{"id":252777,"date":"2021-08-17T10:00:02","date_gmt":"2021-08-17T04:30:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=252777"},"modified":"2021-08-17T09:05:16","modified_gmt":"2021-08-17T03:35:16","slug":"birth-death-certificate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/birth-death-certificate\/","title":{"rendered":"Ker HC | Mandatory discloser of Father\u2019s name in Birth\/Death Certificate is violative of Fundamental Right; HC directs State to provide separate forms for Single Mothers"},"content":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court: <\/strong>Satish Ninan, J., held that the mandatory requirement for disclosing Father\u2019s name in Birth\/Death Certificate was violative of Fundamental Right. Addressing the direction of Ministry of Home Affairs where instead of amending the format it had directed to leave the details of father vacant, the Bench stated,<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cRequiring the petitioner to leave the column regarding the details of father as blank for the issuance of a certificate of birth or certificate of death necessarily affects the right of dignity of the mother as well as the child.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Mandatory Requirement for Disclosing Father\u2019s name in Birth\/Death Certificate <\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The petitioner was a divorcee who had opted to get conceived by In Vitro Fertilization (in short, \u201cIVF\u201d) procedure. The identity of the sperm donor had been kept anonymous and had not been disclosed to the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner was with regard to fulfilment of certain formalities for registration of the birth of the child, on delivery. In other words, the petitioner was aggrieved by the format of Rule 8 of the Kerala Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1970 which made it mandatory to disclose the name of the father of the child. The petitioner assailed the said provision on the grounds that she could not be required to provide the name of the father as the same would be violative of her fundamental rights, for reasons that:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. The identity of the sperm donor is kept anonymous and has not been and could not be disclosed even to the petitioner,<\/li>\n
  2. such requirement intrudes upon her right of privacy, liberty and dignity.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    In ABC v. State (NCT of Delhi) <\/em>(2015) 10 SCC 1<\/a>, <\/em>the Supreme Court had held that, \u201cThere is no gainsaying that the identity of the mother is never in doubt. Accordingly, we direct that if a single parent\/unwed mother apply for the issuance of a Birth Certificate for a child born from her womb, the Authorities concerned may only require her to furnish an affidavit to this effect, and must thereupon issue the Birth Certificate, unless there is a Court direction to the contrary.\u201d<\/em>\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

    Following in the abovementioned decision, the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, had issued directions to the Chief Registrar of Births and Deaths throughout the country to have the birth of the child of a single parent\/unwed mother to be registered showing the name of the single parent in the birth record leaving the name of the other parent blank. The petitioner argued that to leave the column relating to the name of the father in the prescribed form as blank, interferes with the right of dignity, privacy and liberty.<\/p>\n

    Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 Section 8(1) of the Act requires the particulars sought for in the forms prescribed by the State Government, to be furnished to the Registrar.<\/p>\n

    Reliance was also placed by the petitioner on the decision of the Supreme Court in Suchita Srivastava v. Chandigarh Admn.<\/em> 2009 (9) SCC 1<\/a>, wherein the Court had held that, reproductive choice of a woman is a fundamental right encompassed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The right to procreate as well as to abstain from procreation has been recognized as a colour of the right of personal liberty<\/em>.<\/p>\n

    Findings of the Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

    In K.S.Puttaswamy v. Union of India<\/em>, 2017 (10) SCC 1<\/a>, it was held by the Supreme Court that personal choice governing a way of life are intrinsic to privacy and one of the connotations of \u201cprivacy\u201d includes decisional autonomy which comprehends intimate personal choices such as, those governing reproduction as well as choice expressed in public such as, faith or modes of dress.<\/p>\n

    In the year 2005, the Ministry for Health and Family Welfare, Government of India had issued \u201cNational Guidelines for Accreditation, Supervision and Regulation of ART Clinics in India\u201d<\/em><\/strong> with regard to functioning of ART clinics in India, which states:<\/p>\n

