{"id":250565,"date":"2021-07-01T13:00:10","date_gmt":"2021-07-01T07:30:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=250565"},"modified":"2021-07-01T11:45:42","modified_gmt":"2021-07-01T06:15:42","slug":"ker-hc-does-false-accusation-of-unchastity-amount-to-cruelty-can-it-be-the-ground-for-divorce-hc-answers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/ker-hc-does-false-accusation-of-unchastity-amount-to-cruelty-can-it-be-the-ground-for-divorce-hc-answers\/","title":{"rendered":"Ker HC | Does false accusation of unchastity amount to cruelty? Can it be the ground for divorce? HC answers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Kerala High Court:<\/strong> The Division Bench of A. Muhamed Mustaque and Kauser Edappagath, JJ., held that unsubstantiated allegation of unchastity against wife is a mental cruelty and a valid ground for seeking dissolution of marriage. The Bench stated,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">\u201cLevelling disgusting accusation of unchastity and attributing aspersions of perfidiousness to the wife would undoubtedly amount to worst form of mental cruelty. No wife can tolerate such accusation.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>Facts of the Case<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The instant matrimonial appeal had been filed to assail the impugned judgment of the Family Court, dismissing the petition filed by the appellant against her husband for divorce on the ground of cruelty.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The couple was working at Sultanate of Oman. According to the appellant, while they were living together, the respondent made false allegations of unchastity against her and the said allegations were spread among his relatives as well as the co-workers of her father. According to the appellant, the said false imputation of adulterous conduct made by the respondent lowered her reputation in the estimate of others including co-workers and, thus, she could not be expected to live with the respondent. It was further alleged that while they were living together the respondent used to pick up quarrels with her on the issue of unchastity and on 01-03-2012, he brutally assaulted her as well.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>Analysis and Observation by the Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The main allegation of mental cruelty on the part of the respondent canvassed by the appellant was the false allegation of unchastity made by him against her. The Bench opined that it is settled that the unsubstantiated accusation and character assassination by one spouse against the other would constitute mental cruelty. Reliance was placed by the Court on <em>K. Srinivas Rao v. D. A. Deepa<\/em> (AIR 2013 SC 2176), wherein it had been held by the Supreme Court that making unfounded indecent defamatory allegations against the spouse or his or her relatives in the pleadings amount to causing mental cruelty to the other spouse. Similarly, the Court in <em>Raj Talreja v. Kavita Talreja <\/em>(2017 KHC 6335) had held that the reckless, defamatory and false accusations made by the wife against her husband, his family members and colleagues would definitely have the effect of lowering his reputation in the eyes of his peers and, thus amounts to cruelty. In <em>Gangadharan v. T. T. Thankam<\/em> (AIR 1988 Kerala 244), it had been held that false, scandalous, malicious, baseless and unproved allegation made by one spouse, whether by letters or written statement or by any other mode, amounts to cruelty.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">There was specific pleading in the petition that the allegation of unchastity against the appellant had also spread among the relatives of the and that the respondent\u2019s aunt Smt.Usha Pillai, who resides in USA had sent an email message to the appellant alleging that she was caught hold of by police with a boy friend and both of them were taken to police station. The appellant asserted that there was no such incident as alleged in the email and there was absolutely no truth in the allegation of unchastity levelled against her.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Admissibility of E-mail as Evidence<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The respondent argued that the alleged e-mail could not have been even admitted in view of the provisions of Sections 65 and 65B of the Evidence Act and even if it is admitted that the email sent by Usha Pillai, the respondent could not be held liable for its contents inasmuch as nowhere was it stated in the e-mail that the information about the illicit affair of the appellant was furnished by the respondent. Rejecting the argument of the respondent, the Bench opined that,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em>\u201cThe technicalities of the Evidence Act cannot be imported to a proceedings before the Family Court because Section 14 of the Family Courts Act authorizes a Family Court to receive as evidence any report, statement, document, information or matter that may, in its opinion assist it to deal effectually with a dispute irrespective of whether it is relevant or admissible under the Indian Evidence Act, 1972.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Bench held that it is discernible from Section 14 of the Evidence Act, 1972 that the technicalities of the Act regarding the admissibility or relevancy of evidence are not strictly applicable to the proceedings under the Family Court and in the matrimonial dispute before the Family Court, a discretion has been given to the Court to rely on the documents produced if the court is satisfied that it is required to assist the court to effectively deal with the dispute.