{"id":250516,"date":"2021-06-30T14:00:40","date_gmt":"2021-06-30T08:30:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=250516"},"modified":"2021-07-01T09:11:30","modified_gmt":"2021-07-01T03:41:30","slug":"national-stock-exchange","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/national-stock-exchange\/","title":{"rendered":"CCI | Co-location facility of National Stock Exchange is anti-competitive? Is the service an autocratic move against traders? Comprehensive Report"},"content":{"rendered":"

Competition Commission of India (CCI): <\/strong>Coram of Ashok Kumar Gupta (Chairperson) and Sangeeta Verma and Bhagwant Singh Bishnoi (Members) addressed the allegations against the National Stock Exchange for alleged contravention of provisions of the Competition Act.<\/p>\n

Present matter was filed against National Stock Exchange of India Limited for alleged contravention of Section 4, particularly Sections 4(2)(b)(ii) and 4(2)(c) of the Competition Act.<\/p>\n

What were the allegations against NSE?<\/span><\/h3>\n
    \n
  • Indulged in practices of granting preferential market access to select brokers<\/li>\n
  • Creating artificial information asymmetry<\/li>\n
  • Market Manipulation in relation to co-location facilities<\/li>\n
  • Uniform fee charged from all members towards co-location services, but allegedly uniform benefits have not been accorded to all trading members who had paid for the service.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    Analysis, Law and Decision<\/span><\/h3>\n

    While analysing the matter, Coram noted that the co-location facility was in vogue since 2009. Further, it was added that the choice of technology, which had been alleged to have created distortions, ceased to exist as far back as in 2016 and there seems to be confidence instilled in the system, with 188 members of the exchange availing the facility and the sectoral regulator specifying guidelines for adherence by the exchange for provision of such facility. As submitted by the Informant, even the charges payable for availing such facility have been considerably reduced.<\/p>\n

    Commission observed that<\/p>\n

    \n

    Mere pendency of matters in alternate forums does not axiomatically place any embargo on the Commission to halt its mandate in discharging its statutory obligations, in the face of any alleged anti-competitive conduct which is brought or comes to its notice.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

    Co-location facility creates a divide between two classes of trading members <\/u><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

    NSE stated that the said facility was made available on a first come first serve basis and essentially there is no pick and choose. Further, it added that it is not the only exchange in India providing co-location facility, even other exchange like BSE is providing the same.<\/p>\n

    Coram stated that in the present case, \u00a0the consumers are the trading members who were looking for the co-locational facility for algorithmic trading.<\/p>\n

    Abuse of dominant position by NSE in provision of co-location facility?<\/span><\/h3>\n

    Commission noted the submission of NSE that at the time of introducing co-location services, SEBI had not prescribed any specific technology to be used and that it had a choice between two technologies:<\/p>\n

      \n
    • TCP\/IP technology, and<\/li>\n
    • MTBT<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      NSE, after studying practices of some leading international stock exchanges providing co-location services, came to a decision to have TCP technology as it provided market safety, reliability, integrity and accessibility.<\/p>\n

      Commission agreeing with the above submission that if there had been a bonafide<\/em> choice of a particular technology, coupled with the fact that the sector regulator did not observe any instance of fraudulent conduct in violation of SEBI (PFUTP) Regulations, 2003 in the provision of the co-location facility which had been the mainstay of the allegations against NSE, then it ought not to be found in contravention of Section 4 of the Act.<\/p>\n

      Should the co-location facility be stalled as it is in itself anti-competitive?<\/p>\n

      \n

      A robust exchange acts as a backbone of the financial system and the provision of co-location facility by exchanges help increase volumes of trades manifold and provides liquidity to investors. This augurs well for the market, the companies and the economy.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

      Commission stated that to stop the co-location facility will be retrograde. Further noting that the Sectoral Regulator, SEBI did not stop the co-location facility in any manner since its introduction and had recognised the said service.<\/p>\n

      Hence, in view of the Commission, no prima facie case exists. [Manoj K Sheth v. National Stock Exchange, Case No. 35 of 2019, decided on 28-06-2021]<\/p>\n

      \n

      Advocates before the Commission:<\/strong><\/p>\n

      For the Informant: Mr. Nithyaesh Natraj, Advocate Mr. Animesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Anirudh, Advocate<\/p>\n

      For OP: Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Somasekhar Sundaresan, Advocate, Mr. Naval Chopra, Advocate
      \nMr. Aman Singh Sethi, Advocate, Ms. Manika Brar, Advocate and Mr. M. Vasudev Rao, General Counsel\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

