{"id":251213,"date":"2021-07-13T17:00:16","date_gmt":"2021-07-13T11:30:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=251213"},"modified":"2021-07-30T12:17:13","modified_gmt":"2021-07-30T06:47:13","slug":"judgment-and-decree","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/judgment-and-decree\/","title":{"rendered":"When can decree on admission be passed? Madras HC explains how general admission of facts v. admission of claim, makes difference"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Madras High Court: <\/strong>Dr G. Jayachandran, J., refused to pass a decree in favour of the plaintiff who relied on general admission of facts made by the defendant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the instant matter, it was stated that the plaintiff was engaged in the business of providing and arranging finance to various borrowers and had lent a loan to the first defendant company, which is an NBFC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On the date of filing the suit, a sum of Rs 38,16,45,711\/- was due and payable to the plaintiff. While advancing the loan, the second defendant provided personal guarantees for each of the facility agreements entered by the first defendant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The second and third defendants were jointly and severally liable to pay the suit claim.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">According to the plaintiff, since 2014, the transaction between the plaintiff and the first defendant company was regular without any default till the month of September 2020.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, it was submitted that the misappropriation of the fund by the Management of the Company came to light, when there was a default and when the Chief Financial Officer of the first defendant issued a Circular on 07-10-2020 disclosing diversion of the fund of the first defendant company by the second defendant as a consequence, criminal proceedings had been initiated by the plaintiff and the matter had been seized by the Directorate of Enforcement Wing.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Extracting a certain portion of the pleadings in the written statement, the plaintiff sought passing of a decree and judgment upon the said statement as admission.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bench stated that the three admissions which were relied upon by the applicant were all general admissions and did not admit the suit claim.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, the Court added that the admission that fraud was committed <em>per se <\/em>will not entail the plaintiff for a decree as claimed in the suit. Whatever claimed in the suit has to be proved through evidence in the manner known to law and the portions of the admission relied upon by the plaintiff\/applicant is a general admission of fact regarding the liability of the first defendant company and its inability to pay his creditors. The general admissions of fact cannot be construed as an admission of suit claim to pass a judgment and decree.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above application was dismissed. [Northern Arc Capital (P) Ltd. v. Sambandh Finserve (P) Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/U4Wx1R7Y\"><b>2021 SCC OnLine Mad 2577<\/b><\/a>, decided on 5-07-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Advocates before the Court:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For Applicant: Mr Anirudh Krishnan<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For 1st Respondent: Mr. Supriyo Ranjan Mahaptra<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For 2nd respondent: Mr Prashant Rajapogal<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court: Dr G. Jayachandran, J., refused to pass a decree in favour of the plaintiff who relied on general admission <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[46495,9091,2713,35505,10141,12981,29785,3301,30292,2567,2516,2945,33086,46496,30796],"class_list":["post-251213","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-admission-of-fact","tag-criminal-proceedings","tag-decree","tag-directors-of-company","tag-fraud","tag-judgment","tag-law","tag-liability","tag-loan","tag-Madras_High_Court","tag-Misappropriation_of_funds","tag-NBFC","tag-pleadings","tag-suit-claim","tag-written-statement"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>When can decree on admission be passed? Madras HC explains how general admission of facts v. admission of claim, makes difference | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Judgment and Decree\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/judgment-and-decree\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"When can decree on admission be passed? Madras HC explains how general admission of facts v. admission of claim, makes difference\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Judgment and Decree\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/judgment-and-decree\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-07-13T11:30:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-07-30T06:47:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/madras-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/judgment-and-decree\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/judgment-and-decree\/\",\"name\":\"When can decree on admission be passed? Madras HC explains how general admission of facts v. admission of claim, makes difference | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-07-13T11:30:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-07-30T06:47:13+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Judgment and Decree\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/judgment-and-decree\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/judgment-and-decree\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/judgment-and-decree\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"When can decree on admission be passed? Madras HC explains how general admission of facts v. admission of claim, makes difference\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"When can decree on admission be passed? Madras HC explains how general admission of facts v. admission of claim, makes difference | SCC Times","description":"Judgment and Decree","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/judgment-and-decree\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"When can decree on admission be passed? Madras HC explains