{"id":249980,"date":"2021-06-18T14:00:52","date_gmt":"2021-06-18T08:30:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=249980"},"modified":"2021-07-02T10:55:30","modified_gmt":"2021-07-02T05:25:30","slug":"plea-of-guilty","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/18\/plea-of-guilty\/","title":{"rendered":"Ker HC | A monosyllabic \u201cyes\u201d does not amount to plea of guilty; HC issues detailed guidelines to be followed before convicting on plea of guilt \u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Kerala High Court: <\/strong>T.R.Ravi, J., held that a monosyllabic \u201cyes\u201d cannot amount to pleading guilty.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner was convicted by the Magistrate for allegedly obstructing the procession taken out from the Thrikkulam Government High School in connection with the school admission festival and assaulted some of the volunteers. The FIR was registered for offences under Sections 143, 147, 353 read with 149 of the IPC and Section 35 (sic) of the Kerala Prevention of Disturbances of Public Meetings Act, 1961. All accused were convicted by the Trial Court on their pleading guilty of the offences.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The judgments were challenged mainly on the ground that the procedure adopted by the Trial Court, the petitioner contended that the conviction of an accused based on his plea of guilty results in that person being convicted and punished without trial and hence the Magistrates are bound to ensure that the plea is voluntary, clear and unambiguous and is put forth after understanding the implications of such admission. The petitioner contended that he was not made aware of the consequences of his pleading guilty and the unknowing act had resulted in the petitioner being denied appointment, in spite of the inclusion of his name in the ranked list of Constable (Telecommunication).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On scrutiny of the diary extract and records received from the lower court, the Bench noticed that the accused were asked whether they had committed the offences and they answered in the negative. After a few adjournments, the cases were taken up and the question whether the accused had committed the offences was repeated, this time the accused answered \u2018yes\u2019. This answer was treated as pleading of guilt and the accused were convicted. According to Sections 240 and 241 of CrPC, conviction of an accused based on the plea of guilty is not an empty formality. The procedure prescribed has to be followed strictly, since acceptance of the plea would result in an accused being convicted without trial. The Bench clarified,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cThe words &#8216;plea and guilty, the term &#8216;pleading guilty&#8217; should be require a positive and informed act of admitting all the elements of the offence\/s. Mere lip service or a monosyllabic &#8216;yes&#8217;, in reply to a pointed question by the court, cannot, under any circumstance, be equated with, or accepted as, pleading of guilt by the accused.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Accordingly, the Bench issued the following guidelines to be followed before acting upon the pleading of guilt by an accused;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><em>\u201cThe Magistrate should frame the charge, specifying the offences alleged against the accused; <\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>The charge should be read over and explained to the accused; <\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>The accused should be asked whether he pleads guilty of the offence\/s with which he is charged; <\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>The accused should plead guilty after understanding the seriousness of the allegations and the implications of pleading guilty. The plea should be voluntary and expressed in clear and unambiguous terms. <\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>The Magistrate should record the accused<\/em><em>\u2019<\/em><em>s plea of guilty in the words of the accused, to the extent possible. <\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>The Magistrate, after considering all relevant factors should exercise his discretion and decide whether to accept the plea of guilty or not <\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>If the plea is accepted, the accused can be convicted and suitable punishment imposed.\u201d<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hence, the plea of guilty should not only be recorded, but such recording should, to the extent possible, be in the words spoken by the accused.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><em><u>Whether the accused can plead guilty at a later stage, i.e., after framing of charges? <\/u><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In CrPC, the opportunity to plead guilty is provided only under Sections 229, 241 and 252, for Sessions, Warrant and Summons cases respectively. This opportunity arises immediately after the charge\/accusation is framed\/stated. In <em>Santosh v State of Kerala<\/em>, <a href=\"2003%20SCC%20OnLine%20Ker%2093\">2003 SCC OnLine Ker 93,<\/a> a Single Judge had opined that the plea of guilt can be advanced by an accused at any stage of the trial after framing charge. Relevant portion of the Judgment reads as under;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u201cNo doubt, there is no specific provision in the Cr.P.C. enabling the court to permit an accused to withdraw his claim to be tried and convict him on a plea of guilty subsequently\u2026there is also no prohibition in the Cr.P.C. to record the plea of guilty in the course of trial and convict the accused on his subsequent admission of guilt. The object of trial is to investigate the offence and to find out the truth. When the guilt is admitted by the accused and the admission is found to be voluntary, there is no reason why the court should not allow him to withdraw his claim to be tried and plead guilty\u2026There is no reason to restrict the applicability of S. 229 of the Cr.P.C. to a particular date or occasion but the purport of section is obvious that plea of guilt can be advanced by an accused at any stage of the trial after framing charge. If an accused is allowed to withdraw his claim to be tried and plead guilty, an earlier termination of the trial can be secured and wastage of the precious time of the court can be avoided.