{"id":251591,"date":"2021-07-22T11:00:53","date_gmt":"2021-07-22T05:30:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=251591"},"modified":"2021-08-06T11:36:57","modified_gmt":"2021-08-06T06:06:57","slug":"covid-19-vaccination-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/22\/covid-19-vaccination-4\/","title":{"rendered":"Gau HC | \u201cNot based on intelligible differentia\u201d; HC stays Arunachal Pradesh\u2019s order discriminating between vaccinated and non-vaccinated persons"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Gauhati High Court: <\/strong>Nani Tagia, J., stayed the order of the State Executive Committee of Arunachal Pradesh whereby non-vaccinated persons for Covid-19 were being discriminated for the purpose of permit to enter the State for developmental works in both public and private sector.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Covid-19 Vaccination:\u00a0 Whether Mandatory or Voluntary?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner contended that as per the RTI Information furnished by the Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare, which is available on the Ministry\u2019s website, Covid-19 vaccination is not mandatory but voluntary. The petitioner also referred to an answer given on 19-03-2021 in the Lok Sabha to an Unstarred Question No. 3976 by the Minister of State in the Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare stating that <em>there is no provision of compensation for recipients of Covid-19 Vaccination against any kind of side effects or medical complication that may arise due to inoculation. The Covid-19 Vaccination is entirely voluntary for the beneficiaries.<\/em> The petitioner contended that the impugned order had interfered with the fundamental rights granted under Article 19 (1) (d) of the Constitution.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Analysis by the Court<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Vide Clause 11 of the Order dated 30-06-2021, issued by the Chief Secretary cum Chairperson-State Executive Committee, Government of Arunachal Pradesh, vaccinated and unvaccinated persons for Covid-19 virus had been classified into two groups for the purpose of issuing temporary permits for developmental works in both public and private sector. Clause 11 of the Order reads as under:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u201c11. Tourist ILPs shall remain suspended during the period of this order, however for developmental works in both public and private sector; temporary permits may be issued provided such persons are vaccinated for COVID 19.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">While persons who were vaccinated for Covid-19 had been allowed to be issued with a permit to visit Arunachal Pradesh, persons who were not vaccinated with Covid-19 vaccine had not been allowed to be issued with a temporary permit to visit Arunachal Pradesh for developmental works in both public and private sector. The Bench stated that the right granted under Article 19 (1) (d) of the Constitution to move freely throughout the territory of India is not absolute and the State may impose reasonable restrictions either in the interest of the general public or for the protection of the interest of the Scheduled Tribe. However, such restrictions must be a reasonable one conforming to the requirement of Article 14 of the Constitution.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Whether Classification of Vaccinated and Non-vaccinated was based on <em>intelligible differentia<\/em> <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Noticing that the classification sought to be made between the vaccinated and unvaccinated persons was to contain Covid-19 pandemic and its further spread in the State of Arunachal Pradesh, the Bench stated that, \u201ct<em>here is no evidence available either in the record or in the public domain that Covid-19 vaccinated persons cannot be infected with Covid-19 virus, or he\/she cannot be a carrier of a Covid-19 virus and consequently, a spreader of Covid-19 virus.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Bench said that <strong><em>in so far as the spread of Covid- 19 Virus to others is concerned, the Covid-19 vaccinated and unvaccinated person or persons are the same.<\/em><\/strong> Both can equally be a potential spreader if they are infected with the Covid-19 Virus in them. Hence, the classification must always rest upon some real and substantial distinction bearing reasonable and just needs in respect of which it is made.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hence, the Bench stated, if the sole object of issuing the impugned order was for containment of the Covid-19 pandemic and its further spread in the State of Arunachal Pradesh, the classification sought to be made between vaccinated and unvaccinated persons was, <em>prima facie<\/em>, a classification not founded on intelligible differentia nor it was found to have a rational relation\/nexus to the object sought to be achieved by such classification, namely, containment and further spread of Covid-19 pandemic.