"name\":\"Rent Act would not come to the aid of a \u201ctenant-\u00adin-\u00adsufferance\u201d vis-\u00ad\u00e0-\u00advis SARFAESI Act due to operation of S. 13(2) read with S. 13(13) of SARFAESI Act: SC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/18\/rent-act-would-not-come-to-the-aid-of-a-tenant-in-sufferance\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/18\/rent-act-would-not-come-to-the-aid-of-a-tenant-in-sufferance\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-08-18T09:30:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-08-20T04:20:51+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Rent Act would not come to the aid of a \u201ctenant-\u00adin-\u00adsufferance\u201d\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/18\/rent-act-would-not-come-to-the-aid-of-a-tenant-in-sufferance\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/18\/rent-act-would-not-come-to-the-aid-of-a-tenant-in-sufferance\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/18\/rent-act-would-not-come-to-the-aid-of-a-tenant-in-sufferance\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/18\/rent-act-would-not-come-to-the-aid-of-a-tenant-in-sufferance\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rent Act would not come to the aid of a \u201ctenant-\u00adin-\u00adsufferance\u201d vis-\u00ad\u00e0-\u00advis SARFAESI Act due to operation of S. 13(2) read with S. 13(13) of SARFAESI Act: SC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rent Act would not come to the aid of a \u201ctenant-\u00adin-\u00adsufferance\u201d vis-\u00ad\u00e0-\u00advis SARFAESI Act due to operation of S. 13(2) read with S. 13(13) of SARFAESI Act: SC | SCC Times","description":"Rent Act would not come to the aid of a \u201ctenant-\u00adin-\u00adsufferance\u201d","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/18\/rent-act-would-not-come-to-the-aid-of-a-tenant-in-sufferance\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rent Act would not come to the aid of a \u201ctenant-\u00adin-\u00adsufferance\u201d vis-\u00ad\u00e0-\u00advis SARFAESI Act due to operation of S. 13(2) read with S. 13(13) of SARFAESI Act: SC","og_description":"Rent Act would not come to the aid of a \u201ctenant-\u00adin-\u00adsufferance\u201d","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/18\/rent-act-would-not-come-to-the-aid-of-a-tenant-in-sufferance\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-08-18T09:30:31+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-08-20T04:20:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/18\/rent-act-would-not-come-to-the-aid-of-a-tenant-in-sufferance\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/18\/rent-act-would-not-come-to-the-aid-of-a-tenant-in-sufferance\/","name":"Rent Act would not come to the aid of a \u201ctenant-\u00adin-\u00adsufferance\u201d vis-\u00ad\u00e0-\u00advis SARFAESI Act due to operation of S. 13(2) read with S. 13(13) of SARFAESI Act: SC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/18\/rent-act-would-not-come-to-the-aid-of-a-tenant-in-sufferance\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/18\/rent-act-would-not-come-to-the-aid-of-a-tenant-in-sufferance\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png","datePublished":"2021-08-18T09:30:31+00:00","dateModified":"2021-08-20T04:20:51+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Rent Act would not come to the aid of a \u201ctenant-\u00adin-\u00adsufferance\u201d","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/18\/rent-act-would-not-come-to-the-aid-of-a-tenant-in-sufferance\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/18\/rent-act-would-not-come-to-the-aid-of-a-tenant-in-sufferance\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/18\/rent-act-would-not-come-to-the-aid-of-a-tenant-in-sufferance\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png","width":1331,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/18\/rent-act-would-not-come-to-the-aid-of-a-tenant-in-sufferance\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rent Act would not come to the aid of a \u201ctenant-\u00adin-\u00adsufferance\u201d vis-\u00ad\u00e0-\u00advis SARFAESI Act due to operation of S. 13(2) read with S. 13(13) of SARFAESI Act: SC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":357155,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/20\/all-hc-grants-secured-asset-possession-to-axis-bank-u-s-14-sarfaesi-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":252857,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Can\u2019t allow borrowers to wiggle out of liability by using tenancy mechanism\u2019; Allahabad HC directs grant of secured asset\u2019s possession to Axis Bank","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"August 20, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cOnce an order has been passed under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, the authorities are required to act in pursuance of the same and as per the provisions of the Act. The mechanism used by the borrowers to wiggle out of their liability cannot be countenanced by us.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"secured assets possession to Axis Bank","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/secured-assets-possession-to-Axis-Bank.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/secured-assets-possession-to-Axis-Bank.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/secured-assets-possession-to-Axis-Bank.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/secured-assets-possession-to-Axis-Bank.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/secured-assets-possession-to-Axis-Bank.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/secured-assets-possession-to-Axis-Bank.