{"id":252467,"date":"2021-08-09T18:00:16","date_gmt":"2021-08-09T12:30:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=252467"},"modified":"2021-08-09T17:37:04","modified_gmt":"2021-08-09T12:07:04","slug":"sikk-hc-application-allowed-under-or-vi-r-17-cpc-1908-seeking-amendment-to-the-plaint-erroneous-court-explains","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/09\/sikk-hc-application-allowed-under-or-vi-r-17-cpc-1908-seeking-amendment-to-the-plaint-erroneous-court-explains\/","title":{"rendered":"Sikk HC | Application allowed under Or. VI R. 17 CPC, 1908, seeking amendment to the plaint erroneous; Court explains \u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sikkim High Court:<\/strong> Jitendra Kumar Maheshwari, CJ., allowed a petition which was filed aggrieved by the order allowing the application filed under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking amendment to the plaint.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the petition, Mr Nilanjan Bhattacharjee, Mr Souri Ghosal and Mr Amresh Kumar Mandal contended that the application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC allowed by the trial Court was by ignoring the order dated 29-03-2019 of this Court in C.R.P. No. 05 of 2018 in the same suit. It was urged that with altogether identical pleadings earlier an application for amendment was filed by the plaintiff which was allowed by the Trial Court. The said order was assailed in C.R.P. No. 05 of 2018. This Court had set aside order of allowing the amendment, as the Counsel for the plaintiff\/ respondent 1 has conceded before the High Court that the Trial Court has not followed the procedure prescribed by law, therefore, if the order of the trial Court is being set aside, they have no objection. While passing the said order leave was not prayed for or granted, to apply afresh for the amendment. In absence thereto, the order passed subsequently by filing a subsequent amendment application, with the identical pleadings cannot be allowed by the order impugned, therefore, the Trial Court committed illegality much less an error of jurisdiction while passing the order impugned.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the plaintiff\/ respondent 1, Mr N.B Khatiwada, Senior Advocate and Ms Navtara Sarda, Legal Aid Counsel without defending the said issue made an attempt to satisfy this Court that after remand necessary parties have been joined, therefore, the amendment is necessary to adjudicate the issue and the Trial Court has not committed any error while passing the order.<\/p>\n

The Court was of the view that the facts of the case were not disputed. It was further stated that it was apparent that after passing the judgment of remand by the Lower Appellate Court directing to implead the legal heirs of late Sonam Topden Bhutia as defendants in the suit and the plaintiff was allowed to amend the pleadings to the extent required after impleading the necessary parties. The Court observed that the plaintiff\/respondent 1 inserted the amendments over and above the order of the Appellate Court or the provisions of the law, as per the submissions of the defendant. On the said submission Counsel for the plaintiff\/respondent 1 had conceded before the Court that the procedure prescribed by law was not adhered to, however, having no objection if the order of the Civil Judge dated 14-05-2018 allowing the amendment may be set aside.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the pleadings proposed for amendment by way of previous application if not permitted to be incorporated by the order of the Court in view of the order of C.R.P. No.05\/2018 dated 29-03-2019 the same pleading cannot be permitted to be incorporated by a subsequent order of the Trial Court.<\/p>\n

The Court while allowing the petition held that e trial Court had committed illegality, much less an error of jurisdiction to allow subsequent similar application for amendment ignoring the order of this Court.[Jigmi Phunchok Bhutia v. Aishwarya Rai, WP (C) No. 26 of 2021, decided on 03-08-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sikkim High Court: Jitendra Kumar Maheshwari, CJ., allowed a petition which was filed aggrieved by the order allowing the application filed under <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-252467","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"\nSikk HC | Application allowed under Or. VI R. 17 CPC, 1908, seeking amendment to the plaint erroneous; Court explains \u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/09\/sikk-hc-application-allowed-under-or-vi-r-17-cpc-1908-seeking-amendment-to-the-plaint-erroneous-court-explains\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sikk HC | Application allowed under Or. VI R. 17 CPC, 1908, seeking amendment to the plaint erroneous; Court explains \u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Sikkim High Court: Jitendra Kumar Maheshwari, CJ., allowed a petition which was filed aggrieved by the order allowing the application filed under\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/09\/sikk-hc-application-allowed-under-or-vi-r-17-cpc-1908-seeking-amendment-to-the-plaint-erroneous-court-explains\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-08-09T12:30:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/High-Court-of-Sikkim.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/09\/sikk-hc-application-allowed-under-or-vi-r-17-cpc-1908-seeking-amendment-to-the-plaint-erroneous-court-explains\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/09\/sikk-hc-application-allowed-under-or-vi-r-17-cpc-1908-seeking-amendment-to-the-plaint-erroneous-court-explains\/\",\"name\":\"Sikk HC | Application allowed under Or. VI R. 17 CPC, 1908, seeking amendment to the plaint erroneous; Court explains \u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-08-09T12:30:16+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/09\/sikk-hc-application-allowed-under-or-vi-r-17-cpc-1908-seeking-amendment-to-the-plaint-erroneous-court-explains\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/09\/sikk-hc-application-allowed-under-or-vi-r-17-cpc-1908-seeking-amendment-to-the-plaint-erroneous-court-explains\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/09\/sikk-hc-application-allowed-under-or-vi-r-17-cpc-1908-seeking-amendment-to-the-plaint-erroneous-court-explains\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sikk HC | Application allowed under Or. VI R. 17 CPC, 1908, seeking amendment to the plaint erroneous; Court explains \u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sikk HC | Application allowed under Or. VI R. 17 CPC, 1908, seeking amendment to the plaint erroneous; Court explains \u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/09\/sikk-hc-application-allowed-under-or-vi-r-17-cpc-1908-seeking-amendment-to-the-plaint-erroneous-court-explains\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sikk HC | Application allowed under Or. VI R. 17 CPC, 1908, seeking amendment to the plaint erroneous; Court explains \u00a0","og_description":"Sikkim High Court: Jitendra Kumar Maheshwari, CJ., allowed a petition which was filed aggrieved by the order allowing the application filed under","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/09\/sikk-hc-application-allowed-under-or-vi-r-17-cpc-1908-seeking-amendment-to-the-plaint-erroneous-court-explains\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-08-09T12:30:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/High-Court-of-Sikkim.