{"id":251543,"date":"2021-07-20T17:00:07","date_gmt":"2021-07-20T11:30:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=251543"},"modified":"2021-07-23T10:57:35","modified_gmt":"2021-07-23T05:27:35","slug":"pawnor-under-contract-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/20\/pawnor-under-contract-act\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | Can \u2018Pawnor\u2019 under Ss. 172\/176 of Contract Act be made liable for repayment of entire debt, in absence of any guarantee being furnished? Succinct Report\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court: <\/strong>The Division Bench of Rajiv Sahai Endlaw and Asha Menon, JJ., held that the pawnor, merely by his act of delivering his own goods to a creditor in consideration of a credit facility granted to the debtor\/borrower, by legal fiction becomes liable for the entire debt, would be detrimental to trade and commerce, with borrowings becoming difficult to obtain owing to persons not agreeing to make a pledge of their goods for credit to another, for the fear of becoming liable for more than the value of goods.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><em>Legal Question for Consideration<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Whether by virtue of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/W2A1J7O3\">Section 176 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872<\/a>, the pawnor, even if different from borrower or the principal debtor, becomes liable for payment of the entire debt, even if has not furnished any guarantee for repayment of the entire debt i.e. over and above the value of the pawned goods?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><em>Facts pertinent to the matter<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Respondent 1 had filed the original application before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Delhi under Section 19 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 along with <em>pendente lite <\/em>and future interest, jointly and severally from respondent 2 and petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Aggrieved from the order of DRAT, of dismissal of his appeal, the petitioner filed the instant petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><em>Analysis, Law, Decision<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was noted that the counsel for respondent 1 Bank had fairly admitted that there was no document whereunder the petitioner had undertaken liability as a borrower, in his personal capacity or as a guarantor for repayment of the dues of respondent 2 Company to the respondent 1 Bank.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench on an interpretation of Clause 2.1 of the Share Pledge Agreement was unable to agree with the contention of respondent 1 Bank that the petitioner became liable for the entire debt.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, it was stated that,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the Share Pledge Agreement,<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>while the respondent 1 Bank is described as the Bank, the respondent 2 Company is described as the Borrower and the petitioner is described as the Pledgor; the same is indicative of the role of the petitioner in the agreement being confined to that of a pledgor\/pawnor, as distinct from a borrower; had the intent been, of the petitioner along with the respondent 2 Company borrowing the monies and being liable for repayment thereof, the petitioner, besides as a pledgor, would also have been described as a borrower;<\/li>\n<li>Clause 2.1 merely notes the agreement to be for the benefit of the respondent 1 Bank; merely by stating so, the petitioner did not and could not in law have become liable for more than that for which he expressly became liable under the Share Pledge Agreement; the pledge made by the petitioner under the agreement was also for the benefit of the respondent 1 Bank and thus merely from the statement that the agreement was for the benefit of the respondent 1 Bank, it does not follow that the benefit to the respondent 1 Bank flowing from the petitioner was more than that undertaken by the petitioner or provided in the agreement;<\/li>\n<li>the petitioner pledged his shares as security for due discharge and repayment of Obligations under the Finance Documents; it is not the case that under the Finance Documents the petitioner is personally liable; and,<\/li>\n<li>the parties expressly agreed that in the event of any default by the borrower, the respondent 1 Bank would be entitled to transfer or register in its name the pledged shares and to receive all amounts payable with respect thereto and to sell the same; there is no clause, that on any default or breach by the respondent 2 Company as borrower, the petitioner would become personally liable for the borrowings of respondent 2 Company.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Supreme Court, <em>in State of Maharashtra v. M.N. Kaul,<\/em> AIR 1967 SC 1634, while answering the question of whether the guarantee subject matter thereof was enforceable, held, <em>\u201cThat depends upon the terms under which the guarantor bound himself. Under the law he cannot be made liable for more than he has undertaken\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In <em>Central Bank of India v. Virudhunagar Steel Rolling Mills Ltd<\/em>., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/tnlTwBR2\">(2015) 16 SCC 207<\/a>, held that,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u201c\u2026had the intent been to make the directors personally liable for the outstanding liabilities of the company also, it could have been so provided in the letter of guarantee and the directors were thus not personally liable for the dues of prior to the date they signed the letter of guarantee. It was further held that since the deed of guarantee was drafted by the bank, in case of doubt, had to be read against the bank.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the instant matter, High Court dismissed the contention of the respondent 1 Bank that the petitioner admitted his liability before the Recovery Officer.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Court stated that banks are also known to, besides the borrower, make others also on whose surety\/guarantee the said credit facilities are extended to the borrower, sign a plethora of documents, again in their standard form. From the conduct of the respondent 1 Bank not making the petitioner sign any such documents, the only inference is that the petitioner was not intended to be liable for dues of respondent 2 Company save to the extent of the value of the shares pledged by the respondent 2 Company.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Moving, further, with the analysis, Bench elaborated that Section 172 provides bailment of goods as security for payment of a debt is called a \u201cpledge\u201d and the bailor is called the \u201cpawnor\u201d and the bailee, the \u201cpawnee\u201d.