how general admission of facts v. admission of claim, makes difference","og_description":"Judgment and Decree","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/judgment-and-decree\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-07-13T11:30:16+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-07-30T06:47:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/madras-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/judgment-and-decree\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/judgment-and-decree\/","name":"When can decree on admission be passed? Madras HC explains how general admission of facts v. admission of claim, makes difference | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-07-13T11:30:16+00:00","dateModified":"2021-07-30T06:47:13+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Judgment and Decree","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/judgment-and-decree\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/judgment-and-decree\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/judgment-and-decree\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"When can decree on admission be passed? Madras HC explains how general admission of facts v. admission of claim, makes difference"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":268455,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/15\/a-suit-cannot-be-summarily-decreed-until-the-claim-stands-duly-proved-mad-hc-analyses-rules-of-evidence-vis-a-vis-order-xiii-a-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":251213,"position":0},"title":"A suit cannot be summarily decreed until the claim stands duly proved; Mad HC analyses Rules of Evidence Vis a Vis Order XIII A CPC","author":"Editor","date":"June 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: Senthil Kumar Ramamoorthy, J. remarked that a suit cannot be summarily decreed at the instance of a plaintiff unless such plaintiff satisfies the court that the suit claim stands duly proved.\u00a0 The facts of the case are such that the first defendant borrowed money from the Plaintiff\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255322,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/when-can-court-invoke-its-power-to-effect-an-attachment-under-or-38-r-5-of-civil-procedure-code\/","url_meta":{"origin":251213,"position":1},"title":"When can Court invoke its Power to effect an attachment under Or. 38 R. 5 of Civil Procedure Code? Madras HC decides","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: G. Jayachandran, J., with the lens of this decision addressed the Power under Order XXXVIII, Rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Code. In the present matter, the plaintiff a Non-banking Finance Company (NBFC) and the First defendant a Micro Level Finance Company were the parties, and the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":345785,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/15\/order-12-rule6-cpc-provisions-enabling-discretionary-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":251213,"position":2},"title":"Provisions of Order XII Rule 6 of CPC are enabling, discretionary and permissive: Supreme Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court also affirmed interpretation of Rule 6 by Delhi High Court in ITDC Limited v. Chander Pal Sood, wherein the High Court had held that Rule 6 gives a wide discretion to the Court.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Order XII Rule 6 CPC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Order-XII-Rule-6-CPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Order-XII-Rule-6-CPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Order-XII-Rule-6-CPC.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Order-XII-Rule-6-CPC.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":253042,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/20\/interim-injunction-in-favour-of-dps-society-against-infringement-of-trademark\/","url_meta":{"origin":251213,"position":3},"title":"Del HC grants interim injunction in favour of DPS Society against Infringement of trademark and crest logo by Delhi Public International School","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Sanjeev Narula, J. while addressing the matter of trademark infringement, opined that, \u201cBesides, considering that parties are in the field of education, deliberate adoption by the Defendants of impugned trade marks and logo that are deceptively similar and\/or identical to the Plaintiff\u2019s registered trade marks\/names and logos\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/Screenshot-2021-08-20-at-6.04.50-PM.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":252268,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/05\/section-138-ni-act-8\/","url_meta":{"origin":251213,"position":4},"title":"Does a decree automatically follows when a Metropolitan Magistrate take cognizance of an offence under S. 138 NI Act? Read on","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 5, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Asha Menon, J., decided a matter concerning dishonour of cheque. Petitioner had filed a suit for recovery of Rs 1,65, 75,000 under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Background Managing Director and other Directors of the respondent\/defendant persuaded the petitioner\/plaintiff to give friendly loans\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":265328,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/12\/coparcenary-rights-are-not-taken-away-by-hindu-succession-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":251213,"position":5},"title":"Are Coparcenary rights taken away by Hindu Succession Act? Madras HC throws light","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 12, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: N. Anand Venkatesh, J., addressed a matter with regard to coparcenary rights of sons and daughters. Plaintiff had sought for relief of partition and for allotment of 1\/5th share in the suit property and also sought for declaration of the sale deed executed by the 1st defendant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/251213","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=251213"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/251213\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=251213"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=251213"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=251213"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}