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\"><strong>Decision<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Thus, the Bench held that the impugned notification violated Articles 14, 19 (1) (d) &amp; 21 of the Constitution, in so far it made classification of vaccinated and non-vaccinated persons for the purpose of issuance of temporary permits for developmental works in the State of Arunachal Pradesh. Accordingly, Clause 11 of the impugned order was stayed to the extent it discriminated between Covid-19 vaccinated persons and Covid-19 unvaccinated persons.[Madan Mili v. Union of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/O1ZO9I78\"><b>2021 SCC OnLine Gau 1503<\/b><\/a>, decided on 19-07-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008080;\">Kamini Sharma, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Appearance before the Court by:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Advocates for the Petitioner: Debasmita Ghosh, Ebo Mili, Chanya Bangsia and S. Dey<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Advocates for the Respondent: Marto Kato, ASG, R. H. Nabam, Addl. Adv. General, A.P<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gauhati High Court: Nani Tagia, J., stayed the order of the State Executive Committee of Arunachal Pradesh whereby non-vaccinated persons for Covid-19 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[39924,25464,42998,29785,10061],"class_list":["post-251591","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-covid-19","tag-gauhati-high-court","tag-intelligible-differentia","tag-law","tag-vaccination"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Gau HC | \u201cNot based on intelligible differentia\u201d; HC stays Arunachal Pradesh\u2019s order discriminating between vaccinated and non-vaccinated persons | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"COVID-19 Vaccination\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/22\/covid-19-vaccination-4\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Gau HC | \u201cNot based on intelligible differentia\u201d; HC stays Arunachal Pradesh\u2019s order discriminating between vaccinated and non-vaccinated persons\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"COVID-19 Vaccination\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/22\/covid-19-vaccination-4\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-07-22T05:30:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-08-06T06:06:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Gauhati-HC.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/22\/covid-19-vaccination-4\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/22\/covid-19-vaccination-4\/\",\"name\":\"Gau HC | \u201cNot based on intelligible differentia\u201d; HC stays Arunachal Pradesh\u2019s order discriminating between vaccinated and non-vaccinated persons | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-07-22T05:30:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-08-06T06:06:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"COVID-19 Vaccination\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/22\/covid-19-vaccination-4\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/22\/covid-19-vaccination-4\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/22\/covid-19-vaccination-4\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Gau HC | \u201cNot based on intelligible differentia\u201d; HC stays Arunachal Pradesh\u2019s order discriminating between vaccinated and non-vaccinated persons\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Gau HC | \u201cNot based on intelligible differentia\u201d; HC stays Arunachal Pradesh\u2019s order discriminating between vaccinated and non-vaccinated persons | SCC Times","description":"COVID-19 Vaccination","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/22\/covid-19-vaccination-4\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Gau HC | \u201cNot based on intelligible differentia\u201d; HC stays Arunachal Pradesh\u2019s order discriminating between vaccinated and non-vaccinated persons","og_description":"COVID-19 Vaccination","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/22\/covid-19-vaccination-4\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-07-22T05:30:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-08-06T06:06:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Gauhati-HC.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/22\/covid-19-vaccination-4\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/22\/covid-19-vaccination-4\/","name":"Gau HC | \u201cNot based on intelligible differentia\u201d; HC stays Arunachal Pradesh\u2019s order discriminating between vaccinated and non-vaccinated persons | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-07-22T05:30:53+00:00","dateModified":"2021-08-06T06:06:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"COVID-19 Vaccination","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/22\/covid-19-vaccination-4\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/22\/covid-19-vaccination-4\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/22\/covid-19-vaccination-4\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Gau HC | \u201cNot based on intelligible differentia\u201d; HC stays Arunachal Pradesh\u2019s order discriminating between vaccinated and non-vaccinated