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/09\/sikk-hc-application-allowed-under-or-vi-r-17-cpc-1908-seeking-amendment-to-the-plaint-erroneous-court-explains\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/09\/sikk-hc-application-allowed-under-or-vi-r-17-cpc-1908-seeking-amendment-to-the-plaint-erroneous-court-explains\/","name":"Sikk HC | Application allowed under Or. VI R. 17 CPC, 1908, seeking amendment to the plaint erroneous; Court explains \u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-08-09T12:30:16+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/09\/sikk-hc-application-allowed-under-or-vi-r-17-cpc-1908-seeking-amendment-to-the-plaint-erroneous-court-explains\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/09\/sikk-hc-application-allowed-under-or-vi-r-17-cpc-1908-seeking-amendment-to-the-plaint-erroneous-court-explains\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/09\/sikk-hc-application-allowed-under-or-vi-r-17-cpc-1908-seeking-amendment-to-the-plaint-erroneous-court-explains\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sikk HC | Application allowed under Or. VI R. 17 CPC, 1908, seeking amendment to the plaint erroneous; Court explains \u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":313276,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/06\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-amendment-to-written-statement-under-order-vi-rule-17-cpc-for-effective-adjudication-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":252467,"position":0},"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds amendment to written statement under Order VI Rule 17 CPC, emphasising necessity for effective adjudication","author":"Ritu","date":"February 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court noted that the amendment did not change the suit's nature fundamentally and would not cause undue prejudice to the petitioner.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":362730,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/06\/bom-hc-amendment-and-rejection-of-plaint-to-be-considered-simultaneously\/","url_meta":{"origin":252467,"position":1},"title":"Application for amendment of plaint affecting Court\u2019s jurisdiction and application for return of plaint to be considered simultaneously: Bombay HC","author":"Editor","date":"October 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioner contended that the suit did not fall within the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Court, so the respondent filed an amendment application to amend the valuation of the suit \\to bring the suit within the jurisdiction of the Court.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Amendment and rejection of plaint to be considered simultaneously","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Amendment-and-rejection-of-plaint-to-be-considered-simultaneously.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Amendment-and-rejection-of-plaint-to-be-considered-simultaneously.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Amendment-and-rejection-of-plaint-to-be-considered-simultaneously.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Amendment-and-rejection-of-plaint-to-be-considered-simultaneously.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219294,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/09\/raj-hc-high-court-allows-application-for-amendment-of-the-plaint-after-rejection-by-the-trial-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":252467,"position":2},"title":"Raj HC | High Court allows application for amendment of the plaint after rejection by the trial court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Dinesh Mehta, J. allowed a petition for correction and amendment of the plaint due to inadvertent errors. In the present case, the application of the petitioner under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 had been rejected by the trial court, barring it\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":241304,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/25\/ker-hc-proviso-to-or-vi-r-17-of-code-curtails-absolute-discretion-of-court-to-allow-amendment-at-any-stage-of-suit-it-has-to-be-shown-that-in-spite-of-due-diligence-such-amendment-could-not-have\/","url_meta":{"origin":252467,"position":3},"title":"Ker HC | Proviso to Or. VI R. 17 of Code curtails absolute discretion of Court to allow amendment at any stage of suit, it has to be shown that in spite of due diligence, such amendment could not have been sought earlier; legal position reiterated","author":"Editor","date":"December 25, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: R. Narayana Pisharadi, J., while allowing the instant petition, set aside the order of trial Court, thereby allowing the amendment of the plaint contrary to the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure. In the present case, respondent instituted a suit before trial Court for obtaining a decree\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":329489,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/28\/o-vi-r-17-does-not-limit-application-for-amendment-pleadings-at-any-stage-of-proceedings-sikkim-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":252467,"position":4},"title":"\u2018O. VI R. 17 does not limit amendment of pleadings at any stage of proceedings, if it is necessary for determining the real questions in controversy\u2019: Sikkim HC","author":"Editor","date":"August 28, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The amendments were imperative for the proper and effective adjudication of the dispute; refusal to allow the amendment application would have caused injustice or resulted in multiple litigations; and the amendments did not constitutionally or fundamentally change the nature of the case.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sikkim High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200644,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/26\/application-under-order-vi-rule-17-cpc-cannot-be-allowed-to-convert-title-of-a-suit-filed-by-private-individual-to-private-limited-company\/","url_meta":{"origin":252467,"position":5},"title":"Application under Or 6 R 17 CPC cannot be allowed to convert title of suit filed by an individual to one by private limited company","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Anu Malhotra, J. dismissed a petition filed against the order of the trial court whereby plaintiff's application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC was rejected. The petitioner had instituted a suit for recovery of Rs 25 lakhs along with pendente lite\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252467","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=252467"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252467\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=252467"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=252467"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=252467"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}