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>Findings of the Court<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">After pursuing the mail, the Bench was of the view that Mrs Usha Pillai and her husband knew about the marital problems between the appellant and the respondent and they had intervened in it. It was specifically stated in the mail that Mrs Usha Pillai had spoken to the respondent about the marital problems between him and the appellant and she heard what the respondent has to say in the matter. It was also further stated that the respondent had knowledge about the boy friend of the appellant even before the marriage. There was a specific aspersion in that the appellant was caught hold of by police along with a boy friend and both of them were taken to police station. Mrs Usha Pillai had even doubted the paternity of the child.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Admittedly, the father of the appellant and the respondent were working in the same company. The respondent had miserably failed to substantiate the imputation made by him that the appellant had relationship with another person and she was an unchaste woman. Ongoing through the relevant portions of imputations in the e-mail, the Bench found that the imputations were of such quality, magnitude and consequence as to cause reasonable apprehension in the mind of the appellant that it was not safe for her to continue the marital tie. The Bench opined,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Inasmuch as the mental cruelty on this ground has been established, it is immaterial whether the allegation of physical assault has been substantiated or not in order to grant a decree for dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On an overall appreciation of the pleadings and evidence, the Bench held that the appellant had made out a case for granting a decree for dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty and the Court below went wrong in dismissing the original petition for dissolution of marriage. Hence, the impugned judgment was set aside and the marriage between the appellant and the respondent was declared dissolved.[Sabitha Unnikrishnan v. Vineet Das, Mat. Appeal No. 594 of 2018, decided on 28-06-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #008080;\">Kamini Sharma, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Appearance before the Court by:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the Appellant: Adv. Nagaraj Narayanan, Adv. Benoj C Augustin, Adv. U.M.Hassan, Adv. Saijo Hassan and Adv. Vishnu Bhuvandendran<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the Respondent: Adv. Jacob P.Alex, Adv. Joseph P.Alex and Adv. Manu Sankar P.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of A. Muhamed Mustaque and Kauser Edappagath, JJ., held that unsubstantiated allegation of unchastity against wife <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2570,2846],"class_list":["post-250565","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Cruelty","tag-divorce"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Ker HC | Does false accusation of unchastity amount to cruelty? Can it be the ground for divorce? HC answers | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/ker-hc-does-false-accusation-of-unchastity-amount-to-cruelty-can-it-be-the-ground-for-divorce-hc-answers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ker HC | Does false accusation of unchastity amount to cruelty? Can it be the ground for divorce? HC answers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of A. Muhamed Mustaque and Kauser Edappagath, JJ., held that unsubstantiated allegation of unchastity against wife\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/ker-hc-does-false-accusation-of-unchastity-amount-to-cruelty-can-it-be-the-ground-for-divorce-hc-answers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-07-01T07:30:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/ker-hc-does-false-accusation-of-unchastity-amount-to-cruelty-can-it-be-the-ground-for-divorce-hc-answers\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/ker-hc-does-false-accusation-of-unchastity-amount-to-cruelty-can-it-be-the-ground-for-divorce-hc-answers\/\",\"name\":\"Ker HC | Does false accusation of unchastity amount to cruelty? Can it be the ground for divorce? HC answers | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-07-01T07:30:10+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/ker-hc-does-false-accusation-of-unchastity-amount-to-cruelty-can-it-be-the-ground-for-divorce-hc-answers\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/ker-hc-does-false-accusation-of-unchastity-amount-to-cruelty-can-it-be-the-ground-for-divorce-hc-answers\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/ker-hc-does-false-accusation-of-unchastity-amount-to-cruelty-can-it-be-the-ground-for-divorce-hc-answers\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ker HC | Does false accusation of unchastity amount to cruelty? Can it be the ground for divorce? HC answers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ker HC | Does false accusation of unchastity amount to cruelty? Can it be the ground for divorce? HC answers | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/ker-hc-does-false-accusation-of-unchastity-amount-to-cruelty-can-it-be-the-ground-for-divorce-hc-answers\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ker HC | Does false accusation of unchastity amount to cruelty? Can it be the ground for divorce? HC answers","og_description":"Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of A. Muhamed Mustaque and Kauser Edappagath, JJ., held that unsubstantiated allegation of unchastity against wife","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/ker-hc-does-false-accusation-of-unchastity-amount-to-cruelty-can-it-be-the-ground-for-divorce-hc-answers\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-07-01T07:30:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/ker-hc-does-false-accusation-of-unchastity-amount-to-cruelty-can-it-be-the-ground-for-divorce-hc-answers\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/ker-hc-does-false-accusation-of-unchastity-amount-to-cruelty-can-it-be-the-ground-for-divorce-hc-answers\/","name":"Ker HC | Does false accusation of unchastity amount to cruelty? Can it be the ground for divorce? HC answers | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-07-01T07:30:10+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/ker-hc-does-false-accusation-of-unchastity-amount-to-cruelty-can-it-be-the-ground-for-divorce-hc-answers\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/ker-hc-does-false-accusation-of-unchastity-amount-to-cruelty-can-it-be-the-ground-for-divorce-hc-answers\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/01\/ker-hc-does-false-accusation-of-unchastity-amount-to-cruelty-can-it-be-the-ground-for-divorce-hc-answers\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ker HC | Does false accusation of unchastity amount to cruelty? Can it be the ground for divorce? HC answers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":264174,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/24\/accusation-of-extra-marital-relationship-is-a-grave-assault-on-character-status-reputation-as-well-as-health-of-spouse-against-whom-such-allegations-are-made\/","url_meta":{"origin":250565,"position":0},"title":"Accusation of extra-marital relationship is a grave assault on character, status, reputation as well as health of spouse against whom such allegations are made: Would this come under ambit of cruelty? Del HC answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 24, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: While addressing a matter surrounding the issue of cruelty by wife, the Division Bench of Vipin Sanghi, ACJ and Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J., expressed that, \u201cIt has repeatedly been held that accusations of unchastity or extra marital relationship is a grave assault on character, status, reputation as\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":64371,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/29\/past-acts-of-cruelty-after-condonation-are-not-a-ground-to-seek-divorce-unless-revived-by-later-acts-of-cruelty\/","url_meta":{"origin":250565,"position":1},"title":"Past acts of cruelty after condonation, are not a ground to seek divorce, unless revived by later acts of cruelty","author":"Saba","date":"August 29, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Hearing an appeal against the Family Court's order dismissing the appellant husband's petition for dissolution of marriage on grounds of cruelty, the Court observed that the law pertaining to cruelty is if by resuming cohabitation the spouse claiming victim of cruelty forgives the other spouse who commits\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":230859,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/13\/del-hc-adultery-can-only-be-committed-after-marriage-allegation-of-having-relationship-before-marriage-cannot-be-a-ground-of-adultery-divorce-petition-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":250565,"position":2},"title":"Del HC | Adultery can only be committed after marriage, allegation of having relationship before marriage cannot be a ground of adultery; Divorce petition dismissed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 13, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Hima Kohli and Asha Menon, JJ., while addressing a matrimonial appeal filed on behalf of the husband, held that, Adultery can only be committed after marriage, allegation of having relationship before marriage cannot be a ground of adultery. Petitioner being aggrieved by the Family\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":321094,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/30\/delhi-high-court-allegation-unchastity-extra-marital-affair-amounts-cruelty-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":250565,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court | Allegations of unchastity and indecent familiarity with a person outside wedlock amounts cruelty","author":"Arunima","date":"April 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Marriage is a relationship which flourishes when nurtured with absolute trust and compassion but whittles down when sprinkled with accusations on character, fidelity and chastity of the spouse and becomes beyond redemption when the devastating effects of this one-sided barrage of accusations is topped with rejection of paternity and legitimacy\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":244319,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/24\/cruelty-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":250565,"position":4},"title":"Bom HC | Husband making wild allegations that wife, her relatives, secured false certificates to get employment. Does husband&#8217;s conduct amount to &#8216;Mental Cruelty&#8217; to wife? HC explains while upholding Family Court&#8217;s decision","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 24, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The Division bench of A.S. Chandurkar and Pushpa V. Ganediwala, JJ., upheld the family court\u2019s finding that \u201cthe behaviour and the conduct of the husband of making wild and unsubstantiated allegations resulted in causing mental cruelty to the wife.\u201d Factual Matrix Appellant and the respondent were married\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215148,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/29\/utt-hc-physically-assaulting-husbands-mother-also-amounts-to-mental-cruelty-and-is-a-legitimate-ground-for-divorce\/","url_meta":{"origin":250565,"position":5},"title":"Utt HC | Physically assaulting husband\u2019s mother also amounts to \u2018mental cruelty\u2019 and is a legitimate ground for divorce","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 29, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench of Sudhanshu Dhulia and R.C. Khube, JJ. entertained an appeal filed against the impugned judgment and order passed by Family Court, which rejected the petition under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 filed by the appellant. Facts which gave rise to appeal were\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250565","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=250565"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250565\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=250565"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=250565"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=250565"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}