      \n

      Additional Information:<\/span><\/h2>\n

      What are co-location facilities?<\/strong><\/p>\n

      Co-location is the practice of renting space for servers and other computing hardware at a third-party provider\u2019s data centre facility. Co-location helps in the faster movement of data. In the context of co-location services, NSE had on 31.08.2009, announced the launch of co-location services along with the guidelines\/ procedure to be followed by members interested in availing co-location facility. Members availing co-location facility are allowed to take one or more leased lines to the co-location facility from different telecom service providers for the purpose of setting up or modifying parameters, trading related activities and hardware, software, network-related access, software download\/upload and monitoring and data downloads.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      Competition Commission of India (CCI): Coram of Ashok Kumar Gupta (Chairperson) and Sangeeta Verma and Bhagwant Singh Bishnoi (Members) addressed the allegations <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":76441,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[46390,6671,29785,42834,42768,3742,42000,2563,29663,29477],"class_list":["post-250516","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-co-location-facility","tag-competition-law","tag-law","tag-legal-news","tag-legal-updates","tag-National_Stock_Exchange","tag-nse","tag-SEBI","tag-securities-market","tag-trading"],"yoast_head":"\nCCI | Co-location facility of National Stock Exchange is anti-competitive? Is the service an autocratic move against traders? Comprehensive Report | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"National Stock Exchange\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/national-stock-exchange\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"CCI | Co-location facility of National Stock Exchange is anti-competitive? Is the service an autocratic move against traders? Comprehensive Report\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"National Stock Exchange\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/national-stock-exchange\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-06-30T08:30:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-07-01T03:41:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/national-stock-exchange\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/national-stock-exchange\/\",\"name\":\"CCI | Co-location facility of National Stock Exchange is anti-competitive? Is the service an autocratic move against traders? Comprehensive Report | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/national-stock-exchange\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/national-stock-exchange\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-06-30T08:30:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-07-01T03:41:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"National Stock Exchange\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/national-stock-exchange\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/national-stock-exchange\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/national-stock-exchange\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg\",\"width\":1329,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/national-stock-exchange\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"CCI | Co-location facility of National Stock Exchange is anti-competitive? Is the service an autocratic move against traders? Comprehensive Report\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"CCI | Co-location facility of National Stock Exchange is anti-competitive? Is the service an autocratic move against traders? Comprehensive Report | SCC Times","description":"National Stock Exchange","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/national-stock-exchange\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"CCI | Co-location facility of National Stock Exchange is anti-competitive? Is the service an autocratic move against traders? Comprehensive Report","og_description":"National Stock Exchange","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/national-stock-exchange\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-06-30T08:30:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-07-01T03:41:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/national-stock-exchange\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/national-stock-exchange\/","name":"CCI | Co-location facility of National Stock Exchange is anti-competitive? Is the service an autocratic move against traders? Comprehensive Report | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/national-stock-exchange\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/national-stock-exchange\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","datePublished":"2021-06-30T08:30:40+00:00","dateModified":"2021-07-01T03:41:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"National Stock Exchange","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/national-stock-exchange\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/national-stock-exchange\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/national-stock-exchange\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","width":1329,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/national-stock-exchange\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"CCI | Co-location facility of National Stock Exchange is anti-competitive? Is the service an autocratic move against traders? Comprehensive Report"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":208183,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/15\/cci-matter-under-section-4-of-competition-act-against-nse-in-co-location-case-closed-as-allegations-yet-to-be-established\/","url_meta":{"origin":250516,"position":0},"title":"CCI | Matter under Section 4 of Competition Act against NSE in \u201cCo-location Case\u201d closed as allegations yet to be established","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): This information was filed before Ashok Kumar Gupta, Chairperson; Augustine Peter and U.C. Nahta, Members under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act received by informant who is an advocate alleging National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. for abuse of dominance under Section 4 of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":362966,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/08\/cci-on-abuse-of-dominance-by-icici-securities-nse-bse\/","url_meta":{"origin":250516,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Several key players act as competitive constraint\u2019; CCI dismisses anti-competitive, abuse of dominance allegations against ICICI Securities, NSE & BSE","author":"Sanket","date":"October 8, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe alleged conduct of concerted practice by NSE and BSE of prescribing standard agreement flows from the regulatory architecture and therefore, does not attract the provision of Section 3(3) of the Competition Act, 2002.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"abuse of dominance by ICICI Securities","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/abuse-of-dominance-by-ICICI-Securities.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/abuse-of-dominance-by-ICICI-Securities.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/abuse-of-dominance-by-ICICI-Securities.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/abuse-of-dominance-by-ICICI-Securities.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":225294,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/07\/predatory-pricing-not-only-abuse-but-also-proof-of-dominance\/","url_meta":{"origin":250516,"position":2},"title":"Predatory Pricing — Not only abuse but also proof of dominance\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Dhruv Rajain, Principal Associate, Shubhankar Jain, Associate and Aakriti Thakur, Associate, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas\u00a0 Cite as: (2020) PL (Comp. L) February 79","rel":"","context":"In "Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas"","block_context":{"text":"Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/law-firm\/cam\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":53701,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/29\/allegations-of-abuse-of-dominant-position-against-nissan-motor-india-pvt-ltd-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":250516,"position":3},"title":"Allegations of abuse of dominant position against Nissan Motor India Pvt. Ltd., dismissed","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 29, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): CCI has dismissed allegations of abuse of dominant position against Nissan Motor India Pvt. Ltd. in terms of after-sales service while observing that the issue raised in the information pertained to alleged deficiency in services and no case of contravention of the provisions of Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":205001,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/12\/meeting-of-minds-a-sine-qua-non-for-contravention-of-section-3-of-competition-act-no-merit-in-case-against-ola-uber-cci\/","url_meta":{"origin":250516,"position":4},"title":"\u201cMeeting of minds\u201d a sine qua non for contravention of Section 3 of Competition Act; no merit in case against Ola, Uber: CCI","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 12, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): The Bench comprising of Sudhir Mital (Chairperson) and Augustine Peter and U.C. Nahta (Members), closed a matter under Section 26 (2) of the Competition Act, 2002 against the OPs: Ola; Uber; Uber B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands; and Uber Technologies Inc., San Francisco, USA for alleged contravention\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200450,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/cci-dismisses-the-allegation-of-anti-competitive-practice-against-timex-group\/","url_meta":{"origin":250516,"position":5},"title":"CCI dismisses the allegation of \u2018anti-competitive\u2019 practice against Timex Group","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 21, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): The Bench comprising of Sudhir Mital, Chairperson and Augustine Peter, U.C. Nahta and G.P. Mittal, Members, while addressing information being filed under Section 19(1)(a) for contravention of provisions of Sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, found no prima facie case made out.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250516","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=250516"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/250516\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/76441"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=250516"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=250516"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=250516"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}