{"id":252392,"date":"2021-08-07T09:00:30","date_gmt":"2021-08-07T03:30:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=252392"},"modified":"2021-08-12T18:23:04","modified_gmt":"2021-08-12T12:53:04","slug":"trade-mark-infringement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/07\/trade-mark-infringement\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | Whether S. 124 of Trade Marks Act provide for stay of action against passing off? Read on"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: <\/strong>Asha Menon, J., addressed a suit for trade mark infringement, wherein the Court additionally addressed the scope of Section 124 of Trade Marks Act.<\/p>\n

Instant petition, petitioner was aggrieved that on account of the fact that his suit, which he had filed against the defendants for infringement of his proprietary trade mark \u201cRACER\u201d as also passing off their goods as that of the petitioner and other reliefs, was stayed by the trial court.<\/p>\n

The stated order was challenged and was further disposed of by permitting the petitioner to withdraw that petition and granting liberty to approach the Tribunal (sic.) by review petition.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the petitioner, S.K. Bansal relied upon the judgment of this Court in J. K. Oil Industries v. Adani Wilmar Ltd.<\/em>, 2018 SCC OnLine Del 9367<\/a> to submit that when a suit was filed for infringement of trade mark as also for passing off, the filing of a rectification petition before the Intellectual Property Rights Board would result in the stay of the suit as far as infringement of trade mark was concerned under Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, but that suit with regard to passing off was to continue.<\/p>\n

With regard to the prayer of the petitioner for continuing the suit for passing off, the counsel submitted that since an injunction was already in force against the respondents and the respondents were not using the trade mark \u201cRACER\u201d, no prejudice was being caused to the petitioner, if the suit waiting for the disposal of the rectification petition filed by the respondents before the IPRB. Thus, the counsel submitted that the present petition deserved to be dismissed.<\/p>\n

Analysis, Law and Decision<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Bench stated that it is settled law that Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act does not provide for stay of action against the passing off and was applicable only where a rectification application\/cancellation has been sought against the registered trade mark that a plaintiff claims to be exclusively it’s own.<\/p>\n

The above is intended to avoid conflicting decisions by the Civil Courts and the Tribunal.<\/p>\n

\n

There is no such occasion arising in a suit for passing off. It is only when clever drafting discloses the intent of the plaintiff to get over the statutory bar, being aware of the rectification proceedings commenced against the trade mark that it claims is exclusively it’s own.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Hence, Court held that the trial court had misread the judgments of this Court in Micolube India Ltd. v. Maggon Auto Centre,\u00a0 \u00a0 <\/em>2010 SCC OnLine Del 138, <\/b>and an error apparent on the face of the impugned order. Trial Court ought not to have directed that the entire suit be stayed, though, this Court including J.K. Oil Industries v. Adani Wilmar Ltd., <\/em>2018 SCC OnLine Del 9367<\/a>, has consistently held that while the suit for infringement of trade mark has to be stayed under Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act, when a rectification petition is filed before the IPRB, an action for passing off could continue.<\/p>\n

In view of the above petition was allowed. The order passed by the trial court was modified to read that Civil Suit No.577\/2016 [New No.10725\/2016] shall remain stayed under Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act qua the action for infringement of trade mark, but shall continue qua the relief sought against passing off and connected reliefs. [Parveen Kumar Gupta v. Ravi Chadha, 2021 SCC OnLine Del 3916<\/b><\/a>, decided on 6-08-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Advocates before the Court:<\/strong><\/p>\n

