{"id":252794,"date":"2021-08-17T14:00:11","date_gmt":"2021-08-17T08:30:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=252794"},"modified":"2021-09-10T12:40:28","modified_gmt":"2021-09-10T07:10:28","slug":"aft-change-in-dob-cannot-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right-merely-because-the-same-had-been-changed-in-academic-records","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/aft-change-in-dob-cannot-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right-merely-because-the-same-had-been-changed-in-academic-records\/","title":{"rendered":"AFT | Change in DoB cannot be claimed as a matter of right merely because the same had been changed in academic records"},"content":{"rendered":"

Armed Forces Tribunal: <\/strong>The Division Bench of Justice Umesh Chandra Srivastava and \u00a0Vice Admiral Abhay Raghunath Karve, Member (A) held that the a government servant cannot claim change in Date of Birth as a matter of right merely because the same had been changed in academic records.<\/p>\n

Brief facts of the case were that the applicant\u2019s date of birth was mentioned as 23-05-1964 when he was enrolled\/commissioned in the Army and by a decree of City Civil Court of Chennai, dated 23-07-2007 he had got changed his date of birth from 23-05-1964 to 28-06-1965 and accordingly, his educational certificates were endorsed with 28-06-1965 as his date of birth.<\/p>\n

After having his educational documents corrected the appellant approached the Director General of Armed Forces Medical Services, Ministry of Defence on several occasions requesting him to make correction in his date of Birth, but the same were alleged to be unheard by the respondent. Subsequently, the applicant superannuated on 31-05-2021. The applicant contended that the decree of Civil Court, declaring the correct date of applicant\u2019s birth as 28-06-1965 was binding upon respondents as respondent 2 and 3 were party in the Suit in which decree had been passed and were, therefore, under legal obligation to carry necessary amendment in date of applicant\u2019s birth in his service records.<\/p>\n

On the other hand, the stand taken by the respondent was that as per rules, any change with regard to date of birth could possibly be made based on representation made within two years from the date of enrolment\/commissioning only, and not thereafter.<\/p>\n

The Bench observed that in the civil suit the main respondents, though were made party but they were absent and the order was passed ex-parte and the recall application filed by the respondents was dismissed being filed belatedly. Further, in ex-parte order there was no direction to the respondents to incorporate change of date of birth in service record of applicant.<\/p>\n

Relying on the decision of the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Harnam Singh<\/em>, (1993) 2 SCC 162<\/a>, wherein it had been held that, \u201cA Govt servant who makes an application for correction of date of birth beyond the time, so fixed, therefore, cannot claim, as a matter of right, the correction of his date of birth even if he has good evidence to establish that the recorded date of birth is clearly erroneous\u201d, <\/em>the Bench stated that the applicant\u2019s representation for change in date of birth was rejected by competent authority by giving \u00a0cogent reasons for its rejection; i.e. the applicant ought to have applied for change in date of birth in service record within the stipulated period of five years after enrolment\/commission which he had failed to do so.<\/p>\n

Therefore, the Bench was of the view that after passing of ex-parte judgment in the year 2007 and thereafter despite the reasoned order passed by the respondent 10 years prior to filing of this O.A., applicant had been silent on this point and had only preferred the O.A. in the year 2021 knowing well that there was a vacancy of Brigadier on 01-08-2021 and he would retire on 31-05-2021 with date of birth as 23-05-1964. The Bench stated that the whole story of the applicant having come to know of his real date of birth later in a family discussion was nothing but a concocted story to remain in organization for some more time for further promotion.<\/p>\n

Hence, the Bench held that applicant\u2019s ex-parte judgment could not be binding on the respondents, especially when the applicant had slumbered for over a decade to file the O.A. Accordingly, the instant application was dismissed.[P Yesudian Sugumar v. Union of India, 2021 SCC OnLine AFT 4258<\/a>, <\/b>decided on 09-08-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Kamini Sharma, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Appearance by:<\/strong><\/p>\n

