{"id":250586,"date":"2021-07-03T10:15:54","date_gmt":"2021-07-03T04:45:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=250586"},"modified":"2021-07-03T10:14:08","modified_gmt":"2021-07-03T04:44:08","slug":"claim-for-refund-of-advance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/03\/claim-for-refund-of-advance\/","title":{"rendered":"Claim for Refund of Advance: Whether an Operational Debt"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC)1<\/a> is still in the nascent stage, wherein day-to-day the legislature try to strengthen the Code with clarificatory amendments; and\/or as well as the Tribunals and the courts of this country try to strengthen the Code by setting new judicial precedents, explaining the scope and ambit of the Code which came into force in 2016.<\/p>\n

Insolvency and bankruptcy jurisprudence has undoubtedly witnessed many controversies with regard to the various facets of the Code. Notable controversies include the applicability of Section 92<\/a> application for repayment of advances lends out by the operational creditor to the corporate debtor for procuring goods which began from a decision rendered by the NCLT, Kolkata Bench in SHRM Biotechnologies (P) Ltd.<\/em> v. <\/strong>VAB Commercial (P) Ltd.<\/em>3<\/a>. However, NCLT, Mumbai in Sunteck Realty Ltd. v. Goodwill Theatres (P)<\/a> Ltd.<\/em>4<\/a>; has taken a contrary view while dealing with the issue. Other notable controversies include the subject-matter of advance does not fall under the definition of debt i.e which has also been dealt with by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal in D<\/em>aya Engg. Works (P) Ltd.<\/em> v. UIC Udyog Ltd<\/em>.5<\/a>, \u00a0Kavita Anil Taneja <\/em>v. ISMT Ltd.<\/em>6<\/a>, Roma Infrastructures India (P) Ltd. <\/em>v. A.S. Iron & Steel (I) (P) Ltd.<\/em>7<\/a>, and Andal Bonumalla<\/em> v. Tomato Trading LLP<\/em>8<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The latest controversy that has gained considerable importance in insolvency and bankruptcy jurisprudence is the determination of advance lend out for the procurement of goods or services. Although the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has on many occasions delivered seminal judgments on this issue there still appears to be room for uncertainty, this article will study the latest position of law propounded by the Appellate Tribunal with regards to the determination of Section 9 application filed by operational creditor.<\/p>\n

The significance of the term operational debt and operational creditor <\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

Under IBC, for an amount to be claimed by any person as due to a person representing an \u201coperational creditor\u201d9<\/a> such person should demonstrate that; first, such an amount should fall within the definition of \u201cclaim\u201d as defined under Section 3(6)10<\/a> of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and secondly, such a claim should be able as debt as defined under Section 3(11)11<\/a> of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and thirdly, the \u201cdebt\u201d should fall within the purview of Section 5(21)12<\/a> of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.<\/p>\n

At this juncture, it is important to understand and note that the Code, does not define and\/or explicitly say that the debt due by the corporate debtor should be from an actual transfer of goods or services for a claim to be recognised as an operational debt. However, any amount to be claimed as a debt need to have a direct.<\/p>\n

To begin understanding the principle adopted by the Tribunal and the Appellate Tribunal to deal whether the amount advanced by the operational creditor for procuring goods or services would fall under the definition of debt under IBC. It would be pertinent to note here, that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Kolkata in SHRM Biotechnologies (P) Ltd.<\/em> v. VAB Commercial (P) Ltd.<\/em>13<\/a>, the Tribunal had to interpret, whether the debt of the operational creditor as claimed falls under the definition of the debt as defined under Section 3(11) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and whether the operational creditor would fall under the definition as defined under Section 5(20) of the\u00a0 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Tribunal held that:<\/p>\n

\u201c14<\/em>. A reading of Section 5(21) of the Code, it is clear that the debt includes a claim in respect of the provision of goods or services including employment or a debt in respect of the repayment of dues arising under any law for the time being in force and payable to the Central Government, State Government or any local authority. Nor fall within the definition of sub-section (21) of Section 5 of the Code, so the question is whether refund claim of the advance paid for rending service by the corporate debtor would fall within the meaning of a claim in respect of the provision of goods; or services including employment.\u201d<\/p>\n

While deciding the above,\u00a0 NCLT, Kolkata also considered the judgment of NCLT, New Delhi in Sajive Kanwar<\/em> v. AMR Infrastructure<\/em>15<\/a>, wherein the Tribunal discussed in detail the definition of the operational creditor.<\/p>\n

The same issues have been adjudicated by\u00a0 NCLT, Mumbai Bench in TATA\u00a0 Chemicals Ltd. <\/em>v. Raj Process Equipments and Systems (P) Ltd<\/em>.16<\/a>, wherein the Tribunal also rendered that the debt does not come within the definition of \u201cdebt\u201d as defined under Section 5(21) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.<\/p>\n

