{"id":252748,"date":"2021-08-16T13:00:42","date_gmt":"2021-08-16T07:30:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=252748"},"modified":"2021-09-17T16:18:20","modified_gmt":"2021-09-17T10:48:20","slug":"sebi-failure-to-furnish-the-mandate-results-in-restriction-from-the-market-which-became-a-mandate-thereafter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/16\/sebi-failure-to-furnish-the-mandate-results-in-restriction-from-the-market-which-became-a-mandate-thereafter\/","title":{"rendered":"SEBI | Failure to furnish the mandate results in restriction from the market which became a mandate thereafter"},"content":{"rendered":"

Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI):<\/strong> Ananta Barua, Whole Time Member while exercising the powers conferred under Sections 11(1), 11(4), 11(4A), 11A and 11B(1), 11B(2) and Section 12A(1) of SCRA, 1956 read with Section 19 and 11(2)(j) of the SEBI Act, 1992 and Rule 5 of the SEBI (Procedure for Holding Inquiry and Imposing Penalties) Rules, 1995 imposed varied penalties on the Noticees, while restraining\u00a0 them from the securities market.<\/p>\n

In the instant case, it was alleged that the Noticees executed transactions which are non-genuine in nature, resulting in misrepresentation of the accounts\/financial statements and misuse of account\/funds of the company and that such acts were found to be fraudulent in nature as they induced the investors to trade in the securities of the company and had the potential to mislead the investors. Further, that the Directors have failed to exercise duty of care by misrepresenting the financial statements\/misusing the funds of the company.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal was of the opinion that,<\/p>\n

\u201c \u2026penalty under Sections 15A(a) and 15HB of the SEBI Act, 1992, only, is attracted and not the penalties under Section 15HA of SEBI Act, 1992 and Sections 23E and 23H of 78 SCRA, 1956\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n

It further noted that<\/p>\n

\u201cSection 15HA of the SEBI Act, 1992 provides for imposition of penalty in case of fraudulent and unfair trade practices committed by any person. As in the present case, it has been found that violations of Section 12A (a), (b) & (c) of SEBI Act, 1992 and provisions of PFUTP Regulations, 2003 have not been made out, therefore, penalty under Section 15HA of SEBI Act, 1992 is not attracted against the Noticees (i.e. Noticee no. 1 to 9). I also not that Section 23E of SCRA, 1956 provides for penalty for failure to comply with, inter alia, listing conditions by \u2018a company or any person managing collective investment scheme or mutual fund\u2019\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n

