{"id":251181,"date":"2021-07-13T16:00:44","date_gmt":"2021-07-13T10:30:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=251181"},"modified":"2021-07-16T10:15:30","modified_gmt":"2021-07-16T04:45:30","slug":"sikk-hc-or-viii-r-1a-3-which-confers-discretion-on-court-is-not-an-unfettered-discretion-on-court-hc-allows-petitions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/sikk-hc-or-viii-r-1a-3-which-confers-discretion-on-court-is-not-an-unfettered-discretion-on-court-hc-allows-petitions\/","title":{"rendered":"Sikk HC | Or. VIII R. 1A (3) which confers discretion on Court is not an unfettered discretion on Court; HC allows petitions"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sikkim High Court:<\/strong> Jitendra Kumar Maheshwari, CJ, allowed the writ petitions which were arising out of the Order passed on 12-11-2019 in different suits allowing the application filed by the defendant under Order VIII Rule 1A (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Trial Court had observed that Order VIII Rule 1A (3) of the CPC gives discretion to the Court to allow the additional documents but it ought to be used according to well-established principles. Those principles may be relevant to the documents showing sufficient or good cause for not producing it earlier. Thereafter, the Court proceeded to hold that the documents were relevant and were necessary for effective determination of the issues, however, subject to payment of cost.<\/p>\n

The Court from the Trial Court\u2019s findings observed that during cross-examination on the plaintiff one document having signature of late Lakey Sherpa was shown by the counsel of defendants to the plaintiffs on the question of resemblance of the signature of late Lakey Sherpa, father of the plaintiff. Admittedly the said document was not related to the defence of the defendants, however, it was only for the purpose of resemblance of the signature of late Lakey Sherpa. The said document, at this stage, cannot be a relevant document to adjudicate the subject matter of the case.<\/p>\n

The Court further observed that provision of Order VIII Rule 1A (3) which confers discretion on the Court is not an unfettered discretion on the Court. The Court must see the bona fides, genuineness, relevance of the document to the subject matter of the suit determining the controversy in question.<\/em><\/p>\n

The Court allowing all the petitions held that merely by denial of the plaintiffs to the document having transaction with other persons by late Lakey Sherpa cannot be relevant to the merit of the present case setting aside the order passed by the Trial Court.[Chandu Sherpa v. Sunita Rai, 2021 SCC OnLine Sikk 91<\/b><\/a>, decided on 08-07-2021]<\/p>\n

\n

Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Appearance:<\/strong><\/p>\n

For Petitioners: Mr Zangpo Sherpa,\u00a0 Ms Lusiyana Thapa<\/p>\n

For Respondent 1: Mr N. Rai, Senior Advocate Mr Yozan Rai,\u00a0 Ms Vani Vandana Chhetri<\/p>\n