However, the said position was again dealt with by NCLT, Mumbai in Sunteck Realty Ltd. v. Goodwill Theatres (P)<\/a> Ltd.<\/em>17<\/a>, wherein the Tribunal had taken a contrary view from the other Benches of the National Company Law Tribunal. In the instant case, the issue before the Tribunal was whether the advance token amount claimed could be considered an operational debt under IBC. The Tribunal while rendering its decision, applied the test of the intention of the parties. The test was to exchange goods or services for which the operational creditor has paid in advance. While dealing with the same, the Tribunal held that the refund of advance is in connection with the goods or services for repayment of dues by the corporate debtor who had accepted the payment, even though the agreement was not fructified. Therefore, the application filed by the operational creditor is admitted as the debt due is debt as defined under the Code.<\/p>\n

Thereafter in 2019, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal had to revisit this topic in Kavita Anil Taneja <\/em>v. ISMT Ltd<\/em>.18<\/a>. The respondent in this case, filed an application under Section 9 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for alleging default amounting to Rs 2,10,00,000. The Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Mumbai Bench taking into consideration admitted the application by the impugned order. The appellant challenged the said order and the main issue before the Tribunal was that the respondent does not come within the definition of \u201coperational creditor\u201d. The 2-Member Bench of the Tribunal held:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. 4<\/em>. Section 5(20) defines \u201coperational creditor\u201d which is read with Section 5(21) which defines \u201coperational debt\u201d. Hence in this present case, it is clear from the work order that the amount of Rs 2,60,000,00 was advanced by the respondent to the appellant for the supply of 10,000 metric tons of Indonesian Thermal Coal. Form the aforesaid fact, we find that the respondent had not supplied any goods nor provided any services and therefore, it does not come within the meaning of \u201coperational creditor\u201d and set aside the impugned order by the adjudicating authority.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    In August 2020, a 3-Member Bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal had another occasion to revisit this topic in Andal Bonumalla<\/em> v. Tomato Trading LLP<\/em>19<\/a>.\u00a0 The Tribunal while deciding on this issue whether the advance amount paid by Respondent 1 to Respondent 2 for supply is an operational debt, considered the views of the Tribunal as rendered in Kavita Anil Taneja <\/em>case20<\/a> and Roma Infrastructures India (P) Ltd<\/em>. case21<\/a>, and concluded that the advance amount paid by the respondent is not an operational debt, hence the impugned order dated 3-6-2019 was set aside.<\/p>\n

    Thereafter in 2021, another conundrum had arisen before the 2-Member Bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal in Joseph Jayananda<\/em> v. Navalmar (UK) Ltd<\/em>.[22]<\/a>. While interpreting the position, inter alia took a contrary view in respect of the same position which was decided and\/or settled by the three-Member Bench of the Appellate Tribunal. In this instant case, the monies were advanced by Respondent 1 to the corporate debtor as \u00a0advance payment for work to be done in the future. Admittedly, the work was to be done in terms of the General Agency Agreement between the parties. The advance payment was made for the purpose of Turnkey projects and capital goods, but the said amount was adjusted towards cost and expense by the corporate debtor.<\/p>\n

    The Tribunal instead of applying the ratio as laid down by the three-Member Bench \u00a0Appellate Tribunal employed a different method of inquiry altogether. Although the Tribunal took into consideration a decision adjudicated by the Supreme Court in Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure<\/em> Ltd. <\/em>v. <\/em>Union of India<\/em>[23]<\/strong><\/em><\/a>, that an operational debt there is no consideration for the time value of money. Rather, the Tribunal in this present case has held:<\/p>\n

    As per the General Agency Agreement between the operational creditor and the corporate debtor, the corporate debtor acted as an agent of the former in India and collected various payments due in operational credito\u2019s customers name. Since the corporate debtor is an agent and service provider of the operational creditor, the amounts due under the transaction would fall within the ambit of operational debt as defined under Section 5(21) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.<\/p>\n

    Conclusion<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n

    It flows from SHRM Biotechnologies (P) Ltd.<\/em> v. VAB Commercial (P) Ltd.[24]<\/strong><\/a><\/em>, that as per the NCLT\u2019s Kolkata Bench, the advance amount given in a situation where the underlying basis of the advance amount is a contract to transfer goods or services, in these situations the advance amount given will not be treated as operational debt, because the intention of parties was to engage in an exchange of goods or services. As such, other Benches of the NCLT have a contrary view the one dealt by NCLT, Mumbai Bench in Sunteck Realty Ltd. v. Goodwill Theatres (P)<\/a> Ltd.[25]<\/strong><\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