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":302300,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/right-redemption-mortgage-extinguishes-publication-auction-notice-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":252857,"position":1},"title":"Section 13(8) of SARFAESI Act| Right of redemption of mortgage extinguishes on publication of auction notice: Supreme Court","author":"Ridhi","date":"September 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The respondents in the instant matter constituted the borrower, guarantor and the bank (secured creditor), while the appellants were the auction purchasers.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"right of redemption of mortgage","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/right-of-redemption-of-mortgage.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/right-of-redemption-of-mortgage.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/right-of-redemption-of-mortgage.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/right-of-redemption-of-mortgage.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":371436,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/02\/sarfaesi-act-transfer-of-ownership-of-secured-asset-bombay-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":252857,"position":2},"title":"Ownership of secured asset in a statutory sale under SARFAESI is transferred upon issuance of sale certificate: Bombay HC","author":"Sunaina","date":"January 2, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cOn losing merely the right of redemption, a borrower does not automatically lose ownership rights over the secured asset and that the ownership right is ultimately lost only upon issuance of sale certificate in accordance with Rule 9(6) of the SARFAESI Rules.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Ownership of secured asset","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Ownership-of-secured-asset.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Ownership-of-secured-asset.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Ownership-of-secured-asset.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Ownership-of-secured-asset.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":281546,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/13\/set-aside-order-of-telangana-high-court-which-set-aside-order-drt-possession-sale-notice-issued-indian-bank-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":252857,"position":3},"title":"Only a secured property used as agricultural land can be exempted under SARFAESI Act; Supreme Court sets aside Telangana High Court&#8217;s order","author":"Editor","date":"January 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court opined that instead of shifting the burden of proof on the secured creditor to prove that the secured property was not agricultural property, the Telangana High Court should have laid down the burden of proof on the borrowers.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"agricultural land","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-71.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":350920,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/18\/explained-scope-and-ambit-s11-sarfaesi-act-supreme-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":252857,"position":4},"title":"Explained | Supreme Court decision on scope &amp; ambit of Section 11 of the SARFAESI Act","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 18, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThere is no need for an explicit written arbitration agreement to attract Section 11 of the SARFAESI Act. The provision creates a legal fiction as regards the existence of an arbitration agreement\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"S 11 SARFAESI Act scope","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/S-11-SARFAESI-Act-scope.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/S-11-SARFAESI-Act-scope.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/S-11-SARFAESI-Act-scope.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/S-11-SARFAESI-Act-scope.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":361449,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/24\/sc-flags-interpretative-deadlock-s138-sarafesi-act-and-rules\/","url_meta":{"origin":252857,"position":5},"title":"Supreme Court flags \u2018interpretative deadlock\u2019 between S. 13(8) of SARAFESI Act &amp; Rr. 8\/9 of SARFAESI Rules; Urges Finance Ministry to act in earnest","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 24, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe interpretative deadlock between the provision and the rules has single handedly resulted in a huge mess insofar as enforcement of security interest is concerned., giving birth to an endless pipeline of litigation clogging the specialized forums of the DRT and DRAT, that are expected to expeditiously decide matters of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"interpretative deadlock","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/interpretative-deadlock.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/interpretative-deadlock.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/interpretative-deadlock.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/interpretative-deadlock.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252857","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=252857"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252857\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/251173"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=252857"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=252857"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=252857"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}