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">In Court\u2019s opinion, none of the provisions preceding or following Section 176 provide for the pawnor, by virtue of the pledge, even if not otherwise liable for the payment of debt, by a legal fiction becoming so liable for payment for debt, even beyond the value of the pawned goods.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><em>\u201c\u2026we hesitate to, merely on the basis of Section 176 hold that a pawnee can recover from the pawnor anything beyond the value of the goods which the pawnor has pledged, unless the pawnor has separately<\/em> <em>from the pledge also made himself liable for the debt.\u201d<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Therefore, <\/strong>Bench decided that under Section 176 of the Contract Act, the pawnor, if not otherwise liable for the debt as a borrower or as a guarantor or otherwise, does not merely from the act of making a pledge, become liable to the creditor\/pawnee, for anything more than the value of the goods pledged.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hence, DRAT erred in holding the petitioner as a pawnor become liable for the entire debt for which pledge was made even without being a borrower and even in the absence of having promised so.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above discussion, a petition was disposed of. [Ajoy Khanderia v. Barclays Bank, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/FVyRIvRH\"><b>2021 SCC OnLine Del 3740<\/b><\/a>, decided on 20-07-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><strong>Advocates before the Court:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #993300;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 1\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p>Mr Rajeeve Mehra, Sr. Adv. with Mr Kanishk Ahuja and Ms Neha Bhatia, Advs<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #993300;\">For the Respondent:<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 1\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p>Mr R.P. Aggarwal and Ms Manisha Agrawal, Advs.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h3><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Additional Read:<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 1\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/W2A1J7O3\">Section 176 &#8211;<\/a> Pawnee&#8217;s right where pawnor makes default. \u2013 If the pawnor makes default in payment of the debt, or performance, at the stipulated time of the promise, in respect of which the goods were pledged, the pawnee may bring a suit against the pawnor upon the debt or promise, and retain the goods pledged as a collateral security; or he may sell the thing pledged, on giving the pawnor reasonable notice of the sale.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">If the proceeds of such sale are less than the amount due in respect of the debt or promise, the pawnor is still liable to pay the balance. If the proceeds of the sale are greater than the amount so due, the pawnee shall pay over the surplus to the pawnor.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of Rajiv Sahai Endlaw and Asha Menon, JJ., held that the pawnor, merely by his act <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[35213,3090,41118,9292,31346,2543,38363,29785,46538,46541,46540,46539,46542,46543,46544],"class_list":["post-251543","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bailee","tag-bank","tag-borrower","tag-contract-act","tag-debt","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-guarantee","tag-law","tag-liability-of-debt","tag-pawnee","tag-pawnor","tag-pledge","tag-repayment-of-debt","tag-section-172-of-contract-act","tag-section-176-of-contract-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Del HC | Can \u2018Pawnor\u2019 under Ss. 172\/176 of Contract Act be made liable for repayment of entire debt, in absence of any guarantee being furnished? Succinct Report\u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Pawnor under Contract Act\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/20\/pawnor-under-contract-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | Can \u2018Pawnor\u2019 under Ss. 172\/176 of Contract Act be made liable for repayment of entire debt, in absence of any guarantee being furnished? Succinct Report\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Pawnor under Contract Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/20\/pawnor-under-contract-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-07-20T11:30:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-07-23T05:27:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/20\/pawnor-under-contract-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/20\/pawnor-under-contract-act\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | Can \u2018Pawnor\u2019 under Ss. 172\/176 of Contract Act be made liable for repayment of entire debt, in absence of any guarantee being furnished? Succinct Report\u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-07-20T11:30:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-07-23T05:27:35+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Pawnor under Contract Act\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/20\/pawnor-under-contract-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/20\/pawnor-under-contract-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/20\/pawnor-under-contract-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | Can \u2018Pawnor\u2019 under Ss. 172\/176 of Contract Act be made liable for repayment of entire debt, in absence of any guarantee being furnished? Succinct Report\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | Can \u2018Pawnor\u2019 under Ss. 172\/176 of Contract Act be made liable for repayment of entire debt, in absence of any guarantee being furnished? Succinct Report\u00a0 | SCC Times","description":"Pawnor under Contract Act","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/20\/pawnor-under-contract-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | Can \u2018Pawnor\u2019 under Ss. 172\/176 of Contract Act be made liable for repayment of entire debt, in absence of any guarantee being furnished? Succinct Report\u00a0","og_description":"Pawnor under Contract Act","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/20\/pawnor-under-contract-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-07-20T11:30:07+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-07-23T05:27:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/20\/pawnor-under-contract-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/20\/pawnor-under-contract-act\/","name":"Del HC | Can \u2018Pawnor\u2019 under Ss. 172\/176 of Contract Act be made liable for repayment of entire debt, in absence of any guarantee being furnished? Succinct Report\u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-07-20T11:30:07+00:00","dateModified":"2021-07-23T05:27:35+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Pawnor under Contract Act","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/20\/pawnor-under-contract-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/20\/pawnor-under-contract-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/20\/pawnor-under-contract-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | Can \u2018Pawnor\u2019 under Ss. 172\/176 of Contract Act be made liable for repayment of entire debt, in absence of any guarantee being furnished? Succinct Report\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":266879,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/13\/pawnee-pledge-beneficial-owner-right-to-sell-actual-sale-contract-act-sebi-depositories-regulation-supreme-court-india-judgments-legal-research-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":251543,"position":0},"title":"Pawnee recording self as &#8220;beneficial owner&#8221; is a necessary condition to exercise right to sell pledged good; it does not amount to &#8220;actual sale&#8221;: SC\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of MR Shah and Sanjiv Khanna*, JJ has held that mere exercise of the right by the pawnee to record himself as the \u2018beneficial owner\u2019, which is a necessary precondition before the pawnee can exercise his right to sell, is not \u2018actual sale\u2019 and would not\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-171.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-171.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-171.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-171.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-171.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":364043,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/16\/rajasthan-hc-section-138-ni-act-on-cheque-for-time-barred-debt-revives-enforceability-under-contract-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":251543,"position":1},"title":"Cheque for Time-Barred Debt Revives Enforceability Under S. 25(3) Contract Act; Dishonour attracts Section 138 NI Act: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Editor","date":"October 16, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA meaningful reading of Sections 20, 118 and 139 of the NI Act makes it clear that a person who signs a cheque and delivers it to the payee remains liable unless he successfully rebuts the statutory presumptions.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 138 NI Act on Cheque for Time-Barred Debt","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Section-138-NI-Act-on-Cheque-for-Time-Barred-Debt.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Section-138-NI-Act-on-Cheque-for-Time-Barred-Debt.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Section-138-NI-Act-on-Cheque-for-Time-Barred-Debt.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Section-138-NI-Act-on-Cheque-for-Time-Barred-Debt.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266804,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/13\/law-on-liability-of-guarantor-dishonour-of-cheque-section-138-ni-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":251543,"position":2},"title":"Liability of Guarantor for Cheque Dishonour: Can lender enforce his right against either principal borrower or his guarantor? Dwarka Courts answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Dwarka Courts, Delhi: Rahul Jain, Metropolitan Magistrate, while addressing a matter regarding dishonour of cheque, held that mere assertion of non-receipt of legal notice cannot help the accused in escaping liability under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. It was alleged in complaint that accused had approached the complainant to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/Dwarka-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/Dwarka-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/Dwarka-Court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/Dwarka-Court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/Dwarka-Court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":269695,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/07\/bombay-high-court-lenders-are-entitled-to-voting-rights-on-pledged-shares-as-a-matter-of-contract-appeal-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":251543,"position":3},"title":"Bombay High Court | Yes Bank-Dish TV Case: Beneficial Owner of pledged shares, contractually entitled to all rights, including voting rights in Annual General Meeting","author":"Editor","date":"July 7, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of G.S.Patel and Madhav J Jamdar, JJ. dismissed an appeal ruling that lenders are entitled to voting rights on pledged shares as a matter of contract. The appeal was against the order of the Single Judge dated 17-06-2022. The main point of discussion before\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":350920,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/18\/explained-scope-and-ambit-s11-sarfaesi-act-supreme-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":251543,"position":4},"title":"Explained | Supreme Court decision on scope &amp; ambit of Section 11 of the SARFAESI Act","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 18, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThere is no need for an explicit written arbitration agreement to attract Section 11 of the SARFAESI Act. The provision creates a legal fiction as regards the existence of an arbitration agreement\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"S 11 SARFAESI Act scope","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/S-11-SARFAESI-Act-scope.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/S-11-SARFAESI-Act-scope.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/S-11-SARFAESI-Act-scope.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/S-11-SARFAESI-Act-scope.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":316446,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/08\/delhi-court-acquits-accused-under-section-138-negotiable-instruments-act-failure-establish-debt-adjustment-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":251543,"position":5},"title":"Delhi Court acquits accused under Section 138 NI Act on failure to establish debt adjustment","author":"Arunima","date":"March 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The complainant woefully failed to account for the amount of Rs 6,11,071\/- which was due on him towards the accused. Therefore, it cannot be said that the amount represented on the cheque in question was a legally recoverable debt.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"failure to establish debt adjustment","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/failure-to-establish-debt-adjustment.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/failure-to-establish-debt-adjustment.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/failure-to-establish-debt-adjustment.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/failure-to-establish-debt-adjustment.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/251543","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=251543"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/251543\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=251543"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=251543"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=251543"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}