    However, the same ratio has been settled by a three-Member Bench of NCLAT in Andal Bonumalla <\/em>v. Tomato Trading LLP[26]<\/strong><\/a><\/em>, but recently the issue again cropped up before a 2-Member Bench of NCLAT in Joseph Jayananda <\/em>v. Navalamar (UK) Ltd<\/em>.[27]<\/a>, which had a contrary view as regards to the advance amount given in a situation where the underlying basis of the advance amount is a contract to transfer goods or services, in this situation the advance amount given will not be treated as operational debt because the intention of parties was to engage in an exchange of goods or services.<\/p>\n

    What is interesting, however, is that one of the Members of the 2-Member Bench was also a member of the 3-Member Bench of NCLAT which has categorically held that the basis amount advanced, no Section 9 application lies where the applicant had neither supplied goods or services. There also exists another 3-Member Bench decision of NCLAT reiterating the aforesaid provision.<\/p>\n

    Going forward would be interesting to see whether NCLT\/NCLAT decides to follow the 2-Member Bench decision (which appears to correct interpretation) or the contrary view taken by the 3-Member Bench.<\/p>\n

    \n

    *<\/a>Advocate. Author can be reached at\u00a0 rahul.poddar94@gmail.com<\/span><\/h4>\n

    1<\/a> Insolvency and Bankruptcy, Code, 2016<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    2<\/a> Section 9 IBC<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    3<\/a> 2018 SCC OnLine NCLT 28558<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    4<\/a> CP (IB) 3990\/MB\/2019, decided on 7-1-2021 (Mumbai Bench).<\/p>\n

    5<\/a> 2018 SCC OnLine NCLAT 349<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    6<\/a> 2019 SCC OnLine NCLAT 512<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    7<\/a> 2019 SCC OnLine NCLAT 822<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    8<\/a> 2020 SCC OnLine NCLAT 624<\/a><\/p>\n

    9<\/a> “operational creditor” means a person to whom an operational debt is owed and includes any person to whom such debt has been legally assigned or transferred.<\/p>\n

    10<\/a> “claim” means\u2014 (a<\/em>) a right to payment, whether or not such right is reduced to judgment, fixed, disputed, undisputed, legal, equitable, secured or unsecured; and (b<\/em>) right to remedy for breach of contract under any law for the time being in force, if such breach gives rise to a right to payment, whether or not such right is reduced to judgment, fixed, matured, unmatured, disputed, undisputed, secured or unsecured.<\/p>\n

    11<\/a> \u201cdebt” means a liability or obligation in respect of a claim which is due from any person and includes a financial debt and operational debt.<\/p>\n

    12<\/a> “operational debt” means a claim in respect of the provision of goods or services including employment or a debt in respect of the repayment of dues arising under any law for the time being in force and payable to the Central Government, any State Government or any local authority.<\/p>\n

    13<\/a> See supra Note 3.<\/p>\n

    15<\/a> 2017 SCC OnLine NCLT 16279\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n

    16<\/a> 2018 SCC OnLine NCLT 29791<\/a><\/p>\n

    17<\/a> See supra Note\u00a0 4.<\/p>\n

    18<\/a> See supra Note\u00a0 6.<\/p>\n

    19<\/a> See supra Note\u00a0 8.<\/p>\n

    20<\/a> See supra Note\u00a0 6.<\/p>\n

    21<\/a> See supra Note\u00a0 7.<\/p>\n

    [22]<\/a> 2021 SCC OnLine NCLAT 116<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    [23]<\/a> (2019) 8 SCC 416 : 2019 SCC OnLine SC 1005<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    [24]<\/a> See supra Note\u00a0 3.<\/p>\n