persons"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":250562,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/covid-19-vaccination-3\/","url_meta":{"origin":251591,"position":0},"title":"Gau HC | Priority vaccination for persons with disabilities; HC issues directives to Arunachal Pradesh Government","author":"Editor","date":"July 1, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court: Nani Tagia, J., issued directions to the State government to provide priority vaccinations for persons with disabilities. The petitioner, a practising lawyer and a social activist, had filed instant PIL espousing the cause of the persons with disabilities in the State of Arunachal Pradesh within the meaning\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":250327,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/25\/covid-19-vaccination-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":251591,"position":1},"title":"Megh HC | Whether vaccination can at all be made mandatory and whether such mandatory action can adversely affect the right of a citizen to earn his\/her livelihood? Court answers","author":"Editor","date":"June 25, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Meghalaya High Court: The Division Bench of Biswanath Somadder, CJ. and H.S. Thangkhiew, J., decided on the question as to whether vaccination can at all be made mandatory and whether such mandatory action can adversely affect the right of a citizen to earn his\/her livelihood. The Court at first deemed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":248430,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/19\/covid-vaccinationchh-hc%e2%94%82redistribution-of-unused-antyodaya-or-other-category-vaccines-at-the-end-of-the-day-hc-agrees-to-hear-the-matter-read-the-current-vaccine-allocation-plan\/","url_meta":{"origin":251591,"position":2},"title":"[COVID Vaccination] Chh HC \u2502 Redistribution of unused Antyodaya or other category vaccines at the end of the day: HC agrees to hear the matter. Read the current Vaccine Allocation plan\u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"May 19, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: A Division Bench of Prashant Kumar Mishra and Parth Prateem Sahu JJ. laid down allotment of vaccines in percentage to the 'Antyodaya Group', the persons belonging to the 'Below Poverty Line' and the persons belonging to the 'Above Poverty Line'. The present issue has come up before\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":251282,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/15\/vaccinated-people\/","url_meta":{"origin":251591,"position":3},"title":"Mani HC | State cannot seek to impose conditions upon citizens so as to compel them to get vaccinated; Courts holds restraining the non-vaccinated people illegal","author":"Editor","date":"July 15, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Manipur High Court: The Division Bench of Sanjay Kumar, CJ. and KH Nobin Singh, J., decided on a petition which was filed challenging the notification dated 30-06-2021 issued by the Home Department, Government of Manipur and more particularly the para which stated that the State Government proposes to relax curfew\/containment\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/manipurHC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":248155,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/13\/covid-19-upsurge-j-hc-tells-center\/","url_meta":{"origin":251591,"position":4},"title":"[Covid-19 Upsurge] J&#038;K HC| \u201cConsider making additional budgetary allocation for financial assistance of lawyers\u2019 family\u201d; HC tells Center\u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"May 13, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: The Division Bench of Pankaj Mithal, Cj., and Sanjay Dhar, J., had taken suo moto action for initiating this PIL concerning Covid-19 pandemic; as the Union Territory was in the spate of second wave of Covid-19 Pandemic. Amicus curiae, Mrs Monika Kohli, had expressed anxiety\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":248838,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/28\/gau-hc-what-kind-of-test-is-being-done-for-determination-of-covid-19-infection-hc-directs-assam-government-to-set-up-mobile-medical-units-in-tea-gardens\/","url_meta":{"origin":251591,"position":5},"title":"Gau HC | \u201cWhat kind of test is being done for determination of COVID-19 infection?\u201d; HC directs Assam government to set up Mobile Medical Units in Tea Gardens","author":"Editor","date":"May 28, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court: The Division Bench of Sudhanshu Dhulia, CJ., and Manash Ranjan Pathak, J., addressed the issues relating to situation under the Covid-19 pandemic in the Tea Gardens of Assam and conditioner of workers in these Tea Gardens. The petitioner submitted before the Court that there are about 800\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/251591","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=251591"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/251591\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=251591"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=251591"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=251591"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}