    \u201c3.5.2 There would be no bar to the use of ART by a single woman who wishes to have a child, and no ART clinic may refuse to offer its services to the above provided…\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

    The Bench also took note of the \u201cThe Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Bill, 2020\u201d<\/em><\/strong>, and opined that rights of a single woman for reproductive decisions and personal choices having been recognized as a constitutional right, there are instances where single\/unwed women choose to have child through Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART).<\/p>\n

    Hence, the Bench stated that when the identity of the donor was not disclosed to the petitioner there was no rhyme or reason in requiring the petitioner to provide the name of the father in the form prescribed for registration of birth and death. The Bench held that the concept of conceiving through ART had been foreign to this country a few decades back till the first \u201ctest tube baby\u201d was born but now when the right of a single parent\/unwed mother to conceive by ART had been recognized, prescriptions of forms requiring mentioning of name of father, the details of which is to be kept anonymous, was violative of the fundamental rights of privacy, liberty and dignity and it was for the State Government to bring out appropriate forms for registration of births and deaths, and also certificates of births and deaths, in such cases.<\/p>\n

    Verdict<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

    In the light of the above, the Bench directed the State of Kerala to provide a separate form to such applicants which do not contain the field regarding the name and other details of the father. In so far as certificate of death was concerned, the Bench was of the view that it would suffice if in the column where the name of the father or husband is sought for, another entry could be made as that of the mother (like Father \/ Husband \/ Mother). Additionally, noticing that the petitioner was in the 8th month of pregnancy, the Bench directed that the necessary steps should be taken immediately.[X v. State of Kerala, WP(C) NO. 13622 of 2021, decided on 13-08-2021]<\/p>\n

    \n

    Kamini Sharma, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/p>\n

    \n

    Appearance by:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    For the Petitioner: Adv A.Aruna<\/p>\n