For the Petitioner: S.K. Bansal and Ajay Amitabh Suman, Advocates<\/p>\n

For the Respondents: Ashish Deep Verma, Kamya Ritu Verma, Vijay Singh and Bharti Sharma, Advocates<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: Asha Menon, J., addressed a suit for trade mark infringement, wherein the Court additionally addressed the scope of Section <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2543,29785,14722,46683,31861,46158],"class_list":["post-252392","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-law","tag-passing-off","tag-section-124-trade-marks-act","tag-suit","tag-trade-mark-infringement"],"yoast_head":"\nDel HC | Whether S. 124 of Trade Marks Act provide for stay of action against passing off? Read on | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Trade mark infringement\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/07\/trade-mark-infringement\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | Whether S. 124 of Trade Marks Act provide for stay of action against passing off? Read on\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Trade mark infringement\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/07\/trade-mark-infringement\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-08-07T03:30:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-08-12T12:53:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/07\/trade-mark-infringement\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/07\/trade-mark-infringement\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | Whether S. 124 of Trade Marks Act provide for stay of action against passing off? Read on | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-08-07T03:30:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-08-12T12:53:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Trade mark infringement\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/07\/trade-mark-infringement\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/07\/trade-mark-infringement\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/07\/trade-mark-infringement\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | Whether S. 124 of Trade Marks Act provide for stay of action against passing off? Read on\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | Whether S. 124 of Trade Marks Act provide for stay of action against passing off? Read on | SCC Times","description":"Trade mark infringement","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/07\/trade-mark-infringement\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | Whether S. 124 of Trade Marks Act provide for stay of action against passing off? Read on","og_description":"Trade mark infringement","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/07\/trade-mark-infringement\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-08-07T03:30:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-08-12T12:53:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/07\/trade-mark-infringement\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/07\/trade-mark-infringement\/","name":"Del HC | Whether S. 124 of Trade Marks Act provide for stay of action against passing off? Read on | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-08-07T03:30:30+00:00","dateModified":"2021-08-12T12:53:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Trade mark infringement","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/07\/trade-mark-infringement\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/07\/trade-mark-infringement\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/07\/trade-mark-infringement\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | Whether S. 124 of Trade Marks Act provide for stay of action against passing off? Read on"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":301124,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/09\/delhi-hc-rectification-petition-can-be-filed-where-the-dynamic-effect-of-the-registration-is-felt-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":252392,"position":0},"title":"Rectification petition in a trade mark suit can be filed where the dynamic effect of the registration of impugned mark is felt: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"September 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWith the expansion of the internet, and access to goods and services that may originate from some distant site, a litigant is free to file an infringement, or passing off, suit, before any Court within whose jurisdiction use of the impugned mark takes place.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":365423,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/31\/ker-hc-dismisses-plea-to-cancel-india-gate-trade-mark\/","url_meta":{"origin":252392,"position":1},"title":"Kerala High Court dismisses plea to cancel ‘INDIA GATE’ trade mark; clarifies jurisdiction is with Delhi HC","author":"Editor","date":"October 31, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe power of rectification is exercisable only by the High Court exercising appellate jurisdiction over the appropriate office of the Trade Marks Registry, wherein the entry relating to the impugned mark is made.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"INDIA GATE trade mark","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/INDIA-GATE-trade-mark.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/INDIA-GATE-trade-mark.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/INDIA-GATE-trade-mark.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/INDIA-GATE-trade-mark.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239681,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/26\/ap-hc-extensive-analysis-of-trade-marks-law-can-injunction-be-granted-in-case-a-trade-mark-falls-under-ambit-of-test-of-likelihood-of-confusion-or-deception-read-more-on-trademark-law-and-buye\/","url_meta":{"origin":252392,"position":2},"title":"AP HC | Extensive Analysis of Trade Marks Law: Can injunction be granted in case a trade mark falls under ambit of ‘Test of likelihood of confusion or deception’? Read more on Buyer Confusion","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 26, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Andhra Pradesh High Court:\u00a0R. Raghunandan Rao, J., addressed a matter wherein the law relating to Trade Mark and Passing off was highlighted wherein the trademarks of the parties are similar or identical. Permanent Injunction was sought by the respondent to restrain the appellant from infringing on the trademarks or passing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278920,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/01\/delhi-high-court-grants-permanent-injunction-in-favour-of-dream-11-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":252392,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction in favour of Dream 11 in a trade mark infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"December 1, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction in favour of Dream 11 against the person who was operating under the domain name \u2018www.dream11.bet\u2019 and held that the domain name adopted by the defendant was deceptively similar to that of the plaintiffs and was clearly intended to ride on the goodwill and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":279621,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/15\/delhi-high-court-grants-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-to-sukam-systems-p-ltd-for-its-trade-mark-su-kam-against-lithium-power-energy-p-ltd-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":252392,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ex parte ad interim injunction to Sukam Systems (P) Ltd. for its trade mark \u2018Su-Kam\u2019 against Lithium Power Energy (P) Ltd in a trade mark infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"December 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"In the present case, Sukam Systems (P) Ltd. alleged infringement and passing of by Lithium Power Energy (P) Ltd. of its registered trade marks \u2018Su-Kam\u2019, \u2018BIG conqueror Tubular Battery\u2019 and \u2018BIG Warrior Tubular Battery\u2019.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":278658,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/01\/delhi-high-court-rules-on-the-application-of-s-124-trade-marks-act-1999-and-the-standards-of-pleadings-required-to-satisfy-the-ingredients-of-the-provision\/","url_meta":{"origin":252392,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court rules on the application of S. 124 Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the standards of pleadings required to satisfy the ingredients of the provision","author":"Editor","date":"November 1, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In an application filed by the plaintiff seeking permission to file rectification\/cancellation petition against registrations of Defendant's trademark \u2018TRAVELXP\u2019 in different classes, Jyoti Singh, J., adjourned the proceedings for a period of three months, to enable the plaintiffs to take appropriate steps, in accordance with\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252392","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=252392"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252392\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=252392"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=252392"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=252392"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}