For Respondent 2: Mr Sudesh Joshi, Additional Advocate General<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sikkim High Court: Jitendra Kumar Maheshwari, CJ, allowed the writ petitions which were arising out of the Order passed on 12-11-2019 in <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-251181","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs"],"yoast_head":"\nSikk HC | Or. VIII R. 1A (3) which confers discretion on Court is not an unfettered discretion on Court; HC allows petitions | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/sikk-hc-or-viii-r-1a-3-which-confers-discretion-on-court-is-not-an-unfettered-discretion-on-court-hc-allows-petitions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sikk HC | Or. VIII R. 1A (3) which confers discretion on Court is not an unfettered discretion on Court; HC allows petitions\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Sikkim High Court: Jitendra Kumar Maheshwari, CJ, allowed the writ petitions which were arising out of the Order passed on 12-11-2019 in\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/sikk-hc-or-viii-r-1a-3-which-confers-discretion-on-court-is-not-an-unfettered-discretion-on-court-hc-allows-petitions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-07-13T10:30:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-07-16T04:45:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/High-Court-of-Sikkim.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/sikk-hc-or-viii-r-1a-3-which-confers-discretion-on-court-is-not-an-unfettered-discretion-on-court-hc-allows-petitions\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/sikk-hc-or-viii-r-1a-3-which-confers-discretion-on-court-is-not-an-unfettered-discretion-on-court-hc-allows-petitions\/\",\"name\":\"Sikk HC | Or. VIII R. 1A (3) which confers discretion on Court is not an unfettered discretion on Court; HC allows petitions | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-07-13T10:30:44+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-07-16T04:45:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/sikk-hc-or-viii-r-1a-3-which-confers-discretion-on-court-is-not-an-unfettered-discretion-on-court-hc-allows-petitions\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/sikk-hc-or-viii-r-1a-3-which-confers-discretion-on-court-is-not-an-unfettered-discretion-on-court-hc-allows-petitions\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/sikk-hc-or-viii-r-1a-3-which-confers-discretion-on-court-is-not-an-unfettered-discretion-on-court-hc-allows-petitions\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sikk HC | Or. VIII R. 1A (3) which confers discretion on Court is not an unfettered discretion on Court; HC allows petitions\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sikk HC | Or. VIII R. 1A (3) which confers discretion on Court is not an unfettered discretion on Court; HC allows petitions | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/sikk-hc-or-viii-r-1a-3-which-confers-discretion-on-court-is-not-an-unfettered-discretion-on-court-hc-allows-petitions\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sikk HC | Or. VIII R. 1A (3) which confers discretion on Court is not an unfettered discretion on Court; HC allows petitions","og_description":"Sikkim High Court: Jitendra Kumar Maheshwari, CJ, allowed the writ petitions which were arising out of the Order passed on 12-11-2019 in","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/sikk-hc-or-viii-r-1a-3-which-confers-discretion-on-court-is-not-an-unfettered-discretion-on-court-hc-allows-petitions\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-07-13T10:30:44+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-07-16T04:45:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/High-Court-of-Sikkim.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/sikk-hc-or-viii-r-1a-3-which-confers-discretion-on-court-is-not-an-unfettered-discretion-on-court-hc-allows-petitions\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/sikk-hc-or-viii-r-1a-3-which-confers-discretion-on-court-is-not-an-unfettered-discretion-on-court-hc-allows-petitions\/","name":"Sikk HC | Or. VIII R. 1A (3) which confers discretion on Court is not an unfettered discretion on Court; HC allows petitions | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-07-13T10:30:44+00:00","dateModified":"2021-07-16T04:45:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/sikk-hc-or-viii-r-1a-3-which-confers-discretion-on-court-is-not-an-unfettered-discretion-on-court-hc-allows-petitions\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/sikk-hc-or-viii-r-1a-3-which-confers-discretion-on-court-is-not-an-unfettered-discretion-on-court-hc-allows-petitions\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/13\/sikk-hc-or-viii-r-1a-3-which-confers-discretion-on-court-is-not-an-unfettered-discretion-on-court-hc-allows-petitions\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sikk HC | Or. VIII R. 1A (3) which confers discretion on Court is not an unfettered discretion on Court; HC allows petitions"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":208583,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/22\/pat-hc-documents-sought-to-be-produced-by-defendant-must-be-filed-with-written-statement-leave-of-court-required-for-subsequent-production-thereof\/","url_meta":{"origin":251181,"position":0},"title":"Pat HC | Documents sought to be produced by defendant must be filed with written statement \u2013 leave of Court required for subsequent production thereof","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 22, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: The Bench of Ashwani Kumar Singh, J. dismissed an application filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying for quashing of trial court\u2019s order vide which petitioner\u2019s (defendant before the trial court) application under Order 8 Rule 1A(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":300885,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/06\/andhra-pradesh-hc-upholds-the-order-dismissing-application-under-order-viii-rule-2-of-cpc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":251181,"position":1},"title":"Relevance of the documents sought under Order VII Rule 2 of CPC should be stated in the affidavit: Andhra Pradesh High Court upholds Order dismissing application","author":"Editor","date":"September 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is not stated in the affidavit as to how the documents are relevant to the suit except stating that, the documents are important and crucial documents to prove that the promissory note suit is a rank forged and materially altered.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"andhra pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":203048,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/04\/powers-under-order-viii-rule-9-cpc-to-be-exercised-by-the-courts-only-in-cases-of-set-off-counter-claim\/","url_meta":{"origin":251181,"position":2},"title":"Powers under Order VIII Rule 9 CPC to be exercised by the courts only in cases of set off\/counter claim","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 4, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Shree Chandrashekhar, J., partly allowed a writ petition filed against an order passed by the trial court whereby petitioner\u2019s application under Order VIII Rule 9 CPC had been rejected by the trial court. The main issue that arose before the Court was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":241330,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/26\/jhar-hc-service-law-in-a-case-past-two-decade-court-observes-procedural-irregularity-at-the-behest-of-disciplinary-authority-issues-direction-for-consequential-benefits\/","url_meta":{"origin":251181,"position":3},"title":"Jhar HC | [Service Law] In a case past two decade, Court observes procedural irregularity at the behest of Disciplinary authority; issues direction for consequential benefits","author":"Editor","date":"December 26, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Deepak Roshan, J., while allowing the present writ application, said, \u201cThis court is having no hesitation to hold that there is a procedural irregularity in passing the impugned order of punishment. As such, the impugned order of punishment and all subsequent orders deserve to be quashed and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":247415,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/20\/explained-rule-of-alternate-remedy-and-maintainability-of-writ-petitions-under-article-226-of-the-constitution\/","url_meta":{"origin":251181,"position":4},"title":"Explained: Rule of alternate remedy and maintainability of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\"An alternate remedy by itself does not divest the High Court of its powers under Article 226 of the Constitution in an appropriate case though ordinarily, a writ petition should not be entertained when an efficacious alternate remedy is provided by law;.\"","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":209297,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/02\/ori-hc-application-for-additional-evidence-can-be-considered-at-the-time-of-hearing-of-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":251181,"position":5},"title":"Ori HC | Application for additional evidence can be considered at the time of hearing of appeal","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: The Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J. allowed the application filed for challenging the order of the District Court whereunder the appellate court rejected the application of the petitioner-appellant under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC to admit five documents as additional evidence. The facts of the case\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/251181","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=251181"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/251181\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=251181"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=251181"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=251181"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}