\u201d <\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the light of the above, the Bench held that the petitioner having pleaded not guilty at the first instance, recording of the monosyllabic answer &#8216;yes&#8217; in the questionnaire prepared at the stage of framing charge, could not, under any circumstance, be termed as pleading of guilt by the petitioner, based on which the Court could have convicted him. As such, the judgments convicting the petitioner were liable to be set aside. Accordingly, the petition was allowed and the conviction order was set aside.[Raseen Babu K.M. v. State of Kerala, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/06S9Y0yi\"><b>2021 SCC OnLine Ker 2526<\/b><\/a>, decided on 08-06-2021]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Kamini Sharma, Editorial Assistant has reported this brief.<\/span><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Appearance before the Court by:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the Revisionist: Adv. D.Anil Kumar<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For the State: PP T.R. Renjith and Sr. PP. C.S. Hrithwik<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court: T.R.Ravi, J., held that a monosyllabic \u201cyes\u201d cannot amount to pleading guilty. The petitioner was convicted by the Magistrate <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3468,2523,29785,32321],"class_list":["post-249980","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-conviction","tag-Kerala_High_Court","tag-law","tag-plea-of-guilty"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Ker HC | A monosyllabic \u201cyes\u201d does not amount to plea of guilty; HC issues detailed guidelines to be followed before convicting on plea of guilt \u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"plea of guilty\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/18\/plea-of-guilty\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ker HC | A monosyllabic \u201cyes\u201d does not amount to plea of guilty; HC issues detailed guidelines to be followed before convicting on plea of guilt \u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"plea of guilty\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/18\/plea-of-guilty\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-06-18T08:30:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-07-02T05:25:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/18\/plea-of-guilty\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/18\/plea-of-guilty\/\",\"name\":\"Ker HC | A monosyllabic \u201cyes\u201d does not amount to plea of guilty; HC issues detailed guidelines to be followed before convicting on plea of guilt \u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-06-18T08:30:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-07-02T05:25:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"plea of guilty\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/18\/plea-of-guilty\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/18\/plea-of-guilty\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/18\/plea-of-guilty\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ker HC | A monosyllabic \u201cyes\u201d does not amount to plea of guilty; HC issues detailed guidelines to be followed before convicting on plea of guilt \u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ker HC | A monosyllabic \u201cyes\u201d does not amount to plea of guilty; HC issues detailed guidelines to be followed before convicting on plea of guilt \u00a0 | SCC Times","description":"plea of guilty","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/18\/plea-of-guilty\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ker HC | A monosyllabic \u201cyes\u201d does not amount to plea of guilty; HC issues detailed guidelines to be followed before convicting on plea of guilt \u00a0","og_description":"plea of guilty","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/18\/plea-of-guilty\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2021-06-18T08:30:52+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-07-02T05:25:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/18\/plea-of-guilty\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/18\/plea-of-guilty\/","name":"Ker HC | A monosyllabic \u201cyes\u201d does not amount to plea of guilty; HC issues detailed guidelines to be followed before convicting on plea of guilt \u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-06-18T08:30:52+00:00","dateModified":"2021-07-02T05:25:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"plea of guilty","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/18\/plea-of-guilty\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/18\/plea-of-guilty\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/18\/plea-of-guilty\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ker HC | A monosyllabic \u201cyes\u201d does not amount to plea of guilty; HC issues detailed guidelines to be followed before convicting on plea of guilt \u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":250060,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/20\/scc-online-weekly-rewind-vol-1-episode-15\/","url_meta":{"origin":249980,"position":0},"title":"SCC Online Weekly Rewind Vol. 1 Episode 15","author":"Nilufer Bhateja","date":"June 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"15th Episode of SCC Online Weekly Rewind featuring Nilufer Bhateja, Associate Editor bringing you the most important and interesting stories from the field of law is out now! Check out the link below. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Supreme Court \u00a0 Class XII students\u2019 evaluation scheme by CBSE and ICSE approved by Supreme Court with\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;SCC Times Newsflash&quot;","block_context":{"text":"SCC Times Newsflash","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/watch-now-2\/scc-times-newsflash\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/WR.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/WR.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/WR.jpeg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/WR.jpeg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/WR.jpeg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":380238,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/06\/property-owner-guilty-of-trespass-ker-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":249980,"position":1},"title":"Even Property Owner Can Be Guilty of Trespass: Kerala HC Explains Why","author":"Sunaina","date":"April 6, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cOffences such as criminal trespass and house trespass are offences against possession and not against ownership. Therefore, even a true owner cannot, under the guise of ownership, unlawfully enter premises in the lawful possession of another with the intent to commit an offence.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Property Owner Guilty of Trespass","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Property-Owner-Guilty-of-Trespass.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Property-Owner-Guilty-of-Trespass.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Property-Owner-Guilty-of-Trespass.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Property-Owner-Guilty-of-Trespass.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300971,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/07\/strict-adherence-rule-142-2-bsf-rules-important-before-accepting-guilty-plea-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":249980,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Strict adherence to Rule 142(2) of BSF Rules important before accepting plea of guilty\u2019: Supreme Court explains in detail","author":"Ridhi","date":"September 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court specifically highlighted the provision which cautioned that whatever the accused stated was to be taken down in writing and may be used in evidence.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"plea of guilty","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/plea-of-guilty.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/plea-of-guilty.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/plea-of-guilty.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/plea-of-guilty.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":251626,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/23\/prison\/","url_meta":{"origin":249980,"position":3},"title":"Ker HC | 60-year-old convict released after serving 15 years in prison; HC exercises special power under S. 427 CrPC noticing more than 18 years imprisonment would have to be served if sentence don\u2019t run concurrently","author":"Editor","date":"July 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Ashok Menon, J., directed release of a 60-year-old man convicted in 14 criminal cases taking into account that the convict had already undergone 15 years of imprisonment and would have to be in jail for more than 18 years since sentence in all the cases were running\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":224249,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/15\/ker-hc-plea-for-anticipatory-bail-rejected-in-view-of-s-18-of-sc-st-prevention-of-atrocities-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":249980,"position":4},"title":"Ker HC | Plea for anticipatory bail rejected in view of S. 18 of SC\/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 15, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Shircy V., J. dismissed this petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The petitioner, on 23-12-2019 at about 6 pm, wrongfully restrained the de facto complainant, who is a member of the SC and ST community, and even after knowing such fact,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":204702,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/02\/effect-of-entering-plea-of-guilty-benefit-of-discount-in-sentence-must-be-appropriately-accorded-to-the-accused\/","url_meta":{"origin":249980,"position":5},"title":"Effect of entering plea of guilty: Benefit of discount in sentence must be appropriately accorded to the accused","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 2, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of Western Australia: A Single Judge Bench of Jenkins, J., allowed an appeal filed against the order of magistrates court of Western Australia, whereby the appellant was sentenced to 6 months\u2019 imprisonment without allowing appropriate reduction under the Sentencing Act, 1995. The main issue that arose before the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/SC-Western-Australia.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/SC-Western-Australia.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/SC-Western-Australia.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/SC-Western-Australia.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/SC-Western-Australia.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/249980","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=249980"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/249980\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=249980"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=249980"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=249980"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}