{"id":250594,"date":"2021-07-01T14:03:06","date_gmt":"2021-07-01T08:33:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=250594"},"modified":"2021-07-01T14:03:39","modified_gmt":"2021-07-01T08:33:39","slug":"domestic-relationship","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/domestic-relationship\/","title":{"rendered":"Kar HC | Persons only in \u2018domestic relationship\u2019 as per S. 2 of Domestic Violence Act, 2005 can be made as respondent under S. 12 of DV Act"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Karnataka High Court: <\/strong>Sreenivas Harish Kumar, J., allowed the petition and directed that there cannot be any proceedings against the petitioner under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The instant Criminal Petition was filed under Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code i.e. Cr.P.C., praying to quash the entire proceedings on the file of the Civil Judge and JMFC Arakalagudu in Crl.Misc.No.45\/2021 initiated by respondent 1 under Section 12 of Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act 2005 \u00a0as against the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for the petitioner <strong>Mr. M H Prakash<\/strong> submitted that the petitioner has been unnecessarily made a party by the respondent 1 in her application before the Magistrate under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. It was further submitted that the only allegation found is that respondent 1 suspected her husband to be having illegal relationship with the petitioner and he thought of bringing her to his house therefore the petitioner should not have been made a party in the application filed under Section 12 of the Act as she does not fall within the meaning of respondent as mentioned under Section 2(q) of the Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Counsel for respondent 1 <strong>Mr. C P Puttaraja<\/strong> submitted that Domestic violence has been committed on the instigation of the petitioner and this is the reason for making her party in the application filed under Section 12 of the Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that the definition of \u2018domestic relationship\u2019 under Section 2(f) and Section 2(q) of the Act makes it clear that only those persons who have been in the domestic relationship can be made as respondent. It was further observed that in the instant case the allegation against the petitioner is that the 1st respondent\u2019s husband was suspected to be having illegal relationship with the petitioner and he thought of bringing the petitioner to his house. Except this allegation there are no other allegations against the petitioner which indicate that she too joined with the husband of the 1<sup>st<\/sup> respondent in harassing her.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court held <em>\u201cTherefore the petitioner does not come within the scope of respondent as envisaged under Section 2(q) of the Act. Making her respondent in the application filed under Section 12 of the Act is unwarranted\u201d.<\/em>[Harini H v. Kavya H, Criminal Petition No. 2148 OF 2021, decided on 17-06-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court: Sreenivas Harish Kumar, J., allowed the petition and directed that there cannot be any proceedings against the petitioner under <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30329,2698,29785,38183],"class_list":["post-250594","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-domestic-relationship","tag-Domestic_Violence","tag-law","tag-section-12-dv-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Kar HC | Persons only in \u2018domestic relationship\u2019 as per S. 2 of Domestic Violence Act, 2005 can be made as respondent under S. 12 of DV Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Domestic Relationship\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/domestic-relationship\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kar HC | Persons only in \u2018domestic relationship\u2019 as per S. 2 of Domestic Violence Act, 2005 can be made as respondent under S. 12 of DV Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Domestic Relationship\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/domestic-relationship\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-07-01T08:33:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-07-01T08:33:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/07\\\/01\\\/domestic-relationship\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/07\\\/01\\\/domestic-relationship\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editor\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"headline\":\"Kar HC | Persons only in \u2018domestic relationship\u2019 as per S. 2 of Domestic Violence Act, 2005 can be made as respondent under S. 12 of DV Act\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-07-01T08:33:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-07-01T08:33:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/07\\\/01\\\/domestic-relationship\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":416,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"domestic relationship\",\"Domestic Violence\",\"law\",\"Section 12 DV Act\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/07\\\/01\\\/domestic-relationship\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/07\\\/01\\\/domestic-relationship\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/07\\\/01\\\/domestic-relationship\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kar HC | Persons only in \u2018domestic relationship\u2019 as per S. 2 of Domestic Violence Act, 2005 can be made as respondent under S. 12 of DV Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-07-01T08:33:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-07-01T08:33:39+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Domestic Relationship\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/07\\\/01\\\/domestic-relationship\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/07\\\/01\\\/domestic-relationship\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2021\\\/07\\\/01\\\/domestic-relationship\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kar HC | Persons only in \u2018domestic relationship\u2019 as per S. 2 of Domestic Violence Act, 2005 can be made as respondent under S. 12 of DV Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_4\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kar HC | Persons only in \u2018domestic relationship\u2019 as per S. 2 of Domestic Violence Act, 2005 can be made as respondent under S. 12 of DV Act | SCC Times","description":"Domestic Relationship","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/domestic-relationship\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kar HC | Persons only in \u2018domestic relationship\u2019 as per S. 2 of Domestic Violence Act, 2005 can be made as respondent under S. 12 of DV Act","og_description":"Domestic Relationship","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/domestic-relationship\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-07-01T08:33:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-07-01T08:33:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/domestic-relationship\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/domestic-relationship\/"},"author":{"name":"Editor","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"headline":"Kar