And the Tribunal imposed a penalty of Rs 30, 00, 000 on Eskay K \u2018n\u2019 it India Limited, Rs 2, 00, 000 on Noticee 3, Rs 3,00,000 on Noticee 4, Rs 3, 00, 000 on Noticee 5, Rs. 15, 00, 000 on Noticee 6 and Noticee 7.[Eskay K\u2019n\u2019it India Limited, In re, 2021 SCC OnLine SEBI 198<\/b><\/a>, decided on 11-08-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Agatha Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): Ananta Barua, Whole Time Member while exercising the powers conferred under Sections 11(1), 11(4), 11(4A), <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[29785,2563,29663],"class_list":["post-252748","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-law","tag-SEBI","tag-securities-market"],"yoast_head":"\nSEBI | Failure to furnish the mandate results in restriction from the market which became a mandate thereafter | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/16\/sebi-failure-to-furnish-the-mandate-results-in-restriction-from-the-market-which-became-a-mandate-thereafter\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SEBI | Failure to furnish the mandate results in restriction from the market which became a mandate thereafter\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): Ananta Barua, Whole Time Member while exercising the powers conferred under Sections 11(1), 11(4), 11(4A),\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/16\/sebi-failure-to-furnish-the-mandate-results-in-restriction-from-the-market-which-became-a-mandate-thereafter\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-08-16T07:30:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-09-17T10:48:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/security-exchange-board-of-india.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/16\/sebi-failure-to-furnish-the-mandate-results-in-restriction-from-the-market-which-became-a-mandate-thereafter\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/16\/sebi-failure-to-furnish-the-mandate-results-in-restriction-from-the-market-which-became-a-mandate-thereafter\/\",\"name\":\"SEBI | Failure to furnish the mandate results in restriction from the market which became a mandate thereafter | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-08-16T07:30:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-09-17T10:48:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/16\/sebi-failure-to-furnish-the-mandate-results-in-restriction-from-the-market-which-became-a-mandate-thereafter\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/16\/sebi-failure-to-furnish-the-mandate-results-in-restriction-from-the-market-which-became-a-mandate-thereafter\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/16\/sebi-failure-to-furnish-the-mandate-results-in-restriction-from-the-market-which-became-a-mandate-thereafter\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SEBI | Failure to furnish the mandate results in restriction from the market which became a mandate thereafter\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SEBI | Failure to furnish the mandate results in restriction from the market which became a mandate thereafter | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/16\/sebi-failure-to-furnish-the-mandate-results-in-restriction-from-the-market-which-became-a-mandate-thereafter\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SEBI | Failure to furnish the mandate results in restriction from the market which became a mandate thereafter","og_description":"Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): Ananta Barua, Whole Time Member while exercising the powers conferred under Sections 11(1), 11(4), 11(4A),","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/16\/sebi-failure-to-furnish-the-mandate-results-in-restriction-from-the-market-which-became-a-mandate-thereafter\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-08-16T07:30:42+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-09-17T10:48:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/security-exchange-board-of-india.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/16\/sebi-failure-to-furnish-the-mandate-results-in-restriction-from-the-market-which-became-a-mandate-thereafter\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/16\/sebi-failure-to-furnish-the-mandate-results-in-restriction-from-the-market-which-became-a-mandate-thereafter\/","name":"SEBI | Failure to furnish the mandate results in restriction from the market which became a mandate thereafter | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-08-16T07:30:42+00:00","dateModified":"2021-09-17T10:48:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/16\/sebi-failure-to-furnish-the-mandate-results-in-restriction-from-the-market-which-became-a-mandate-thereafter\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/16\/sebi-failure-to-furnish-the-mandate-results-in-restriction-from-the-market-which-became-a-mandate-thereafter\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/16\/sebi-failure-to-furnish-the-mandate-results-in-restriction-from-the-market-which-became-a-mandate-thereafter\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SEBI | Failure to furnish the mandate results in restriction from the market which became a mandate thereafter"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":357260,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/21\/sat-order-on-sadhna-broadcast-stock-manipulation-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":252748,"position":0},"title":"Read why Securities Appellate Tribunal granted relief to Naman Broadcasting in Sadhna Broadcast stock manipulation case","author":"Ekta","date":"August 21, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Naman Broadcasting amongst others was alleged to contravene the provisions of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 by using digital platforms to mislead the investors. It was alleged that the price and volume of the scrip was manipulated through a coordinated scheme involving dissemination of misleading information and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sadhna Broadcast stock manipulation case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Sadhna-Broadcast-stock-manipulation-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Sadhna-Broadcast-stock-manipulation-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Sadhna-Broadcast-stock-manipulation-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Sadhna-Broadcast-stock-manipulation-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239840,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/28\/sebi-holds-promotors-of-ndtv-guilty-of-insider-trading-bars-them-from-securities-market-for-two-years\/","url_meta":{"origin":252748,"position":1},"title":"SEBI holds promotors of NDTV guilty of insider trading, bars them from securities market for two years","author":"Editor","date":"November 28, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI): S.K. Mohanty, (Whole Time Member) has barred two promoters of NDTV, namely Mr Prannoy Roy and Mrs Radhika Roy (the Noticees) from the securities market for 2 years and directed them to disgorge illegal gains of more than Rs 16.97 crore for indulging in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":252231,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/04\/deceptive-portfolio-manager\/","url_meta":{"origin":252748,"position":2},"title":"SEBI | Specious Portfolio, Spurious Manager -Deceptive Portfolio Manager with a real-looking-fake website caught and handled suitably","author":"Editor","date":"August 4, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): S.K. Mohanty, Whole Time Member while exercising the powers under Sections 11, 11(4),11B (1) and 11D, read with of Section 19 of the SEBI Act, 1992 and regulation 11 of the PFUTP Regulations, 2003, while disposing of the allegations levelled in the interim\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":253866,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/08\/manipulative-pricing\/","url_meta":{"origin":252748,"position":3},"title":"SEBI | Manipulative Pricing | Connected entities aiding other connected entities gets disconnected from the securities market","author":"Editor","date":"September 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): G. Mahalingam, Whole Time Member, while exercising the powers under Sections 11(1), 11(4) and Section 11B of the SEBI Act, gave directions restricting the Noticees from accessing the securities market for fraudulently manipulating of the price of the scrip with connected entities. In\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":269458,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/02\/sebi-fines-rs-7-crores-on-nse-and-nearly-35-crores-on-guilty-officials-and-stockbrokers-in-dark-fibre-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":252748,"position":4},"title":"SEBI fines Rs. 7 crores on NSE and nearly 35 crores on guilty officials and stockbrokers in Dark Fibre Case","author":"Editor","date":"July 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI): Dark Fibre\/Leased Line connectivity allowed to certain Stock Brokers, the Adjudicating Officer In the matter relating to Dark Fibre\/ Leased Line connectivity allowed to certain Stock Brokers, the Adjudicating Officer Suresh B Menon has who was CEO of NSE at the relevant time;observed some\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"SEBI","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-111-4.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-111-4.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-111-4.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-111-4.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-111-4.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252694,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/13\/sebi-5\/","url_meta":{"origin":252748,"position":5},"title":"SEBI | To insulate the interest of the investors from impostures — Issues order for debarment","author":"Editor","date":"August 13, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI):\u00a0 Madahabi Puri Bach, Whole Time Member while keeping in view the violation of MPS requirement, the Tribunal considered it to be appropriate that Riddhi Siddhi Gluco Biols Ltd. (RSGBL) increase its public shareholding and further gave directions of debarment from the securities market\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252748","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=252748"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252748\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=252748"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=252748"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=252748"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}