    [25]<\/a> See supra Note\u00a0 4.<\/p>\n

    [26]<\/a> See supra Note\u00a0 8.<\/p>\n

    [27]<\/a> See supra Note\u00a0 23.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    by Rahul Poddar*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":250698,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[42503,1191],"tags":[46422,30361,29785,34910,43791],"class_list":["post-250586","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-legal-analysis","category-op-ed","tag-claim-for-refuns","tag-ibc","tag-law","tag-operational-creditor","tag-operational-debt"],"yoast_head":"\nClaim for Refund of Advance: Whether an Operational Debt | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Claim for Refund of Advance\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/03\/claim-for-refund-of-advance\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Claim for Refund of Advance: Whether an Operational Debt\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Claim for Refund of Advance\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/03\/claim-for-refund-of-advance\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-07-03T04:45:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-4.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/03\/claim-for-refund-of-advance\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/03\/claim-for-refund-of-advance\/\",\"name\":\"Claim for Refund of Advance: Whether an Operational Debt | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/03\/claim-for-refund-of-advance\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/03\/claim-for-refund-of-advance\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-4.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-07-03T04:45:54+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Claim for Refund of Advance\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/03\/claim-for-refund-of-advance\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/03\/claim-for-refund-of-advance\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/03\/claim-for-refund-of-advance\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-4.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-4.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/03\/claim-for-refund-of-advance\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Claim for Refund of Advance: Whether an Operational Debt\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Claim for Refund of Advance: Whether an Operational Debt | SCC Times","description":"Claim for Refund of Advance","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/03\/claim-for-refund-of-advance\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Claim for Refund of Advance: Whether an Operational Debt","og_description":"Claim for Refund of Advance","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/03\/claim-for-refund-of-advance\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-07-03T04:45:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-4.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/03\/claim-for-refund-of-advance\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/03\/claim-for-refund-of-advance\/","name":"Claim for Refund of Advance: Whether an Operational Debt | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/03\/claim-for-refund-of-advance\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/03\/claim-for-refund-of-advance\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-4.jpg","datePublished":"2021-07-03T04:45:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Claim for Refund of Advance","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/03\/claim-for-refund-of-advance\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/03\/claim-for-refund-of-advance\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/03\/claim-for-refund-of-advance\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-4.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-4.jpg","width":1331,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/03\/claim-for-refund-of-advance\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Claim for Refund of Advance: Whether an Operational Debt"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-4.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":270628,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/25\/nclat-mumbai-interest-on-delayed-payments-is-a-part-of-operational-debt-under-s-311-of-ibc\/","url_meta":{"origin":250586,"position":0},"title":"NCLAT Mumbai |Interest on Delayed Payments is a part of Operational Debt under S. 3(11) of IBC","author":"Editor","date":"July 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai: The Bench of Ashok Bhushan, J., Chairperson, M. Satyanarayana Murthy, Judicial Member, and Naresh Salecha, Technical member has dismissed a company appeal and has held that interest on delayed payment is also a form of debt and therefore, would form a part of the operational\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268652,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/18\/can-default-in-payment-of-instalments-under-the-settlement-agreement-be-defined-as-an-operational-debt-nclt-decides\/","url_meta":{"origin":250586,"position":1},"title":"Can default in payment of instalments under the settlement agreement be defined as an operational debt? NCLT decides","author":"Editor","date":"June 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi: The bench of Abni Rajan Kumar Sinha, Judicial Member and Hemant Kumar Sarangi, Technical Member has held, that default made in payment of instalment amount as per the terms of the settlement agreement does not fall under the definition of operational debt. Facts of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Financial Creditor","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/NCLT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/NCLT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/NCLT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/NCLT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/NCLT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":260970,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/02\/operational-creditor-is-under-obligation-to-recover-money-from-its-client-and-not-agent\/","url_meta":{"origin":250586,"position":2},"title":"Operational Creditor is under obligation to recover money from its client and not agent: NCLT decides while dismissing a petition filed under S. 9 IBC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench: The Coram of H.V. Subba Rao (Judicial Member) and Chandra Bhan Singh (Technical Member) dismissed a petition filed under Section 9 of the IBC while noting that no operational debt existed under Section 5(8) and expressed that, Operational Creditor being the Principal was always\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/NCLT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214242,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/02\/trade-union-is-an-operational-creditor-under-the-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016\/","url_meta":{"origin":250586,"position":3},"title":"Trade Union is an operational creditor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Holding that the trade union represents its members who are workers, to whom dues may be owed by the employer, which are certainly debts owed for services rendered by each individual workman, who are collectively represented by the trade union, the bench of RF Nariman and Vineet Saran,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268365,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/14\/quietus-on-the-threshold-limit-for-filing-insolvency-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":250586,"position":4},"title":"Quietus on the threshold limit for filing Insolvency proceedings","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"June 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Samir Malik \u2020 and Aditya Sharma\u2020\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-253.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-253.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-253.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-253.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-253.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":260969,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/01\/whether-a-decree-or-an-arbitral-award-or-a-settlement-deed-can-form-the-basis-of-a-financial-or-operational-debt-under-ib-code-part-ii\/","url_meta":{"origin":250586,"position":5},"title":"Whether a Decree or an Arbitral Award or a Settlement Deed can form the Basis of a Financial or Operational Debt under IB Code \u2013 Part II","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 1, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Akaant Kumar Mittal\u2020 Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 9","rel":"","context":"In "Akaant Mittal"","block_context":{"text":"Akaant Mittal","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/individual\/akaant-mittal\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-253.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-253.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-253.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-253.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-253.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250586","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=250586"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250586\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/250698"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=250586"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=250586"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=250586"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}