HC | Persons only in \u2018domestic relationship\u2019 as per S. 2 of Domestic Violence Act, 2005 can be made as respondent under S. 12 of DV Act","datePublished":"2021-07-01T08:33:06+00:00","dateModified":"2021-07-01T08:33:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/domestic-relationship\/"},"wordCount":416,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["domestic relationship","Domestic Violence","law","Section 12 DV Act"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/domestic-relationship\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/domestic-relationship\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/domestic-relationship\/","name":"Kar HC | Persons only in \u2018domestic relationship\u2019 as per S. 2 of Domestic Violence Act, 2005 can be made as respondent under S. 12 of DV Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-07-01T08:33:06+00:00","dateModified":"2021-07-01T08:33:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Domestic Relationship","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/domestic-relationship\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/domestic-relationship\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/domestic-relationship\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kar HC | Persons only in \u2018domestic relationship\u2019 as per S. 2 of Domestic Violence Act, 2005 can be made as respondent under S. 12 of DV Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":234194,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/19\/madras-hc-limitation-provided-under-crpc-is-applicable-to-complainants-under-domestic-violence-act-court-rejects-complaint-filed-after-lapse-of-1-yr-10-months\/","url_meta":{"origin":250594,"position":0},"title":"Madras HC | Limitation provided under CrPC is applicable to complaints under Domestic Violence Act: Court rejects complaint filed after lapse of 1 yr 10 months","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 19, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0 G.K. Ilanthiraiyan, J., quashed the proceedings filed under the Domestic Violence Act in light of being barred by limitation. The instant petition was filed to quash the Domestic Violence proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act. Petitioner and respondent are husband and wife, due to some misunderstanding between\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222898,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/06\/cal-hc-a-mother-is-entitled-to-claim-relief-under-domestic-violence-act-against-his-son-law-on-aggrieved-person-under-dv-act-restated\/","url_meta":{"origin":250594,"position":1},"title":"Cal HC | A mother is entitled to claim relief under Domestic Violence Act against his son; law on &#8220;aggrieved person&#8221; under DV Act restated","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 6, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court:\u00a0Madhumati Mitra, J., dismissed an application filed against the order of the Sessions Judge whereby he upheld the order passed by the Magistrate who had directed the petitioner to pay monthly monetary relief to his mother and also her medical expenses. The respondent, the mother of the petitioner,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233038,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/29\/del-hc-no-exception-to-remedy-against-orders-of-custody-under-domestic-violence-act-court-dismisses-s-482-crpc-petition-in-view-of-s-29-dv-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":250594,"position":2},"title":"Del HC | &#8220;No exception to remedy against orders of custody under Domestic Violence Act&#8221;: Court dismisses S. 482 CrPC petition in view of S. 29 DV Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 29, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Jyoti Singh, J., while addressing the maintainability and legality of a petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 held that, legislature in its wisdom has provided for Appeal under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 against all \"orders\" and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":196050,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/16\/women-governed-under-muslim-personal-law-have-right-to-recourse-under-the-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005\/","url_meta":{"origin":250594,"position":3},"title":"Women governed under Muslim Personal Law have right to recourse under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005","author":"Saba","date":"May 16, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Bharati H. Dangre, J., has held that the Muslim Personal Law can in no way curtail the protection granted under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005, from being available to a Muslim woman. Brief facts of the case\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268791,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/21\/karnataka-hc-directs-timeline-for-expeditious-disposal-of-every-application-invoking-s-12-5-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005\/","url_meta":{"origin":250594,"position":4},"title":"Karnataka HC directs timeline for expeditious disposal of every application invoking S. 12 (5) Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005","author":"Editor","date":"June 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: M Nagaprasanna J. allowed the petition and directed to dispose the application seeking maintenance, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. The petitioner filed an application invoking Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258217,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/07\/domestic-violence\/","url_meta":{"origin":250594,"position":5},"title":"Does marrying another lady causes emotional abuse so as to come under Domestic Violence? Read Sessions Court decision","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"LXIII Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru: \u00a0B. Venkatesha, LXIII Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, dismissed\u00a0an appeal filed under Section 29 of the Domestic Violence Act finding that the petitioner wife had proved the factum of domestic violence. Appellant had filed the present appeal under Section 29 of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/City-Civil-Court-Bengaluru.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/City-Civil-Court-Bengaluru.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/City-Civil-Court-Bengaluru.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/City-Civil-Court-Bengaluru.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/City-Civil-Court-Bengaluru.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250594","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=250594"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250594\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=250594"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=250594"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=250594"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}