For the Applicant: Yashpal Singh, Advocate<\/p>\n

For Union of India: Sunil Sharma, Central Govt. Counsel<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Armed Forces Tribunal: The Division Bench of Justice Umesh Chandra Srivastava and \u00a0Vice Admiral Abhay Raghunath Karve, Member (A) held that the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":198586,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-252794","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies"],"yoast_head":"\nAFT | Change in DoB cannot be claimed as a matter of right merely because the same had been changed in academic records | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/aft-change-in-dob-cannot-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right-merely-because-the-same-had-been-changed-in-academic-records\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"AFT | Change in DoB cannot be claimed as a matter of right merely because the same had been changed in academic records\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Armed Forces Tribunal: The Division Bench of Justice Umesh Chandra Srivastava and \u00a0Vice Admiral Abhay Raghunath Karve, Member (A) held that the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/aft-change-in-dob-cannot-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right-merely-because-the-same-had-been-changed-in-academic-records\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-08-17T08:30:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-09-10T07:10:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/aft-change-in-dob-cannot-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right-merely-because-the-same-had-been-changed-in-academic-records\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/aft-change-in-dob-cannot-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right-merely-because-the-same-had-been-changed-in-academic-records\/\",\"name\":\"AFT | Change in DoB cannot be claimed as a matter of right merely because the same had been changed in academic records | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/aft-change-in-dob-cannot-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right-merely-because-the-same-had-been-changed-in-academic-records\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/aft-change-in-dob-cannot-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right-merely-because-the-same-had-been-changed-in-academic-records\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-08-17T08:30:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-09-10T07:10:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/aft-change-in-dob-cannot-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right-merely-because-the-same-had-been-changed-in-academic-records\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/aft-change-in-dob-cannot-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right-merely-because-the-same-had-been-changed-in-academic-records\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/aft-change-in-dob-cannot-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right-merely-because-the-same-had-been-changed-in-academic-records\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887,\"caption\":\"Armed Forces Tribunal\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/aft-change-in-dob-cannot-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right-merely-because-the-same-had-been-changed-in-academic-records\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"AFT | Change in DoB cannot be claimed as a matter of right merely because the same had been changed in academic records\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"AFT | Change in DoB cannot be claimed as a matter of right merely because the same had been changed in academic records | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/aft-change-in-dob-cannot-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right-merely-because-the-same-had-been-changed-in-academic-records\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"AFT | Change in DoB cannot be claimed as a matter of right merely because the same had been changed in academic records","og_description":"Armed Forces Tribunal: The Division Bench of Justice Umesh Chandra Srivastava and \u00a0Vice Admiral Abhay Raghunath Karve, Member (A) held that the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/aft-change-in-dob-cannot-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right-merely-because-the-same-had-been-changed-in-academic-records\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-08-17T08:30:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-09-10T07:10:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/aft-change-in-dob-cannot-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right-merely-because-the-same-had-been-changed-in-academic-records\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/aft-change-in-dob-cannot-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right-merely-because-the-same-had-been-changed-in-academic-records\/","name":"AFT | Change in DoB cannot be claimed as a matter of right merely because the same had been changed in academic records | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/aft-change-in-dob-cannot-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right-merely-because-the-same-had-been-changed-in-academic-records\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/aft-change-in-dob-cannot-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right-merely-because-the-same-had-been-changed-in-academic-records\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg","datePublished":"2021-08-17T08:30:11+00:00","dateModified":"2021-09-10T07:10:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/aft-change-in-dob-cannot-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right-merely-because-the-same-had-been-changed-in-academic-records\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/aft-change-in-dob-cannot-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right-merely-because-the-same-had-been-changed-in-academic-records\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/aft-change-in-dob-cannot-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right-merely-because-the-same-had-been-changed-in-academic-records\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg","width":1330,"height":887,"caption":"Armed Forces Tribunal"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/aft-change-in-dob-cannot-be-claimed-as-a-matter-of-right-merely-because-the-same-had-been-changed-in-academic-records\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"AFT | Change in DoB cannot be claimed as a matter of right merely because the same had been changed in academic records"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":312741,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/02\/thc-dismisses-writ-petition-for-alteration-in-date-of-birth-in-service-records-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":252794,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Correction of date of birth cannot be claimed as a matter of right\u2019; Telangana High Court dismisses petition for alteration in date of birth in service records","author":"Editor","date":"February 2, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA.P. Public Employment (Recording and Alteration of Date of Birth) Rules, 1984 do not permit alteration of date of birth on the basis of any judgement, decree or order of a Civil Court and no indulgence can be shown.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"telangana high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/telangana-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255586,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/14\/getting-your-date-of-birth-changed-at-fag-end-of-your-career-stop-first-read-the-law-laid-down-by-the-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":252794,"position":1},"title":"Getting date of birth changed at fag end of your career? STOP! First read the law laid down by the Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 14, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where a Government employee had sought change of date of birth in service records from 04.01.1960 to 24.01.1961, 24 years after he had joined the service, the bench of MR Shah* and AS Bopanna, JJ has held that the said employee was not entitled to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":256003,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/25\/where-lesser-age-is-recorded-in-school-certificate-than-the-actual-age\/","url_meta":{"origin":252794,"position":2},"title":"AFT | Where lesser age is recorded in school certificate than the actual age; correct date of birth will be the one recorded by the parents in service records","author":"Editor","date":"October 25, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Armed Forces Tribunal: Resolving a date of birth related controversy, the Division Bench of Justice Umesh Chandra Srivastava and Vice Admiral Abhay Raghunath Karve, Member (A) stated, \u201cIf we take date of birth recorded in educational certificate of the applicant as correct i.e. 05-07-1992 and date of birth in respect\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Armed Forces Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268703,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/20\/aft-can-a-defence-person-change-the-name-of-his-wife-twice-in-his-service-records-tribunal-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":252794,"position":3},"title":"AFT | Can a defence person change the name of his wife twice in his service records? Tribunal answers","author":"Editor","date":"June 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Armed Forces Tribunal (Lucknow Bench): The Division Bench of Justice Umesh Chandra Srivastava, Member (J) and Vice Admiral Abhay Raghunath Karve, Member (A) held\u00a0that a defence person cannot be permitted to change the name of his wife twice in service records. \u201cName of wife of the applicant has already been\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Armed Forces Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":316120,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/05\/correction-date-of-birth-service-record-cannot-made-fag-end-career-bombay-hc-reiterates\/","url_meta":{"origin":252794,"position":4},"title":"Correction of date of birth in service record cannot be made at the fag end of career: Bombay High Court reiterates","author":"Ridhi","date":"March 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court clarified that \u201cthe expression \u2018fag end of the career\u2019, must be construed in light of the length of service being put in by an employee.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":337122,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/12\/bomhc-imposes-cost-on-clerk-who-attempted-to-hoodwink-court-by-correcting-date-of-birth\/","url_meta":{"origin":252794,"position":5},"title":"Bombay HC imposes Rs 25000 cost on Educational Institution clerk who attempted to hoodwink the Court by correcting his date of birth","author":"Simranjeet","date":"December 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Sub-Divisional Officer, Miraj passed an order thereby correcting petitioner\u2019s date of birth and therefore, the District Collector, Sangli was directed to issue notice to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Tasgaon, asking for an explanation, as to how he could record the date of birth as 02-06-1972.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252794","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=252794"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252794\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/198586"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=252794"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=252794"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=252794"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}