    For the Respondents: Govt. Pleader M.H.Hanil Kumar and S.Krishna, CGSC<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Kerala High Court: Satish Ninan, J., held that the mandatory requirement for disclosing Father\u2019s name in Birth\/Death Certificate was violative of Fundamental <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31004,46396,2523,29785,46751],"class_list":["post-252777","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-birth-certificate","tag-death-certificate","tag-Kerala_High_Court","tag-law","tag-single-mothers"],"yoast_head":"\nKer HC | Mandatory discloser of Father\u2019s name in Birth\/Death Certificate is violative of Fundamental Right; HC directs State to provide separate forms for Single Mothers | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Birth\/Death Certificate\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/birth-death-certificate\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ker HC | Mandatory discloser of Father\u2019s name in Birth\/Death Certificate is violative of Fundamental Right; HC directs State to provide separate forms for Single Mothers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Birth\/Death Certificate\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/birth-death-certificate\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-08-17T04:30:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/birth-death-certificate\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/birth-death-certificate\/\",\"name\":\"Ker HC | Mandatory discloser of Father\u2019s name in Birth\/Death Certificate is violative of Fundamental Right; HC directs State to provide separate forms for Single Mothers | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-08-17T04:30:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Birth\/Death Certificate\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/birth-death-certificate\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/birth-death-certificate\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/birth-death-certificate\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ker HC | Mandatory discloser of Father\u2019s name in Birth\/Death Certificate is violative of Fundamental Right; HC directs State to provide separate forms for Single Mothers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ker HC | Mandatory discloser of Father\u2019s name in Birth\/Death Certificate is violative of Fundamental Right; HC directs State to provide separate forms for Single Mothers | SCC Times","description":"Birth\/Death Certificate","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/birth-death-certificate\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ker HC | Mandatory discloser of Father\u2019s name in Birth\/Death Certificate is violative of Fundamental Right; HC directs State to provide separate forms for Single Mothers","og_description":"Birth\/Death Certificate","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/birth-death-certificate\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-08-17T04:30:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/birth-death-certificate\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/birth-death-certificate\/","name":"Ker HC | Mandatory discloser of Father\u2019s name in Birth\/Death Certificate is violative of Fundamental Right; HC directs State to provide separate forms for Single Mothers | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-08-17T04:30:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Birth\/Death Certificate","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/birth-death-certificate\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/birth-death-certificate\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/17\/birth-death-certificate\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ker HC | Mandatory discloser of Father\u2019s name in Birth\/Death Certificate is violative of Fundamental Right; HC directs State to provide separate forms for Single Mothers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":270651,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/26\/can-court-direct-to-retrospectively-amend-birth-certificate-to-expunge-fathers-name-by-replacing-mothers-name-as-an-only-parent-kerala-hc-decides\/","url_meta":{"origin":252777,"position":0},"title":"Can Court direct to retrospectively amend birth certificate to expunge father’s name by replacing mother’s name as an only parent? Kerala HC decides","author":"Editor","date":"July 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\"The children of unwed mothers and the children of the rape victims can also live in this country with the fundamental rights of privacy, liberty, and dignity. None can intrude into their personal life, and if it happens, the Constitutional Court of this country will protect their fundamental rights.\"","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/kerla_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":234054,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/17\/madras-hc-adoption-does-not-sever-relationship-of-child-with-biological-father-unless-he-renounces-his-right-as-father\/","url_meta":{"origin":252777,"position":1},"title":"Madras HC | Adoption does not sever relationship of child with biological father unless he renounces his right as father","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0P.T. Asha, J., addressed a matter in relation to adoption and modification in the birth certificate of a minor in terms of change in the name of the biological father of the child. Legal status of a biological daughter Petitioners are the adopted father and biological\/natural mother of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":198570,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/16\/authorities-cannot-insist-on-disclosure-of-fathers-name-for-the-purpose-of-childs-birth-certificate-madras-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":252777,"position":2},"title":"Authorities cannot insist on disclosure of father\u2019s name for the purpose of child’s ‘Birth Certificate’: \u00a0Madras HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 16, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of M.S. Ramesh, J. addressing a Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India on the issue of removal of a name recorded in the column of father\u2019s name in the birth certificate of the petitioner\u2019s child. In the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":48271,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/05\/20\/requirement-of-fathers-name-of-applicant-not-mandatory-for-issuing-passport-mothers-name-sufficient\/","url_meta":{"origin":252777,"position":3},"title":"Requirement of father’s name of applicant not mandatory for issuing passport, mother’s name sufficient","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 20, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Allowing the petition wherein the petitioner had sought reissuance of her daughter's passport without insisting upon the father's name being mentioned in the application form, the Bench of\u00a0 Manmohan, J. held that \u201cmother's name is sufficient in certain cases like the present one to apply for passport,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":255329,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/birth-and-death-register-are-public-documents-and-admissible-under-s-35-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872\/","url_meta":{"origin":252777,"position":4},"title":"[RTI] HP HC | Birth and Death Register are public documents and admissible under S. 35 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872; To be given even if asked on a simple paper","author":"Editor","date":"October 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Tarlok Singh Chauhan J. directed all the Panchayat Secretaries in the State of Himachal Pradesh to provide death certificate as demanded by any person or authority under the Right to Information Act. The instant application was filed seeking direction to the Panchayat Secretary, Shingla, Development Block,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":224513,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/24\/jhar-hc-succession-certificate-issued-by-a-competent-court-is-mandatory-for-legal-heirs-to-claim-pension-under-coal-mines-provident-fund-scheme\/","url_meta":{"origin":252777,"position":5},"title":"Jhar HC | \u2018Succession Certificate\u2019 issued by a competent court, is mandatory for legal heirs to claim pension under Coal Mines Provident Fund Scheme","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 24, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: A Division Bench of Dr Ravi Ranjan, CJ and Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. addressed an appeal in which the daughter-in-law of a deceased employee of State-owned respondent company Central Coalfields Limited (CCL) sought for payment of family pension as well as other dues accrued to her mother-in-law\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252777","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=252777"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252777\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=252777"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=252777"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=252777"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}